Excellently put Alan.
I do find it odd, that they are classed as Muslims, simply for having a Muslim name and/or of <foreign>heritage. They might be for all I know, however there's nothing Islamic in their despicable actions, even ignoring the drinking and drugs aspect.
Maybe the negativity fits the 'them Muslims' narrative, afterall, I wouldn't assume John or Mark, who's parents are strict Catholics to automatically be classed as a Christian. Carolann Gallon, the white female convicted as part of the Newcastle trial was only referred by name.
Then you had these sick men, without any mention of race, religion or live broadcast from Moron Robinson
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-32413502
Please, please don't see this as a justification of Tommy Robinson, it isn't.
The parallel you are trying to highlight is only valid (in my opinion) if local councils, social services and police, ignored these crimes initially.
The outrage (for me) isn't that Muslim men from Pakistan commit crimes, every culture, race and religion has a low, but equal capacity for criminality. The outrage is because it was ignored by people in authority (whom have subesquently admitted as such), based on the race of the perpetrators.
There is a difference.
Can I just say I am highlighting a valid difference. I am not pro Tommy Robinson or EDL, I hope people realise that.
Perhaps it doesn't matter, really, I don't know why I care about such small detail, especially when it can seem like I am siding with the EDL (which again, I'm not). I think it's some sort of OCD.
