Author Topic: Michael Owen: Return of the Prodigal Son?  (Read 19759 times)

Offline Paul Tomkins

  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 9,475
Michael Owen: Return of the Prodigal Son?
« on: August 1, 2005, 10:01:28 am »
The arrival of two new Brazilian strikers has certainly cast doubt on Michael Owen's future at Real Madrid. His days in Spain are almost certainly numbered. So where next? Liverpool have first option, but is Rafa inclined to act upon it?

I am sure Rafa rates him highly –– everyone in the game does. But that's different to feeling he needs him. He has other problems to contend with.

Would Owen choose to go to Manchester United, as widely speculated, given they already have established first choice strikers in Ruud van Nistelrooy and Wayne Rooney? I'd hate to see Owen at United, but I wouldn't blame him for going there, unless he also had the option to return to Anfield –– in which case the act of snubbing Liverpool would naturally smart.

A return to Liverpool would be the 'easy' option. But if Rafa isn't prepared to make a move, then it would make sense for Owen to join the best club which does show an interest; United have the added attraction of being close to his roots in Chester.

We need to be realistic: he's not going to come back and play for Newcastle if he has the chance to join United. I'm sure he doesn't want to upset the feelings of Liverpool supporters, but he's not going to torpedo his own career to stop us feeling miffed, and I for one wouldn't expect him to.

Owen took a chance by going to Real Madrid, and it hasn't worked out, through no real fault of his own; his impressive record shows that he didn't fail, merely that he didn't get a full chance to impress.

While he will have been envious when watching the Reds lift the European Cup, it highlights his class as an individual that he still outscored all Liverpool's strikers, despite playing on the right on occasions, and being stuck on the bench for most of the season. He will have learned a lot from the experience, both as a person and as a player. Training and playing with such great players will have helped his technique, and from Ronaldo he'd have learned that if you eat too many pies your shorts will no longer fit.

I don't see it as a problem to have to sell Owen for £8m in 2004 and buy him back a year later for £12m; ultimately, if Rafa feels Owen can add £12m of value to the team and has the funds, he'll take the plunge, especially as you still find it hard to get a player of Owen's calibre for such a meagre fee.

Owen was free to Liverpool in the first place, so the club could re-sign him for £12m, get another six years out of him, and for an overall net transfer fee of £4m the club would have a total of 13 years of service. Would that be financially reckless? Hardly. I still think £12m for Owen is a steal.


System

Does Michael Owen fit into Benítez' system? We cannot expect Rafa to sign a player, however good, if he does not provide what the team is looking for. Nor can we expect him to sign a player merely to stop that player joining a rival.

Let's get one thing clear: while never predictable enough to stick rigidly to one formation, Benítez' preferred system is one striker, supported by three attacking players (nominally midfielders, but possibly strikers shifted wide or deep). As with Milan Baros, Owen doesn't necessarily suit that system –– at least in terms of being the lone striker.

But unlike Baros, Owen offers an extra element of class: more proven, more reliable. Perhaps as his manager you'd make more effort to find him a role? Owen is English, used to both the club and the Premiership, and has a special understanding on the pitch with Steven Gerrard and a close bond with Jamie Carragher. These are all additional plus points that you just can't find anywhere else.


Enough strikers?

Rafa has said that he's now looking for a centre-back and a right winger. He's spent a fair amount of money, and both of these positions need a solution that may not prove cheap. Rafa may want Owen; but he may also feel that he doesn't need him.

Would making a move for Owen be like paying to have plastic surgery when in more urgent need of a heart bypass and a hip replacement?

Judged purely as individuals, Owen is a superior player than Crouch in terms of reputation and career statistics. But Crouch is a better 'fulcrum', and that was Rafa's first priority: a player to bring others into the game.

However, if you're looking for players to feed off of Crouch, there can be few better options than Owen. The two have played one senior professional game together; Owen scored a hat-trick. The arrival of Crouch ahead of Owen was seen as an either/or situation by many fans. But in a funny way, Crouch's arrival makes a move for Owen all the more logical.

