Do you not think it's slightly hypocritical to suggest people shouldn't really be bothered or potentially even discuss how a nationally broadcast pundit discusses our young players in a slightly moralising post in which you are bothered about how posters on RAWK discuss that player and how he's perceived?
Don't mean to sound hyper critical but you have literally said yourself there what most of us are saying "Maybe the criticism of his defensive play is a bit OTT and bit dated". But then gone on to generalise and describe people who share your view as "precious and sensitive" and suggest they need to "calm down".
The precious and sensitive bit comes from the over the top reaction.
Is calling Carragher a yard dog defender reasonable in your eyes?
Is calling Carragher jealous of TAA justifiable or formed on any basis of evidence?
My general point is that most fans of every club think pundits are biased against their clubs as a collective. They aren't. Also, TV and radio companies stir debate by having people exaggerate opinions to create a reaction. My point is don't take it all too seriously. Not to the point that you are calling out a player who has done loads for this club as a yard dog defender or jealous.
You just spent the whole summer hammering anyone on here who had a different opinion to you, bit of a cheek that! If you don't like it then turn it off.
Though it's cute you think no pundit can be biased. What a lovely, trusting view of the world.
When did I hammer anyone on here over the summer about having a different opinion? Are you on about transfers and not buying anyone?
If so, that's another example of what I think is an over reaction to a situation. Or of people not seeing the wider picture on why people make certain decisions or say certain things.
Sorry if I caused any offence though. My aim isn't to hammer anyone on here or shut down conversation.