Author Topic: Bridging the Gap to a Structured Playmaking Style  (Read 28321 times)

Offline exiledinyorkshire

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,857
Re: Bridging the Gap to a Structured Playmaking Style
« Reply #280 on: June 5, 2012, 08:00:40 PM »
Why have we moved this? Surely this needs to be in the main forum and bumped every half hour. This is exactly the kind of thread that this site needs, and is actually good at. Its quality and it educates. Why move it?

Offline exiledinyorkshire

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,857
Re: Bridging the Gap to a Structured Playmaking Style
« Reply #281 on: June 5, 2012, 08:31:11 PM »
seriously this thread will die in here.

Offline redmark

  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 8,801
    • Save Liverpool FC
Re: Bridging the Gap to a Structured Playmaking Style
« Reply #282 on: June 5, 2012, 08:32:19 PM »
It seems to me that the system requires a certain sort of player. 
Physically fit enough to move the whole game and pressure whenever the ball is lost.  More Henderson and Enrique in this regard than Adam and Gerrard (because he is aging). 
Quick thinking with good technical skills.  More Lucas and Gerrard than Enrique and Kelly. 
Patience rather than direct play.  More Lucas and Agger than Johnson and Carragher.
A tendency to pass more than dribble.  More Henderson than Johnson.
Tactical discipline over fluidity.  More Downing than Adam.

To me that's Reina, Agger, Skrtel, Lucas, Maxi, Spearing, probably Henderson, Coates.
It's not Gerrard, Adam, Johnson, Enrique, Carragher.
I don't know about Downing, Suarez, Carroll.

Some of our best players don't fit the system, which is a conundrum.

I think the 'unsuitability' of certain players can be overstated by viewing them through the lens of their performances in previous systems; and also it can be misleading to view a Rodgers system as being entirely possession oriented - the idea is still to carve out chances and score goals.

For example, in a Rodgers system Johnson shouldn't need to run with the ball from inside his own half - firstly, our starting position should be higher up the pitch and secondly, he should be able to run off the ball while slick passing moves the play upfield, picking the ball up on the overlap or cutting inside in the final third. But nothing about Rodgers system says that he isn't allowed to attack the defence or get into the box and shoot.

Patience as a whole should (ideally) come through the players buying into the system and then, through demonstrated effectiveness, having confidence that the system will produce goals and victories. The confidence in the system to not feel the need to force things. The ability of players like Johnson, Gerrard and Suarez to create chances with 'something different' (a quick overlap, a powerful burst, a nutmeg and jinking run) in the final third becomes a valuable weapon in a patient, possession focused side, as long as it isn't overdone (which negates patient possession) and isn't completely ignored.

The pressing side also doesn't necessarily place increased physical demands on players. Again, we'll be looking to play higher, compressing space and press to win the ball back quickly - then "rest with the ball", in Rodgers phrase. Short passages of physical energy, in a smaller space: as opposed to the less 'energetic' but perhaps more sapping experience of 'getting back into the deep 'shape'' we've seen over the last two years, which can require a midfielder to cover half the length of the pitch between phases of play.
Today, truth.
Tomorrow, justice for the 96.

Offline redmark

  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 8,801
    • Save Liverpool FC
Re: Bridging the Gap to a Structured Playmaking Style
« Reply #283 on: June 5, 2012, 08:36:55 PM »
On the midfield issue, consider that his Swansea side dominated some very good teams indeed featuring for the most part either Britton, Allen, and Sigurdsson, or Britton, Augustien, and Allen, sprinklings of players like Dobbie and McEachran... and always lined up an a kind of rotated 'V' (Ajax & co's 'echelon') with the wide players making angles just by running their touch lines. The full backs push right up to around the apex of that V and that way it's easy to make the triangles. The 'V' in the middle pretty much guarantees that 2 sides of the triangle are always in place before anyone moves.

