Author Topic: "Sell-Off" - The Abolition of Your NHS  (Read 85560 times)

Offline Red Beret

  • Yellow Beret. Wants to sit in the Lobster Pot. Fat-fingered. Key. Boa. Rd. Kille. R. tonunlick! Soggy Knickers King. Bed-Exiting / Grunting / Bending Down / Cum Face Champion 2023.
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 51,526
Re: "Sell-Off" - The Abolition of Your NHS
« Reply #80 on: November 19, 2014, 09:02:20 am »
I don't always visit Lobster Pot.  But when I do. I sit.

Popcorn's Art

Offline Broad Spectrum

  • Antibiotic
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 4,633

Offline HarryLabrador

  • went broke, so had to get the retrievers in.
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 7,262
Re: "Sell-Off" - The Abolition of Your NHS
« Reply #82 on: November 20, 2014, 11:40:58 am »
SoS Membership Number: 387

Offline Red Beret

  • Yellow Beret. Wants to sit in the Lobster Pot. Fat-fingered. Key. Boa. Rd. Kille. R. tonunlick! Soggy Knickers King. Bed-Exiting / Grunting / Bending Down / Cum Face Champion 2023.
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 51,526
Re: "Sell-Off" - The Abolition of Your NHS
« Reply #83 on: November 20, 2014, 09:21:03 pm »
I don't always visit Lobster Pot.  But when I do. I sit.

Popcorn's Art

Offline G1 Jockey 4(betfair)

  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 9,302
Re: "Sell-Off" - The Abolition of Your NHS
« Reply #84 on: November 21, 2014, 09:20:44 am »
corruption
Freedom of Speech unless you get shouted down and abused by the in-crowd.

Offline Mutton Geoff

  • 'The Invigilator'
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 32,663
  • Life is a journey, not a destination.
Re: "Sell-Off" - The Abolition of Your NHS
« Reply #85 on: November 21, 2014, 10:56:10 am »
So was this guy the right choice to run the NHS then?

http://www.labourleft.co.uk/jeremy-hunt-co-authored-a-book-calling-for-the-nhs-to-be-de-nationalised/

By Dr Eoin Clarke

Jeremy C*nt is the new man appointed by David Cameron to run the NHS. As Health Secretary, he replaces Andrew Lansley who has been moved on following the shambolic and undemocratic passage of the NHS Bill. Naturally, NHS campaigners, staff and patients are very eager to hear what Jeremy C*nt has to say about the NHS.

Well, that should be easy to explain because Jeremy C*nt has put his name to two books published by Direct Democracy which deal with the NHS at length. Many thanks to @Singularity78 who helped me locate downloadable copies of the two books. The books were co-authored with Daniel Hannon MEP who famously called the NHS a 60 year mistake.
 
The free download of the 2005 version “Direct Democracy” in which Hunt is an author can be found here (click this) and the free download of the 2008 version “The Plan” in which put his name in support can be found here (click this)
 
So, what do they say? In short, they are pretty scathing of the NHS. The one which is part authored by Hunt advocates the de-nationalisation of the NHS and the use of a USA style insurance scheme were patients pay into their individual pots and decide how to spend it. Some of the ways both books talk about the NHS give serious cause for concern that Jeremy C*nt is now in charge of the NHS.
 
I will as I read through both books put some of the key phrases in this article (below).
 
1. Page 98 of the 2008 book mocks the NHS as “the national sickness service”.
2. The problem with the NHS is not one of resources. Rather, it is that the system remains a centrally run, state monopoly, designed over half a century ago.

3. Page 78 of the 2005 book says the following “Our ambition should be to break down the barriers between private and public provision, in effect denationalising the provision of health care in Britain“

4. Page 31 of the 2005 book says the following “They are told that record investment has transformed the NHS; but their hospital seems as grimy as ever.”

5. Page 40 of the 2008 book mocked the NHS as a Quango “The NHS is one among many institutions that make up the quango state.”

6. Page 74 of the 2005 book states the following “The problem with the NHS is not one of resources. Rather, it is that the system remains a centrally run, state monopoly”

7. Page 76 of the 2005 book states “The NHS was designed over half a century ago, at a time of rationing and deep poverty. It was, and remains, a child of its time”.

8. Page 80 of the 2005 book states “a 1940s monopolistic structure is no longer relevant in the Twenty-first Century.”

9. Page 74 of the 2005 book states “We should fund patients, either through the tax system or by way of universal insurance, to purchase health care from the provider of their choice.”

A bit like putting a Fox in charge of the Chicken coop, so are we surprised with the stealth selling off of the NHS services now?

A world were Liars and Hypocrites are accepted and rewarded and honest people are derided!
Who voted in this lying corrupt bastard anyway

Offline G1 Jockey 4(betfair)

  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 9,302
Re: "Sell-Off" - The Abolition of Your NHS
« Reply #86 on: November 21, 2014, 10:57:04 am »
Was an issue a few years ago involving the gambling commision when it was 1st set up.
One of the mp's on it was on one of the big 4 bookmakers payroll.

Once it was pointed out he came off the GC rather quickly.

Freedom of Speech unless you get shouted down and abused by the in-crowd.

Offline Red Beret

  • Yellow Beret. Wants to sit in the Lobster Pot. Fat-fingered. Key. Boa. Rd. Kille. R. tonunlick! Soggy Knickers King. Bed-Exiting / Grunting / Bending Down / Cum Face Champion 2023.
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 51,526
Re: "Sell-Off" - The Abolition of Your NHS
« Reply #87 on: November 25, 2014, 11:32:02 am »
I don't always visit Lobster Pot.  But when I do. I sit.

Popcorn's Art

Offline macca007

  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 3,233
Re: "Sell-Off" - The Abolition of Your NHS
« Reply #88 on: December 2, 2014, 10:22:59 am »
I hope he done this through whats happening with nhs funding

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/v/WIQWaBbURlY" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="bbc_link bbc_flash_disabled new_win">http://www.youtube.com/v/WIQWaBbURlY</a>

Offline viteslesrouges

  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,645
  • Games : 535. Won : 308. Drawn : 131. Lost : 96
Re: "Sell-Off" - The Abolition of Your NHS
« Reply #89 on: December 2, 2014, 11:06:53 am »
I hope he done this through whats happening with nhs funding

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/v/WIQWaBbURlY" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="bbc_link bbc_flash_disabled new_win">http://www.youtube.com/v/WIQWaBbURlY</a>

The doctor's probably retired now mate, this is from June 2011.  ;)

Doesn't change your point at all though. :)

Is that woman's head photoshopped????
You made me forget myself, I thought I was someone else, someone good.

Offline macca007

  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 3,233
Re: "Sell-Off" - The Abolition of Your NHS
« Reply #90 on: December 2, 2014, 11:20:32 am »
The doctor's probably retired now mate, this is from June 2011.  ;)

Doesn't change your point at all though. :)

Is that woman's head photoshopped????

Didnt even clock onto the date.

Offline planet-terror

  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 13,249
Re: "Sell-Off" - The Abolition of Your NHS
« Reply #91 on: December 2, 2014, 12:59:08 pm »
http://www.theguardian.com/society/2014/nov/27/nhs-england-millions-pounds-private-companies?CMP=fb_gu

Tech firms, management consultants and private healthcare companies have received millions of pounds in payments from public funds in the first full financial year of the coalition’s new-look NHS, an analysis by the Guardian can reveal.

Last week NHS England, the body which assigns £96bn to fund the health service, produced its first detailed report on all spending over £25,000 in the 12 months up to April 2014.

Unlike other government departments, the health service has never published comprehensive accounts, and NHS England only acted after campaigners received 76,000 signatures over 48 hours in a petition organised by online activists 38 Degrees and transparency lobbyists Spinwatch.

The dataset, which has more than 140,000 entries, illustrates how big business has become enmeshed in the NHS and how hundreds of millions of pounds were required to set up and run the new structures in the health service.

The figures show that to “establish” NHS England cost £135m, with computer maker Dell receiving £3.6m and telephone provider Vodafone collecting £13.5m in a year. To run NHS England, which is headquartered in Leeds, for one year costs £350m.

Firms with ties to the Tories did well. Care UK, one of the country’s biggest private health firms, received £112m from the NHS in a single year, 90% of which was for the provision of healthcare. The wife of the company’s former chairman John Nash made a personal donation of £21,000 to Andrew Lansley, the architect of the coalition’s NHS policy, to fund his office while in opposition.

The spending report also revealed a string of controversial firms are retained by the central NHS board. Serco, admonished by MPs after it was revealed to have altered data about out-of-hours doctor services in Cornwall, was paid £10m by NHS England for providing healthcare. G4S,G4S, the troubled outsourcing firm, took £3.5m for medical services. Atos, the French IT company that ran fitness-for-work tests which ministers criticised for “quality failures”, received £2.7m last year.

The revolving door in the NHS means many public servants have connections with the private firms that profit from tie-ins. Ian Dalton was NHS England’s deputy chief executive until he left for BT in February 2013. Last year, while Dalton ran the company’s global health division, BT received £18m in contracts from NHS England. Dr Foster, the company co-founded by the

NHS’s information czar Tim Kelsey, took £1.8m.

