Some officiating stats. Mostly VAR related.
Only 1 caution for simulation. 0 for dissent.
On VAR, 441 incidents have been checked during the 44 games with 29 official VAR reviews. Of the 29, 25 have been changed and only 4 confirmed on the original decision.
Without VAR, 92% of decisions would have been correct. With VAR, it's up to 98%.
12 of the 23 penalties so far awarded without VAR. 3 penalties cancelled after VAR advice.
On average there has been 10 checks a match and 0.66 official reviews per match.
Those stats are utterly useless in that form, especially if being used to puff VAR.
Unless somebody can provide a stat, for example, for 'Lineswoman thought it was offside, but didn't flag per VAR guidelines' the idea that the VAR ruling out something that would normally have been flagged is just text book false positives.
The refs body did this during the Mens world cup - it's definitely cynical, but it's hard to tell if it's only that they're as statistically illiterate as they seem (chances are that they are) or just protecting their project/jobs.
EDIT: ah cheers Kellan - it was briefed to the media. Amazing how unthinkingly people take those as worthwhile, let alone positive, stats