Some examples of Michael Cox's write ups on their performances:

http://www.zonalmarking.net/2012/01/15/swansea-3-2-arsenal-swansea-outpass-arsenal/

http://www.zonalmarking.net/2012/02/13/swansea-2-3-norwich-link-and-graphics/

http://www.zonalmarking.net/2011/05/31/swansea-4-2-reading-sinclair-play-off-final/

Always the 'V'. It almost doesn't matter who slots in there, as long as he can play it one or two touch, spin or pirouette with the ball, and close down and tackle or intercept. Anything beyond that's a bonus, but in terms of the system, that'll keep it ticking over even with relatively limited personnel - they don't have to be world beaters necessarily.

BTW - watch Graham or whoever's in the front slot and you'll see it's a zig zag kind of shape - that's the idea - to put habits into your team shape that help make the triangles natural. Do that and the possession stats and the control in the middle are a natural by-product if you coach the team to value keeping the ball.

Given this description and some people objecting to the 'tiki taka' terminology, how about Liverpool playing ziggy-zaggy football? ;)
Today, truth.
Tomorrow, justice for the 96.

Offline lankyguy007

  • Subject of a restraining order by a regular member of the HIGNFY crew.
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,206
  • We all Live in a Red and White Kop
Re: Bridging the Gap to a Structured Playmaking Style
« Reply #284 on: June 5, 2012, 08:48:47 PM »
The ability of players like Johnson, Gerrard and Suarez to create chances with 'something different' (a quick overlap, a powerful burst, a nutmeg and jinking run) in the final third becomes a valuable weapon in a patient, possession focused side, as long as it isn't overdone (which negates patient possession) and isn't completely ignored.
I agree. The ability of those three players in particular to be able to show their ability in the final third is obviously a key asset. The concept is a very good one - to be able to build up the play, to control the ball as a team and then use the explosive ability of the key attacking players is something I'm sure Rodgers will have in mind. That all comes down to the balance and the movements to get the most out of our best players without going against the team philosophy.
Football is a lie - Rafa Benitez

Offline royhendo

  • RAWK Editor. Would like dumplings with his stew.
  • RAWK Staff
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 25,732
  • RIP Ray Osbourne
    • www.theanfieldwrap.com
Sid Lowe: "Has the environment around the game changed?"
Juanma Lillo: "Yes, the garnish has eaten the steak."

Offline No666

  • RAWK Scribe
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 11,025
Re: Bridging the Gap to a Structured Playmaking Style
« Reply #286 on: June 6, 2012, 10:10:16 AM »
Very interesting, roy. I think the optimum quality required to operate this system with success in a short time span is intelligence which we do not have throughout the squad.

Looking at his quotes (as far as one can extrapolate - you have to interpret this thanks to lack of grammatical basics and a certain wariness of revealing too much) he thinks the same:

Rodgers wants Liverpool to play a similar brand of football but he also accepts that it won't happen overnight.

He said: "For me it is going to take time for how I want to play and the philosophy I want to introduce.

"My longer-term aim is to arrive here seeing how quickly we can do so.

"The principles of your game are based on the players you have and there is no doubt I'll have a look at that and see if there is anyone I need to bring in to improve that.


"We want to play winning football, effective football. I know what we need to play that way and win that way but ultimately that will be the job of the next period of time.

"It is about results and the progress of the team but we will make our first steps and hopefully that will improve over the next few years.

"What we need to do is improve the team and the quality of the team and hopefully over the next couple of years we will be ready to challenge and ready to compete."

For all the talk of how a Rodgers team will pass the ball, hard work and pressing opponents are just as important to the Northern Irishman.
« Last Edit: June 6, 2012, 10:16:37 AM by No666 »
BETTISON IS LAUGHING AT YOU.....AND YOU PAY FOR IT! SIGN THIS! https://submissions.epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/47770

Offline royhendo

  • RAWK Editor. Would like dumplings with his stew.
  • RAWK Staff
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 25,732
  • RIP Ray Osbourne
    • www.theanfieldwrap.com
Re: Bridging the Gap to a Structured Playmaking Style
« Reply #287 on: June 6, 2012, 10:27:17 AM »
I reckon his starting point is pretty strong though mate - even without the finer details of how the system works, he has players that fit, and broad instructions will just about do it if he plugs in the right 3 in the midfield. If we swap Adam and Spearing for Sigurdsson and a.n.other, then we'll start not too far from the system he wants. All he'll need to do is tell Enrique to push up, swap Downing to the right so he naturally stays a little bit narrower... in fact, just coaching Enrique to do that role well would go a very long way to putting the system in place, wouldn't it? 

