On the plus side, kiNki has been kind enough to allow this thread to reopen.
On the downside, he's got my nuts in a vise and is threatening to crush them if any of you annoy the mods in even the slightest way. Which basically means I'm doomed.
So be gentle and let's keep the thread open.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alright, I'd like to start a discussion about the relative merits of a back four vs. a back three given our current personnel. My preference would be to see a back four of the two Spaniards, Lovren and Sakho.
Despite the misgivings of many about Lovren, he does seem to be pretty good with the ball on the deck. When he recovers, I think he will eventually settle in and be at least a bit better in performance.
Mamadou for me is an absolute must in any formation. I was looking at the video summary of his Boxing Day work and thought it was excellent overall.
Our young fullback transfers have been a mixed bag, I'll grant you, but I think both have tremendous potential and we need to see what they can do. I'd like to give them both an extended run.
If we are to drop one of the young Spanish boys, I'd rather see Enrique than Johnson. The latter's upside is better on a given day, but for me Enrique gives you a more predictable steady game. Johnson can be very up and down and is prone to defensive gaffes.
That leaves Skrtel and Toure, plus Flanagan. Three solid backups. I have no problem with any of them in that role. Our problem is that we need four defenders (in particular Sakho and Lovren) to start giving week in week out top notch work. With it, we'll get top 4 IMO. Without it, we're in deep trouble.
Thoughts? KEEP IT CIVIL WITH NO NASTY ATTACKS ON INDIVIDUAL PLAYERS OR THIS WILL GET LOCKED AGAIN!