The new look NHS is proving to be lucrative business for management consultants and big accountancy firms. Deloitte’s received £7m last year from the NHS while PA Consulting got £3.8m and McKinsey’s £2.7m. Spinwatch says that its own research into spending on consultants by the Department of Health, NHS and the regulator Monitor shows that eight of the biggest firms were paid £56m last year.

Much of NHS England’s spending on management consultants was by the 22 clinical support units set up by the coalition to “advise” GPs on how best to spend money on patients. Many have made controversial decisions. In Norfolk the Anglia CSU spent £2.9m – much of it on private firms – the accounts reveal but was forced to shut down in February this year after local GPs complained it was “too expensive” and doctors had “no confidence that it can deliver high quality services that are good value for money”.

Greater East Midlands Commissioning Support Unit (GEM), spent £190,000 a month for seven months on KPMG last year, but has been taken to task by Labour’s Liz Kendall over a “series of care failures” such as discharging a terminally-ill patient from hospital without proper support.

Tamasin Cave, director of Spinwatch, told the Guardian: “NHS chiefs have gone big on transparency, but these figures are two years late and incomplete. We’ve got nothing on where the money went for the first six months of NHS England’s existence.
“But, the figures do begin to give us an accurate picture of the continuing cost of the reforms, the sums being spent on the new market in health services, and the flow of money to the private sector. In the data, there are bodies that evidently cost millions to set up just last year that don’t even exist today.

“The figures are in places damning. Why are commissioners in the East Midlands spending £200k a month on KPMG, when they only have one part-time person monitoring the quality of all their home care providers?”

“We are constantly warned about the NHS’s dire financial situation: hospitals facing bankruptcy, services being rationed, and the need for massive savings to be made if the NHS is to survive. But first, we need the stewards of the NHS budget to spend with care and where it matters.”

A spokesperson for NHS England said it “always intended to publish the information”.

“(We were) keen to do this and it was the first one and took a long time … because we had to check each line for patient privacy issues. From now on (the NHS) will be releasing the information monthly ... [The NHS] takes transparency seriously.”

Andy Burnham, Labour’s shadow health secretary, said: “These figures alsoshow that the NHS was throwing money like confetti at private consultants at the same time that it was cutting nursing posts and cancer care.”
bollocks

Offline viteslesrouges

  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,645
  • Games : 535. Won : 308. Drawn : 131. Lost : 96
Re: "Sell-Off" - The Abolition of Your NHS
« Reply #92 on: January 9, 2015, 12:57:39 pm »
FIRST PRIVATE PROVIDER TO MANAGE NHS HOSPITAL QUITS CONTRACT

FRIDAY 9 JANUARY 09:43



Private healthcare provider Circle Health is to withdraw from its contract to run Hinchingbrooke Hospital in Cambridgeshire, blaming, without irony, NHS cuts and the A&E crisis.

While January is ‘health month’ for Labour, you won’t be seeing Andy Burnham hammer this one too hard. The failing NHS trust was quasi-privatised on his watch in Spring 2010 after the preferred NHS bidder pulled out.

The company’s chief executive — whose largest shareholder is a hedge fund founded by a top Tory donor — said:

“This combination of factors means we have now reluctantly concluded that, in its existing form, Circle’s involvement in Hinchingbrooke is unsustainable.”


Translation: give us more money.

http://politicalscrapbook.net/2015/01/circle-health-quits-nhs-hinchingbrooke-hospital-contract/#
You made me forget myself, I thought I was someone else, someone good.

Offline HarryLabrador

  • went broke, so had to get the retrievers in.
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 7,262
Re: "Sell-Off" - The Abolition of Your NHS
« Reply #93 on: January 9, 2015, 01:38:01 pm »
This is my local hospital...

Hinchingbrooke Hospital: Circle to withdraw from contract

A company which became the first private firm to manage an NHS hospital says it wants to "withdraw from its contract".

Circle Holdings, which operates Hinchingbrooke Hospital in Cambridgeshire, said its franchise is "no longer viable under current terms".

The move comes amid funding cuts and pressure on the casualty department, Circle said.

The Department of Health said it was "disappointed" in the decision.

Circle took on Hinchingbrooke in early 2012, as it faced closure.

'Unsustainable'
 
It said there had been unprecedented increases in accident and emergency attendances, a lack of care places for patients awaiting discharge, and that funding had been cut by 10.1% this financial year.

Circle has made payments to the trust totalling about £4.84m and could be required to make a final support payment of approximately £160,000, the firm said.

Under the terms of its 10-year contract it has the right to end the franchise if the amount of money it has to put in to the trust exceeds £5m.

Chief Executive Steve Melton said: "This combination of factors means we have now reluctantly concluded that, in its existing form, Circle's involvement in Hinchingbrooke is unsustainable."

Circle chairman Michael Kirkwood said the decision had been made "with regret and after considerable thought".
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Analysis
 
By Nick Triggle, BBC health correspondent

Circle has quickly looked to place the blame on the way things have worked out with Hinchingbrooke Hospital on the current conditions in the NHS, citing rising A&E attendances and the squeeze on funding.

Those issues have almost certainly had a role to play in the decision to pull out of the contract.

But there is undoubtedly more to it than that - after all the current pressures have not just appeared from nowhere. They were building when the idea of the contract started being discussed in 2009.

When Circle took over, there were question marks over whether the firm was being too ambitious in claiming it could turn the hospital around.

Hinchingbrooke had been called a "basket case" with historic debts of nearly £40m.

Within six months of Circle taking over, losses were twice what was forecast. However, as time went by improvements to services were made.

But still they could not escape the past. The Care Quality Commission has just carried out an inspection of the hospital.

It is yet to be published, but Circle knows the contents. It is widely expected to be critical.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The GMB Union said the Circle takeover had been the "disaster waiting to happen when you get the private sector involved in running a hospital".

Spokesman Steve Sweeney said: "It's not overly surprising to see them try to pack their bags, cut loose and walk away.

"Obviously having the major backers walk away leaves [the hospital] in a very vulnerable position .... we're hoping that there's some planning in place to aid and assist that."

Circle chairman Mr Kirkwood said despite the issues at Hinchingbrooke, the company "remains a committed partner of the NHS at our elective treatment centres and independent hospitals".

A spokesman for the Department of Health said: "There will now be a "managed transfer of the running of the trust and patient care will not be affected."

The company said it is in discussion with the NHS Trust Development Authority to ensure an "orderly withdrawal".

Circle runs private hospitals in Bath and Reading, which both accept NHS patients, and it also has NHS treatment centres in Bedfordshire and Nottingham.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-cambridgeshire-30740956
SoS Membership Number: 387

Offline HarryLabrador

  • went broke, so had to get the retrievers in.
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 7,262
Re: "Sell-Off" - The Abolition of Your NHS
« Reply #94 on: January 9, 2015, 01:49:41 pm »
29 September 2014 Last updated at 18:58

Hinchingbrooke staff in CQC 'abuse' concerns 'fear bosses'

Staff accused of treating patients in an "undignified and emotionally abusive manner" at a privately-run NHS hospital in Cambridgeshire are victims of a "blame culture", a union said.

The criticism was in a Care Quality Commission (CQC) letter to Hinchingbrooke Hospital ahead of a full report following a recent inspection.

The Royal College of Nursing (RCN) said hospital staff felt bullied.

The hospital said it was inappropriate to comment before the final report.

The letter from CQC was leaked to the Health Service Journal last week.

CQC visited Hinchingbrooke Hospital, which is run by the private company Circle, earlier this month.

Karen Webb Karen Webb said some staff at Hinchingbrooke were too frightened to report concerns to their managers
The letter highlighted the health watchdog's concerns, which will be published in full later this year.

These included some patients who "lacked the capacity to consent" being sedated, and staff failing to update care plans or locking drugs away securely.

'Bullied and blamed'
 
Karen Webb, regional director of the RCN said: "I am horrified that patients are being put in a position where they don't feel they're getting dignified care, but equally horrified that staff are feeling they are not being treated as human beings either.

"Many of them say they're being bullied by managers and don't have the confidence to speak up when they feel quality is going awry."

She said there was a "growing culture of blame" at the hospital.

Jo Rust, from the union Unison, said members were "afraid to report concerns because there is a blame culture at the hospital, rather than a support system to help staff to achieve".

A hospital spokesman said they were "very happy" to talk to representative bodies and unions.

Hisham Abdel-Rahman, Hinchingbrooke's chief executive, said: "We can't comment further until the CQC publish their final report, other than to say we are working closely with them and are confident our plans will meet their [CQC's] approval."

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-cambridgeshire-29414508
SoS Membership Number: 387

Offline HarryLabrador

  • went broke, so had to get the retrievers in.
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 7,262
Re: "Sell-Off" - The Abolition of Your NHS
« Reply #95 on: January 9, 2015, 02:05:57 pm »
Will that Jeremy kHunt fellow listen to the BMA?

