I should really be trying to avoid this thread until I've seen it, but can everyone kinda measure their verdicts a bit?
"Crock of shit" or "mind-blowingly incredible" (a number of summaries I've seen from elsewhere) both seem excessive, hyperbolic. Can a film not quite live up to massive expectations anymore without being "crap"? Leave that language for the proper crap, with no redeeming features (and likewise the other way; if it's highly enjoyable and interesting, but not a work of astounding timeless genius, you don't need to inflate the words you use to make your positive reaction to it more noticable).
If this is a solid 7.5-8 out of 10, I'm cool with that. Hopefully catch it next week.