You sound gutted that people are calling out Islamphobia.. drop the faux-outrage, you only have to look at comment sections nowadays to see anti-Muslim sentiment is rife.. it's an "ugly, ugly agenda"
If you can't spot that persons agenda, that's on you.
I'm not outraged with the author, and there's nothing faux in what I'm saying - that's ironically enough a criticism you could offer the author of that. Just calling out an agenda when it's clear.
I have a problem with anti-muslim bigotry, and have spoken up on it on the occasions I've witnessed it.
Tomlin, who is white, then fled the scene after attacking the pair, who are of South Asian descent, but eventually turned himself in. Police described the attack as a hate crime.
Mukhtar has said he believes they were targeted because of their Islamic faith.
http://www.aljazeera.com/news/2017/07/uk-acid-attack-survivors-demand-government-action-170715064824392.html
Not sure where the line gets drawn between hate crime and terrorism, but if the Police described it as a hate crime it's not that short of ticking all the boxes for terrorism.
The police also said this:
Police are appealing for information on a man they want to speak to regarding the acid attack, which took place in Tollgate Road at around 9.15am on 21 June.
A spokesperson described John Tomlin, 24, as white, around 6ft tall, of stocky build and with short fair hair, saying he is known to frequent the Canning Town area.
“While enquiries into this attack remain ongoing, there is no current information to suggest that this attack was racially or religiously motivated,” he added.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/muslim-man-acid-attack-victim-why-not-terror-attack-east-london-jameel-muhktar-resham-khan-21st-a7816331.htmlPS I was talking about the Finsbury Park attack, and the writer's faux outrage about things being labelled terror attacks (even though it rightly was labelled that - hence the obvious agenda)