With Baros almost certain to bid the club farewell, it will leave only three fully established strikers (plus three understudies in Pongolle, Le Tallec and Mellor); and top clubs tend to prefer four, sometimes even five main men in the squad. (Having said that, with many teams frequently playing only one up front, having more than three strikers in the squad seems less crucial.)

I expected there to be a lot of takers for Baros; so far there's just Schalke 04 and Aston Villa –– hardly inspiring, and neither is prepared to offer more than £6m. Why? Do other managers share Benítez' doubts? It certainly appears so.

Loaning Baros to Schalke 04 would be pointless, as in a year's time he'll be just 12 months from a Bosman, so his value will drop markedly. You could save £3m in wages in that time, but lose £4m in transfer value.


Formations

Last year Rafa played 4-4-2 on quite a few occasions, but it didn't tend to work too well. When Baros and Cissé led the line together, neither was able or inclined to hold up the ball, with both looking to play on the shoulder of the last defender.

The arrival of Morientes offered a nice alternative, with his inclination to drop deep and link play, but he wasn't sharp enough and struggled to adapt, and that –– coupled with Baros' poor form in front of goal after December –– meant the formation may not have been to blame, merely the failure of individuals.

Occasionally two out-and-out goalscorers will work as a pairing, but it's rare. Sometimes you think quality will prevail –– stick two top strikers side-by-side and it will take care of itself –– but even Rush and Aldridge couldn't pull it off, and nor could Owen and Fowler.

The times when 4-4-2 is most successful is when you have two contrasting, complimentary styles: the target man alongside the nippy trickster, or the poacher alongside the feeder.

Toshack and Keegan were the perfect example of the former, and, for a season, Heskey and Owen looked equally devastating. It's easy to see Owen and Crouch working together, especially as Crouch's flicks and headers are more thoughtful and controlled than Heskey's. But maybe Rafa already has such an option, in Crouch and Cissé –– and the early evidence was very promising in Lithuania.

But it's the unison of a quick goalscorer/poacher being fed from deep which seems most effective. Dalglish and Rush; Beardsley with Aldridge, Lineker and Andy Cole; Sheringham with Shearer and Cole; and Bergkamp with Wright, Anelka and Henry. These are all examples of a deep-lying creator supplying a 20-40 goal a season man.

It also helps if the creator can score goals, too; and maybe Morientes can fill this role, in the way he did for Monaco. In their brief appearances together at Real Madrid, Owen and Morientes linked very effectively, and you could see them doing the same in the Red of Liverpool.

So Crouch gives the manager the option to play a classic 4-4-2, with a nippy finisher  (Cissé, Pongolle, Baros if he stays, or maybe Owen?) pushed up alongside and running off of him, but the new boy also offers the chance to play 4-2-3-1, where you have three deeper or wider attacking players joining the fray.

While both systems would see Crouch winning flick-ons, the latter requires more holding-up play, to allow Gerrard, Garcia, Zenden, Kewell, Riise, et al, to arrive. It's the system with which Chelsea won the league. (On the occasions Mourinho opted for two strikers, Gudjohnsen played in the hole, behind Drogba.)

My hunch is that if we see Owen back at Anfield next season it will be just once, as a visiting player. But I'd love to see him back in the red of Liverpool on a full-time basis. No one guarantees 20 goals in all competitions, but Owen comes pretty damn close. And with more creative players now at the club, you could surmise that he'd fill his boots to the brim.

©Paul Tomkins, 2005

To buy "Golden Past, Red Future" –– acclaimed by this month's FourFourTwo magazine (it received the joint-highest rating with four stars) –– for £12.99 with free worldwide postage and packing, click here: www.paultomkins.com


Offline Cardie

  • Has severe hair-trigger and adores Aberdare
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,985
Re: Michael Owen: Return of the Prodigal Son?
« Reply #1 on: August 1, 2005, 10:08:44 am »
Not convinced it changes Owen's position at all.

