Firstly mate, I hope you’re not serious about being done with the drafting. I personally enjoy seeing the variety of teams being assembled and as a “younger” drafter myself, like to discover new names etc.
However, with regards to your comment about top heavy full backs - whilst I agree they are more attack minded, it’s not as if I’ve shoehorned in a couple of wingers at full back! Both players have a combined total of 259 appearances for their respective international sides (Srna 134 + R Carlos 125) over a 14 year period. I intentionally drafted attacking full backs as well, to provide the natural width in this diamond set up.
Similarly in midfield, I know I’ve opted for silky operators (who doesn’t want to see their team on the front foot!) but have done so safe in the knowledge of an out and out DM behind them.
Ultimately, I’ve ended up with a team full of goals, creativity, serial winners etc but most importantly to me they’d be fun as fuck to watch 
I didn't mean to put down your team mate, but it has Deco and Socrates as CMs. That's not being silky, it simply won't work in a real football game. On top of this, you have your FBs as the only providers of width, who will be going up and at times being caught upfield as well. I have two all-time great wingers and two world class full-backs, the four of them will eat your wide areas. You're asking Cambiasso to do 4 men's job. Just that, my team was more balanced, had players in their positions, had goalscorers, crossers, playmakers, passers, defensively solid players and all and yet, the voting was completely disproportionate.
If it was an isolated scenario, I wouldn't have mentioned. It's just that teams aren't voted on quality and balance, but based on some favorite player picks who are popular in the draft circle and some teams who are expansive even if the balance is not right. If it's an all-time draft, trying out different players should not be frowned upon.
I'm not giving up drafting, but I feel I need a break from this. My last three drafts have been voted disproportionately, so either I need to revisit my drafting ways or the voting needs to be revisited. Either way, a break will do good.
Poll