He has an MSc in Mechanical Engineering and a Masters in Strategic Studies. In what way does that make him an expert on anything other than mechanical engineering and military strategy?
I’d say you were falling for the classic logical fallacy of argument from authority, but that generally assumes the “authority” has expertise in the field in question.
I think you are mischaracterizing what I was saying quite a bit. I was stating that Karl Nell is both highly credible and senior in both Army and aerospace circles. "Lockheed Missiles & Space, Northrop Grumman" stand out but he was also senior to Grusch within the UAPTF (task force). He's clearly someone with access, and if you listen to him speak you can tell he is careful not to say too much. Of course, people won't like that either!
From what I have read, he was instrumental in drafting the NDAA 2023 legislation with Chuck Schumer. So for what it is worth given he must have a nicely earning career: he must either be insane (to make unfounded claims) or he knows something.
The science is fascinating to debate but I do find it amusing that people say literally no one in the world has any credibility on this subject. Especially not Ryan Graves and David Fravor, the latter who would be one the world's most elite aviators and authorities on what things are or are not in the skies.
For what it is worth, yes, I would also need to see Karl Nell under Oath being cross-examined by Congress to move things further. Credible testimony does count but it is still "no cigar".
Or cigar-shaped UAP
Recent Posts