That middle 3 is the big tweak though. The front 3 will play better knowing they're secure and getting better, more incisive supply.
Sid Lowe: "Has the environment around the game changed?"
Juanma Lillo: "Yes, the garnish has eaten the steak."

Offline exiledinyorkshire

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,857
Re: Bridging the Gap to a Structured Playmaking Style
« Reply #288 on: June 6, 2012, 10:39:10 AM »
666 your absolutely right. the concept of keeping the ball isnt going to be alien to this Liverpool side, it was very much part of the Dalglish philosophy. The structured build up will perhaps be different, but the idea of a short passing game wont come as a shock, dont think we were ever particulary direct last year. We are blessed with 2 CB who are very comfortable on the ball, and have been playing as a split pair for over a season now, and the raw materials through out the rest of the team look very much upto the job with the ball in my opinion.

As regards the pressing, thats what will be new. But then again, there are enough players left from the Benitez era who new how to press, and if you look at Suarez, he has been trying to press intelligently all year, often on his own. The ideas behind rodgers 5-6 second rule if effectively taught to Carroll for example should lead to Suarez not having to coach the rest of the attacking unit in game like he did many times last season. It infuriated me that he was constantly having to tell Carroll when and where to applie the pressure.

I think its all there, and i'm genuinely optomistic that rodgers can get his ideas over pretty quickly, its not the massive task that some would have ou believe, and i think Rodgers quietly knows it.

Offline rednich85

  • Gargantuan Wanker.
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 17,171
  • Stay Black. That's the most important thing.
Re: Bridging the Gap to a Structured Playmaking Style
« Reply #289 on: June 6, 2012, 10:45:04 AM »
I reckon his starting point is pretty strong though mate - even without the finer details of how the system works, he has players that fit, and broad instructions will just about do it if he plugs in the right 3 in the midfield. If we swap Adam and Spearing for Sigurdsson and a.n.other, then we'll start not too far from the system he wants. All he'll need to do is tell Enrique to push up, swap Downing to the right so he naturally stays a little bit narrower... in fact, just coaching Enrique to do that role well would go a very long way to putting the system in place, wouldn't it? 

That middle 3 is the big tweak though. The front 3 will play better knowing they're secure and getting better, more incisive supply.

Have you more or less written off Charlie Adam, as a Liverpool player, Roy?
“When I was in first grade, I went to Catholic school and I can very clearly remember thinking that I'm fucked, because I know I don't know what life is all about, but I know these assholes don't either, and they're the ones who are gonna tell me.”

@rednich85

Offline exiledinyorkshire

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,857
Re: Bridging the Gap to a Structured Playmaking Style
« Reply #290 on: June 6, 2012, 10:46:04 AM »
I reckon his starting point is pretty strong though mate - even without the finer details of how the system works, he has players that fit, and broad instructions will just about do it if he plugs in the right 3 in the midfield. If we swap Adam and Spearing for Sigurdsson and a.n.other, then we'll start not too far from the system he wants. All he'll need to do is tell Enrique to push up, swap Downing to the right so he naturally stays a little bit narrower... in fact, just coaching Enrique to do that role well would go a very long way to putting the system in place, wouldn't it? 

That middle 3 is the big tweak though. The front 3 will play better knowing they're secure and getting better, more incisive supply.

Yep spot on. And even that middle 3 becomes less of a worry if a fit Lucas emerges in pre season. There are a lot of options with the return of the Loanees. I think in a more instructive environment Hendo is going to flourish too, and as you say an Enrique with an objective has to be an improvement.

Roy, everybody is talking about Aquilani and cole coming back. But we do have a Barca old boy returning in Pacheco he for me is more of the Rodgers type of player. Do you reckon he will get some game time under Brendan?

Offline royhendo

  • RAWK Editor. Would like dumplings with his stew.
  • RAWK Staff
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 25,732
  • RIP Ray Osbourne
    • www.theanfieldwrap.com
Re: Bridging the Gap to a Structured Playmaking Style
« Reply #291 on: June 6, 2012, 10:46:12 AM »
Have you more or less written off Charlie Adam, as a Liverpool player, Roy?