I have a feeling Baptista will be playing as an attacking midfielders and Robino more wide left with license to get in, much like Ronaldino at Barca. Quite how Madrid accomodate Baptista, Robinho, Zidane and Beckham I don't know but it wouldn't be tghe first time Madrid have decided they can do without a defensive midfielder.

Obviously the option to play both as strikers is their should they need it but can still see the front two being Raul and Ronaldo with Owen third choice.

Plus I don't think Benitez rates him or see's him as a priority.

 If Liverpool were offered him on loan I think he'd take it but Benitez won't be commiting cash to sign him.
« Last Edit: August 1, 2005, 10:13:32 am by Cardie »

Offline Kanonkop

  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,441
Re: Michael Owen: Return of the Prodigal Son?
« Reply #2 on: August 1, 2005, 10:14:42 am »
Good article which highlights the footballing reasons for (against) his return rather than the sentimental ones.

I am perhaps slightly more optimistic (and I do mean slightly rather than saying it 's a certainty!) that Owen may return.  This for two reasons.  Firstly, the lack of any real tangible news regarding where he might go tends to suggest that there are advanced negotiations going on in the background with a club that have the ability to negotiate away from the media and/or have an agreement already in place to buy the player.  Liverpool spring to mind.  Secondly, I have a sneaky feeling that extra funds might be made available to get Owen back into the fold.  I.E. Moores might be prepared to inject a few more £million to get Owen back, seeing him as part of the family so to speak.

Both points purely my speculation rather than anything else but it does make me slightly more optimistic as I also would love to see him back for all the reasons you have stated and £11-12m is an absolute steal for a proven player of his calibre.
Confucius say, "Man who walk through door sideways going to Bangkok"

Offline luspr

  • Main Stander
  • ***
  • Posts: 223
  • We all Live in a Red and White Kop
Re: Michael Owen: Return of the Prodigal Son?
« Reply #3 on: August 1, 2005, 10:16:25 am »
I think you're right about Mr Moores Kanonkop, but the lack of news might well be just that!

Offline Emperor

  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,039
  • Rise.... Lord Vader......
Re: Michael Owen: Return of the Prodigal Son?
« Reply #4 on: August 1, 2005, 10:17:02 am »
I think it would be a good move to get him back yeah. Crouch and he would certainly be a good partnership.

One problem would be putting Cisse down onto the bench. Or, if Owen comes, could we see Cisse being groomed into an attacking winger or 4-3-3 style winger?

Either way, it sounds good, but we haven't registered an interest anyways.

A loan sounds better than a permanent deal to Madrid and us, especially if they plan on expanding their squad again.
« Last Edit: August 1, 2005, 10:38:13 am by Rushian »
"From here, you will witness the final destruction of the alliance, and the end of your insignificant rebellion" - Emperor Palpatine

Offline montse

  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,033
Re: Michael Owen: Return of the Prodigal Son?
« Reply #5 on: August 1, 2005, 10:25:11 am »
excellent post as usual paul.
Liverpool, European City of Football, 2005.

Offline hooded claw

  • Foiled by the Anthill Mob
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 23,413
    • The Plate Licked Clean
Re: Michael Owen: Return of the Prodigal Son?
« Reply #6 on: August 1, 2005, 10:25:20 am »
Wenger claims not to be interested. He wants to strengthen other positions, apparently- which may seem a little odd, given his lengthy and ultimately frustrated pursuit of Baptista.

Offline Emperor

  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,039
  • Rise.... Lord Vader......
Re: Michael Owen: Return of the Prodigal Son?
« Reply #7 on: August 1, 2005, 10:26:58 am »
Wenger's a liar.

We all know that. So is Ferguson though.
"From here, you will witness the final destruction of the alliance, and the end of your insignificant rebellion" - Emperor Palpatine

Offline God's Left Peg

  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 3,804
  • We all Live in a Red and White Kop
Re: Michael Owen: Return of the Prodigal Son?
« Reply #8 on: August 1, 2005, 10:27:51 am »
The thought of Owen wearing a United shirt makes me feel sick. Literally. Wherever he goes he scores goals, and that is a fact. With the options we have in Cisse, Crouch and Morientes Owen would be the perfect compliment. As you've said it's Rafa's decision, and we can't blame Owen for going to United if that's his only real option, but I would really struggle to get my head round that, really I would. Just don't like the the thought of it at all. One of our own, nurtured by us, in that nasty fucking shirt.

