As I have stated in previous posts, there is not a Xenophobic bone in Klopp's body, from everything we have seen and heard; especially from his comments yesterday.
In the discussion on here we can and have put things straight on this matter but if you are discussing something with someone, calling them "obtuse" doesn't help clarify anything.
Also, best not to pile in on the guy. Lay out the facts:
"Xenophobia" was a word put out by Man City PR attack dogs.
It is completely UNTRUE. So to get from that to "racism" is 100% false flag.
This is about State Ownership of football clubs and unlimited spending. The Premier league is not prepared to have a serious and far-reaching discussion on that, therefore is allowing deflections like this Klopp nonsense to fill the airwaves.
Understand your broader stance, but many many responses were laying out the facts. A response is not necessarily a pile on.
Personally, I have my doubts whether it was actually Lolo's mates who were "offended" by Klopps comments. But giving the benefit of the doubt, the question I and others raised was around the point at which they became offended.
Was it when Klopp actually spoke, or was it when Abu Dahbi's PR told them he was being borderline xenophobic? Because it would be a huge leap for anyone to take his comments and come to that conclusion unaided. If the latter, then as others have said, his mates have been well and truly sportswashed.
My other point was whether it was necessary to make the initial post in the first place. The general tone in here is one of disgust at City's antics, and has been since the game finished. So to come in here after seeing the general mood, and to post that his mates were offended is I think naive in the extreme, as all it achieved was to provide some kind of credence to the ridiculous Abu Dhabi PR exercise. Which is what raised some cynicism amongst many. Me included.