Yeah mate - I can't see Rodgers compromising his setup to carry what he lacks, can you? He seems pretty fundamentalist about that aspect of the play. Henderson will flourish though.
Sid Lowe: "Has the environment around the game changed?"
Juanma Lillo: "Yes, the garnish has eaten the steak."

Offline royhendo

  • RAWK Editor. Would like dumplings with his stew.
  • RAWK Staff
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 25,732
  • RIP Ray Osbourne
    • www.theanfieldwrap.com
Re: Bridging the Gap to a Structured Playmaking Style
« Reply #292 on: June 6, 2012, 10:49:15 AM »
I think in a more instructive environment Hendo is going to flourish too

Haha! Just said the same thing. :)

Roy, everybody is talking about Aquilani and cole coming back. But we do have a Barca old boy returning in Pacheco he for me is more of the Rodgers type of player. Do you reckon he will get some game time under Brendan?

I've no idea actually mate. That's gonna be interesting isn't it? Cos if he was to trust Pacheco and the younger lads to stand in, he could really free up money from the wage bill if we wrote off the money for the likes of Cole and Aquilani. It depends how much leeway he's been given by the owners I guess. Is it a 'you make top 4 or you're out' scenario? I hope not, cos that'll let him relax and experiment a wee bit with bringing the young lads through.
Sid Lowe: "Has the environment around the game changed?"
Juanma Lillo: "Yes, the garnish has eaten the steak."

Offline rednich85

  • Gargantuan Wanker.
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 17,171
  • Stay Black. That's the most important thing.
Re: Bridging the Gap to a Structured Playmaking Style
« Reply #293 on: June 6, 2012, 10:49:53 AM »
Yeah mate - I can't see Rodgers compromising his setup to carry what he lacks, can you? He seems pretty fundamentalist about that aspect of the play. Henderson will flourish though.

Agreed on both counts.

Be interestesting to see if we actually try and move him on.  I do think there's a side out there that will get the best out of Adam. He's shown brilliance in spurts but the holes in his game were gaping by the time he picked up his injury.
“When I was in first grade, I went to Catholic school and I can very clearly remember thinking that I'm fucked, because I know I don't know what life is all about, but I know these assholes don't either, and they're the ones who are gonna tell me.”

@rednich85

Offline exiledinyorkshire

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,857
Re: Bridging the Gap to a Structured Playmaking Style
« Reply #294 on: June 6, 2012, 10:59:06 AM »
Haha! Just said the same thing. :)

I've no idea actually mate. That's gonna be interesting isn't it? Cos if he was to trust Pacheco and the younger lads to stand in, he could really free up money from the wage bill if we wrote off the money for the likes of Cole and Aquilani. It depends how much leeway he's been given by the owners I guess. Is it a 'you make top 4 or you're out' scenario? I hope not, cos that'll let him relax and experiment a wee bit with bringing the young lads through.

Cant help but think they will give him his head. They need to if its going to work. He is the man to utilise the work thtas been done at the academy over the last 3 years. If ever Borrell and Segura were churning out players to fit a system then its Rodgers one. And his appointment in my opinion suggests thats exactly what the owners are thinking too.

If that is the case then i would expect to see some really interesting teams setting up for the pre season friendlies. Really cant wait now.

i'm totally on board, but even i cant imagine a side that isnt built around Stevie G, and i really think that thats where Rodgers is going to have his main dilema. As good as he is, nobody likes playing with him as far as i can see, except maybe Suarez. At his age can he knuckle down and keep it simple. Perhaps i am underrating him a little, but his influence is perhaps my greatest fear.

Offline redmark

  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 8,801
    • Save Liverpool FC
Re: Bridging the Gap to a Structured Playmaking Style
« Reply #295 on: June 6, 2012, 11:41:04 AM »
i'm totally on board, but even i cant imagine a side that isnt built around Stevie G, and i really think that thats where Rodgers is going to have his main dilema. As good as he is, nobody likes playing with him as far as i can see, except maybe Suarez. At his age can he knuckle down and keep it simple. Perhaps i am underrating him a little, but his influence is perhaps my greatest fear.

