Gary Neville gives opinion in a marginal call that favours Liverpool, some United fans on redcafe dislike it, how is that evidence at all lol?
Well, it's not the only case, you can look through more of Neville on Redcafe (if you want) and see it's not "marginal". Or you can choose not to take any of that as evidence, as much as you can choose not to take anything from here as evidence of anything.
Your comment, "
United fans by and large love Neville, he's actually a decent analyst" can be based on people you know, "marginal" experiences of yours, etc. etc., but my point is that you can pretty much take your "
United fans by and large love Neville, he's actually a decent analyst. I think Jamie is good at analysing the stuff he's at home with... but he's so quick to forget even the basics of foreign football philosophies when he's 'analysing' them" comment, flip jamie with Neville and United with Liverpool, and you'll find that on the mirror of this place (that being, redcafe).
Neville goes on tv and criticizes Man U, doesn't think unfair things happen specially to them, is generally not tribal and tries to be objective, etc etc = he becomes disliked by redcafe/man utd fans (take your pick).
Jamie goes on tv, criticizes Liverpool, doesn't think unfair things happen specially to us, is generally not tribal and tries to be objective, etc etc = he becomes disliked by rawk/Liverpool fans (take your pick).