Questions like....
"who's the best? Ronaldo or De Bruyne" (Recently mooted on the BBC sport-web..)
Why does it hannoy??
It hannoys becaause....logically...and I'm talking Vulcan "Spock" type logic here.....the ONLY person ever qualified to answer these type of questions...is somebody who is demonstrably better (at playing football) than BOTH of the parties being compared.
Have you ever played 5-a-side with....(let's make a fictitious character up....let's call him big Kev from Garston) and bless him, it's quite obvious that he really loves to play the game...really has a go...but he'll never be any good so long as he's got a hole in his arse...Well why does it always seem to be THESE kind of lads who are often the most opinionated about these kinds of "who's the best" type questions?
Really!!...Like THEY'D actually know!!
The interweb is riddled with these "big Kev from Garston" types and they occupy entire threads, pages long...debating this or that, but if you ever actually played football with them, you'd likely soon realise that they're simply not qualified to hold the
bold opinions they often espouse.
I may be wrong about this of course....but I'm talking about lads you may have played with "in their prime" so to speak...back when you too...were in your "prime"...so I'm not just having a go at the many faded, jaded fat-arsed amongst us who still like to kick a ball about... and who once used to be a really useful player...
back in the day.Nope...I'm talking about those amongst us (and you KNOW who you are!!) ....who have realised that they're much better at amateur football punditry than they ever were at actually playing the game.
The imposters.
These are silly questions designed to draw out the bold opinions of the unqualified and the unskilled IMHO.
These kind of questions ought to be BANNED!!
gRRRR...