Author Topic: Government approve Gas Fracking after banning it  (Read 19806 times)

Offline mulfella

  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 4,308
  • Hedgehogs are boss
Re: Government approve Gas Fracking after banning it
« Reply #80 on: February 23, 2014, 07:53:46 pm »
On a lighter note : ;D

http://tompride.wordpress.com/2012/04/17/controversial-urine-extraction-method-given-go-ahead-by-government/

A controversial method used by the government to extract urine out of the public should be extended, but under strict conditions, a government-named panel of experts says.

The process involves pumping large amounts of bullshit and crap into the population via electronic and paper media at high pressure in order to make sure that huge reservoirs of public indifference are utilised to the greatest effect by the government.

The method – popularly known as ‘fagging’ - is also seen as a relatively cheap way of ensuring the country’s natural resources are extracted and made available for exploition by a bunch of public schoolboys and their friends.



But critics have warned of possible side effects – including the possibility of unforeseen consequences for the government – if too much urine is extracted out of the public too quickly.

A government spokesperson explained the dangers:

There have already been at least two seismic shifts since our test policy of shafting everyone began in 2010 – the break-up of the NHS and tax cuts for the rich – but as no-one seems to have noticed them much we’ve decided to keep on with the method until at least 2015.
Test fagging of the population stopped temporarily when two downward movements were felt in the government’s popularity but experts think that any further shifts in the polls due to large urine extractions out of the population are not likely to cause significant damage to the government. An expert explained:

While such events might well be felt on the surface they are extremely unlikely to be significant, due to the massive amounts of crap being forced onto the public to take the pressure off, such as the Queen’s Jubilee celebrations and the Olympics.
Hot air and gas are commonly found inside layers of relatively weak sedimentary and lazy politicians, typically several kilometres out of touch of the rest of the country.
A place full of grammer Nazi's?
'Grammar' and no apostrophe in 'nazis'.

Offline mulfella

  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 4,308
  • Hedgehogs are boss
Re: Government approve Gas Fracking after banning it
« Reply #81 on: February 25, 2014, 09:35:29 am »
A place full of grammer Nazi's?
'Grammar' and no apostrophe in 'nazis'.

Offline Red Raw

  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 4,822
  • Klopptimistic
Re: Government approve Gas Fracking after banning it
« Reply #82 on: February 25, 2014, 12:24:20 pm »
Bloody Nimbys!

Exxon CEO Joins Anti-Fracking Lawsuit After Drilling Threatens His Property Value
Exxon CEO Rex Tillerson is involved in a legal battle over fracking. The weird part is, he’s on the side that’s against it. . .

http://www.alternet.org/environment/exxon-ceo-joins-anti-fracking-lawsuit-after-drilling-threatens-his-property-value




#youcouldntmakeitup

Offline capt k

  • aaaaaaaavemaaaaaaaaan!
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 5,730
  • id rather be fishing
Re: Government approve Gas Fracking after banning it
« Reply #83 on: March 8, 2014, 08:01:59 am »
An Australian Company has just been fined for water pollution
http://news.ninemsn.com.au/national/2014/03/08/09/10/santos-fined-over-csg-pollution-incident
However, Labor environment spokesman Luke Foley said the government should tear up an agreement with Santos to fast-track the coal seam gas project.

"The MoU (Memorandum of Understanding) should be torn up in light of the contamination," Mr Foley said in a statement on Saturday.

"This contamination of the water aquifer is highly alarming."

Greens NSW MP Jeremy Buckingham called the contamination "totally unacceptable" and urged all coal seam gas projects in NSW to be halted immediately.

"Here is definitive proof that unconventional gas, such as coal seam gas, pollutes aquifers with extremely toxic elements," he said in a statement.
JFT 96

Offline RojoLeón

  • Brentie's #1 fan
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 3,773
Re: Government approve Gas Fracking after banning it
« Reply #84 on: May 22, 2014, 04:35:16 pm »
http://www.theguardian.com/environment/earth-insight/2014/may/22/two-thirds-write-down-us-shale-oil-gas-explodes-fracking-myth

Write-down of two-thirds of US shale oil explodes fracking myth
Industry's over-inflated reserve estimates are unravelling, and with it the 'American dream' of oil independence

Quote
Next month, the US Energy Information Administration (EIA) will publish a new estimate of US shale deposits set to deal a death-blow to industry hype about a new golden era of US energy independence by fracking unconventional oil and gas.

EIA officials told the Los Angeles Times that previous estimates of recoverable oil in the Monterey shale reserves in California of about 15.4 billion barrels were vastly overstated. The revised estimate, they said, will slash this amount by 96% to a puny 600 million barrels of oil.

The Monterey formation, previously believed to contain more than double the amount of oil estimated at the Bakken shale in North Dakota, and five times larger than the Eagle Ford shale in South Texas, was slated to add up to 2.8 million jobs by 2020 and boost government tax revenues by $24.6 billion a year.

Industry lobbyists have for long highlighted the Monterey shale reserves as the big game-changer for US oil and gas production. Nick Grealy, who runs the consultancy No Hot Air which is funded by "gas and associated companies", and includes the UK's most high-profile shale gas fracker Cuadrilla among its clients, predicted last year that:

"... the star of the North American show is barely on most people's radar screens. California shale will... reinvigorate the Golden State's economy over the next two to three years."

This sort of hype triggered "a speculation boom among oil companies" according to the LA Times. The EIA's original survey for the US Department of Energy published in 2011 had been contracted out to Intek Inc. That report found that the Monterey shale constituted "64 percent of the total shale oil resources" in the US.

The EIA's revised estimate was based partly on analysis of actual output from wells where new fracking techniques had been applied. According to EIA petroleum analyst John Staub:

"From the information we've been able to gather, we've not seen evidence that oil extraction in this area is very productive using techniques like fracking... Our oil production estimates combined with a dearth of knowledge about geological differences among the oil fields led to erroneous predictions and estimates."

The Intek Inc study for the EIA had relied largely on oil industry claims, rather than proper data. Hitesh Mohan, who authored the Intek study for the EIA, reportedly conceded that "his figures were derived from technical reports and presentations from oil companies, including Occidental Petroleum, which owns the lion's share of oil leases in the Monterey Shale, at 1.6 million acres." Mohan had even lifted his original estimate for the EIA to 17 billion barrels.

Geoscientist David Hughes, who worked for the Geological Survey of Canada for 32 years, said:

"The oil had always been a statistical fantasy. Left out of all the hoopla was the fact that the EIA's estimate was little more than a back-of-the-envelope calculation."

Last year, the Post Carbon Institute (PCI) published Hughes' study, Drilling California: A Reality Check on the Monterey Shale, which conducted an empirical analysis of oil production data using a widely used industry database also relied on by the EIA. The report concluded that the original EIA estimate was "highly overstated," and unlikely to lead to a "statewide economic boom.... California should consider its economic and energy future in the absence of an oil production boom."

A spokesman for the Institute, Tod Brilliant, told me:

"Given the incredible difference between initial projections of 15 billion barrels and revisions to 600 million, does this not call into account all such global projections for tight oil?"

Advertisement

As I'd reported earlier in June last year, a wider PCI study by Hughes had come to similar conclusions about bullish estimates of US shale oil and gas potential, concluding that "light tight oil production in the USA will peak between 2015 and 2017, followed by a steep decline", while shale gas production would likely peak next year. In that post, I'd pointed out previous well-documented, and alarmingly common, cases of industry over-estimates of reserve sizes which later had been questioned.

Analysts like Jeremy Leggett have said, citing exaggerated oil industry estimates, that if reserve and production reality are indeed significantly lower than industry forecasts, we could be at risk of an oil shock as early as within the next five years.

The latest revelations follow a spate of bad news for industry reassurances about the fracking boom. New research published this month has found that measured methane leaks from fracking operations were three times larger than forecasted. The US Environment Protection Agency therefore "significantly underestimates" methane emissions from fracking, by as much as a 100 to a 1,000 times according to a new Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences study published in April.

The Associated Press also reported, citing a Government Accountability Office investigation, that the US Interior Department's Bureau of Land Management had failed to adequately inspect thousands of oil and gas wells that are potentially high risk for water and environmental damage.

Despite the mounting evidence that the shale gas boom is heading for a bust, both economically and environmentally, both governments and industry are together pouring their eggs into a rather flimsy basket.

According to a secret trade memo obtained by the Huffington Post, the Obama administration and the European Union are pushing ahead with efforts to "expand US fracking, offshore oil drilling and natural gas exploration", as well as exports to the EU, under the prospective Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) agreement.

Oops. That's 2/3rds of predicted US shale oil reserves wiped out. In fact, it's the encapsulation of the problem with shale oil and gas: there is a lot of it there but much of it is technically irritrevable, and only a small amount of what's left is economically retrievable.

The EIA are little better than industry cheerleaders - they are notorious for overstating reserves and over estimating productive potential. The downside (for us) is that huge sums have been invested in these overestimated predictions and, once people twig that their investments are based on snake oil, there will be a collapse of this unfortunate bubble. We are the ones that will carry the can. Once again.