Come on Rafa, bring him home.
"The socialism I believe in is everybody working for the same goal and everybody having a share in the rewards. That's how I see football, that's how I see life."

Offline JayCee

  • Anny Roader
  • ****
  • Posts: 489
Re: Michael Owen: Return of the Prodigal Son?
« Reply #9 on: August 1, 2005, 10:28:18 am »
If / when Baros moves, we will definately bring in another forward.

Mellor, Le Tallec and Pongolle with a combined total of 13 goals between them could not be relied upon when we eventually start to see some injuries.

Owen is a great option in my opinion.

Offline Emperor

  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,039
  • Rise.... Lord Vader......
Re: Michael Owen: Return of the Prodigal Son?
« Reply #10 on: August 1, 2005, 10:29:45 am »
I would truly hate him if he signs for them.

Liverpool boy or Welsh lad, either way, if you've been a Liverpool player for most of your life, you DO NOT, under any circumstances sign for United.

"From here, you will witness the final destruction of the alliance, and the end of your insignificant rebellion" - Emperor Palpatine

Offline Kanonkop

  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,441
Re: Michael Owen: Return of the Prodigal Son?
« Reply #11 on: August 1, 2005, 10:31:14 am »
Moving back on topic...

Paul, what do you think of a solution where we take Owen on loan for this season with an option to buy for £11-12m next summer?

Could work well for all parties.  We get his services this season without having to pay a  transfer fee, which we would have funds for next summer

Owen gets to play regular football and prepare properly for the World Cup next summer.

If we don't take him, then RM would still be in a better position as Owen will have played a competitive season + be on form for the World Cup, thereby boosting / maintaining his value more than 1 year on the bench will do for him.

I have this sneaky feeling that with the possible exception of Arsenal, the only interested teams are those that won't interest Owen (e.g. Newcastle).  I don't see ManU having the funds for a new striker when their number 1 priority is a replacement for Keane.
Confucius say, "Man who walk through door sideways going to Bangkok"

Offline eskdale

  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,055
  • Nice shooting son, what's your name?
Re: Michael Owen: Return of the Prodigal Son?
« Reply #12 on: August 1, 2005, 10:31:56 am »
I think Owen would feed off Crouchie perfectly, but as has already been said by several people, we sadly have greater priorities in the market at the moment.

If the bank balance was endless then perhaps we would go for him, but sadly I doubt it.

Although if we did, we could consider Cisse as a right winger, but my concern then would be the "El Hadji" effect . . . Somthing we could never let happen to Cisse

Offline gjr1

  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 9,397
Re: Michael Owen: Return of the Prodigal Son?
« Reply #13 on: August 1, 2005, 10:32:59 am »
Hi,

I think Madrid would be mad to sell him. If they could get rid of all the politics out of their set-up Owen would become No. 1 there IMO.

I don't think Rafa will take him back which means if he comes back to the prem he will be knocking in the goals for our competitors.

I am not sure if I would want him back only for the fact that we need the cash for a RW and CB. I would rather Rafa paid extra (if he has it) to get better players in those positions. Thats if the right player(s) comes along.

:)


Obi-Wan:
Mos Eisley spaceport. You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy. We must be cautious.

Offline God's Left Peg

  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 3,804
  • We all Live in a Red and White Kop
Re: Michael Owen: Return of the Prodigal Son?
« Reply #14 on: August 1, 2005, 10:33:02 am »
There was a post on here a couple of weeks back, someone saw Carra and his lad in a petrol station and he asked him about Owen/United. Carra told him 'bollocks, don't believe everything you read'. So it can't happen. Ever.





