Martinez would be an interesting appointment. Finally a chance for him to show that he can push a club on with a bit of money to spend. I can't decide whether he's been conning the media season after season, or he's genuinely done a top job and their relegation was to be expected. Pulis did reasonably well at Stoke, but when you look at some of his signings, you have to wonder if they could have achieved more under a more positive manager.
Kightly £3m, Adam £4m, Butland £6m, N'Zonzi £3m, Shea £3m, Crouch £10m, Palacios £8m, Jones £8m, Whitehead £3m, Huth £5m, Begovic £3m, Tuncay £5m, Kitson £5m, Olofinjana £3m.
That's a selection of Pulis's most notable dealings at Stoke. Some proved to be bargains, but others stand out as signings representing awful value. The average age of Pulis's signings needs to be considered as well. Stoke virtually never get a reasonable fee when they sell these players on. Bit of a low-end O'Neill approach. Overall their net spend under Pulis is close to £75m. Have they achieved enough?