If there is an cash injection of some sort, we'd do well.
There won't be.
As a club we have had one of our best years for a while...
No thanks to G&H. They dragged out Rafa's contract negotiations. They wouldnt allow any players to extend their contracts in the run-up to the January deadline.
question is how much of this has been down to financial acumen by G&H or whether its been benitez - personally its been a combination of both, G&H have scrutinised transfer dealings ...
What do you mean by "scrutinised"? Are you saying that there was some disastrous move that Rafa wanted to make, but that G&H heroically prevented?
What bollocks!
The reason we have Degen (and no offence to the lad) is not because Rafa felt he was the best available RB last summer. It's because he was free.
The reason we dont have Barry (not someone I'm especially keen on personally) is that G&H "scrutinised" this deal and said "no".
The reason we didnt get Dani Alves for £12m is that G&H "scrutinised" this deal and said buy Pennant for £6m instead. (2 years later, Alves was worth £23m, and we couldnt even get anyone to take Pennant off us on a Free).
Takeover talks will go on and on, although i hate the fact that G&H are in charge, this current period of LFC history is one where we have to pull together and make sure it works.
We need to do everything in our power to stop the club being put into administration by G&H.
... i'm willing to move on with G&H in charge if we continue to prosper ...
What do you mean by "continue"?
We have the best manager we've had since (at least) Kenny, and he's taken us high up in the league. Whether we come 1st, 2nd, or 3rd, none of it is thanks to G&H, and none of it amounts to "prospering".
In the last few seasons, Liverpool has had the highest revenues in its history. This isnt due to G&H (*), it's because, we have had repeated success in the CL, and because TV money is at an all time high. All that G&H's ownership has done is to ensure that tens of millions of that money goes, not to improving the infrastructure or playing staff, but to the banks who lent the money which G&H gave to Moores.
To be clear, the TV money (in slightly varying amounts) also benefits Villa, Everton, Spurs, and everyone else. G&H arent advancing us in comparison to anyone else.
Whereas the CL money is split between 4 clubs (partly based on progression in the tournament, but largely based on league position). It's Rafa and the players who earned that money, not G&H.
(*) Just to be fair, G&H have worked on improving the club's commercial side, which is welcome and long overdue. However, firstly, the increased revenue from these efforts is dwarfed by the revenue from TV and CL. Secondly, any competent owner would have taken these measures; G&H havent done anything unique or special.