Offline alfonso

  • Simply adores orange squash. With not one, not two either, but yea verily with three, that is correct, THREE ice cubes therein! Do not forget his straw though.....
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 5,814
  • Salford - crime capital of England
Re: Government approve Gas Fracking after banning it
« Reply #85 on: May 27, 2014, 04:38:14 pm »
Saw this today.
So, what have they got to hide?

Quote
Three Republican senators in North Carolina introduced a bill that would charge individuals with a felony for disclosing confidential information about the chemicals used in fracking. Though fire chiefs and health care personnel can obtain this information during emergencies, the bill allows companies who own the chemical information to require emergency responders to sign a confidentiality agreement.

http://www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/262/921/470/
"I know Liverpool fans care more about their club's success than the national team." Rafael Benitez

"Still we've had the hard times too - one year we finished second." Bob Paisley

"When zonal marking goes wrong, the system is blamed. When man-to-man marking fails, an individual is blamed and the system goes uncriticised." A LFC fan talking sense

Offline alfonso

  • Simply adores orange squash. With not one, not two either, but yea verily with three, that is correct, THREE ice cubes therein! Do not forget his straw though.....
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 5,814
  • Salford - crime capital of England
Re: Government approve Gas Fracking after banning it
« Reply #86 on: October 12, 2014, 02:09:17 am »
Quote
Documents Reveal Billions of Gallons of Oil Industry Wastewater Illegally Injected Into Central California Aquifers

Tests Find Elevated Arsenic, Thallium Levels in Nearby Water Wells

SAN FRANCISCO— Almost 3 billion gallons of oil industry wastewater have been illegally dumped into central California aquifers that supply drinking water and farming irrigation, according to state documents obtained by the Center for Biological Diversity. The wastewater entered the aquifers through at least nine injection disposal wells used by the oil industry to dispose of waste contaminated with fracking fluids and other pollutants.

The documents also reveal that Central Valley Water Board testing found high levels of arsenic, thallium and nitrates — contaminants sometimes found in oil industry wastewater — in water-supply wells near these waste-disposal operations.

“Clean water is one of California’s most crucial resources, and these documents make it clear that state regulators have utterly failed to protect our water from oil industry pollution,” said Hollin Kretzmann, a Center attorney. “Much more testing is needed to gauge the full extent of water pollution and the threat to public health. But Governor Brown should move quickly to halt fracking to ward off a surge in oil industry wastewater that California simply isn’t prepared to dispose of safely.”

The state’s Water Board confirmed beyond doubt that at least nine wastewater disposal wells have been injecting waste into aquifers that contain high-quality water that is supposed to be protected under federal and state law.

Thallium is an extremely toxic chemical commonly used in rat poison. Arsenic is a toxic chemical that can cause cancer. Some studies show that even low-level exposure to arsenic in drinking water can compromise the immune system’s ability to fight illness.
“Arsenic and thallium are extremely dangerous chemicals,” said Timothy Krantz, a professor of environmental studies at the University of Redlands. “The fact that high concentrations are showing up in multiple water wells close to wastewater injection sites raises major concerns about the health and safety of nearby residents.”

The Center obtained a letter from the State Water Resources Control Board to the Environmental Protection Agency. The letter says that the Central Valley Regional Water Board has confirmed that injection wells have been dumping oil industry waste into aquifers that are legally protected under the federal Safe Drinking Water Act. The state Water Board also concedes that another 19 wells may also have contaminated protected aquifers, and dozens more have been injecting waste into aquifers of unknown quality.

The Central Valley Water Board tested eight water-supply wells out of more than 100 in the vicinity of these injection wells. Arsenic, nitrate and thallium exceeded the maximum contaminant level in half the water samples.

While the current extent of contamination is cause for grave concern, the long-term threat posed by the unlawful wastewater disposal may be even more devastating. Benzene, toluene and other harmful chemicals used in fracking fluid are routinely found in flowback water coming out of oil wells in California, often at levels hundreds of times higher than what is considered safe, and this flowback fluid is sent to wastewater disposal wells. Underground migration of chemicals like benzene can take years.

In July the state’s Division of Oil, Gas and Geothermal Resources shut down 11 Kern County oil field injection wells and began scrutinizing almost 100 others that were potentially contaminating protected groundwater. The Environmental Protection Agency, which has ultimate legal authority over underground injection, ordered state officials to provide an assessment of the water-contamination risk within 60 days, and the letter from the state Water Board confirms that illegal contamination has occurred at multiple sites.

California’s oil and gas fields produce billions of gallons of contaminated wastewater each year, and much of this contaminated fluid is injected underground. California has an estimated 2,583 wastewater injections wells, of which 1,552 are currently active. Wastewater injection wells are located throughout the state, from the Chico area in Northern California to Los Angeles in the south, and even include offshore wells near Santa Barbara.

The Center for Biological Diversity is a national, nonprofit conservation organization with more than 775,000 members and online activists dedicated to the protection of endangered species and wild places.
http://www.biologicaldiversity.org/news/press_releases/2014/fracking-10-06-2014.html
"I know Liverpool fans care more about their club's success than the national team." Rafael Benitez

"Still we've had the hard times too - one year we finished second." Bob Paisley

"When zonal marking goes wrong, the system is blamed. When man-to-man marking fails, an individual is blamed and the system goes uncriticised." A LFC fan talking sense

Offline mulfella

  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 4,308
  • Hedgehogs are boss
Re: Government approve Gas Fracking after banning it
« Reply #87 on: October 13, 2014, 11:30:57 am »
Old story but in light of above....

http://www.messengernewspapers.co.uk/news/10971603.MP_demands_answers_on_why_waste_water_from_fracking_was_dumped_into_the_Manchester_Ship_Canal/?ref=rss

THE MP for Stretford and Urmston has demanded to know why waste water from fracking was dumped into the Manchester Ship Canal.


Kate Green spoke out after a BBC Inside Out programme aired on Monday, January 27, reported that before October 2011, radioactive water from Cuadrilla’s fracking operations was handled at United Utilities (UU) treatment works in Davyhulme and, after treatment, released into the Manchester Ship Canal.



A UU spokesman said water from Cuadrilla’s Preece Hall site was treated at Davyhulme, but under a licence granted by the Environment Agency (EA) and this treatment stopped in September 2011, when the EA amended the licence.


The spokesman said the effluent released into the ship canal complied with the EA-granted licence.


Ms Green has now written to the chief executiveof UU to ask how much radioactive waste water from fracking was treated at Davyhulme before the regulations changed, and how much waste was released into the Manchester Ship Canal or elsewhere.


“I am extremely concerned that radioactive waste water has been released into our local waterways,” said Ms Green.


“Local residents are rightly worried, which is why I have written to the chief executive of United Utilities to ask for a full explanation of their involvement with waste water from fracking.


“Full and open disclosure from Cuadrilla and United Utilities is essential so that we can get to the bottom of why this has happened.”


A UU spokesman said: “United Utilities takes its environmental responsibilities in controlling discharges to watercourses very seriously and complied fully with permits issued by the regulator.”
A place full of grammer Nazi's?
'Grammar' and no apostrophe in 'nazis'.

Offline Trada

  • Fully paid up member of the JC cult. Ex-Tory boy. Corbyn's Chief Hagiographer. Sometimes hasn't got a kloop.
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 22,812
  • Trada
Re: Government approve Gas Fracking after banning it
« Reply #88 on: July 12, 2015, 06:54:24 am »
Fracking rigs 'could surround national parks' under Government plans
Ministers expected to set out legislation to allow drilling underneath protected areas if rigs are based just outside them

 National parks and Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty risk becoming surrounded by fracking rigs under Government plans to let energy companies extract shale gas from beneath them, campaigners have warned.

Ministers previously agreed to an “outright ban” on fracking in such protected areas, but are this week expected to put forward legislation allowing the controversial process to take place underneath the areas – so long as drilling rigs are stationed just outside their boundaries.

Fracking typically involves drilling more than a mile down into the ground and then out horizontally, potentially for more than a mile and a half – enabling companies to access the resources under national parks without breaking the ground at their surface.

Campaigners fear the Government’s plans could see areas such as the North York Moors and South Downs national parks, which are believed to be particularly rich in shale, circled by rigs as companies seek to extract the gas and oil beneath them.

In a letter to the Telegraph, groups including the RSPB, National Trust and Campaign to Protect Rural England urge Amber Rudd, the energy secretary, to rethink the plans in order to “protect some of the most precious parts of our natural environment”.

“While we welcome the Government’s previous commitment to rule out fracking in particularly sensitive areas, we believe drilling beneath these areas should also be explicitly ruled out,” they write.

“This would prevent unnecessary negative impacts from drilling rigs next to these sites, which would harm their tranquillity and people’s enjoyment of them.

“While the wells may be just outside protected areas, pollution - and visual, noise and light disturbance - won’t respect those boundaries.”

 They also call for the scope of the protected areas to be widened to include Special Areas of Conservation, Local Wildlife Sites and nature reserves, amongst others.

Nick Clack, senior energy campaigner at the Campaign to Protect Rural England, said: “Allowing drilling just outside National Parks and other protected areas will incur visual, noise and other environmental impacts that would seriously affect their quality and character.

