No I didn't. He was reporting what he read. They are not his own opinions.
Reading comprehension.
Nope. He reported a stat, you quoted it and said it wasn't accurate. Although you took an unnecessary swipe at Alpha-males. But it's the same day as you got upset at people for hitting on your wife so maybe it struck a nerve, fair enough.
Isn't this just the common lament of men who are struggling to get a date? I've read of the Pareto principle being applied to dating as a whole and it doesn't really stand up to scrutiny, though. Good looking people want to have good looking partners. The only way that happens is because they are not ploughing their way through 80% of the female population. There are only so many hours in the day.
Then you
separately quoted
his interpretation of that stat, and the impact it has on the female users of dating apps, and said that his interpretation was resentment.
That's just resentment talking.
Then I asked who
he is resenting with his opinion.
Who is he resenting there??
To which you replied 80% of women.
The "80%" of women
So I can comprehend what you meant just fine. Then you got pulled up on it, quoted some niche online movement about men that because I hadn't heard of, means I know next to nothing. I've got better things to do with my life than study relationships online.
It must be very lonely being you when you're not picking on widowers for supporting the leader of the opposition or acting passive aggressive.
edit - took out a personal dig, apologies.