voronin was not good enough but up to now same time of the year robbie keane 4 goals(CL 2 league 2) voronin 4 goals (CL1 League 3) so why did voronin get stick when he was a free transfer but keane doesnt and he is a 20 million pound player plus keane has played well more games , now personally both should not be castigated but facts speak loudly .
These are, apparently, Voronins career statistics(1995-2008):
Borussia Mönchengladbach : played 9, scored 1
Mainz : played 75, scored 29
Köln : played 19, scored 4
Bayer Leverkusen : played 92, scored 32
Liverpool→ Hertha Berlin (loan)
Ukraine : played 54 , scored 6
These are Robbie Keanes (1997-2008)
Wolves : played 73, scored 24
Coventry : played 31, scored 12
Inter : played 6, scored 0
Leeds (inc loan spell) played 46, scored 13
Spurs : played 197, scored 80
ROI : played 85, scored 35
Voronin gets slated because he's just not very good. I certainly don't think he's any kind of Sean Dundee, but I don't think that he improves our squad either. Seeing as how you're using a stats based argument, check those out above - Keane is a more prolific striker, in a shorter period of time. Furthermore, he's done a lot of his scoring in the EPL - so we know it's in his locker.
Unfortunately for Voro the only thing in his locker is a leopard print jumpsuit, an alice band, some timotei and a cougar. Not the worst player we've ever had, but certainly a candidate for worst barnet and dresser. On those points alone I don't think we should want him back...