 “In the worst case, this could mean some of our most precious areas being ringed by drilling rigs. The Government should honour its original promise to exclude fracking from these areas completely.”

Ministers first introduced restrictions on fracking in national parks last summer when they issued planning guidance saying it could only take place there “in exceptional circumstances”.

The move followed a campaign by the National Trust, RSPB and others calling for the establishment of “frack-free zones”.

But under pressure from MPs including Conservative backbenchers, the Government in January went further, agreeing to a Labour amendment to the Infrastructure Bill to introduce an outright ban on fracking “within or under” protected areas.

Less than a month later, however, Ms Rudd, then the energy minister, indicated the Government would row back from that commitment, claiming a ban on fracking beneath national parks would “not be sensible” because it could “unduly constrain” the industry.

The precise details of what will be allowed are still yet to be decided and are expected to be put before Parliament in secondary legislation this week.

Ms Rudd said at the time that there was “a strong case that sites such as World Heritage sites and the Norfolk Broads should be protected from fracking taking place under them” but said that “in other cases, that would not be so sensible”.

She said: "For example, in the case of areas of outstanding natural beauty and national parks, given their size and dispersion, it might not be practical to guarantee that fracking will not take place under them in all cases without unduly constraining the industry."

Labour has warned that the “weakened regulations” and has also warned that they create “the prospect that protected areas such as areas of outstanding natural beauty and national parks could be ringed by operators fracking underneath them”.

Ken Cronin, chief executive of fracking trade body the UK Onshore Operators Group, said: “The UK has already drilled more than 2,000 wells onshore and about 10 per cent have used hydraulic fracturing techniques.

“A significant number of these sites exist or co-exist within areas of outstanding natural beauty, nature reserves and sites of special scientific interest (SSSI) as well next to a RSPB reserve and in the South Downs National Park and the North York Moors National Park.

“People are largely unaware of the UK’s established onshore oil and gas industry. Yet, the industry has proven to be well-regulated, safe and a beneficial industry for the economy. Indeed, this industry has been present in communities and touristic destinations for decades without disruption or cause for locals to be alarmed.”

A spokesman for the Department of Energy and Climate Change declined to comment.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/earth/energy/fracking/11732864/Fracking-rigs-could-circle-national-parks-under-Government-plans.html
Don't blame me I voted for Jeremy Corbyn!!

Miss you Tracy more and more every day xxx

“I carry them with me: what they would have thought and said and done. Make them a part of who I am. So even though they’re gone from the world they’re never gone from me.

Offline mulfella

  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 4,308
  • Hedgehogs are boss
Re: Government approve Gas Fracking after banning it
« Reply #89 on: July 13, 2015, 09:13:13 pm »
Ken Cronin, chief executive of fracking trade body the UK Onshore Operators Group, said: “The UK has already drilled more than 2,000 wells onshore and about 10 per cent have used hydraulic fracturing techniques."

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/earth/energy/fracking/11732864/Fracking-rigs-could-circle-national-parks-under-Government-plans.html

Lies and double speak.

When we are talking about Fracking these days we are referring to High Volume Slick Water Fracking. To understand the differences see below.

There has only been one true HVSW Fracking well in the UK. Preese Hall near Blackpool which was shut down having caused earthquakes (sorry, minor tremors). that's what brought the original moratorium in.

http://stopfyldefracking.org.uk/latest-news/how-does-high-volume-slick-water-hydraulic-fracturing-of-shale-differ-from-traditional-hydraulic-fracturing/
A place full of grammer Nazi's?
'Grammar' and no apostrophe in 'nazis'.

Offline Trada

  • Fully paid up member of the JC cult. Ex-Tory boy. Corbyn's Chief Hagiographer. Sometimes hasn't got a kloop.
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 22,812
  • Trada
Re: Government approve Gas Fracking after banning it
« Reply #90 on: October 23, 2015, 10:56:28 am »
This is a nightmare. The Tories just approved gas fracking licenses for over 10,000 hectares in over 300 sensitive wildlife habitat sites it promised to protect. That includes Bempton Cliffs, one of the largest seabird colonies in Europe.

303 Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) are included in the 159 onshore oil and gas licenses issued by the Conservative government last month. These are some of the most sensitive ecosystems in Britain that are so classified because they protect a rare species or habitat. David Cameron's response? Drill, baby, drill.

Shale gas fracturing or fracking is one of the most destructive methods of extracting fossil fuels we know. Dense rock is blasted with water and toxic chemicals at high temperatures to loosen and extract microscopic bubbles of natural gas. The process can permanently contaminate groundwater and lead to earthquakes. We shouldn't be pursuing it at all, let alone in some of Britain's most sensitive habitats.

Tell the UK government not to sacrifice our most important wildlife habitats for Big Oil's profits.

We've been fighting fracking in Britain for years now. Almost 150,000 SumOfUs supporters spoke up to keep oil and gas drilling out of our national parks. It should naturally follow that SSSIs are similarly protected -- in fact, Energy and Climate Change Secretary Amber Rudd promised exactly that in February. But that promise has been forgotten.

SSSIs make up less than one per cent of the over 1000 square miles just opened up for fracking by Cameron's Tories. The cost to Big Oil to protect these areas is miniscule -- but the cost to our environmental heritage if these habitats are damaged? Immeasurable.

Luckily, the licenses are far from finalized. The government still has a chance to fulfill its pre-election promise and protect SSSIs -- but if we don't make our voices heard, it will side with Big Oil and sign over these incredibly sensitive habitats to drilling, fracturing and destruction.

Join us and tell the Tories: No oil and gas drilling in our most sensitive ecosystems!

http://action.sumofus.org/a/SSSI-fracking/?sub=tw
Don't blame me I voted for Jeremy Corbyn!!

Miss you Tracy more and more every day xxx

“I carry them with me: what they would have thought and said and done. Make them a part of who I am. So even though they’re gone from the world they’re never gone from me.

Offline HarryLabrador

  • went broke, so had to get the retrievers in.
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 7,262
Re: Government approve Gas Fracking after banning it
« Reply #91 on: October 23, 2015, 11:53:04 am »
The prospects for the shale industry are beginning to look less promising as these companies are producing at a loss due to Saudi Arabia’s aim in keeping the United States from becoming a major exporter. By refusing to cut oil production, Saudi Arabia has caused oil prices to drop from 140 dollars a barrel to about 50 dollars a barrel. Shale gas producers cannot compete at present, and some companies in the States have gone bust. I don't know how long that heinous desert state can can hang on with cheap oil, but it certainly won't be long.

If the Saudis had invested in producing oil much more effectively and hence economically, then I can't see how the shale industry would compete. It can only be good for us if this were to happen, but it's Saudi Arabia we are talking about here, but just maybe they are working towards this. Just my opinion.
SoS Membership Number: 387

Offline Andy @ Allerton!

  • Missing an asterisk - no, wait sorry, that's his rusty starfish..... RAWK Apple fanboy. Hedley Lamarr's bestest mate. Has done nothing incredible ever.
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 73,660
  • Asterisks baby!
Re: Government approve Gas Fracking after banning it
« Reply #92 on: October 23, 2015, 12:04:09 pm »
This is a nightmare. The Tories just approved gas fracking licenses for over 10,000 hectares in over 300 sensitive wildlife habitat sites it promised to protect. That includes Bempton Cliffs, one of the largest seabird colonies in Europe.

303 Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) are included in the 159 onshore oil and gas licenses issued by the Conservative government last month. These are some of the most sensitive ecosystems in Britain that are so classified because they protect a rare species or habitat. David Cameron's response? Drill, baby, drill.

Shale gas fracturing or fracking is one of the most destructive methods of extracting fossil fuels we know. Dense rock is blasted with water and toxic chemicals at high temperatures to loosen and extract microscopic bubbles of natural gas. The process can permanently contaminate groundwater and lead to earthquakes. We shouldn't be pursuing it at all, let alone in some of Britain's most sensitive habitats.

Tell the UK government not to sacrifice our most important wildlife habitats for Big Oil's profits.

We've been fighting fracking in Britain for years now. Almost 150,000 SumOfUs supporters spoke up to keep oil and gas drilling out of our national parks. It should naturally follow that SSSIs are similarly protected -- in fact, Energy and Climate Change Secretary Amber Rudd promised exactly that in February. But that promise has been forgotten.

SSSIs make up less than one per cent of the over 1000 square miles just opened up for fracking by Cameron's Tories. The cost to Big Oil to protect these areas is miniscule -- but the cost to our environmental heritage if these habitats are damaged? Immeasurable.

Luckily, the licenses are far from finalized. The government still has a chance to fulfill its pre-election promise and protect SSSIs -- but if we don't make our voices heard, it will side with Big Oil and sign over these incredibly sensitive habitats to drilling, fracturing and destruction.

Join us and tell the Tories: No oil and gas drilling in our most sensitive ecosystems!

http://action.sumofus.org/a/SSSI-fracking/?sub=tw

Do you honestly think the Tories give a fuck about the UK or its people or its wildlife or its future?
Quote from: tubby on Today at 12:45:53 pm

They both went in high, that's factually correct, both tried to play the ball at height.  Doku with his foot, Mac Allister with his chest.

