Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 10
1
The numbers will inevitably drop in the winter due to the weather. I wouldn't be surprised to see the Tories try and time the first flights so that they can point at that drop as evidence that the policy is working.

FWIW I think the policy will work to an extent as it will likely discourage the proportion of migrants who are travelling for economic reasons. The problem then though is that the policy ends up being targeted at the most vulnerable migrants who are either desperate enough to still make the crossing or isolated enough from any information that they are not aware of the risk of being sent on to Rwanda. Then you also have the issue of whether it is right that the policy should be used retrospectively on people who have already arrived in the UK before its introduction.

One other thought - whilst the Tory rhetoric on this is grim I think it is important to acknowledge that this issue is one where a great deal of the responsibility lies with Western Europe as a whole rather than just the UK Tories. You never hear a lot of talk about what responsibility France bears for making its country so inhospitable and hostile that people are forced into small boats to cross the channel to escape from there.
Some good points, not sure how many come for economic reasons but am sure that must be at the back of the Torys minds. something to think about.
What annoys me is this stop the boats dates back to when we left the EU, the Torys incompetence created a new opportunity for criminal gangs to make real money, we are stuck with that for many years to come.  the Torys attitude towards France and the rest of the EU caused a lot of friction, Labour were saying this a few yrs back, the Torys were insulting France, they needed to ask for Frances co-operation to stop people leaving in the boats. something the Torys looked at as crawling to the EU, Patel lied many times over setting up Visa application posts when Labour were telling them people are coming on boats because you haven't set up visas application posts, Patel lied and said she had done, all she did was talk nasty and tough instead of actually solving the problem. Braverman carried it on, talk nasty and tough while doing nothing to stop it. I couldn't blame France if they told us to piss off after the way the Torys Brexit nutters ridiculed them.
I think you maybe jumping to a few conclusions though, some already have family here, some can speak English better than French but yeah. afaik. benefits are given quicker here.
Am not going to look for the stats right now but don't France take in far more refugees than us?
2
General Football and Sport / Re: Everton - The 777 Unflushables
« Last post by DonkeyWan on Today at 02:13:41 pm »
At what point does shit hit the fan for these? It feels like over a year of them being “financially fucked” but they still survive on both on and off the pitch. Not financially clued up so genuinely asking is there a specific point in time that would tip them over the edge?

It's a lot longer than a year. Everton have made an operating loss for nearly 10 years straight (they made a £5m profit in 2014 after a loss in 2013). Back then quite  afew on here were predicting future problems financially for Everton (myself included) based on the age of the squad, the growing costs of being competitive, the decrepit ground that needed replacing and the fact the club had nop growtrh factor in their revenue beyond rising broadcasting income. The reason Moshiri became involved was a tacit admission that Everton needed a new direction, in particular gaining access to funding to build a new stadium.

At the time Everton looked at a number of options and eventually chose the most complex and costly route, largely because Moshiri promised easy money (Usmanov, apparently) and the city council were offering to fund a huge lump of the stadium on the cheap. Since then the council money and Usmanov money have not materialised. Instead Moshiri loaded the club with debt, using his loaned money to buy out club shares and then taking that money as chairman and spending it on players. To cover that model they renamed that money as 'equity' but ultimately it was owed by the club to Moshiri. Now, it is Moshiri's money (though some would suggest it is usmanov), but it was never a gift, that's the crucial bit.

When the war in the Ukraine started a lot of people complained that Everton had been hard done by, losing a crucial income stream. However, the deep borrowing at high fin ancial risk had started long before then, as Moshiri had failed to get cheap income and instead borrowed at high rates to start stadium construction, but without all the money required in place.

There were a number of points where Everton could have given up the difficult and expensive BMD option, but chose to risk it and go ahead instead. At each stage they have doubled down instead of easing off. Think of a car careening out of control where the owner accelrates instead of braking, trying to drive out of the spin. However, they have painted themselves into a corner and made the situation worse and worse. At this point they need non-business money (as only idiots would invest in a billion pound loss-making exercise where 4 different lenders have 4 different controls in place and one bad season would wipe out your investment), i.e. petrodollars. The problem there is that Everton have been available for takeover for quite a while and nobody with silly money has looked even remotely interested.

The word last month was the money had run out and a takeover had to occur or the jig was up. That does not appear to have been the case, but losing an estimated £20m a month on wages, salaries and interest is not sustainable. The crunch has to come soon, possibly before the season, likely over the summer. Either the great escape is realised twice 9pitch and board room) or they blow up spectacularly.
3
Liverpool FC Forum / Re: Diogo Jota (Diogo José Teixeira da Silva)
« Last post by MD1990 on Today at 02:13:10 pm »
i would sell in the summer.
actually better to keep diaz jota just cannot stay fit
4
Liverpool FC Forum / Re: New Kit thread
« Last post by Spezialo on Today at 02:12:18 pm »
It'll be fine when you see the players wear the finished product a few times.

that's it.

who gives a fuck what the kit looks like (maybe ages 12 and under  ;D). we should worry about how we play in it.
5
Liverpool FC Forum / Re: Diogo Jota (Diogo José Teixeira da Silva)
« Last post by Jookie on Today at 02:11:59 pm »
Only played 5700 minutes in PL over 4 seasons.

For comparison Salah played over 12,000 PL mins in his 1st 4 seasons. Luis Dias has played 4200 minutes in 2.5 seasons and missed most of 1 season with injury.

Jota’s continued lack of availability is becoming a real issue. Need to get away from having multiple players like Jota, Konate and Thiago who are only available about 50% of the time and need their minutes managing continuously
6
Liverpool FC Forum / Re: Diogo Jota (Diogo José Teixeira da Silva)
« Last post by Caligula? on Today at 02:11:33 pm »
:-\

We have too many players prone to injury

We really do. Compared to other teams we seem to have an abnormal amount of injuries.
7
Liverpool FC Forum / Re: Diogo Jota (Diogo José Teixeira da Silva)
« Last post by LFCEmpire on Today at 02:09:17 pm »
Gutted.
9
Liverpool FC Forum / Re: Diogo Jota (Diogo José Teixeira da Silva)
« Last post by PaleBlueDot on Today at 02:08:25 pm »
This one will hurt us the most.

Fuck!
10
Liverpool FC Forum / Re: Diogo Jota (Diogo José Teixeira da Silva)
« Last post by newterp on Today at 02:07:59 pm »
This is why it's important to get another forward - since he will miss alot of time each year.

Or get Danns fully integrated.
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 10