Had they lost a game, they wouldn't have made it into this thread. So it wasn't all for nothing.
My point is that the quality of a team isn't always defined by what they win. The reputation of the club is.
The Liverpool team under Rodgers that nearly won the league were better than the 05 team, that won CL, even though they won nothing.
Everyone knows that Steaua Bucuresti are the real invincibles; they are actually centurion invincibles because they went 104 games unbeaten in the Romanian league, and 112 unbeaten at home! Imagine not losing a home league game for over six and a half years or any league game for well over three years! Before anyone says they were in a shit league, they began their incredible run right after winning the European Cup in 1986, and lost the final in 89 and the semi-final in 88. They even won the Super Cup in 86 as well!
Incidentally, poor old Dinamo Bucuresti had a similar fate to us last season in the 88/89 season. They won 30, drew 2, lost 2 of 34 games, with a GD of +100 and still lost the fucking league to Steaua by three points when it was two points for a win!
The fact Steaua won all 17 home games by a score of 69-9 didn't help I suppose.
The previous season, Dinamo had 30 wins 3 draws and 1 loss, a GD of +82 and lost the league by a point. At least they went on to win the league in 89/90 by a point, which they definitely deserved!!!