Why does it have ti be have Ince and let Sterling go? I'd of liked Sterling and Ince still with us because he's good, we let him go for nothing!
We offered him a contract, he refused it.
If the club had upped the offer, then not only would they have that added cost, but the added cost of all the other youth players who are given a green light to bully the club in contract negotiations. And the club don't have an infinite budget for wages.
Would you be happy if keeping Ince meant we didn't have the money to sign Suso to a new contract?
Anyway, since Ince has played almost 50 games for Blackpool. Would he have anything like that first team experience if he'd stayed here?
Would he have developed in the same way?
For all we know, if he'd stayed his development could have stalled, and we'd now have people bemoaning giving a player with approx. 10 minutes of game time for us such a generous contract and being unable to unload him.