Offline Red Raw

  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 4,822
  • Klopptimistic
Re: Government approve Gas Fracking after banning it
« Reply #93 on: November 11, 2015, 03:12:42 am »
As the government, driven by Chancellor Osbourne, continues to back nuclear and fracking, Amber Rudd has admitted, that having faffed about with and finally binned most the support framework for renewables at the individual and community level (and effectively abolished onshore wind), that we no longer have the policies in place to meet our binding target of 15% renewable energy by 2020.

http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/nov/10/rudd-issues-transport-challenge-to-meet-uk-renewables-target

It might be a bit OT, but out of interest, and to add to the debate about subsidies,  the proportion of the DECC bugdet that goes on nuclear clean up is really quite alarming:


http://www.carbonbrief.org/analysis-how-decc-spends-its-annual-budget

Offline Andy @ Allerton!

  • Missing an asterisk - no, wait sorry, that's his rusty starfish..... RAWK Apple fanboy. Hedley Lamarr's bestest mate. Has done nothing incredible ever.
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 73,660
  • Asterisks baby!
Re: Government approve Gas Fracking after banning it
« Reply #94 on: November 27, 2015, 09:50:47 pm »
https://secure.greenpeace.org.uk/page/s/greg-clark

Earlier this year, people from across Lancashire worked tirelessly to pressure council leaders, pushing them to say a resounding NO to opening up the county to the shale gas industry. But now, in a move that would make a mockery out of local democracy, Westminster politicians have announced they will 'call in' the council's decision.

The final say now lies with one man -- Greg Clark. As the minister who oversees our councils, the decision will land on his desk.

It's Greg Clark's job to champion the voices of local democracy and in the past he's called on council leaders to "take power" back from central government. This could one of the biggest decisions he will make in his time in office, so please join us in asking Greg Clark respect Lancashire's right to say no to shale gas.

Sign the petition to Greg Clark MP, who's in charge of local government
« Last Edit: November 27, 2015, 09:53:46 pm by Andy @ Allerton »
Quote from: tubby on Today at 12:45:53 pm

They both went in high, that's factually correct, both tried to play the ball at height.  Doku with his foot, Mac Allister with his chest.

Offline Andy @ Allerton!

  • Missing an asterisk - no, wait sorry, that's his rusty starfish..... RAWK Apple fanboy. Hedley Lamarr's bestest mate. Has done nothing incredible ever.
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 73,660
  • Asterisks baby!
Re: Government approve Gas Fracking after banning it
« Reply #95 on: December 6, 2015, 08:54:48 am »
<a href="https://www.youtube.com/v/QGdzl6NcYgc" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="bbc_link bbc_flash_disabled new_win">https://www.youtube.com/v/QGdzl6NcYgc</a>
Quote from: tubby on Today at 12:45:53 pm

They both went in high, that's factually correct, both tried to play the ball at height.  Doku with his foot, Mac Allister with his chest.

Offline CornerFlag

  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 6,649
  • We all Live in a Red and White Kop
Re: Government approve Gas Fracking after banning it
« Reply #96 on: December 16, 2015, 10:15:31 pm »
Nice one knobheads.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-35107203

Quote
MPs have voted to allow fracking for shale gas 1,200m below national parks and other protected sites.

The new regulations - which permit drilling from outside the protected areas - were approved by 298 to 261.

Opposition parties and campaigners criticised the lack of a Commons debate - and accused ministers of a U-turn as they previously pledged an outright ban on fracking in national parks.

The government said its plans would protect "our most precious landscapes".

It said the UK had "one of the best track records in the world for protecting our environment while developing our industries".

MPs overwhelmingly rejected a bid to suspend drilling for shale gas in a Commons vote in January, during which ministers also pledged an "outright ban" on fracking in national parks.

Labour has said the government's plans, contained in a draft regulation, represent a U-turn on this commitment, and called for stronger safeguards.

The proposals, first set out in July, would only allow fracking 1,200m below national parks, Areas of Outstanding National Beauty, the Norfolk and Suffolk Broads and World Heritage Sites.

The drill rigs would have to be positioned outside the boundaries of the protected areas.

Sites of Special Scientific Interest, which are designated to protect wildlife or geology, are not mentioned.

MPs opposed the passing of the draft regulation when it was read out in the Commons on Tuesday evening. Because this happened after the conclusion of the day's main business, parliamentary rules required the vote to be deferred - until Wednesday.

Under this process of so-called deferred divisions, MP voted on the proposal by filling in ballot papers with the result announced later by Deputy Speaker Natascha Engel.

Shadow energy secretary Lisa Nandy accused ministers of using a "parliamentary backdoor" to try to approve the "weak regulations" without debate.

She said: "Fracking should not go ahead in Britain until stronger safeguards are in place to protect drinking water sources and sensitive parts of our countryside like national parks."

The vote to allow fracking under national parks is the latest stage of the political battle over drilling for shale gas, writes BBC political reporter Tom Moseley.

MPs voted in January to continue with fracking, and David Cameron declared last year the UK was going "all out" for shale gas - but it remains a controversial issue in the Commons.

This is particularly true for MPs - including many Conservatives - facing fracking, and vocal anti-fracking campaigns, in their constituencies.

In January the government said there would be an outright ban on fracking in protected areas. But that was under the Tory/Lib Dem coalition, and in July the new Conservative administration unveiled new guidelines allowing drilling at least 1,200m under ground.

These were the regulations approved in today's deferred division - sparking accusations of a U-turn from Labour, which wants a moratorium on fracking until "we can be sure it is safe".

Four Tories voted against the government including London mayoral candidate and environmental campaigner Zac Goldsmith and Sarah Wollaston, whose Totnes seat includes Dartmoor national park.

Liberal Democrat leader Tim Farron said the government had shown a "complete lack of regard for protecting some of the most beautiful scenery in the UK and its wildlife", while Greenpeace criticised the use of what it called an "arcane parliamentary process".

Rose Dickinson, of Friends of the Earth, said the new rules would put drinking water and national parks "at risk of fracking" and represented "a complete U-turn on earlier promises".

No fracking is currently taking place in the UK, but details of sites where drilling is likely to take place are expected on Wednesday.

More than 100 sites, of 10km across, are expected to be granted licences, with most in Northern England.

A Department of Energy and Climate Change spokesman said: "The UK has one of the best track records in the world for protecting our environment while developing our industries - these regulations will get this vital industry moving while protecting our environment and people.

"Yesterday's Task Force for Shale Gas report confirmed exactly what we have been saying for some time - that with the right standards in place fracking can take place safely."
My Twitter

Last time I went there I saw masturbating chimpanzees. Whether you think that's worthy of £22 is up to you. All I'll say is I now have an annual pass.

Offline Andy @ Allerton!

  • Missing an asterisk - no, wait sorry, that's his rusty starfish..... RAWK Apple fanboy. Hedley Lamarr's bestest mate. Has done nothing incredible ever.
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 73,660
  • Asterisks baby!
Re: Government approve Gas Fracking after banning it
« Reply #97 on: December 17, 2015, 09:29:54 am »
I'm glad I haven't got kids.

Those trillions of tons of chemicals are going to stay there effectively forever. They don't dissipate.

And one day that'll be what all your descendants will be drinking, not to mention the wildlife and plants.

"...studies of fracking waste indicate that the fluid contains: formaldehyde, acetic acids, citric acids, guar gum, hydrochloric acid and boric acids, among hundreds of other chemical contaminants. "


Nom nom nom. Short term gain for long term.. Well.. I'm sure you can imagine.
« Last Edit: December 17, 2015, 09:33:28 am by Festive User Name @ Allerton »
Quote from: tubby on Today at 12:45:53 pm

They both went in high, that's factually correct, both tried to play the ball at height.  Doku with his foot, Mac Allister with his chest.

Offline Fat Scouser

  • Trolley Dolly with a 54 2/3 inch waist - last seen shopping on Scottie Road for speedos. Is just a bit.....you know.....
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 23,906
Re: Government approve Gas Fracking after banning it
« Reply #98 on: December 17, 2015, 10:13:02 am »
Bloody Nimbys!

Exxon CEO Joins Anti-Fracking Lawsuit After Drilling Threatens His Property Value
Exxon CEO Rex Tillerson is involved in a legal battle over fracking. The weird part is, he’s on the side that’s against it. . .

http://www.alternet.org/environment/exxon-ceo-joins-anti-fracking-lawsuit-after-drilling-threatens-his-property-value




#youcouldntmakeitup

I have an email from Just Dave of Witney Oxfordshire, he says not in my backyard...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4LBjSXWQRV8
"A peasant you are. A peasant you will remain. And we shall use all our wealth and power, to make your lot even worse and keep you exactly where you are, Bondage!"    The Boy King, Richard II, after  putting down the The Peasants Revolt in 1381.

http://misterinobody.weebly.com/

Offline Trada

  • Fully paid up member of the JC cult. Ex-Tory boy. Corbyn's Chief Hagiographer. Sometimes hasn't got a kloop.
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 22,812
  • Trada
Re: Government approve Gas Fracking after banning it
« Reply #99 on: December 17, 2015, 01:15:06 pm »
So they change the law one day about fracking and the next day they issue 93 new licenses that was quick like it was all planned.

