Well when I hear something I'll let you know mate.
I spoke to one coach and he heard it had something to do with the students. He explained that when being assessed the student coaches were concentrating more on the technical aspect than the phases of play, because the other participants were lacking in the technical department, so had to coach this when seeing someone who made a mistake instead of when the phases of play needed coaching. Hope that makes sense
It does make sense. You get told to ignore technical errors as much as possible, but sometimes you have to pick up on them. If, for instance, you're working on an attacking phase and someone misses the target from 6 yards, you have to work on it even if it's not the intended focus of the session.
Training groups are vast and varied - ours spanned the scale from a Premiership goalkeeper to a bloke in his 40s who didn't look like he'd kicked a ball in 20 years, if at all, with pretty much everything else thrown in as well.
Not enough emphasis is put on the need to be physically able to complete the course, in my opinion - the younger lads were having to play in every single session, every single day because some of the older blokes just weren't up to it. This might sound ideal, and it is fun, but 8 hours of solid football for two or 3 days running is no good for anyone, plus you don't get the chance to sit back and observe sessions which is one of the better ways to learn. Blisters on day 2 didn't help, either!
With any luck, the FA will look at the possibility of using outside groups of players (maybe centre of excellence / college teams, local semi-pro teams) during the assessment days to try and ensure a decent level of fitness and technical ability across the group.