Can it?
"The socialism I believe in is everybody working for the same goal and everybody having a share in the rewards. That's how I see football, that's how I see life."

Offline Emperor

  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,039
  • Rise.... Lord Vader......
Re: Michael Owen: Return of the Prodigal Son?
« Reply #15 on: August 1, 2005, 10:34:01 am »
Either way, we have to stop the Mancs. Simple as that.

United need to replace Keane. Just hope they don't replace him with Ballack. Though he wouldn't be the best option. Can't tackle to save his life.
« Last Edit: August 1, 2005, 10:37:36 am by Rushian »
"From here, you will witness the final destruction of the alliance, and the end of your insignificant rebellion" - Emperor Palpatine

Offline BCCC

  • Or B square
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 13,962
  • Blessed are the Cheesemakers
Re: Michael Owen: Return of the Prodigal Son?
« Reply #16 on: August 1, 2005, 10:50:04 am »
Toshack and Keegan were the perfect example of the former, and, for a season, Heskey and Owen looked equally devastating. It's easy to see Owen and Crouch working together, especially as Crouch's flicks and headers are more thoughtful and controlled than Heskey's. But maybe Rafa already has such an option, in Crouch and Cissé –– and the early evidence was very promising in Lithuania.

But it's the unison of a quick goalscorer/poacher being fed from deep which seems most effective. Dalglish and Rush; Beardsley with Aldridge, Lineker and Andy Cole; Sheringham with Shearer and Cole; and Bergkamp with Wright, Anelka and Henry. These are all examples of a deep-lying creator supplying a 20-40 goal a season man.


Missed out Fowler and Collymore there Paul ;D

Another angle here, until the arrival of Abramovich, was used by ferguson a few times. He would buy players just to stop the opposition getting them thereby nobbling the competition. Do we, for footballing reasons, want Owen to go to the mancs? The mancs are our main rivals in the league next season in terms of finishing top three. If they get Owen and he performs we may struggle to finish above 4th. If we buy Owen back and he warms our bench, at least he won't be scoring for them.

Good article btw.
*****LFC Purveyors of fine football tradition since 1892*****

Offline Emperor

  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,039
  • Rise.... Lord Vader......
Re: Michael Owen: Return of the Prodigal Son?
« Reply #17 on: August 1, 2005, 10:52:04 am »
Just by the way, I know it's off topic, but even though Jorge Andrade has played in the Inter-Toto Cup, he is not cup tied.

This is due to the fact that the competetion has not been given a full European Competition status by the UEFA.

Might've been posted earlier.
"From here, you will witness the final destruction of the alliance, and the end of your insignificant rebellion" - Emperor Palpatine

Offline montse

  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,033
Re: Michael Owen: Return of the Prodigal Son?
« Reply #18 on: August 1, 2005, 10:52:47 am »
If we buy Owen back and he warms our bench, at least he won't be scoring for them.

good idea, i fancy putting in a loan bid for essien and ballack too ;D
Liverpool, European City of Football, 2005.

Offline shankstheman

  • RAWK Supporter
  • Kopite
  • ******
  • Posts: 557
Re: Michael Owen: Return of the Prodigal Son?
« Reply #19 on: August 1, 2005, 10:55:27 am »
Good article there Paul.

I wouldn't be surprised if Rafa does try and sign Owen either as an outright purchase or on a season long loan for a number of reasons, and foremost amongst those is the often cited statement "premiership proven goal scorer".

We may have uniquely talented individuals in Cisse, Moro & Crouch (assuming Baros departs), but none have been proven to be a 20+ goal a season centre forward, something that we so desperately craved last year.

Crouch, although working wonders for Southampton last season needs more than one season to be classed as a "20+" player (I know he only scored +-13). Cisse as we all know, spent 80% of last season on the sidelines and Moro was out of his depth last year due to fitness etc. 

So where does that leave Rafa; he does expect our midfield and in particluar Gerrard to score more goals, but does he hope & pray that one of the above become that player we so badly missed last year, or does he make every effort to sign Owen safe in the knowledge that with Owen leading the line, we are "virtually guaranteed" to have that "20+" player.

