I imagine they have a date and time it was delivered, so their employers will know who was working that day. If it's been signed for then that will also identify that person you'd of thought.
There is obviously no legal trouble she can get in as not enough evidence, but if the delivery company chase it up with the receptionists employer, and it puts the thought in their head that they are signing for packages then not delivering them, or they are going missing, then not going to be good for them is it.
No, I get that. But for me, Amazon did deliver the parcel to the wrong address. If someone delivered a parcel to my house, and I didn't realise it wasn't meant for me and if I did just keep it, there's no responsibility assumed by me legally - assuming I don't open it, it's Amazon.
Amazon Logistics is, obviously, a part of Amazon, and their policy is that they assume all responsibility for the order until delivery is made, then it's no longer their responsibility. They delivered it the wrong address, and have recognised their responsibility for it by offering me a refund for the order. What happens to the order after they delivered it to the wrong address isn't part of the contract they've entered with me.
I guess I'm approaching it with a legal viewpoint, but I do get the morality of it, which is why I quoted Barney's post. Personally, I see them offering a refund as taking responsibility and closing the matter and I don't see it escalating any further, ie. contacting an employer. I don't see Amazon Logistics - with the amount of orders they receive and deliver - chasing up an employer over a missing parcel containing an iPhone case, 3 pairs of boxers and hair clippers. But yes, to your original post, let's hope.