I suppose that was why I stripped out the England and early career Scandanavian numbers. I wanted to compare his and Magath's records in their domestic leagues.
Didn't focus on his Palace percentage though - 28% wow. But I think the whole Palace thing is a great case study in Hodgism. By that I mean the art of self promotion whilst being distinctly average. You ask anyone with a passing interest in football about Hodgson at Palace, and the response will be along the lines of "He's done a great job" or "He's turned them around". Palace fans in general love him.
But what's he actually done? 1.17 ppg, that's what he's done and he's getting lauded for it. projecting 44 points over a season.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/42626314This shambles from McNulty talks of "How Hodgson turned around Crystal Palace and his reputation".
Literally is one of the most misused words in English, but when you take over a team with no wins and no goals, it literally is impossible to do any worse. Post Hodge, Palace have seen the return of Zaha and a couple of other injuries clear up as well as having the benefit of Sakho at the back. That alone would have been enough to see some sort of bounce. Any manager, and I mean any manager could have gone in and suggested abandoning De Boers ways and reverting to type. That and the availability of key players would have arguably achieved the same result.
So next time anyone within earshot says that Hodgson has "done well" - do us a favour and put them straight.
He's yet again done well for himself, but that's about it.