"Chairman Mao has never seen a greater show of red strength." Bill Shankly

"The difference between Everton and the Queen Mary is that Everton carry more passengers!" Bill Shankly

Offline Emperor

  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,039
  • Rise.... Lord Vader......
Re: Michael Owen: Return of the Prodigal Son?
« Reply #20 on: August 1, 2005, 10:57:57 am »
I'm warming up to the possibility of him rejoining us now.

He is really good and I forgot that whilst recovering from the surprise of his departure.
"From here, you will witness the final destruction of the alliance, and the end of your insignificant rebellion" - Emperor Palpatine

Offline nisse

  • Kemlynite
  • **
  • Posts: 41
  • We all Live in a Red and White Kop
Re: Michael Owen: Return of the Prodigal Son?
« Reply #21 on: August 1, 2005, 11:03:23 am »
I always thought that in Owens LFC days he´d be better off as an offensive attacking midfielder rather than as a striker. He wouldn´t be marked out of position, he could receive passes with his body under control and he wouldn´t become the victim of opposing teams offside traps. He would be deadly in that position. I can see Owen playing wide with one or two strikers and he would be perfect for the club.

He is older now and there is more to his game than just relying on pace.

I hope Rafa realize this otherwise I might need to tell him  ;)

Offline Emperor

  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,039
  • Rise.... Lord Vader......
Re: Michael Owen: Return of the Prodigal Son?
« Reply #22 on: August 1, 2005, 11:04:50 am »
I always thought that in Owens LFC days he´d be better off as an offensive attacking midfielder rather than as a striker. He wouldn´t be marked out of position, he could receive passes with his body under control and he wouldn´t become the victim of opposing teams offside traps. He would be deadly in that position. I can see Owen playing wide with one or two strikers and he would be perfect for the club.

He is older now and there is more to his game than just relying on pace.

I hope Rafa realize this otherwise I might need to tell him  ;)

don't agree.
"From here, you will witness the final destruction of the alliance, and the end of your insignificant rebellion" - Emperor Palpatine

Offline Johnnyboy1973

  • ★★★ Never, ever, bloody anything ever! ★★★
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 14,649
  • Up the piss boiling, asthmatic Reds!!!
Re: Michael Owen: Return of the Prodigal Son?
« Reply #23 on: August 1, 2005, 11:10:29 am »
Where's this Yakimoto fella?

Offline piddsterturk

  • Main Stander
  • ***
  • Posts: 221
  • We all Live in a Red and White Kop
Re: Michael Owen: Return of the Prodigal Son?
« Reply #24 on: August 1, 2005, 11:15:09 am »
In my opinion Owen was in the comfort zone the last couple or three seasons, he saw off strikers as good as Fowler and Anelka and was more or less guaranteed a start when fit under Ged.

If he was to come back, under no illussions that he would be a guaranteed starter but that good form would keep him in the side then I think it would be a good thing, but as the press are now proving again, there is a certain amount of media circus that goes with Owen (uninvited in fairness)  and I'm not sure I could be arsed with all that again.

Offline mercury

  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 3,747
Re: Michael Owen: Return of the Prodigal Son?
« Reply #25 on: August 1, 2005, 11:15:21 am »
Good analysis.  I'd welcome Owen back for footballing reasons but not on other grounds:

i)  Money:  I cannot see sense spending more than 8m on him.  Basically we would be saying to everyone we are "mugged-able" and will have diffculty holding our position with other clubs and players in future.  It's really more management than money.

ii)  Emotion:  Did he leave the Club on good enough terms?  I do think he'd led the Club on on the contract and never had the intention of signing another one.  I never believe that Real came in at the last minute - that's not Real's style anyway ::).  But that's my personal opinion and I can be way off mark.

A loan deal would suit us but Real being what they are would not do it.