Friday 9th January 2015 | 13:37

BMA response to Circle’s withdrawal from Hinchingbrooke Hospital
    
British Medical Association press release

Commenting on the announcement that Circle Holdings, which operates Hinchingbrooke Hospital in Cambridgeshire, is withdrawing from its contract, Dr Mark Porter, BMA council chair said:

“What has happened in Hinchingbrooke shows that the responsibility of running a critical public service can never be handed over and so the insistence on private providers as a potential solution to problems facing Hinchingbrooke was always misguided. This example also shows that that not even private providers are immune to the extreme financial pressures on NHS services, caused by a shortage of government funding.

“Patient care must remain the absolute priority at Hinchingbrooke hospital as the running of services is transferred. The doctors, nurses and other healthcare staff at the hospital deserve recognition for continuing to provide excellent quality of care for patients, under difficult and uncertain circumstances.

“The BMA’s preference would be for NHS providers over private management, but if the hospital is to be handed over to an NHS Trust to run, the services have to be properly resourced - we cannot continue to meet rising demand with underinvestment. At this moment, Hinchingbrooke’s finances remain in doubt, the hospital needs to put on a sound financial footing or else the problems facing it will only persist.”

http://www.politicshome.com/uk/article/110889/bma_response_to_circle%E2%80%99s_withdrawal_from_hinchingbrooke_hospital.html
SoS Membership Number: 387

Offline B0151?

  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 19,125
Re: "Sell-Off" - The Abolition of Your NHS
« Reply #96 on: January 9, 2015, 04:09:12 pm »
Circle Holdings, which operates Hinchingbrooke Hospital in Cambridgeshire, said its franchise is "no longer viable under current terms".


What a fucking abhorrent sentence.

Offline HarryLabrador

  • went broke, so had to get the retrievers in.
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 7,262
Re: "Sell-Off" - The Abolition of Your NHS
« Reply #97 on: January 9, 2015, 04:34:46 pm »
Circle Holdings, which operates Hinchingbrooke Hospital in Cambridgeshire, said its franchise is "no longer viable under current terms".


What a fucking abhorrent sentence.

Well this article just shows us how any amount of private involvement in the NHS will always create even more financial crisis engineered by pure greed.

Battle with GPs led to Circle’s retreat from Hinchingbrooke hospital

Contract began with high hopes and company claimed small successes, but it became clear things were not going to plan
 
The Guardian, Friday 9 January 2015 16.12 GMT

When the coalition government privatised Hinchingbrooke hospital in 2012, there were high hopes. Since 2006 the hospital had been in deep trouble, losing five chief executives in as many years, building up £40m of debt and undergoing two independent external reviews.

The second review, in 2011, led to the colorectal department being moved to another hospital after six serious incidents, two of which had led to patient deaths and another of which had involved a medical instrument being left inside a patient. Things could not get worse.

For a little while they didn’t. Then at the end of 2012 Circle lost its chief executive, not long after it posted higher than expected losses. In 2013 the hospital’s latest boss departed.

Circle claimed small successes in turning around patient confidence, and performance at its accident and emergency department. However, it became clear that things were not going to plan. A low point came this summer when staff were accused of treating patients in an “undignified and emotionally abusive manner”.

At the heart of this was an unseen battle between local GPs and the hospital over who should profit from patients. In the new NHS structure, family doctors were meant to pay Hinchingbrooke for every patient they sent there – and with money tight, GPs saw their budgets being drained to fund the hospital.

Worse was that Circle aimed to make profits, even if it meant GPs sitting on losses. Last March when the hospital looked as if it would finally break even, GPs in the area initially slapped a £5m fine on the hospital for “poor performance”. After much wrangling this was lowered to about £1m. But a company aiming to make money from a hospital with a £100m budget could not continue to risk having its profits siphoned off by GPs.

None of this should have surprised anybody. Andrew Lansley, the then health secretary, was a local MP and well aware of the perils of pitting doctor against doctor. Unhelpfully, he removed a layer of NHS management that specifically managed these local turf wars.

We have been here before. In 2003 New Labour signed a three-year “franchising” deal allowing a private company, Tribal Secta, to run Birmingham’s Good Hope hospital. The contract was terminated eight months early after the hospital deficit increased from £839,000 to £3.5m.

That debacle left pro-marketeers in every party with nowhere to turn in debates about policy. To improve healthcare, Labour flooded the NHS with taxpayers’ cash. That era ended when the banks went bust. :no

http://www.theguardian.com/society/2015/jan/09/battle-gps-circle-hinchingbrooke-hospital

Isn't this what Labour are now saying that £1bn in bank fines will be handed to the NHS?
SoS Membership Number: 387

Offline macca007

  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 3,233
Re: "Sell-Off" - The Abolition of Your NHS
« Reply #98 on: February 4, 2015, 09:52:45 pm »
It's a few weeks old but reread this just now and think its worth posting here.

http://www.theguardian.com/society/guardianwitness-blog/2015/jan/08/surviving-night-nhs-hospital-a-and-e-doctors-story


I am a senior registrar A&E doctor in a major teaching hospital. I qualified over 10 years ago and have been an A&E doctor for three quarters of my career. On most daytime shifts, I am in charge of a section of our department, such as the resuscitation room, majors, minor injuries, children’s A&E or clinical decision unit; when I work night shifts, I am in charge of the entire department, covering all those areas.

The difficulties we are facing this winter arise from patient and population factors, issues around senior staffing of A&E departments, and problems with the broader health and social care system. Most of the difficulties are not new, but the chronic strain they have been putting on the system for years has, for many reasons, been felt particularly acutely in 2014. It’s being called a winter crisis, but the summer of 2014 was the most difficult I have seen in my career; winter is only making matters that little bit worse – and so far, we are lucky that there has not been a big spike in influenza cases.

I’ll try to explain the problems using the format of a diary of a typical night shift in my A&E department.

10pm
I start work and take a handover of all areas of the department.

Advertisement

There are 72 patients in A&E. Half of them haven’t seen a doctor yet. Ten of them haven’t even seen a triage nurse who will decide how serious their case is. We don’t have enough space for them all.

All the beds in the resuscitation room (“resus”) are full.

Patients with chest pain are sitting on chairs, waiting for up to an hour for an electrocardiogram (ECG) to make sure they’re not having a heart attack.

Patients with minor injuries have been waiting for more than three hours to see a doctor. The day shift is finishing; more doctors are going home than are starting for the night shift. That waiting time is going to get longer. I cannot divert more doctors to see those patients because I need them with me in majors and resus to see the more unwell cases.

Advertisement

Three of the six doctors working under me tonight are locum doctors. They are not employed full time; they pick up the shifts they want, when they want, at different hospitals, for two or three times the pay I’m getting for tonight. Some of them are great doctors; others not so good. Two of them have never worked in this department before, so I’m going to have to show them round, explain our local policies, and teach them how to use the computer system before they can even see one patient. The reason? Nobody wants to take up full-time jobs in A&E any more – especially the more senior posts like registrar and consultant.

And why would they? For the same amount of training and experience, I could be a dermatologist or a kidney doctor. I’d work the same number of hours for the same pay, but much less (or no) evening and nighttime work, with regular, predictable, scheduled activities in my day, time for lunch, and no drunk people to deal with. Most of my patients wouldn’t be acutely unwell; I wouldn’t be making life-and-death decisions every shift. So why choose A&E, with constant pressure from dealing with really sick patients, drunks causing havoc all night, often no time for a lunch or dinner break, and frequent evening and night shifts? So – we’re really short of senior doctors, every day.

11pm
The ambulance service calls to say they’re bringing in a very unwell 80-year-old with difficulty in breathing. He’s going to need the resuscitation room, but it’s still full. I have to decide which of the sick patients in there can come out to a less high priority area.

The population is getting older and carrying a higher burden of serious illness. Patients with longstanding heart, lung, or kidney disease can become extremely unwell very quickly, especially if they catch flu or a vomiting bug. We are getting better at treating them. There is more we can do, but it takes a huge amount of resources. It’s expensive. The result is people do get better; they live longer with their chronic illnesses; and they keep coming back when new complications arise.

Minutes later, another call from the ambulance service. They’re bringing in a drunk man with a head injury who is being aggressive and difficult to manage. Maybe he’s being difficult because he’s drunk; maybe he’s always like that; but maybe he has a brain injury that’s causing this behaviour. He’s going to need to be in resus as well, and he will take four or five members of staff to sort him out.

1am
I’ve stabilised the two new resus cases. But my junior doctors are waiting to discuss their cases with me. Because I’m the only senior doctor on duty tonight, and I’ve been busy in resus, the juniors haven’t been able to make any real decisions about the patients they’ve seen. The queue, and the waiting time, is getting longer by the minute.

One of the patients they need to discuss is a 96-year-old whose relatives called an ambulance early in the evening because they couldn’t get her GP to visit her and treat what is probably a minor chest infection. But now it’s nearly 2am, so although she is not very unwell, she’s going to have to stay in hospital overnight: it’s not fair to send her home alone at this time. In hospital, she will occupy a bed unnecessarily.

