I really want Ugarte and Caicedo but I'm not convinced a midfield 3 in which 2 are Ugarte and Caicedo has enough ball progression. I'm also not sure it works with our new 8/10 hybrid roles for the midfielders. Perhaps Trent inverting offsets this and Ugarte turns out to be better on the ball than his numbers suggest so the ball progression isn't an issue. But Caicedo is not, and never will be, an 8/10 hybrid. That said, if we're going back to basically giving Trent a free role in possession to roam the right hand flank as he wants and asking our RCM to cover him Caicedo would be perfect. Might even get away with Fabinho as a 6 if we had Caicedo fighting fires
The thing is if we bought Ugarte and Caicedo you'd have a pretty complete unit .. Thiago, Trent, Jones, Elliot and Henderson are already excellent ball progressors and you can mix and match.. play your runners in tough away games, more creative players vs the dross etc
By the way you're under rating Caicedo's forward passing - it's already good and will only improve (makes significantly more progressive passes than Fabinho for example)
Obviously this isn't the business we're going to be doing so its all hypothetical.
I''m really skeptical the set up we played at the end of the season is going to work with some combination of fabinho/henderson at 6. City make it work with the best 6 in the world - despite our results improving in this stretch we've had a lot of soft opposition and it hasn't looked good when we've been put under any sort of pressure
I'm totally perplexed if we're really looking at this team and not thinking we need 2 athletes with defensive ability or at the absolute minimum an upgrade at 6
Sitting on our hands and watching Ugarte go to Chelsea would be bad