Even back under Rafa, there was the odd game where Gerrard was asked to sit and play a more restrained game and he generally did so, very effectively. I don't think he's like Carragher, who doesn't have the tools to change the way he plays, nor do I really agree with the frequent criticism that he lacks discipline. He's generally been asked and required to provide 'the spark' in Liverpool teams, or been encouraged to do so (under Dalglish, and in the advanced role under Rafa). A stat I often referred to was that despite him supposedly "always" looking for the killer ball was that his pass completion figures were typically only 3-5% below those of Alonso, while playing a more advanced and creative role. Ultimately, Gerrard can play patient pass and move as well as most, if he's being asked to and isn't being required to force the pace of the game as he often has been throughout his career in losing or drawing positions.

Defensively too, his weaknesses were exacerbated in the deeper systems, and focus on shape over pressing, under Dalglish and Hodgson. Sitting a few yards ahead of a back four on the edge of it's own area doesn't suit many midfielders. As we saw under Rafa, Gerrard is much better suited to pressing around the halfway line - either by playing in a more advanced position, or the entire team being higher up the pitch.

What Rodgers does with Gerrard will be very interesting. There's an assumption with many on here that Gerrard's injuries over the last couple of years are indicative of final physical decline, rather than just injuries. Along with his supposed impatience and lack of discipline, the assumption for many is that we're into the 'managed decline' stage of his career (and in some formations, a return to a wide position if not behind the striker). I'm not so sure. He just turned 32 last week. Two injury hit seasons do not necessarily indicate irreversible phyiscal decline; they might just be injuries. He'd managed 30 or more league games in 8 straight seasons prior to that, after being labelled 'injury prone' as a youngster.

The only thing I think we can really say is that his days as a 'box to box' player are probably over, but in a more defined role there's still life in the old dog, who perhaps doesn't need to be taught new tricks so much as guided as to which of the many tricks he's capable of should be the focus in a new system. Reports of Gerrard's demise have been frequent and frequently exaggerated.

Today, truth.
Tomorrow, justice for the 96.

Offline No666

  • RAWK Scribe
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 11,025
Re: Bridging the Gap to a Structured Playmaking Style
« Reply #296 on: June 6, 2012, 11:44:21 AM »
I entirely agree with the two midfielders you've mentally shipped out, roy, and the replacements we need. (The transfer season monkey in me can't help adding that I hope we add two others in attack and one to cover cb/left-back and we're looking fit to go.) I think Gerrard is well suited to that attacking midfield role; his pressing at Wembley on Saturday was decisive. Supposedly he enjoyed the advanced role under Rafa so much some of the press now believe it is his favoured role - I'll try and look up the cut but I'm sure I saw Winter or someone drop that into some England coverage.
« Last Edit: June 6, 2012, 11:46:19 AM by No666 »
BETTISON IS LAUGHING AT YOU.....AND YOU PAY FOR IT! SIGN THIS! https://submissions.epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/47770

Online BMW

  • "Bloody Memory Wavers" Currently in debt with RAWK.
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 7,239
  • Luis Suarez is innocent.
Re: Bridging the Gap to a Structured Playmaking Style
« Reply #297 on: June 6, 2012, 11:47:18 AM »
I think Gerrard won't have a long term future as a 'starter' in Rogers system.

I just can not see it nor think it would be wise. I say that because of his body is just not what it was and he is naturally getting older, the only reason I can see him starting matches on a regular basis beyond next season is because of history - i.e. everything he has done for Liverpool FC.

The role I could see him filling is being used to come of the bench and change games against teams who are playing for a draw. Playing as either a wide forward, in 'zone 5' or even deeper... I mean there is no other player that's like Gerrard, he is a very rare breed of footballer but he isn't going to be starting matches on a regular basis next season IMHO.
« Last Edit: June 6, 2012, 11:53:20 AM by BMW »

Offline exiledinyorkshire

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,857
Re: Bridging the Gap to a Structured Playmaking Style
« Reply #298 on: June 6, 2012, 12:06:37 PM »
Ultimately it whether or not he buys in to the Rodgers Philosophy. Early indications are that he will. If thats the case and he applies himself to what will be strict principals then perhaps my worries are a little unfounded. Dont think the traditional liverpool way of "get the ball to Gerrard" is going to wash with Rodgers though, so it will be interesting to see how Steven copes as a cog. The new system should actually free others from within the team from that feeling of playing second fiddle to mr liverpool, as they all will need to play second fiddle to the principles of the group doctrine Gerrard included.