Outside her familiar home environment, she is at increased risk of getting confused or falling over. And she may be at risk of contracting a hospital-acquired infection. If her GP could have visited her, she would have avoided all those risks, and we’d have another bed free. It’s not her GP’s fault: the GPs are terribly overstretched and under-resourced, too.

2am
The last four patients to arrive by ambulance were drunk. Very, very drunk. They’re taking up A&E cubicles and nursing staff, meaning that the old man who got a taxi here with chest pain (he “didn’t want to bother” the ambulance service) doesn’t have a cubicle or a nurse. One of the drunk patients is shouting and swearing. He urinates all over the floor. It’s upsetting for the family of the dying cancer patient next door. They should be spending these last days together in a hospice, not in A&E – but all the local hospices are full.

We’re seeing more and more drink-related problems. Drunk patients take up a lot of resources and they’re often frightening for other patients and relatives in the department.

3am
A woman arrives with her three-year old son in an ambulance. The boy has had a runny nose for three days and vomited once tonight. There’s no way they should be here, at this time, when he just has a cold – and they certainly shouldn’t have called an ambulance – but we have to see him anyway. She’s never heard of NHS 111.

4am
Phil has arrived in an ambulance. It’s the third time in the last 24 hours, the tenth time this week, and the 20th time this month he’s come to A&E, every time by ambulance. He has heart disease, it’s true, but every time he’s come to see us this month, we’ve found nothing acutely wrong with him. Maybe he’s lonely. Maybe he thinks it’s funny. Maybe he actually thinks there is something wrong. I’m not sure. But I do know we’ll have to do an ECG again, and a doctor is going to have to spend time carefully examining him to be sure that this isn’t the time when he actually is unwell.

Phil isn’t the only patient like this is our area. There are maybe eight or 10 of them. They take up a lot of time and resources unnecessarily, but there doesn’t seem to be much we can do about it.

5am
I still haven’t had a break. I’m tired and hungry. We still have 35 patients in A&E. It never stops. A few years ago, you could sometimes hope to get A&E empty by 4am and have an hour or so for the team to eat and freshen up, maybe do some teaching for the juniors. Not any more.

Patients want a 24/7 health service. Only A&E provides that. So they come, and they come, and they keep coming, all times of day and night.

The hospital is full. There are no more beds. If we decide to admit anyone else, they will have to stay in A&E for hours until mid-morning, when patients get discharged from upstairs. The hospital simply isn’t big enough. Part of the reason is that it’s so hard to put in place social care packages for patients who are medically well but need help looking after themselves at home. So they have to stay in a hospital bed until social services which are grossly underfunded – can organise a carer.

7am
Another priority call from the ambulance service. An 86-year-old man was found on the floor of his home by his son, who was going to pick him up for a hospital appointment. He’s been on the floor for 36 hours, lying in his own urine and faeces, shouting for help, because no one visited him yesterday. He has a broken hip and he’s gone into kidney failure. He might not survive. Maybe if people looked out for their elderly neighbours a little more, he could have been found sooner and he would have been much less unwell when he got to us.

Meanwhile, a man in his forties with a three-year complaint of back pain wants to know why he’s been waiting for over two hours to see a doctor. And why are there doctors sitting at the desk “not doing anything” when he is waiting to be seen? He came here instead of going to his GP because he couldn’t get an appointment until next week.

I want to ask him why it’s so urgent now, after three years and nothing’s changed, but hold my tongue. (The doctors at the desk aren’t “not doing anything”. They’re writing up notes on the patients they have seen – detailed, accurate notes are essential for delivering safe ongoing care – checking blood test results and scans, and discussing their patients with me and with specialist teams to decide on the best course of action for each case. And besides, none of them have had a break tonight.)

8am
Time to hand over to the day team. I’m past being hungry now; I just want to crawl home and into bed.

As I’m leaving, I see a man arriving with a blocked urinary catheter. The district nurse is meant to change it, which would solve the problem, but there weren’t any district nurses available this morning. So, like everyone else, his fallback plan is to come to A&E. It’s unfair on him – much better for him that he be treated at home – and it places even more pressure on our department, with too few senior staff, not enough space to see patients, and no beds for people if they need a hospital stay.

The day shift is short of nurses. Maybe that’s because half the senior charge nurses in our department have resigned in the last year or so. They’ve gone to find less stressful work in other specialities – or even other countries.

As well as too few nurses, there are two unfilled consultant shifts and three unfilled junior doctor shifts. Nobody wants to do A&E. I’m starting to see why.
« Last Edit: February 4, 2015, 09:54:47 pm by macca007 »

Offline viteslesrouges

  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,645
  • Games : 535. Won : 308. Drawn : 131. Lost : 96
Re: "Sell-Off" - The Abolition of Your NHS
« Reply #99 on: February 6, 2015, 03:36:02 pm »
You made me forget myself, I thought I was someone else, someone good.

Offline macca007

  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 3,233
Re: "Sell-Off" - The Abolition of Your NHS
« Reply #100 on: February 17, 2015, 07:14:54 pm »
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/feb/17/jeremy-hunt-nhs-bully-in-chief-health-secretary-staff?CMP=share_btn_fb

A “climate of fear” pervades the NHS, warns a report by Robert Francis QC. Over 19,000 NHS staff gave evidence that speaking out about poor care is a career-threatening risk. Jeremy C*nt, the health secretary, responded by promising a whistleblowers’ protection law before the election: “The message must go out that we are calling time on bullying, intimidation and victimisation which has no place in our NHS.”

Quite right. But Hunt might ask where this “climate of fear” comes from? He points the finger at others below him, but bullying starts at the top. Every Monday at midday Simon Stevens, the head of NHS England, is summoned – along with the heads of Monitor, the NHS regulator and the Trust Development Authority – to name and shame any laggard hospital failing to hit targets. No 10 sends in Sir Jeremy Heywood, Eric Pickles and Francis Maude to oversee this: bad news from the NHS, and heads roll. Hunt hands it on down, personally calling the manager of any hospital breaching the four-hour emergency targets, or operation waiting times, and terrifying the life out of them. In his office he shows off his noticeboard with “Never Events” listing medical disasters, with no matching board for “Excellent Events” – all stick, no carrot. He is bully-in-chief.

Sadly, Francis’s 2013 report into appalling treatment at the Mid Staffordshire trust has increased the “climate of fear” he criticises in last week’s Freedom to Speak Up review. He called for tougher Care Quality Commission inspections, but these now make the NHS shudder. A coachload of 50 inspectors descend with anonymous numbers on their lapels, charging through looking for faults: terror is their mission. Small failings – a tiny blood spec on an emergency wall in one hospital I visited, for example – can result in a big black X on their results. This is understandable, for CQC itself is under intense pressure: the last head was sacked ignominiously, so everyone looks over their shoulder. Targets and league tables are useful, but in the NHS have become implements of torture. No wonder many vacancies for hospital chief executives go unfilled.

I’ve just spent a few days where Hunt’s buck stops, with a GP near Mexborough, outside Sheffield, to see life on the front line. Dr Krishna Kasaraneni, originally from India and the 34-year-old scion of a remarkable family of 14 doctors, is a partner in a practice short of two GPs. They have advertised; they’ve had no applicants.

Kasaraneni’s mentors were a GP couple, who had just left with their five children for Alberta, Canada; another GP has gone to Australia’s Gold Coast: each cost £400,000 to train. As chair of the British Medical Association’s (BMA) GP education, training and workforce committee, he sees the growing national shortage: there was a 6% drop in applications last year, 9% the year before, and many places left empty.

Why don’t doctors want to be GPs? The first thing to note is the relentless work: when I visited there were three-week waits for appointments. Kasaraneni arrives at 7.30am, stays until 7.30pm, with lunch an unhealthy white bap and crisps at his desk. On the phone and in person he had 42 morning patients, with four home visits; in the afternoon 46 patients, with 107 letters to read, 74 test results to examine, seven urgent clinical emails from consultants and a pile of prescriptions to sign. Each partner earns £60,000 a year, no longer fat-cat wages. But he loves it, and still makes each patient feel he has all the time in the world.

What good value we get when the NHS pays him just £120 per patient per year – less than a Sky TV package – and GPs provide 90% of NHS care. They are the magic ingredient that put the NHS top in the US Commonwealth Fund table for value, quality, access and equity.

On average patients visit 6.5 times a year, but I saw one mother bringing her healthy two-year-old for a 69th visit because “she has problems: she needs to me to say everything’s OK”. There was the drug addict trying to cheat a prescription; the old man who wets the chair; the depressive who said she was trying not to cry; the labourer with severe arthritis who needs to lose weight, the patients with coughs and colds – some indignant to leave without antibiotics; the three-year-old with possible autism; and the man with a skin complaint who says the walk-in centre near his job has a two-week wait (so much for walking in). On a home visit, we saw a 93-year-old. Her drug addict grandson lives with her and steals her money. “But I love him to bits,” she said. Kasaraneni’s practice awaits an imminent CQC inspection. Hardly what it needs? It needs staff and equipment to cope with rising numbers of people with multiple conditions: “We’re fire-fighting,” he says.