UK frackers get more licences to explore

The Oil and Gas Authority has awarded a raft of new licences to explore for oil and gas on the mainland of the UK.

The 93 licences to explore 159 blocks of land could pave the way for more controversial hydraulic fracturing, or fracking.

Parts of the Yorkshire, the Midlands, and the North West have been opened for exploration.

There are also licence blocks in the South of England and Wales.

Around 75% of the exploration licences relate to "unconventional" shale oil and gas, which typically requires fracking.

Today's licences give rights to companies to explore for shale oil and gas, but do not give automatic permission to drill.

Planning permission to build rigs and drill land needs clearance from local or central authorities.

Earlier this year, councillors in Lancashire rejected shale gas firm Cuadrilla's application to drill a handful of shale gas exploratory wells.

There would be too much noise and the impact on the landscape would be too great, they said.

But the final decision will be made by central government.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-35121390?ocid=socialflow_twitter&%2338;ns_mchannel=social&%2338;ns_campaign=bbcnews&#38;ns_source=twitter
Don't blame me I voted for Jeremy Corbyn!!

Miss you Tracy more and more every day xxx

“I carry them with me: what they would have thought and said and done. Make them a part of who I am. So even though they’re gone from the world they’re never gone from me.

Offline CornerFlag

  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 6,649
  • We all Live in a Red and White Kop
Re: Government approve Gas Fracking after banning it
« Reply #100 on: December 17, 2015, 01:51:14 pm »
You're so very very cynical mate, I can't imagine this government having a load of interest in "shale gas speculators" who may or may not have lobbied to have their money-making schemes pushed through at the possible expense of the environment.
My Twitter

Last time I went there I saw masturbating chimpanzees. Whether you think that's worthy of £22 is up to you. All I'll say is I now have an annual pass.

Offline Sudden Death Draft Loser

  • old and annoying
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 9,483
Re: Government approve Gas Fracking after banning it
« Reply #101 on: December 17, 2015, 03:38:38 pm »
You're so very very cynical mate, I can't imagine this government having a load of interest in "shale gas speculators" who may or may not have lobbied to have their money-making schemes pushed through at the possible expense of the environment.

I can't imagine them not having any interest. Sadly lobbying by business is the way decisions work especially when a Tory government is "in power". This decision is clearly about money and directly flies in the face of the agreements signed in Paris.
"The greatest argument against democracy is to have a five minute conversation  with the average voter. "

Offline Trada

  • Fully paid up member of the JC cult. Ex-Tory boy. Corbyn's Chief Hagiographer. Sometimes hasn't got a kloop.
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 22,812
  • Trada
Re: Government approve Gas Fracking after banning it
« Reply #102 on: December 17, 2015, 04:19:41 pm »
So they will be able frack under places like the Norfolk Broads,areas of natural beauty even world heritage sites,

Shocking they didn't even have a debate in the HOC's.

Just imagine if some of that shit water they use leaks onto the Broads.
« Last Edit: December 17, 2015, 04:22:29 pm by Trada »
Don't blame me I voted for Jeremy Corbyn!!

Miss you Tracy more and more every day xxx

“I carry them with me: what they would have thought and said and done. Make them a part of who I am. So even though they’re gone from the world they’re never gone from me.

Offline alfonso

  • Simply adores orange squash. With not one, not two either, but yea verily with three, that is correct, THREE ice cubes therein! Do not forget his straw though.....
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 5,814
  • Salford - crime capital of England
Re: Government approve Gas Fracking after banning it
« Reply #103 on: December 17, 2015, 05:59:00 pm »
I find it funny that some people following the pied pipers think their bills will decrease due to fracking. As always how much in subsidies does the taxpayer front?
"I know Liverpool fans care more about their club's success than the national team." Rafael Benitez

"Still we've had the hard times too - one year we finished second." Bob Paisley

"When zonal marking goes wrong, the system is blamed. When man-to-man marking fails, an individual is blamed and the system goes uncriticised." A LFC fan talking sense

Offline Andy @ Allerton!

  • Missing an asterisk - no, wait sorry, that's his rusty starfish..... RAWK Apple fanboy. Hedley Lamarr's bestest mate. Has done nothing incredible ever.
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 73,660
  • Asterisks baby!
Re: Government approve Gas Fracking after banning it
« Reply #104 on: December 18, 2015, 07:38:56 am »
I find it funny that some people following the pied pipers think their bills will decrease due to fracking. As always how much in subsidies does the taxpayer front?

I find it funny how few people care.

If someone has kids and they don't care about this, then I don't know what to make of their views.

How can you not care what kind of a world you're going to leave your kids? They already know it pollutes. They already know that what they inject stays there effectively forever and they already know that eventually it'll leak.
Quote from: tubby on Today at 12:45:53 pm

They both went in high, that's factually correct, both tried to play the ball at height.  Doku with his foot, Mac Allister with his chest.

Offline Fat Scouser

  • Trolley Dolly with a 54 2/3 inch waist - last seen shopping on Scottie Road for speedos. Is just a bit.....you know.....
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 23,906
"A peasant you are. A peasant you will remain. And we shall use all our wealth and power, to make your lot even worse and keep you exactly where you are, Bondage!"    The Boy King, Richard II, after  putting down the The Peasants Revolt in 1381.

http://misterinobody.weebly.com/

Offline CornerFlag

  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 6,649
  • We all Live in a Red and White Kop
Re: Government approve Gas Fracking after banning it
« Reply #106 on: December 18, 2015, 10:19:56 am »
Jim Fitzpatrick going against the rest of the party I see.  A shame.  Another shame is so many were absent from the vote itself though.

Debbie Abrahams
David Anderson
Ian Austin
Hilary Benn
Roberta Blackman-Woods
Ann Clwyd
Julie Cooper
Rosie Cooper
Thangam Debbonaire
Peter Dowd
Michael Dugher
Frank Field
Mike Gapes
Mary Glindon
Louise Haigh
David Hanson
Harry Harpham
Meg Hillier
Kate Hollern
George Howarth
Helen Jones
Steve McCabe
Pat McFadden
Jim McMahon
Alan Meale
Melanie Onn
Bridget Phillipson
Yasmin Qureshi
Rachel Reeves
Joan Ryan
Paula Sherriff
Graham Stringer
Gareth Thomas
Jon Trickett
Anna Turley
Iain Wright

Natascha Engel and Lindsay Hoyle can't vote because they're deputy speakers?  That's 36 missed votes (minus Engel and Hoyle whod be 38) for Labour as opposed to 30 missing votes for the Tories.  9% of missing MPs for the Conservatives as opposed to nearly 16% of Labour MPs missing for it.  Would they have otherwise rebelled?  Were they at surgeries in their constituencies?
« Last Edit: December 18, 2015, 10:21:40 am by CornerFlag »
My Twitter

Last time I went there I saw masturbating chimpanzees. Whether you think that's worthy of £22 is up to you. All I'll say is I now have an annual pass.

Offline stevedo

  • Lacks Emotion.
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 6,251
  • Muddling through.
  • Super Title: Corbyn Circle Jerker
Re: Government approve Gas Fracking after banning it
« Reply #107 on: December 18, 2015, 11:20:16 am »
Jim Fitzpatrick going against the rest of the party I see.  A shame.  Another shame is so many were absent from the vote itself though.

Debbie Abrahams
David Anderson
Ian Austin
Hilary Benn
Roberta Blackman-Woods
Ann Clwyd
Julie Cooper
Rosie Cooper
Thangam Debbonaire
Peter Dowd
Michael Dugher
Frank Field
Mike Gapes
Mary Glindon
Louise Haigh
David Hanson
Harry Harpham
Meg Hillier
Kate Hollern
George Howarth
Helen Jones
Steve McCabe
Pat McFadden
Jim McMahon
Alan Meale
Melanie Onn
Bridget Phillipson
Yasmin Qureshi
Rachel Reeves
Joan Ryan
Paula Sherriff
Graham Stringer
Gareth Thomas
Jon Trickett
Anna Turley
Iain Wright

Natascha Engel and Lindsay Hoyle can't vote because they're deputy speakers?  That's 36 missed votes (minus Engel and Hoyle whod be 38) for Labour as opposed to 30 missing votes for the Tories.  9% of missing MPs for the Conservatives as opposed to nearly 16% of Labour MPs missing for it.  Would they have otherwise rebelled?  Were they at surgeries in their constituencies?
There were 30 Conservatives that didn't vote so it'd be a surprise if there hadn't been some pairing amongst the 36+30.

Offline sminp

  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 7,818
  • We all Live in a Red and White Kop
Re: Government approve Gas Fracking after banning it
« Reply #108 on: December 18, 2015, 11:59:24 am »
Another shame is so many were absent from the vote itself though.
That's 36 missed votes (minus Engel and Hoyle whod be 38) for Labour as opposed to 30 missing votes for the Tories.  9% of missing MPs for the Conservatives as opposed to nearly 16% of Labour MPs missing for it.  Would they have otherwise rebelled?  Were they at surgeries in their constituencies?