Gerrard however by his very nature is a direct energy player, he does force it, he always has. He certainly has the ability to choose options well, the when "its on" and when it isnt worries me a little bit, for Gerrard its always on. If the instant judgement is an attacking ball or a possesion ball, left to his own devises he always looks for the attacking option in my opinion. Will be interesting to see if Brendan can teach an old dog a more patient approach. Like i say i may be worrying for no reason, it may well be that Gerrard is more than capable of toing a party line........ its just that Rafa didnt ever feel he could, which is why he utilised him the way he did.

Offline Vulmea

  • Almost saint-like.....
  • RAWK Scribe
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,235
Re: Bridging the Gap to a Structured Playmaking Style
« Reply #299 on: June 6, 2012, 01:49:38 PM »
How does the possible zig zag, tic tac (there's got to be a more manly way of expressing it) formation allow for the rotation of players - I dont mean squad rotation - I mean if the fullback follows the play who covers - if all of the roles are so specialised how does that effect player movement?

If you play JB wide left does everything switch to two stage diagonal pressing game rather than full on press? Or is the formation simply not flexible enough to accomodate a 'luxury' player.

I think any system including Barca's remains unconvincing if its fixed because once you know whats coming you can counter it - Rafa I think used squad rotation to keep the opposition guessing making them less prepared than they could be and it worked because he could use the different individuals abilities within the same system or switch system to accomodate individuals - I'm hoping some of the things in this thread are me reading an inflexibility that isn't really there and you gents can put me right.
The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie — deliberate, contrived and dishonest — but the myth — persistent, persuasive and unrealistic.

John F. Kennedy/Shanklyboy.

Offline hesbighesred

  • But you can call me quick fingers, if you can prise them off Dirk's balls
  • RAWK Scribe
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 9,992
    • Collaborative thoughts on Euro 2012
Re: Bridging the Gap to a Structured Playmaking Style
« Reply #300 on: June 6, 2012, 03:45:15 PM »
Depends on the type of players you get in, Vulmea. But if you look at Rafa's side you had the front 4 who were all capable of operating effectively in each other's areas, you had the midfield triangle who could interchange to an extent, you had the full backs and wide players who, at our best, could offer cover for each other, and in Agger and now Skrtel CBs who can move up the pitch with the DMs covering any holes (and indeed also with the full backs) and with a genuine footballer in goal acting more like a CB at times.

But the degree of flexibility is not just conditional on the quality but also the flexibility of the players. One of my main gripes with Dalglish/Commoli's summer signings is how inflexible the main ones were - Carroll, Downing and Adam are all decent players, more than capable of doing a dangerous job, but none are really that flexible. Downing has, or had, the potential to be, but apart from him Henderson and Bellamy are the only really 'modern' footballers among them, and Bellamy can clearly be no-more than a useful squad option (albeit a very useful one).
Collaborative Euro 2021 blog I'm writing for. Check it out, and by all means share your views.
http://straightoffthebeach.wordpress.com/

Offline redmark

  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 8,801
    • Save Liverpool FC
Re: Bridging the Gap to a Structured Playmaking Style
« Reply #301 on: June 6, 2012, 04:01:28 PM »
One of the Rodgers articles posted in Callaghan's thread in STF did discuss 'rotation' in that sense. Most of the candidates for the 'central three' (however we notate the formation) seem reasonably well-equipped for it, but the 'front three' seems less obvious, particularly if it does include Carroll - or do we 'rotate' the '5' behind him, with him as the fixed point of reference?
Today, truth.
Tomorrow, justice for the 96.