GPs used to command 10% of the NHS budget; that’s been cut to 8%. Nationally, 40% of district nurses have gone since 2010. Most hospitals are in debt, beds are cut to 2.95 per 1,000 people (compared with Germany’s 8.2). Meanwhile, 4,000 community mental health nurses are gone, plus 1,500 mental health beds. The tyranny of A&E targets results in operations cancelled to save bed space. Half our hospitals have 10% of beds blocked by social care cases, and that dovetails with 26% cuts in community care. The NHS has never suffered a squeeze like it: its average annual rise since 2010 of 0.6% is five times less than the average for the previous six decades.

Who should be blowing whistles loudest on all of this? Staff in the wards and the community, of course, but the loudest blasts should come from managers. They are under unbearable pressure to obey political targets, despite unprecedented per capita cuts in resources. When Hunt calls to bully them, chief executives should give an honest whistleblower’s reply: No, minister, it can’t be done .

The NHS is just holding together with a £700m pre-election bung, but the BMA knows the truth. Yesterday it launched its “No More Games” campaign to warn politicians that wheezes and quick fixes won’t do. Voters need to know about funding: the UK spends less than similar countries, and the NHS needs a lot more money.

Bullying from Hunt’s office is no substitute for cash. Still if he really believes there is “no place” for intimidation, he could first rehabilitate all those whistleblowers whose careers have been wrecked. Gut-wrenching stories were told by victimised doctors, nurses and managers at a BMA meeting last week: Charlotte Monro, an occupational therapist, was sacked for warning her local council health scrutiny committee about a 33% cut in beds for stroke patients at Whipps Cross hospital, east London. What will bully-in-chief Hunt do for her?

Offline macca007

  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 3,233
Re: "Sell-Off" - The Abolition of Your NHS
« Reply #101 on: February 24, 2015, 12:31:18 pm »
Have a go at this and see what you think. At the very least it should make you thankful for the nhs. Or hopefully make you want to live that bit more healthy for yours and societies benefit

http://www.buzzfeed.com/sirajdatoo/heres-to-our-health

Offline macca007

  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 3,233
Re: "Sell-Off" - The Abolition of Your NHS
« Reply #102 on: March 14, 2015, 02:32:27 pm »
http://www.theguardian.com/society/2015/mar/12/nhs-agrees-largest-ever-privatisation-deal-to-tackle-backlog

NHS agrees largest-ever privatisation deal to tackle backlog
Plan by NHS Supply Chain to deal with backlog of patients waiting for surgery and tests will see 11 companies paid £780m to diagnose and treat patients

 Operations and scans incliuding X-rays could be carried out by private companies
 Operations and scans including X-rays could be carried out by private companies. Photograph: Getty
Denis Campbell Health correspondent
Thursday 12 March 2015 07.00 GMT Last modified on Friday 13 March 2015 00.07 GMT

The NHS has agreed the biggest-ever privatisation of its services in a deal worth up to £780m intended to help hospitals tackle the growing backlogs of patients waiting for surgery and tests.

The deal will see 11 private firms paid by the NHS to carry out heart, joint and other types of operations and perform scans, X-rays and other diagnostic tests on patients.

Under the contract many services will be provided in mobile facilities rather than hospitals. The NHS has been using mobile services for breast screening programmes but the contracts mark a large expansion into other areas of treatment and testing. The system is seen as more patient-friendly but it will also allow the NHS to rapidly buy in services from firms to help meet key waiting times targets.

The deal has been struck by the little-known body called NHS Supply Chain, which helps the health service with procurement. NHS Supply Chain has agreed the scale of the work across the health service and individual NHS trusts will now be able to hire the mobile firms to help clear backlogs.

The contract has raised concern because three of the 11 profit-driven companies involved have been heavily criticised, including two by the NHS regulator, for providing poor quality of care in hospitals and care homes. Labour’s shadow health secretary Andy Burnham said it showed that “chunks” of the NHS were being sold off – but the Department of Health insisted there had been no significant increase in the privatisation of the health service.

Depending on how many hospitals use them, the 11 firms stand to pocket up to £780m over the four years to December 2018. That eclipses the previous record NHS privatisation deal, which saw Virgin Care get a £500m contract in 2012 to provide community services in south-west and north-west Surrey until 2017.

The country has never given its approval for the NHS to be bought and sold in this way
Andy Burnham, Labour
A spokesman for the NHS Business Services Authority, which oversees NHS Supply Chain, said the deal broke down to five national contracts with a maximum value of £240m, £160m, £240m, £80m and £60m – adding up to a total of £780m.

“This framework was introduced to provide a central point from which mobile and strategic clinical services could be procured efficiently within the NHS. NHS organisations can choose to utilise this route to market if needed saving time, and resource, from not having to undertake formal public procurement locally”, the spokesman said.

Burnham said: “It is outrageous that large chunks of the NHS are being parcelled up and sold off without the permission of a single person in this country.”

“Jeremy C*nt tries to claim that ‘privatisation isn’t happening’, but the truth is it is happening at speed and scale,” he added. “This now needs to become an election issue. The country has never given its approval for the NHS to be bought and sold in this way. This sounds like a race to the bottom. It’s clear that quality is not the deciding factor when people with poor care records are winning the contracts.”

It’s nonsense to suggest that this contract means significant outsourcing of clinical services
Department of Health
A Department of Health spokesman said: “It’s nonsense to suggest that this contract means significant outsourcing of clinical services. Use of the private sector in the NHS represents only 6% of the total NHS budget – an increase of just 1.7% since May 2010. Charities, social enterprises and other providers continue to play an important role for the NHS as they have done for many years and the NHS should hold providers to account if they do not meet the high standards of care that patients expect.” It declined to comment on the three companies that have been criticised for poor care winning fresh NHS contracts to treat patients.

The companies include several that have previously held controversial contracts with the NHS. Vanguard was the sole winner of a contract worth up to £160m to help NHS trusts undertake surgical procedures in mobile operating theatres. It is facing legal action over a series of eye operations carried out in 2014 at Musgrove Park Hospital in Somerset. A confidential NHS report into Vanguard said the operations appeared “rushed” and surgeons were allowed to continue even after patients reported serious complications. The hospital terminated its contract with Vanguard after just four days as a result of the problems.

A second firm, Circle, is in line to share up to £240m for providing imaging services, such as scans and X-rays. It will also provide services within operating theatres. Circle is the firm which pulled out of running Hinchingbrooke hospital in Cambridgeshire – the first private firm to manage an NHS hospital – following the publication of a damning Care Quality Commission (CQC) report into the quality of care patients were receiving at Hinchingbrooke.

Despite ministerial denials, this is yet more proof that privatisation is an everyday reality in the NHS
NHS Support Federation
A third company involved in the deal, Care UK, was criticised by the CQC for the quality of care at two nursing homes it runs in Suffolk.

Paul Evans of the NHS Support Federation, which tracks outsourcing of NHS services and campaigns against privatisation, said: “How can the public have trust in companies that have so recently been the subject of such damning criticism? We already have many examples where patients have suffered because of the way that health firms are providing care to the NHS. It is time to step away from healthcare through the market”.

“Despite ministerial denials, this is yet more proof that privatisation is an everyday reality in the NHS. The scale of contracts is increasing as companies are seizing the opportunity to bid to run a huge range of NHS services,” Evans added.
« Last Edit: March 14, 2015, 02:34:55 pm by macca007 »

Offline macca007

  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 3,233
Re: "Sell-Off" - The Abolition of Your NHS
« Reply #103 on: March 14, 2015, 02:36:34 pm »
have a read of that last article ive posted above.  all across the nhs we are being made to make cut after cut and they go and outsource that income to private companies. Thats all this is to me. Do you really think its right that our money for medical help is going to profit making firms?
« Last Edit: March 17, 2015, 07:29:11 am by macca007 »

Offline Guz-kop

  • Baz cop
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 14,475
Re: "Sell-Off" - The Abolition of Your NHS
« Reply #104 on: March 14, 2015, 05:52:57 pm »
Vicious hurtful and harmful words from Nigel Frotage on the NHS in today's Torygraph
It's wonderful, it's marvellous, it's 3-3

Offline viteslesrouges

  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,645
  • Games : 535. Won : 308. Drawn : 131. Lost : 96
Re: "Sell-Off" - The Abolition of Your NHS
« Reply #105 on: March 21, 2015, 03:40:56 pm »
You made me forget myself, I thought I was someone else, someone good.


Offline macca007

  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 3,233
Re: "Sell-Off" - The Abolition of Your NHS
« Reply #107 on: March 26, 2015, 06:17:26 am »
And now boys and girls. Heres one that should be close to our hearts. The women's hospital

https://you.38degrees.org.uk/petitions/save-liverpool-women-s-hospital?source=facebook-share-button&time=1427302618

Offline Sudden Death Draft Loser

  • old and annoying
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 9,483
Re: "Sell-Off" - The Abolition of Your NHS
« Reply #108 on: March 26, 2015, 01:31:22 pm »
Apparently the NHS deficit is heading towards £2 billion.

http://www.theguardian.com/society/2015/mar/26/patient-care-deteriorate-nhs-2bn-deficit-kings-fund-thinktank

UK military budget for 2015 around £45 billion.