Well Rosie Cooper is a bellend so no surprise to see she couldn't be arsed
My Betfair referal code for anyone who wants it: R6K4MTAQM (You get a £25 free bet)

"Liverpool are magic, Everton are tragic."
"It was like playing in a foreign country." Ian Rush on his time with Juventus in Italy
"Don't worry Alan. At least you'll be able to play close to a great team!" Bill Shankly to A

Offline Andy @ Allerton!

  • Missing an asterisk - no, wait sorry, that's his rusty starfish..... RAWK Apple fanboy. Hedley Lamarr's bestest mate. Has done nothing incredible ever.
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 73,660
  • Asterisks baby!
Re: Government approve Gas Fracking after banning it
« Reply #109 on: December 20, 2015, 01:33:59 pm »
http://www.breitbart.com/london/2014/05/14/only-frack-labour-seats-says-george-osborne-s-father-in-law/

Lord Howell of Guildford, the father-in-law of Chancellor George Gideon Oliver Osborne, son of Sir Peter Osborne, 17th Baronet of Ballentaylor and Ballylemon and Felicity Alexandra Loxton-Peacock, educated at St. Paul's and Magdalen College, Oxford, has warned that the Conservatives will lose thousands of votes if they allow fracking to go ahead in Tory heartlands in southern England rather than the industrial north.

He said that areas such as northeast and northwest England would be grateful for fracking and the jobs it brings, as these were areas where “the Industrial Revolution has left the worst historical scars”.

Lord Howell also said that “bribing” wealthy rural communities with various government benefits would “lose rural votes on a major scale”.

Writing for the Institute for the Analysis of Global Security, Lord Howell says: “Trying to start [fracking] in Southern England, and in the Home counties, or in rural and countryside areas anywhere, north or south, is a guarantee of longer delays, higher costs and increased hostility from both green left and countryside right.

“Every time Ministers open their mouths to claim that fracking must start everywhere around Britain, and not just in carefully selected and remote (derelict) areas, they lose thousands of Tory votes.

“In the north east, the north west and all the places where the Industrial revolution has left the worst historical scars they do have just such areas, they have the gas and they have the local wish to see fracking investment  – to upgrade old coal mining areas, for example.”

Rural southern England is traditionally a centre of support for the Conservative Party, with some seats not having changed hands for over century. Although the party may previously have been able to afford to lose some support in these seats, the rise of the UK Independence Party means they are now at risk of having their vote undermined in their own heartlands.

Northern England, by contrast, has a much more industrial past and would therefore be more likely to welcome shale drilling, and the jobs it creates. It also tends to vote Labour, meaning that the government would not need to worry as much about losing support.

Last year, Lord Howell caused controversy with similar comments when he said that fracking should begin in the “desolate” northeast, rather than more “sensitive” areas, such as wealthy Sussex. He later apologised for any offence caused, stating that he meant the northwest.
« Last Edit: December 20, 2015, 01:36:50 pm by Festive User Name @ Allerton »
Quote from: tubby on Today at 12:45:53 pm

They both went in high, that's factually correct, both tried to play the ball at height.  Doku with his foot, Mac Allister with his chest.

Offline Circa1892

  • Real Madrid 0 - 1 Liverpool - Parc des Princes, 27th May 1981 Remember?... About as intimidating as Bambi.
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 16,200
Re: Government approve Gas Fracking after banning it
« Reply #110 on: December 20, 2015, 03:38:18 pm »
Natascha Engel and Lindsay Hoyle can't vote because they're deputy speakers?  That's 36 missed votes (minus Engel and Hoyle whod be 38) for Labour as opposed to 30 missing votes for the Tories.  9% of missing MPs for the Conservatives as opposed to nearly 16% of Labour MPs missing for it.  Would they have otherwise rebelled?  Were they at surgeries in their constituencies?

Rachel Reeves is still on maternity (I think another is aswell?), and I'd assume Mike Gapes isn't back after his health scare?

Offline Andy @ Allerton!

  • Missing an asterisk - no, wait sorry, that's his rusty starfish..... RAWK Apple fanboy. Hedley Lamarr's bestest mate. Has done nothing incredible ever.
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 73,660
  • Asterisks baby!
Re: Government approve Gas Fracking after banning it
« Reply #111 on: December 20, 2015, 04:01:49 pm »
http://www.thecanary.co/2015/12/20/cameron-go-thatcher-ever-dash-gas-halted/

Cameron could go more ‘Thatcher’ than ever before if dash for gas is halted

David Cameron seems determined to push ahead with fracking, come what may. If his plans are disrupted by massive popular resistance, will Cameron crack down hard on campaigners in the same way as Margaret Thatcher treated the miners?

On Wednesday the government succeeded in passing a piece of legislation that paves the way for the extraction of shale gas from underneath National Parks. This apparent u-turn, and the rather dubious way it was put to a vote with no parliamentary debate, has also struck a jarring note, coming as it does so soon after the climate talks in Paris.

David Cameron gave up pretending to be ‘green’ long ago and is now pedalling hard in the opposite direction. The Tories seem determined to ditch renewables in favour of vastly expensive nuclear power and unpopular shale gas. On Thursday (the last day of parliamentary business before Christmas and obscured by a snowstorm of potentially contentious announcements) the government announced the award of 159 licenses for onshore oil and gas exploration. Given that we really need to be keeping fossil fuels in the ground to have any chance of hitting the Paris climate targets, launching a prospecting boom is ecological insanity.

But the likes of Cameron and Osborne, and their frack-happy friends and relatives, may not have it all their own way. In an article on the BBC website, business reporter Richard Anderson details a number of factors which could slow down the fracking bandwagon, or even halt it in its tracks. The regulatory framework, the planning applications and the logistical and technical demands all combine to mean that no actual shale gas extraction is likely before around 2020. However, Professor Paul Stevens of think tank Chatham House tells the BBC that public opposition may well be the deciding factor. Public distrust of the fracking process, combined with anger at the high-handed way the government is overruling local planning decisions, is likely, he believes, to lead to “serious civil disorder”.

We’re not talking Orgreave incident [levels], but not far off. The vehemence felt is so strong it would be virtually impossible to carry out sensible operations.
Professor Stevens foresees a situation where fracking companies decide it is impossible to continue and “to all intents and purposes, the shale gas revolution is dead”. Such a prophecy may chill the bones of gas executives, and lift the spirits of community campaigners, but the invocation of Orgreave is potentially a double-edged sword.

The ‘Battle of Orgreave’ was a defining moment during the miners’ strike of 1984-85. A substantial mobilisation of workers and secondary (‘flying’) pickets sought to close down a strategically important coking plant, and were met by a vast and heavily-tooled police presence. The exact course of events has always been the subject of differing opinions – even this week Home Secretary, Theresa May, received a demand for an independent inquiry. What is beyond doubt is that mounted police charged the crowds and chased people across fields and down streets. Riot police tactics such as kettling and snatch squads were used for the first time in mainland UK. There were over 90 arrests and more than 120 miners and police were injured. The events opened a rift between mining communities and the police, and Thatcher was able to use the violent images to fuel her propaganda that the striking miners represented a grave threat to Britain.

Anderson’s article makes the most of the Orgreave mention, using three photographs to drive the point home. Does this mean we can expect to see anti-fracking protestors vilified and misrepresented by the media, and labelled ‘the enemy within’ by a Prime Minister seeking his ‘Thatcher moment’? Will there be a steady media campaign to discredit anyone opposed to fracking?

What is striking in comparing the two scenarios separated by 30 years is that the police seem just as prepared to use force, even violence, now as they were then. The two images above both show situations in which the police’s determination to keep an industrial operation moving appears to have veered into senseless sadism.

On the left, the son of Green MP Caroline Lucas is being subjected to a painful pressure hold behind his ear, supposedly to elicit compliance and enable police to clear the road. The court case, at which Lucas was found not guilty of any wrong-doing, was told that no people or vehicles had actually been obstructed by the protest.

On the right, there is no way in which the mounted officer could be said to be acting proportionately towards Lesley Boulton. Far from blockading Orgreave coking plant, Boulton was seeking medical assistance for an injured man she’d found by the roadside. This image, which has become iconic over the decades, was only featured in one of the 17 national newspapers at the time, an omission almost certainly made deliberately.

So will we be able to hear the voices against fracking? Well, Caroline Lucas has done her best. The Nanas, a headscarf and tabard wearing group of women, are tailor-made for reporters seeking a story. Campaigns are frequently driven by the local community, who nowadays have ample means to publicise their own message. For anyone who wants to find it, the information is out there.

But, as we learn from the miners’ strike, when the government is desperate to get its way, it can call on an impressive arsenal of police muscle, media manipulation, and the coercive power of surveillance. Recent times have seen worrying developments in terms of free speech and the criminalisation of protest. As the Tories get ever more frantic in their lust for fracking, it will be important for everybody who wants to talk sensibly about energy security, climate change, and the many practical considerations raised by this technology, to watch out for media manipulation and political policing – and challenge them at all times.

