Recent Posts

Pages: 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 [10]
91
Nick and Betty obviously don't see the vision. Wenger and Jacquet should've spoken too me back in the day.  8)
92
He'd use up evrey hair gel at Kirkby.
93
General Football and Sport / Re: Arsenal: Top of the divers league
« Last post by Bennett on Today at 04:28:00 pm »
Rodgers is a good manager, not a truly great one. Arteta is a good manager, at the moment not a truly great one. What are we even fucking debating here?
94
Yeah the general tone in those threads is bad. I steer clear of the player threads at the moment anyway but ones like the title run in and the Klopp threads  are so negative.

I get that people are upset and disappointed. We all are. But the overall tone and revisionism in there comes a a bit if a shock. Nothing to report to mods and everyone is entitled to their view. Think I’m maybe surprised that I seem to be out of kilter with the general consensus.

I never thought I'd say this but can I hear more from Nick?
95
Does that mean we're back in for De Zerbi? There's no one shorter than him.

We're honestly sleeping on De Zerbi. Would want Amorim first choice but I still maintain De Zerbi would wreak havoc with our players.
96
General Football and Sport / Re: Arsenal: Top of the divers league
« Last post by Redley on Today at 04:27:09 pm »
Yeah, since Rodgers was advocating for the likes of Benteke, Dempsey and Ashley Williams, I'm not sure how much good another £100m+ would've done him!

But yes, Arteta's spending is something that doesn't come up much when he gets praise from the pundits/media - similar to his mentor in that respect. Having said that, it does reflect the different state of play for title-challenging teams now - if you're going to compete with a team of financial dopers, and you don't have the high transfer hit rate/best-in-class manager that we've had for the last few years, then you need to splash big money to bridge the gap.

My guess would be that if Arteta and Rodgers swapped roles for next season, neither would perform much better than the other currently is - Arteta would win the SPL, and Rodgers would challenge for the league but ultimately fall short.

I do think the play acting, constant diving, whinging at refs, faking head injuries and the bizarre mid-half team talks would stop under Rodgers. You wonder how much of a boost that would be, we've just seen the last week they've gone out of the CL because of Saka diving instead of just trying to score a goal.
97
I respect Arsenal because they are a proper football club unlike 115 but that doesn't mean they aren't a bunch of cheating shithouses which they are.
98
General Football and Sport / Re: Everton - The 777 Unflushables
« Last post by Mister Flip Flop on Today at 04:24:39 pm »
What's utterly hilarious about them is they cheated to gain success and still gained no success. Everton that.
99
Liverpool FC Forum / Re: Mohamed Salah - Best in the World *
« Last post by Sonofthewind on Today at 04:23:41 pm »
In one day I've read on here that we'd get £30 million for Mo and £30 million for Darwin

Burn it with fire

Bloody hell, we could get Richarlison for 50m with ten to spare!
100
General Football and Sport / Re: Arsenal: Top of the divers league
« Last post by ScottishGoon on Today at 04:23:22 pm »
If we're being fair to Rodgers, he spent about the same on transfers (net) in his four seasons here that Arteta spent in the summer. They have spent an absolutely incredible amount of money, Rodgers (probably luckily) didn't have the financial backing Arteta has. And that has to be included in any comparison between the two, or what the expectations were.

They've apparently spent £550 million NET in his four years there  :o  :o  :o Didn't realise it was that much.

Not sure it’s fair to compare transfer prices of 10 years ago to transfer prices now when discussing how much either have spent?
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 [10]