I see a solution here.
"The greatest argument against democracy is to have a five minute conversation  with the average voter. "

Offline macca007

  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 3,233
Re: "Sell-Off" - The Abolition of Your NHS
« Reply #109 on: April 8, 2015, 09:41:15 pm »
http://www.theguardian.com/society/2015/apr/07/senior-doctors-assess-governments-record-on-nhs-letter-in-full?CMP=share_btn_fb

Senior doctors assess government’s record on NHS – letter in full
More than 100 senior health professionals write in a personal capacity outlining their view of how the NHS in England has fared under the coalition
 Pledge to protect the NHS … a Conservative party election poster from 2010
 Pledge to protect the NHS … a Conservative party election poster from 2010
Letters
Tuesday 7 April 2015 19.29 BST Last modified on Wednesday 8 April 2015 00.06 BST

After five years of a government which pledged to protect the NHS, this election campaign makes it timely to assess its stewardship, since 2010, of England’s most precious institution. Our verdict, as doctors working in and for the NHS, is that history will judge that this administration’s record is characterised by broken promises, reductions in necessary funding, and destructive legislation, which leaves health services weaker, more fragmented, and less able to perform their vital role than at any time in the NHS’s history.

In short, the coalition has failed to keep its NHS pledges.

The 2012 Health and Social Care Act is already leading to the rapid and unwanted expansion of the role of commercial companies in the NHS. Lansley’s Act is denationalising healthcare because the abolition of the duty to provide an NHS throughout England abdicates government responsibility for universal services to ad hoc bodies (such as clinical commissioning groups) and competitive markets controlled by private-sector-dominated quangos.

In particular, the squeeze on services is hitting patients. People may be unaware that under the coalition, dozens of Accident & Emergency departments and maternity units have been closed or earmarked for closure or downgrading. In addition, 51 NHS walk-in centres have been closed or downgraded in this time, and more than 60 ambulance stations have shut and more than 100 general practices are at risk of closure.

The core infrastructure of the NHS is also being eroded with the closure of hospitals and thousands of NHS beds since 2010.

Mental health and primary care are faring no better – with both in disarray due to funding cuts and multiple reorganisations driven by ideology, not what works. Public health has been wrenched out of the NHS, where it held the ring for coordinated and equitable services for so long.

In September 2014, the Royal College of General Practitioners said that the wait to see a GP is a “national crisis”.

In England the waiting list to see a specialist stands at 3 million people, and in December 2014 NHS England estimated that nearly 250,000 more patients were waiting for treatment across England who are not on the official waiting list.

Throughout England, patients have been left queueing in ambulances and NHS trusts have resorted to erecting tents in hospital car parks to deal with unmet need.

A&E target waiting times have not been met for a year, and are at the worst levels for more than a decade; and elderly, vulnerable patients are marooned in hospital because our colleagues in social care have no money or staff to provide much-needed services at home.

Funding reductions for local authorities (in some places reductions as high as 40%) have undermined the viability of many local authority social care services across England. This has resulted in more patients arriving at A&E and more patients trapped in hospital as the necessary social care support needed to ensure their safe discharge is no longer there.

The NHS is withering away, and if things carry on as they are then in future people will be denied care they once had under the NHS and have to pay more for health services. Privatisation not only threatens coordinated services but also jeopardises training of our future healthcare providers and medical research, particularly that of public health.

Given the obvious pressures on the NHS over the last five years, and growing public concern that health services now facing a very uncertain future, we are left with little doubt that the current government’s policies have undermined and weakened the NHS.

The way forward is clear: abolish all the damaging sections of the Health and Social Care Act 2012 that fragment care and push the NHS towards a market-driven, “out-for-tender” mentality where care is provided by the lowest bidder. Reversing this costly and inefficient market bureaucracy alone will save significant sums. Above all, the secretary of state’s duty to provide an NHS throughout England must be reinstated, as in Scotland and Wales.

As medical and public health professionals our primary concern is for all patients.

We invite voters to consider carefully how the NHS has fared over the last five years, and to use their vote to ensure that the NHS in England is reinstated.

Dr Sheila Abdullah general practitioner (retired)
Dr Sheila Adam former deputy chief medical officer for England
Dr Gwen Adshead consultant psychiatrist
Prof George Alberti emeritus Professor of Medicine, University of Newcastle
Dr James Anderson consultant psychiatrist
Prof Sabarantnam Arulkumaran former president Royal College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Prof John Ashton retired director of public health
Dr Ashok Atrey GP
Dr Helen Bailey physician in Sexual Health and HIV
Dr Arun Bakshi emeritus consultant physician, Isle of Man
Dr JS Bamrah consultant psychiatrist
Mr Dipak Banerjee retired consultant opthalmologist
Dr Roger Banks psychiatrist in intellectual disability, former vice-president Royal College of Psychiatrists
Dr Helen Bantock senior lecturer and consultant paediatrician
Dr David Bareford retired consultant haemotologist
Dr Vijay Bathla GP
Dr Naomi Beer GP partner
Prof Richard Bentall professor of clinical psychology, University of Liverpool
Dr Morris Bernadt retired consultant psychiatrist
Dr Naureen Bhatti GP and associate dean, London Professional Support Unit
Prof Dinesh Bhugra consultant psychiatrist and former president Royal College of Psychiatrists
Dr Christopher Birt University of Liverpool and Christie hospital, Manchester
Dr Kambiz Boomla GP and former chair City and East London Local Medical Committee
Dr Carol Brayne
Dr Raymond Brown consultant paediatrician
Dr Laurence Buckman GP and former chair UK General Practitioners Committee
Dr Chris Burns-Cox emeritus consultant physician, Bristol
Dr Marta Buszewicz GP and senior lecturer in general practice
Prof Simon Capewell professor of public health, University of Liverpool
Dr Lucy Carter GP
Dr Lyn Challands retired GP
Professor Sir Iain Chalmers coordinator, James Lind Initiative
Dr Kailash Chand GP and former NHS trust chair
Dr Connie Chen GP clinical lead for prescribing and child health, Central Manchester CCG
Prof Carolyn Chew-Graham
Dr Jonathan Coates GP
Dr Tom Coffee GP
Prof Michel Coleman professor of epidemiology
Prof Peter Crome emeritus professor
Dr Richard Cunningham consultant microbiologist
Dr Jack Czauderna retired GP
Dr Jonathan Dare retired consultant child and adolescent psychiatrist, Maudsley hospital
Dr Susan Davies consultant histopathologist
Dr Paquita de Zulueta honorary senior clinical lecturer, Imperial College London
Dr Nicholas Dennis retired, clinical genetics
Dr Harpal Dhingra GP, Albrighton
Professor Paola Domizio pathology education
Dr Edgar Dorman consultant obstetrician and gynaecologist, London
Dr Ross Dyer-Smith clinical lead, Lambeth CCG director
Dr David Elliman consultant, community child health
Dr Katrina Erskine consultant gynaecology and obstetrics, Homerton University hospital, London
Dr George Farrelly GP
Dr Katherine Fielder GP
Dr Miriam Fine accident and emergency
Dr Peter Fisher retired consultant physician
Dr Paul Fleming consultant anaesthetist
Dr Lindsay Forbes senior lecturer in cancer and public health
Prof Robbie Foy professor of primary care, University of Leeds
Dr Andrea Franks consultant dermatologist, Chester
Dr Robert Galloway accident and emergency
Prof Linda Gask emirita professor of primary care psychiatry, University Of Manchester
Dr Clare Gerada GP and former chair, Royal College of General Practitioners
Dr Colin Godber consultant old age psychiatry
Dr Michael Gopfert
Dr Marilyn Graham general practitioner
Prof Trisha Greenhalgh professor of primary care, University of Oxford
Dr Rex Haigh consultant psychiatrist in medical psychotherapy
Dr Phil Hammond associate specialist paediatric chronic fatigue service, Bath
Dr MG Harrington consultant geriatrician
Dr David Hawkins consultant physician
Dr Iona Heath GP and former president, Royal College Of General Practitioners
Dr Robert Hugo consultant psychiatrist
Dr Christopher Jenkins GP
Prof Roger Jones editor, British Journal of General Practice, emeritus professor of general practice, King’s College, London
Dr Coral Jones GP
Dr Fred Kavalier GP
Dr Mohammed Salah Khalifa GP
Dr Surendra Kumar GP
Dr Dianne Levevre consultant psychiatrist
Dr Jasvinder Singh Lidder consultant psychiatrist
Prof Karina Lovell professor of mental health
Dr Simon Lowes specialist registrar clinical radiology
Dr Sahira Mahmood locum GP
Dr Nick Mann GP and NHS osteopath
Dr Chris Manning convener Action for NHS Wellbeing
Prof Martin McKee professor of European public health
Dr Helene McKeon GP
Dr John Middleton independent public health physician
Dr Sally Mitchison retired consultant psychiatrist
Dr Roger Neighbour GP and former president, Royal College of General Practitioners
Dr Julia Nelki child psychiatrist Cheshire & Wirral Partnership Trust
Dr David Nicholl consultant neurologist
Dr Maureen O’Leary retired consultant psychiatrist
Dr Tony O’Sullivan consultant paediatrician, Kaleidoscope – Lewisham Centre for Children & Young People
Dr Sophia Osbourne GP
Dr David Owen
Dr Tim Paine former president, National Association for Patient Participation
Prof Allyson Pollock professor of public health
Prof Hilary Powers professor of nutritional biochemistry and head of oncology, University of Sheffield
Dr Umesh Prabhu consultant paediatrician
Dr Braham Prashara GP
Dr Shibley Rahman academic in dementia, Primrose Hill
Dr Dan Rainbow GP and locality commissioner
Anne Read consultant psychiatrist
Dr Paul Revell consultant haematologist
Dr Brian Rossiter retired consultant physician
Dr Yvette Saldanha GP trainer
Dr Alex Samuel senior lecturer in public health, University of Liverpool
Professor Wendy Savage retired senior lecturer in obstetrics and gynaecology
Dr Gabriele Scally public health consultant
Dr Parveen Sharma consultant psychiatrist
Mr Virender Sharma consultant ENT Surgeon
Dr Caroline Shulman GP for homeless and inclusion health, Kings Health Partners
Dr Kamal Sidhu GP
Dr Martin Siebert GP
Dr Brian Silk
Dr Ian Sinclair general practitioner (retired)
Dr Surinder Singh GP
Dr Francis Skiffington retired consultant community paediatrican
Dr Alison Smailes GP
Dr Donatella Soldi community paediatrician
Mr Virender Soni ophthalmologist
Dr Miranda Splitt consultant geriatrician
Dr John Sweeney consultant physician
Dr RL Symonds consultant psychiatrist
Prof Raymond Tallis emeritus professor of geriatric medicine, University of Manchester
Dr Jonathon Tomlinson GP
Dr Charlie Tomson consultant nephrologist
Dr David Tomson GP
Dr Norman Traub former consultant haematologist, Southend hospital
Dr Asha Umrawsingh emergency care doctor, Lewisham University hospital
Dr Devaraja Vedakkalur GP
Dr Ian Walton GP
Dr Fiona Watson GP
Dr Eric Watts retired consultant haemotologist and clinical director
Prof Jonathon Weber professor of infectious diseases, Imperial College London
Dr Tara Weeramanthri GP
Dr Sian Williams consultant in occupational medicine
Dr David Wrigley GP
Dr Luke Zander retired GP
Dr Patrick Zentler-Munro retired consultant physician
« Last Edit: April 8, 2015, 09:43:37 pm by macca007 »

