The problem is that 99.9% of people ae not experts in the science of the conspiracy in question. Could plans bring down the twin towers and building 7? What about the bullet that killed JFK? What about 5g? Climate change a hoax?
I’m an expert in none of the above. All I can do is read as much as I can (if I’m interested) and see if I can make sense of it. There are some scientists who question climate change. They are more qualified than me so who am I to totally dismiss them?
I’m not saying I particularly have an opinion (before the insults start) but when Im left with the official story coming from the mouths of known liars and people that genuinely don’t give a shit, then I think it’s natural to question things.
Check your sources. don't give equal weight to all the opinions you read.
so a few people believe planes couldn't bring down the towers, who do you believe a few people with no expertise on the subject or the experts, there's also more powerful proof to say this is just CT rubbish. they are making absurd accusations, the USA government all got together to allow this attack to happen, I assume they think the planted explosives or whatever to bring down the towers, they believe all that instead of the experts simple explanation of yes a plane could bring down these particular structures.
5G you can dismiss in seconds, the whole accusation on 5G affecting your health has been laughed at by science, the other 5G CT is over Wuhan, as if 5G caused covid, 5G was rolled out all over China at the time on none of these regions had Covid. so whose opinion do you believe, reputable scientists or someone who you will most likely find is considered a crank most of the time.
Only took a few seconds to form a opinion on those 500 so called scientists who wrote a letter protesting Climate change, first search was do the majority of scientists believe in Climate change, the answer was yes 97% do.
Nearly all actively publishing climate scientists (97–98%[1]) support the consensus on anthropogenic climate change,[2][3] and the remaining 2% of contrarian studies either cannot be replicated or contain errors.[4]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_consensus_on_climate_change That would be enough for me as 97% can't be cranks but looked for the scientists who don't believe in climate change. some may well be scientists but they are not scientists who have studied Climate change, it's not their field.
The Climate Denialist Distraction Brought Upon Us: “500 Scientists” Petitioning the UN
https://medium.com/wedonthavetime/the-climate-denialist-distraction-brought-upon-us-500-scientists-petitioning-the-un-bec387e679c4