And David Cameron might do well to remember that although Thatcher ‘won’ the miners’ strike, she lost the support of swathes of the population to such an extent that feelings were still raw when she died years later. Does he really want that kind of legacy the length and breadth of the country, wherever he tries to frack?
Quote from: tubby on Today at 12:45:53 pm

They both went in high, that's factually correct, both tried to play the ball at height.  Doku with his foot, Mac Allister with his chest.

Offline Andy @ Allerton!

  • Missing an asterisk - no, wait sorry, that's his rusty starfish..... RAWK Apple fanboy. Hedley Lamarr's bestest mate. Has done nothing incredible ever.
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 73,660
  • Asterisks baby!
Re: Government approve Gas Fracking after banning it
« Reply #112 on: December 27, 2015, 05:25:31 am »
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/colorado-floods-spur-fracking-concerns/

Colorado floods spur fracking concerns

The devastating flooding that pummeled Colorado the past week, also inundated a main center of the state's drilling industry, temporarily bringing production of natural gas to a halt.

The mix of floodwaters and drilling operations has also spurred environmental and health concerns that industry and government officials say they are closely monitoring, and that activists have seized on as another demonstration of the dangers posed by hydraulic-fracturing.

Pictures and videos that cropped up on anti-fracking sites and in local news outlets in recent days show inundated oil pads, flooded wells, and, in some cases, overturned tanks and ruptured lines. Many were reportedly captured in Weld County, an area northeast of Denver and Boulder that was hit hard by the flooding.

With nearly 18,000 active wells, it's also a main drilling center in Colorado, a state that increasingly relies on hydraulic-fracturing for its energy production.

"Water pollution is the biggest concern," said Gary Wockner, the Colorado program director for the anti-fracking group Clean Water Action.

"Our biggest fear is that oil and gas hydrocarbons and hydrofracking chemicals will get into the water supply, and that the flooding will spread the pollution over a large swath of the landscape."

While industry representatives have downplayed what one executive called the "social media frenzy" of photos and videos due to lack of information, they have taken steps to mitigate concerns, including stopping the flow of oil at potentially affected wells, a process known as shutting in.

Doug Hock, the director of public relations for Encana Oil & Gas which operates a number of wells in the area, said that of the 1,241 wells Encana operates in the energy-heavy Denver-Julesburg Basin, 397 were shut in last week. Since then, 99 of those shut in have returned to production.

"We still have not found any spills of any reportable quantity, but cannot rule out future discoveries until we get to everything," Hock said Tuesday.

For their part, Colorado officials have been "aggressively assessing the impacts of the flood to oil and gas facilities," Colorado Department of Natural Resources spokesman Todd Hartman said in a statement.

Officials note that there's still limited information concerning the status of the area's oil and gas locations, but are warning about the potential health risks associated with hazardous materials in the flood water.

"The Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment is advising Coloradans that many contaminants, such as raw sewage, as well as potential releases of chemicals from homes, businesses and industry, may be contained in the floodwaters," Hartman said in his statement.

"People are encouraged to stay out of the water as much as possible."

Specialists in the hydraulic fracturing field offered mixed assessments of the situation.

"They're being overly cautious," said William Fleckenstein, the interim department head of petroleum engineering at the Colorado School of Mines, referring to the activists' concerns about flooded wells.

Most natural gas wells, Fleckenstein said, are designed to withstand large amounts of pressure, and to stay sealed under all conditions. Though he noted that it's hard to predict the potential damage posed posed to a well site by rushing water combined with debris.

"With just inundation -- unless the ground is structurally being damaged -- the wells should be in fairly good shape," he said.

"The biggest concern is open-wastewater pits," said Robert Jackson, a professor of environmental sciences at Duke University, who lead a study earlier this year linking fracking to water contamination. The hazardous fluid waste from hydraulic fracturing, also called flowback water, is sometimes stored in open-air pits that Jackson said can possibly overflow if inundated.

In Colorado though, according the the Colorado Oil and Gas Association, the wastewater is generally stored in holding and treatment tanks before disposal or reuse. A June 2012 Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission presentation on regulating pits includes pictures of open-air pits in Weld County.

Colorado officials said that they are assessing the impact to open pits, but that generally there are fewer pits in the Wattenberg Field area where the floodwaters struck than in areas further east, which were mostly unaffected by the floods.

In response to a inquiry from CBSNews.com, CDNR's Hartman said: "It's important to remember what's in the pits, and their purpose. Pits are rarely used in hydraulic fracturing operations in northeastern Colorado. Fracturing and flowback fluids are held in storage tanks and then are either recycled or transported to a disposal well. The pits that are used during hydraulic fracturing store fresh water. It is also quite rare to have a drilling pit in the western part of the DJ Basin as companies have moved toward closed loop drilling as a way to reduce the size of their surface disturbance and in order to reuse the drilling fluids."

Jackson also said chemicals on inundated oil pads where drilling occurs could present a health and environmental concern, though Fleckenstein said regulations would have kept oil and gas companies from storing those chemicals in an unsafe manner.
Quote from: tubby on Today at 12:45:53 pm

They both went in high, that's factually correct, both tried to play the ball at height.  Doku with his foot, Mac Allister with his chest.

Offline Andy @ Allerton!

  • Missing an asterisk - no, wait sorry, that's his rusty starfish..... RAWK Apple fanboy. Hedley Lamarr's bestest mate. Has done nothing incredible ever.
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 73,660
  • Asterisks baby!
Re: Government approve Gas Fracking after banning it
« Reply #113 on: December 27, 2015, 05:28:18 am »
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/flooding-and-fracking-in-colorado-double-disaster-20130919

Flooding and Fracking in Colorado: Double Disaster

Serious flooding threatens the state's 50,000 controversial oil and gas wells

Cliff Willmeng was filming from the banks of the raging St. Vrain River in Colorado when he heard a sound like guitar strings being plucked. He looked around for the source and spotted, in the rapids near him, an electrical pole leaning at 45 degrees. "To be honest, it was probably dangerous, what I was doing," he admits. "[But] the more unsafe the travel became, the more important the work became."

Willmeng, a trauma nurse who lives in Lafayette, Colorado, wasn't documenting the devastation of the Front Range's 1000-year flood for thrills. For years, he's been involved in trying to ban the controversial drilling practice known as hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, from Colorado communities. As the flooding began to reach what the National Weather Service called "biblical" proportions, he realized that floodwater was headed straight for some of Colorado's most developed oil and gas drilling areas.

Concerned about how drilling sites would withstand the flooding – and what chemicals might end up in the water – Willmeng grabbed his camera. He headed towards neighboring Weld County, one of the nation's most productive agricultural counties and home to thousands of fracked wells.

With roads and bridges washed out or flooded, getting there was tough. But he eventually found what he'd feared: submerged wellpads and pipelines, waste tanks torn from their moorings and floating downstream. He posted the photos to his Facebook page and that of East Boulder County United, a grassroots group working to ban fracking in Lafayette. (Click here to see them.) The next day, Willmeng was out photographing again. On Tuesday, he took a flight with a group called EcoWatch, following waterways and recording images of inundated drilling facilities and loose tanks. "It was pretty dramatic all around," he says. Within a few days, says Willmeng, the photos had "gone fully international" and other people were out documenting compromised drilling facilities.

Thanks to a recent boom in natural gas production atop the Wattenberg Field, Colorado is home to some 50,000 oil and gas wells. It's not yet known just how many were impacted by the flooding, but early reports suggest a significant number. "We have thousands of wells impacted with anything from standing water to flowing water," a spokeswoman for the Colorado Oil and Gas Association told CBS News.

Industry spokespeople and state regulators say it's too soon to know the impact, including whether or how much the flooding introduced hydrocarbons and chemicals into surface water. Some have said that many wells were safely closed before the flooding and that activists are overstating the danger of contamination.

On Wednesday, as FEMA helicopters became available for non-rescue uses, the EPA sent two airborne and one ground crew to look for oil sheens, according to EPA regional spokesman Matthew Allen. The EPA's major concern, he says, is a major spill like the one that happened in 2011, when debris and floodwater ruptured a pipeline running underneath the Yellowstone River. So far, though, no significant spills have been discovered.

Oversight of natural gas drilling and the wastewater produced by it falls to the Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission, which Wednesday released a statement that it "is aggressively assessing the impacts of the flood to oil and gas facilities," including by mapping drilling sites within flooded areas, tracking reports from the ground, and sending out inspection teams.

Water pollution from chemicals used in fracking (which include known carcinogens and endocrine disruptors) was a concern well before the flood. What's new is the concern that contaminated wastewater stored in tanks and even open pits may have been released into water and soils. "Any flood that breaches a wastewater pit will flush the waste and contaminated sediments into streams and rivers," Roy Jackson, an environmental scientist at Duke University, told FastCoExist. Then there's the pipeline infrastructure that supports the wells: One pipeline reportedly broke, and others sagged as the soil that supported them eroded. Emergency managers have advised residents to stay out of floodwater for fear of contact with chemical pollutants as well as sewage.