Offline macca007

  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 3,233
Re: "Sell-Off" - The Abolition of Your NHS
« Reply #110 on: May 3, 2015, 04:04:31 pm »
A few things in the article that contain links so worth reading from the link

http://anotherangryvoice.blogspot.co.uk/2014/08/12-things-tories-nhs.html?m=1

12 things you should know about the Tory NHS "reforms"


In this article I'm going to explain twelve things that you should know about the Tories and the NHS.

I have also uploaded a version of this article to Buzzfeed, which contains more pictures but fewer words. You can see that here.

David Cameron Lied about the NHS

Before the 2010 general election David Cameron promised "no more top-down reorganisations of the NHS", then within months of coming to power his Health secretary Andrew Lansley launched the biggest top-down reorganisation in the history of the NHS (the Health and Social Care Act). Cameron also made the pre-election promise that the Tories would "cut the deficit, not the NHS", before launching £20 billion worth of NHS cuts.

Michael Portillo admitted the truth

In 2011 the former Tory leadership candidate Michael Portillo admitted that David Cameron and the Tories had lied to the public about their intentions towards the NHS before the 2010 General Election: "They did not believe they could win an election if they told you what they were going to do because people are so wedded to the NHS."

Portillo was right, the privatisation of the NHS is a very unpopular idea



According to a 2013 YouGov poll, 84% of the public would prefer to see the NHS run as a not-for-profit public service, whilst just 7% favour privatisation. [source]

Even though they were facing a Labour party led by an incredibly unpopular and blunder prone leader in Gordon Brown, and in the wake of the biggest economic meltdown in generations, the Tories were still incapable of even winning a majority government. Had they admitted their intentions to carve up the NHS and hand out the pieces to their corporate mates, this would surely have cost them hundreds of thousands of votes, and potentially left Labour to form a coalition government with the Liberal Democrats.

Loads of Tory politicians have vested interests in the privatisation of the NHS

Dozens and dozens of the Tory MPs and Lords who voted in favour of the privatisation of the NHS had clear vested financial interests in private health corporations. Here is a detailed list of some of those politicians who look set to benefit from the NHS privatisation bill they voted for.

One of the most notable examples is Lazy Lord Coe, who barely ever turns up to vote in the House of Lords (he voted in just 7.9% of debates between 2000 and 2013). However when the opportunity to benefit his numerous private health interests (PruHealth, AMT Sybex, Chime Communications) presented itself, he was amongst many Tory lords with financial interests in the private health sector to make rare appearances in the House of Lords and vote in favour of greater NHS privatisation.

The Tories have been carving up the NHS and giving away the pieces to their donors
Circle Health, which is 29.2% owned by a hedge fund run by major Tory party donor Paul Ruddock has been handed over £1.3 billion in NHS contracts. Other Tory party donors with major investments in Circle Health include Martyn Arbib, Crispin Odey and Michael Platt.

 Care UK has received over £100 million in NHS contracts. Their chairman is John Nash who has made £247,250 worth of donations to the Tory party. Aside from his company picking up huge NHS contract as a result of Tory party legislation, he has also been handed a seat in the unelected House of Lords.

 [source]

The NHS is one of the best health services in the world

A recent study by the Washington based Commonwealth Fund has shown that the NHS is one of the best, cheapest and most efficient health services in the world, whilst the private sector dominated US health system is the worst, most expensive and least efficient of the eleven different health care systems that they looked at. The NHS reforms introduced by the Tory party are designed to make the NHS much more like the US system by bringing in ever more private health corporations to take over NHS services. The Tory mantra about bringing in the private sector to "make the NHS more efficient" is just a smokescreen. The real reason for bringing in the private sector is to soak as much profit out of the system as possible, with no regards for the quality or efficiency of the service.

Jeremy C*nt

In 2009 the Tory MP Jeremy C*nt co-authored a book which called for the NHS to be dismantled and called it "no longer relevant". In 2012 David Cameron appointed Jeremy C*nt as Health Secretary, meaning that the man who is now responsible for the NHS is a man who has called for it to be completely abolished.

The fact that David Cameron would appoint a Health Secretary who is on record saying that the NHS should be abolished illustrates exactly how gullible he imagined the general public to be when he made the pre-election promise that "the NHS will be safe in my hands".

No Confidence

Medical professionals have voted time and again against the Tory NHS reforms. The British Medical Association have also passed motions of no-confidence against the current Health Secretary Jeremy C*nt, and his predecessor Andrew Lansley. Virtually the entire medical profession is opposed to the Tories and their plot to privatise the NHS. It is quite impossible to make the NHS "more efficient" when the people in charge of it are conducting an ideological war against the people who actually run the service. What is needed is people in charge who want to work with the doctors and other medical professionals, rather than against them.

The myth of private sector efficiency

The facts that the private sector dominated US health system is hugely expensive and inefficient, whilst the public sector dominated NHS is rated as one of the most efficient in the world should be enough to convince most people that it is a complete myth that the private sector is somehow inherently more efficient than the public sector.

When it comes to health care provision it is quite easy to understand why greater private sector involvement causes inefficiencies in the system. If the NHS signs a 30 year PFI contract for a new hospital, or outsources the provision of health care services to a private health company on a 25 year contract, these contracts can only be escaped from at enormous cost in compensation. Even modifying the contracts to take account of changing needs is extraordinarily expensive. When such long term contracts are signed, the NHS is legally obliged to continue paying for them, no matter what the changing health care requirements of the community.

These obligations build inflexibility and inefficiency into the system. When the health system operates under a single umbrella, services can be modified with relative ease, but when contracts with hedge funds, private equity groups and multinational healthcare companies have been signed, any modifications incur large financial costs.

Forced hospital closures

The Princess Regent University Hospital (which cost £118 million to construct) was built in South London, but under the terms of the PFI contract, the amount repayable over the decades will be £2.5 billion, returning a handsome 70.6% profit to the PFI consortium.

The extraordinary costs of paying off this PFI debt crippled the South London Healthcare Trust, forcing them to look for savings. The proposal they came up with was a plan to shut down the Accident and Emergency department and the maternity ward at Lewisham Hospital, and to sell off the land and buildings in order to raise £17 million towards paying their PFI debts. This plan would have left Lewisham (population 750,000) without an A&E or maternity ward, and sparked large public protests and a legal challenge against the decision to shut down most of the hospital and sell off the land.

