Labour has always stood for minorities.
Does it have to be front page? No. Should Labour abandon minorities? Hell no.
I know the Labour Party is a broad church and all, but what you are espousing is something that isn’t actually the Labour Party.
Labour's stood for the principle of equal rights, and against hate.
It shouldn't automatically 'stand' for any and every minority issue.
This is especially true when there are conflicting and competing 'rights' - as is the case with the trans debate, particularly concerning access to what women consider 'safe areas' and self-identification.
I think the problem Labour has with regards to these 'minorities' issues is not actually specifically of their making. Whilst Labour does have that history of supporting the principle of equality, what has traditionally been a broad approach has morphed into a labyrinth of increasingly niche 'minority issues', which bring their own subtleties.
Where once 'anti-racism' or 'pro-feminism' was the broad aim, now that large strides have been made in these general areas and the majority of campaigners in these areas are reasonably content with progress, 'micro-minorities' within those groups, who feel that their own niche groups are perhaps lagging behind on the progress front, have come to prominence. With that has come an increased level of militancy and shrillness of activists within these micro-minority issues.
With the Corbyn era, these militant activists more closely associated themselves with Labour and, in turn, the public have come to associate Labour with these militant activists.
Whether we like it or not, that plays a part in deterring a lot of people from voting Labour.