Offline Paul Tomkins

  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 9,475
Re: Michael Owen: Return of the Prodigal Son?
« Reply #26 on: August 1, 2005, 11:17:28 am »
In my opinion Owen was in the comfort zone the last couple or three seasons, he saw off strikers as good as Fowler and Anelka and was more or less guaranteed a start when fit under Ged.


Maybe he was. He certainly wasn't happy, but maybe that was the style of football.

But he still scored one goal every two games...

Offline georgiejones

  • Kopite
  • *****
  • Posts: 864
  • We all Live in a Red and White Kop
Re: Michael Owen: Return of the Prodigal Son?
« Reply #27 on: August 1, 2005, 11:19:38 am »
as i said in another thread in the 17 previous premiership games before the arsenal game where he was crocked in his last season he scored 17 goals.

thats quality in any language.

Offline piddsterturk

  • Main Stander
  • ***
  • Posts: 221
  • We all Live in a Red and White Kop
Re: Michael Owen: Return of the Prodigal Son?
« Reply #28 on: August 1, 2005, 11:20:45 am »

Maybe he was. He certainly wasn't happy, but maybe that was the style of football.

But he still scored one goal every two games...

I never said he didn't.

Offline montse

  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,033
Re: Michael Owen: Return of the Prodigal Son?
« Reply #29 on: August 1, 2005, 11:25:39 am »
as i said in another thread in the 17 previous premiership games before the arsenal game where he was crocked in his last season he scored 17 goals.

thats quality in any language.

was this in his last season?  03/04 owen scored 16 prem goals?  I think you mean 8gls in 7 games before arse on 4/10/03? 
Liverpool, European City of Football, 2005.

Offline Red-juvenated

  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,952
  • "Normal One"
Re: Michael Owen: Return of the Prodigal Son?
« Reply #30 on: August 1, 2005, 11:26:09 am »
Rafa has set out a scheme for the next season and he will only get Owen if he fits into his plans. With our poor strike rate in the PL last season, Rafa has brought in Crouch and Zenden to improve that and is looking for a RM to give width to attacks. He's also has Cisse and Nando, who need to settle into the team, and they will need lots of games together to achieve that. Though Owen would give him very good options, if does come here, he will spend a lot of time on the bench as he was not in Rafa's plans when he set out to restructure the team with his new acquisitions.

I think he's satisfied with the strike power, and we have a very strong midfield, which will be strengthened even further with the addition of a RM this week (Both Figo and Stellios would be good options). Rafa is focussed on adding strength to defense where we lack adequate quality cover and wont be too pressed about wranglings with Real over any deals for Owen, knowing how deals with them usually turn out.

Ideally, Owen at Liverpool would set us up well for a challenge for the PL, but the little I know of what makes Rafa tick, I wont raise my hopes too high.
« Last Edit: August 1, 2005, 11:38:45 am by Red-juvenated »
Doubters to Believers

Offline georgiejones

  • Kopite
  • *****
  • Posts: 864
  • We all Live in a Red and White Kop
Re: Michael Owen: Return of the Prodigal Son?
« Reply #31 on: August 1, 2005, 11:27:15 am »
i would welcome owen with open arms.

baros...proven international,not quite cutting it in the prem..

cisse...awesome in france,not yet done it in the prem,although imconfident he will.my only worry is (apart from a few flaws,that im sure rafa will iron out ) that ,although if he loses the ball he will chase back and tackle for it.if he goes in for a 50-50 tackle he invariably jumps out of it.although he might physically be over his injury,but emotionally...you never know.

morientis...goal scoring royalty in europe,as yet to do it in the premiership

pongolle....better on the wing or in the hole,our swp if you ask me.

owen....proven in the prem,europe and internationally,will rise to any occasion.alegedly.

Offline georgiejones

  • Kopite
  • *****
  • Posts: 864
  • We all Live in a Red and White Kop
Re: Michael Owen: Return of the Prodigal Son?
« Reply #32 on: August 1, 2005, 11:30:32 am »
montse...i mean stretching over the 2 seasons before the arsenal game in his last season when he was injured.from the charlton game on28 sept 03 going backwards for 17 premiership games

Offline Paul Tomkins

  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 9,475
Re: Michael Owen: Return of the Prodigal Son?
« Reply #33 on: August 1, 2005, 11:30:35 am »
I never said he didn't.