The legal challenge against the closure of Lewisham A&E was successful, but this victory for people power was a short lived one. The response of the Tory party was to pass new legislation to allow the Health Secretary the power to shut down any NHS run hospital, no matter how efficiently the services is run, in just 40 days. As a result, next time a local health authority gets into financial difficulties as a result of their PFI debts, the Tories can simply shut down a load of local NHS run services in order to protect the profits of rip-off PFI consortia, no matter how efficient the NHS services are, or how strong the public opposition.

More Tory lies

Here's one undeniable example of lies from the Tory party manifesto. 2010
"We will stop the forced closure of A&E and maternity wards, so that people have better access to local services, and give mothers a real choice over where to have their baby, with NHS funding following their decisions."
2010 Conservative Party Manifesto, page 47

2012
The Tories attempt to force the closure of the A&E and maternity ward at Lewisham Hospital, but were defeated in the courts.

2014
The Tories pass new legislation to make it much easier for the Health Secretary force the closure of NHS hospitals and services.

And here's another example.

2010
"We will make patients’ choices meaningful by putting patients in charge of making decisions about their care, including control of their health records."
2010 Conservative Party Manifesto, page 47

2014
The Tories table new legislation aimed at allowing private health corporations to buy access to people's private health records without their consent. After a huge public outcry against this plan the Tories were forced to postpone their plan to sell off our medical data. However within a week of them shelving their data sharing plans it was revealed that 47 million private medical records had already been sold off to a private insurance company.

The Tories and the NHS eventually admitted that the records shouldn't have been sold off without anyone's consent, so I suppose that's alright then!
   
Privatising the profits, socialising the losses

The most recent example of privatising the profits and socialising the losses can be seen in the botched eye operations carried out at the NHS Musgrove Park hospital in Taunton by the private sector contractor Vanguard Health. 30 of the 60 operations carried out by the private company led to complications, including complete blindness in one case. After just four days the NHS Hospital terminated the contract with Vanguard, but it seems that the NHS hospital will be held liable for compensations to the victims of these botched eye operations carried out on NHS premises by a private company. Another example of the taxpayer having to pay out for the failings of private health companies can be in the case of the Lister Surgicentre in Stevenage, which was run by the private company Clinicenta until the contract was terminated early in 2013 due to poor standards of care. In order to terminate the contract, the taxpayer had to fork out £53 million in compensation to Clinicenta.

Offline hide5seek

  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 10,324
  • We all live in THE 5 EUROPEAN CUPS
Re: "Sell-Off" - The Abolition of Your NHS
« Reply #111 on: May 15, 2015, 03:31:24 pm »
Keep posting.

Offline Zephyr

  • Thinks of RAWK whilst pleasuring himself
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Kopite
  • ******
  • Posts: 866
Re: "Sell-Off" - The Abolition of Your NHS
« Reply #112 on: May 15, 2015, 05:08:08 pm »
An absolute disgrace that the Tory c*nts are getting away with this.
Mint-Berry Crunch!

Offline Welshred

  • CBE. To be fair to him, he is a massive twat. Professional Ladies' Arse Fondler. Possibly......we're not sure any more......
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 34,608
  • JFT96
Re: "Sell-Off" - The Abolition of Your NHS
« Reply #113 on: May 15, 2015, 06:37:55 pm »
A few days after the election and we all get an email from the trust Chief Exec about the trusts new 'partnership' with Capita.

Offline OOS

  • Jordan Henderson fanclub member #4
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 6,657
Re: "Sell-Off" - The Abolition of Your NHS
« Reply #114 on: May 15, 2015, 07:02:48 pm »
From PFI's to outsourcing services to run for profit companies. Stinks.
"I think the most important thing about music is the sense of escape." - Thom Yorke

Offline macca007

  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 3,233
Re: "Sell-Off" - The Abolition of Your NHS
« Reply #115 on: May 15, 2015, 07:07:17 pm »
A few days after the election and we all get an email from the trust Chief Exec about the trusts new 'partnership' with Capita.

I thought capita had been mostly fucked off as they are shit. At least thats what happened in the hospital i worked at before and they where amongst the last to use their services l. Just another middle man taking profit out of our health care system

Offline thisyearisouryear

  • Need a dose of Hopium
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 4,475
Re: "Sell-Off" - The Abolition of Your NHS
« Reply #116 on: May 16, 2015, 05:35:26 am »
Not really relevant to the 'sell-off' but interesting article on healthcare (relevant more for US I guess, but talks about UK too) -
http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2015/05/dont-get-sick-in-july-and-other-advice-from-from-americas-nurses-117876.html#.VVbHqfmqqko

Offline Guz-kop

  • Baz cop
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 14,475
Re: "Sell-Off" - The Abolition of Your NHS
« Reply #117 on: May 16, 2015, 02:33:40 pm »
Many corners of the NHS are a mess at the moment. I'm not sure what would have changed under Labour but there's a lot of doom and gloom around the front line staff like I've never seen before
It's wonderful, it's marvellous, it's 3-3

Offline macca007

  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 3,233
Re: "Sell-Off" - The Abolition of Your NHS
« Reply #118 on: May 18, 2015, 07:31:49 pm »
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/nurses-threaten-first-strike-unions-5716193#ICID=sharebar_twitter

Nurses threaten first strike in union's 100-year history to fight David Cameron's 7-day NHS
18 MAY 2015 09:35 AM BY DAN BLOOM
No one knows for sure where 5,000 new GPs will come from - and the Royal College of Nursing says it'll fight any move that strains its members
1361 Shares
 nhs-nurses-main.jpgPA
Threat: Nurses could strike over Cameron's plans - and Jeremy C*nt struggled on the detail
Britain's biggest nursing union is threatening the first strike in its 100-year history if David Cameron's 7-day NHS piles even more pressure on staff.

The Prime Minister faces the stark challenge today as he unveils plans for an all-week-round service in his first major speech of the new Parliament.

He'll need 5,000 extra GPs in five years - but doctors claim this doesn't add up because hundreds of GP surgeries have closed despite rising demand.

And nurses are worried they will be forced to work more antisocial hours or lose out on extra payments for working weekends - two things they say are a 'red line'.


The head of the Royal College of Nursing says its 420,000 members could walk out, which they've never done since the body was founded in 1916.

Jeremy C*nt questioned about Tory plans for 7 day NHS on BBC Radio 4 Today Programme
Dr Peter Carter told The Independent: "Unsocial hours, weekend working, Christmas Day and bank holidays – they get a very modest higher level of remuneration.

"Any attack on that and I do fear it would result in industrial action.”

Health Secretary Jeremy C*nt has already been left floundering on live radio over where 5,000 extra GPs will come from.

He was challenged repeatedly over the source of the staff during a heated interview - and was accused of drifting off into 'vague' answers.

He told Radio 4's Today programme: "We need to look at why it is that, um, we, er, that GPs have so much burnout.

Peter Carter
Strike threat: The Royal College of Nursing's general secretary Dr Peter Carter
"We need to look at the GP contract, we need to look at what it is that's putting people off becoming GPs."

When told to give more detailed information he snapped: "You're asking me to give you the entire answer now in two minutes."

But GP Matthew Cheetham told the show: "Who is going to be staffing these extra shifts? The government is talking about 5,000 extra GPs by the end of this Parliament. Where are they going to come from?"

In September it was revealed more than 500 GP surgeries had closed since the Coalition took power - and just 110 opened to fill the gap.

And the health secretary was read a letter from a listener in Chesterfield, Derbyshire, who complained two out of every five surgeries had shut down.

Mr Hunt, however, accused the nurses' union of 'jumping the gun' just '8 days into a new government'.

Jeremy C*nt
Fightback: Health secretary Jeremy C*nt has accused the union of 'jumping the gun'
He told BBC Breakfast: "I think the RCN should talk to their members and, rather than grandstanding like this, should come and talk to me."

David Cameron will outline the plans later as he renews his pledge to plough an extra £8bn into the NHS.

Speaking at a GP surgery in the West Midlands, the Prime Minister will say: "Our commitment is to free healthcare for everyone - wherever you are and whenever you need it.

"That means getting the best care and making that care available for everyone - free - wherever they are and whenever they need it.

"So I believe that together - by sticking to the plan - we can become the first country in the world to deliver a truly seven-day NHS."

Offline macca007

  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 3,233
Re: "Sell-Off" - The Abolition of Your NHS
« Reply #119 on: May 18, 2015, 07:39:15 pm »
So theres another. They are cutting funding left right and centre and then are saying we dont do enough and need to work more. Ive just finished 7 days of 12 hour night shifts And get very little extra for it so if he thinks he can take my unsocial hours pay im leaving the country. For anyone thinking its jumping the gun theyve mooted the idea before. all they want is to cut funds, say it isnt working and farm out the work to private companies like they are here http://www.virgincare.co.uk/. And trust me that would not be good.