Willmeng calls the flooding "our worst nightmare," but also notes that it comes at a fraught time, as Colorado communities debate the role of fracking within their borders. This November, five cities will be voting on ballot initiatives to either ban hydraulic fracturing (in the case of the Lafayette Community Rights Act) or to put local moratoriums on gas drilling. "Colorado was in the process of rapidly becoming aware of the dangers of this industry prior to the floods," says Willmeng. He believes that process is about to speed up dramatically.
Quote from: tubby on Today at 12:45:53 pm

They both went in high, that's factually correct, both tried to play the ball at height.  Doku with his foot, Mac Allister with his chest.

Offline Andy @ Allerton!

  • Missing an asterisk - no, wait sorry, that's his rusty starfish..... RAWK Apple fanboy. Hedley Lamarr's bestest mate. Has done nothing incredible ever.
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 73,660
  • Asterisks baby!
Re: Government approve Gas Fracking after banning it
« Reply #114 on: December 27, 2015, 05:29:24 am »
http://energydesk.greenpeace.org/2014/02/10/new-fracking-licenses-include-flood-plains/

Two maps showing current flood warnings (left) and The area under consultation to be offered for oil and gas exploration (right)

The government is likely to issue licenses to explore for oil and gas across large parts of Somerset as the area continues to be hit by the worst flooding for hundreds of years.

A spokesperson for the Department of Energy and Climate change (DECC) confirmed that the next round of Petroleum Exploration and Development License (PEDL) blocks will be issued ‘later this Spring’.

A map of license under consultation by the department includes the Somerset levels and many areas currently covered by severe flood warnings. Studies bythe British Geological Survey published by DECC suggest parts of Somerset may be appropriate for oil or gas extraction though exploration is at a very early stage.

The department has already issued licenses in North Somerset and the Mendips. Welsh shale gas firm UK Methane and Australian partner, Eden Energy sought permission to drill in Keynsham, a small town outside Bath, which has recently suffered minor flooding.

However the plan to offer licenses further south may increase flood risks. The recently published Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) on the 14thonshore oil and gas licensing round noted “flood risk presents a significant planning issue… should the site become flooded during exploratory drilling, production, operation or decommissioning, adverse effects could occur.”

Shale gas drilling can involve the storage and local transport of chemicals or contaminated water – though both are normally stored in sealed tanks.

Last year Energy minister Greg Barker had a trip to US re-routed to avoid visiting oil and gas drilling sites in Colorado which had become inundated with flood-waters. The flooding prompted a number of spills from drilling sites though testing did not find large-scale water contamination.

Flood risks would have to be considered as part of an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) though the government’s planning guidelines suggest it may be prepared to consider developments in flood risk areas – so long as measures are in place to manage risk.

The SEA for the next licensing round notes that “as the location of [actual drilling] sites vis-à-vis areas with a high probability of flooding is unknown at this stage, it has not been possible to determine the likelihood or magnitude of effects on this objective”.

Quote from: tubby on Today at 12:45:53 pm

They both went in high, that's factually correct, both tried to play the ball at height.  Doku with his foot, Mac Allister with his chest.

Offline Andy @ Allerton!

  • Missing an asterisk - no, wait sorry, that's his rusty starfish..... RAWK Apple fanboy. Hedley Lamarr's bestest mate. Has done nothing incredible ever.
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 73,660
  • Asterisks baby!
Re: Government approve Gas Fracking after banning it
« Reply #115 on: December 27, 2015, 05:30:24 am »
http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2013/oct/04/fracking-us-toxic-waste-water-washington

Fracking produces annual toxic waste water enough to flood Washington DC

Growing concerns over radiation risks as report finds widespread environmental damage on an unimaginable scale in the US

Fracking in America generated 280bn US gallons of toxic waste water last year – enough to flood all of Washington DC beneath a 22ft deep toxic lagoon, a new report out on Thursday found.

The report from campaign group Environment America said America's transformation into an energy superpower was exacting growing costs on the environment.

"Our analysis shows that damage from fracking is widespread and occurs on a scale unimagined just a few years ago," the report, Fracking by the Numbers, said.

The full extent of the damage posed by fracking to air and water quality had yet to emerge, the report said.

But it concluded: "Even the limited data that are currently available, however, paint an increasingly clear picture of the damage that fracking has done to our environment and health."

A number of recent studies have highlighted the negative consequences of horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing, which have unlocked vast reservoirs of oil and natural gas from rock formations.

There have been instances of contaminated wells and streams, as well as evidence of methane releases along the production chain.

The Environment America report highlights another growing area of concern – the safe disposal of the billions of gallons of waste water that are returned to the surface along with oil and gas when walls are fracked.

The authors said they relied on data from industry and state environmental regulators to compile their report.

More than 80,000 wells have been drilled or permitted in 17 states since 2005.

It can take 2m to 9m gallons of water mixed with sand and chemicals to frack a single well. The report said the drilling industry had used 250bn gallons of fresh water since 2005. Much of that returns to the surface, however, along with naturally occurring radium and bromides, and concerns are growing about those effects on the environment.

A study published this week by researchers at Duke University found new evidence of radiation risks from drilling waste water. The researchers said sediment samples collected downstream from a treatment plant in western Pennsylvania showed radium concentrations 200 times above normal.

The Environment America study said waste water pits have been known to fail, such as in New Mexico where there were more than 420 instances of contamination, and that treatment plants were not entirely effective.

"Fracking waste-water discharged at treatment plants can cause a different problem for drinking water: when bromide in the wastewater mixes with chlorine (often used at drinking water treatment plants), it produces trihalomethanes, chemicals that cause cancer and increase the risk of reproductive or developmental health problems," the report said.

About 260bn US gallons of the 280bn US gallons of toxic waste water were from Texas, a state that has undergone three years of severe drought and where there is fierce competition for water between the oil industry and farmers and ranchers.

Environment America said that water was now taken out of the supply and that storing, transporting and even recycling the toxic waste carried environmental risks. ""They say a lot of it is recycled. It is still 280bn gallons of toxic waste generated that is running through our communities," said John Rumpler, author of the report.

Spokespersons for Energy in Depth, the industry lobby group, disputed the findings as "alarmist:" and "meaningless".

"Number is meaningless unless they're alleging something is happening with it, ie ending up in tap water," Steve Everley, the lead spokesman for the lobby group said on Twitter.

Other consequences of fracking highlighted in the report included: 450,000 tons of air pollution a year and 100m metric tons of global warming pollution since 2005.
Quote from: tubby on Today at 12:45:53 pm

They both went in high, that's factually correct, both tried to play the ball at height.  Doku with his foot, Mac Allister with his chest.

Offline Andy @ Allerton!

  • Missing an asterisk - no, wait sorry, that's his rusty starfish..... RAWK Apple fanboy. Hedley Lamarr's bestest mate. Has done nothing incredible ever.
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 73,660
  • Asterisks baby!
Quote from: tubby on Today at 12:45:53 pm

They both went in high, that's factually correct, both tried to play the ball at height.  Doku with his foot, Mac Allister with his chest.

Offline Andy @ Allerton!

  • Missing an asterisk - no, wait sorry, that's his rusty starfish..... RAWK Apple fanboy. Hedley Lamarr's bestest mate. Has done nothing incredible ever.
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 73,660
  • Asterisks baby!
Re: Government approve Gas Fracking after banning it
« Reply #117 on: December 30, 2015, 11:06:12 am »
Quote from: tubby on Today at 12:45:53 pm

They both went in high, that's factually correct, both tried to play the ball at height.  Doku with his foot, Mac Allister with his chest.

Offline Red Beret

  • Yellow Beret. Wants to sit in the Lobster Pot. Fat-fingered. Key. Boa. Rd. Kille. R. tonunlick! Soggy Knickers King. Bed-Exiting / Grunting / Bending Down / Cum Face Champion 2023.
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 51,551
Re: Government approve Gas Fracking after banning it
« Reply #118 on: January 3, 2016, 02:53:12 pm »
Apologies if already shared.

I don't always visit Lobster Pot.  But when I do. I sit.

Popcorn's Art

Offline dave 5516

  • Is in a world of shit and loves it! Loves to Buffy up Danny Dyer. A Cyclopath without a Garmin. Sadly not quite bad enough to make the worst commentator list
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 32,781
  • Si muore sulla bici.
Re: Government approve Gas Fracking after banning it
« Reply #119 on: January 6, 2016, 07:01:57 pm »
Apologies if already shared.


Here you go.





<a href="http://www.youtube.com/v/6mp4ELXKv-w?fs=1" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="bbc_link bbc_flash_disabled new_win">http://www.youtube.com/v/6mp4ELXKv-w?fs=1</a>







<a href="http://www.youtube.com/v/rvzdc8l_4xM?fs=1" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="bbc_link bbc_flash_disabled new_win">http://www.youtube.com/v/rvzdc8l_4xM?fs=1</a>


Exercise is to the body what reading is to the mind.

"If I hadn't doped, I would never have won". "Doping improves your performance between 5 and 7 per cent, and maybe 10 to 12 per cent when you are in a peak shape.

"Doping isn't addictive but it's an instrument of power: whoever wins attracts the money; for themselves, the team and the sponsors"