 ???

I know.

I was just saying that even if he was in the comfort zone, that was still an impressive comfort zone.

Offline montse

  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,033
Re: Michael Owen: Return of the Prodigal Son?
« Reply #34 on: August 1, 2005, 11:33:25 am »
montse...i mean stretching over the 2 seasons before the arsenal game in his last season when he was injured.from the charlton game on28 sept 03 going backwards for 17 premiership games

cheers, nice little statistic that.
Liverpool, European City of Football, 2005.

Offline jfpower

  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,032
  • Yanks out!
Re: Michael Owen: Return of the Prodigal Son?
« Reply #35 on: August 1, 2005, 11:37:46 am »
I would welcome Owen back in a minute, but I reckon that our 4 first strikers will be Morientes, Crouch, Cisse and Pongolle. If Pongolle gets enough games - this could be his season.

Offline Paul Tomkins

  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 9,475
Re: Michael Owen: Return of the Prodigal Son?
« Reply #36 on: August 1, 2005, 11:40:16 am »
I would welcome Owen back in a minute, but I reckon that our 4 first strikers will be Morientes, Crouch, Cisse and Pongolle. If Pongolle gets enough games - this could be his season.


He was looking the part when injury struck.

Offline SuperSub77

  • Kopite
  • *****
  • Posts: 678
  • Scals aren't what they used to be
    • terrace ultra
Re: Michael Owen: Return of the Prodigal Son?
« Reply #37 on: August 1, 2005, 11:50:20 am »
Well said Paul.

If Baros goes, MO has to come home. OK - he's had his 'dream' of playin for Madrid, must be sick of the politics etc and must surely envy the way we are now playing, as it would suit his game.

We missed a poacher in the box, with Crouch / Morientes, that's exactly what we need. I've always liked Baros, but if it means letting him go to get MO back,  I for one won't be complaining.
"I was a teenage armchair Honved fan"

Offline gjr1

  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 9,397
Re: Michael Owen: Return of the Prodigal Son?
« Reply #38 on: August 1, 2005, 11:51:53 am »
Hi,

Several questions need to be asked.

1) Will Owen enhance the team/squad?
Yes. He would enhance anyones squad IMO. And as I have stated above, Madrid are idiots for not playing him more.

2) Can we afford him without taking money away from the "last two" players Rafa is looking for?
Thats an impossible question to answer as we don't have any idea.

3) Would Rafa like him back?
This to me may well be the crux of the problem. Except maybe for Q2. Rafa is always so relaxed and at ease in front of the TV but inside lies a hardness you need to be a sucessful manager. Would he like a player back who just 12 months earlier left him in a tricky situation? Leaving so late in the season didn't give Rafa many options and after the injuries we   struggled up front.

Rafa is not only thinking about this season, he is planning ahead. He's not buying young players for a laugh. He will want to see if these prospects turn into great players.

So I think if the cash is there and we have first refusal it will be only if Rafa wants him back IMO.

:)
Obi-Wan:
Mos Eisley spaceport. You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy. We must be cautious.

Offline koolkamal

  • There's a kind of hush
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 6,440
  • Our dreams are what make us who we are.
Re: Michael Owen: Return of the Prodigal Son?
« Reply #39 on: August 1, 2005, 11:56:10 am »
I would welcome Owen coming back home. We all know of his quality and what he brings to the team. I dont think its so much if he fits into our system more then what is priority for us right now. Benitez has stated that he wants a defender and a winger. Im sure if Benitez had the cash he'd jump at the chance of signing Owen, quality players like Owen dont come around that often. A loan deal with option to buy might be a more feasable option.

As much as I'd like to see Owen back at Liverpool, I dont think it's going to happen. As for him going to United, I wouldnt blame him, if that was his best option.
"All our dreams can come true, if we have the courage to pursue them". Walt Disney