Rox, I'm not hung up on you capitalizing the W.
you clearly said "Worldwide" (with a capital W, to boot)
Made a point of it, though didn't you?
I'm just bemused that you can call me a nitwit for arguing about the lack of benefits from worldwide exposure, which was your original point, and then you go and say you were talking about national exposure. Those are two entirely different things in the context of a Midlands charity like Acorns.
'Nitwit' is a rather irreverent thing to say, trying to lighten the mood. There were much worse things I could have said.
Worldwide exposure is what they will be getting; but it is the National exposure that will help them most. BUT, with this scheme, they are getting both. How else would a little Charity like that get such exposure?
And in actual fact, they aren't different things because with the Worldwide exposure comes, by definition, National and Local exposure - the people who read the national papers, which will have photos of the players and the strips will probably be read by more locals than the local newspaper. It is more exposure than that charity could ever have hoped for.