Pretty much all betting companies behave like twats. 365 is no different. My comment about her as an owner of the company was to try and get her pay into some sort of context. She isn't an executive in the traditional sense of the word. In the context that an executive at a FTSE250 would be understood she's an owner. To take her earnings from 365 as those of an average CEO is either disingenuous or just plain daft.
Yes, but it is important to note she is drawing a salary as well as the dividends from her 50% stake. This is why she must be considered as are other executives. She could choose to just take her dividend and a nominal (or even just a normal) wage like many in her position do. Although, it would be awful to expect her to get by on a meagre £50m or so a year dividend.
It's utterly obscene and abhorrent by any measure. Even more so when it comes at a time when gambling addiction is a massive issue that leaves families ripped to bits.