Offline lankyguy007

  • Subject of a restraining order by a regular member of the HIGNFY crew.
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,206
  • We all Live in a Red and White Kop
Re: Bridging the Gap to a Structured Playmaking Style
« Reply #302 on: June 6, 2012, 04:32:07 PM »
One of the Rodgers articles posted in Callaghan's thread in STF did discuss 'rotation' in that sense. Most of the candidates for the 'central three' (however we notate the formation) seem reasonably well-equipped for it, but the 'front three' seems less obvious, particularly if it does include Carroll - or do we 'rotate' the '5' behind him, with him as the fixed point of reference?
Carroll's more mobile than he gets credit for I think. I do think he'd be used more as a point of reference but he can create space and turn quite effectively. He can run in the channels but we can also use him for lay offs and to bring players from the second line into play. I agree we need more mobile and flexible attacking players though.
Football is a lie - Rafa Benitez

Offline redmark

  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 8,801
    • Save Liverpool FC
Re: Bridging the Gap to a Structured Playmaking Style
« Reply #303 on: June 6, 2012, 04:38:03 PM »
Carroll's more mobile than he gets credit for I think. I do think he'd be used more as a point of reference but he can create space and turn quite effectively. He can run in the channels but we can also use him for lay offs and to bring players from the second line into play. I agree we need more mobile and flexible attacking players though.

Mobile is fine, in that he can drop off, be involved in buildup play and get forward (though he didn't, for more than half a season). But he's not going to spend ten minutes wide right running at people, for example. If we play Carroll upfront, I think we need a 'second Suarez', to have pacy goalscoring and creative threats either side of him, to stretch the defence and prevent them simply pushing up and (with our high line, too) compressing play into 20 yards either side of halfway.
Today, truth.
Tomorrow, justice for the 96.

Offline NHRed

  • Main Stander
  • **
  • Posts: 81
  • We all Live in a Red and White Kop
Re: Bridging the Gap to a Structured Playmaking Style
« Reply #304 on: June 6, 2012, 05:59:31 PM »
How does the possible zig zag, tic tac (there's got to be a more manly way of expressing it)

Diagonal?  Angled?

Offline redmark

  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 8,801
    • Save Liverpool FC
Re: Bridging the Gap to a Structured Playmaking Style
« Reply #305 on: June 6, 2012, 06:00:24 PM »
Diagonal?  Angled?

I like ziggy-zaggy (or zigi-zagi). :)
Today, truth.
Tomorrow, justice for the 96.

Offline steveeastend

  • One drum. Only one tune. Even more tedious than the Ingerland band.
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 11,609
Re: Bridging the Gap to a Structured Playmaking Style
« Reply #306 on: June 6, 2012, 07:36:35 PM »
The "V" as it is here described is more of a general way of play, a basic way of playing together than a tactical set up in terms of the duties and orders for the players.

The "V" is more like HOW to make a given tactical set up work in attack, rather then the set up itself. It΄s a guide line for the players how to play together as a unit in attack rather then defense. I΄d rather call it "playing in triangles", that΄s the way I got to know it.. the european way (dutch, spain) of playing pass and move.. there are still different ways in europe though, yugoslavian football school f.e.


« Last Edit: June 6, 2012, 07:42:40 PM by steveeastend »

Offline Not A Scouser

  • Anny Roader
  • ***
  • Posts: 321
Re: Bridging the Gap to a Structured Playmaking Style
« Reply #307 on: June 6, 2012, 08:34:29 PM »
This is good. http://www.eplindex.com/15096/liverpool-fc-brendan-rodgers-tactics-pressing-game-works.html

That is great.  It describes exactly the reasons for pressing, limiting the options of the opposition, trying to get the ball when it is easiest, and giving the greatest opportunity to attack against a defence that isn't settled.  For me this is one of the two most efficient methods for getting great chances rather than decent chances, and it relies on attacking against a disorganized defence.  The other is the fast counter-attack, getting the ball at the other area of greatest opportunity (at the edge of your own penalty area where space is constricted) and then moving it rapidly up the field with pacy players.  This results in smaller numbers of attackers and defenders, providing more space and making it easier to pull the defence out of position or overload one portion of the pitch.  These two methods result in an attacker with the ball in an "open" penalty area rather than a packed penalty area.

Under these two systems possession in the middle of the pitch doesn't matter much in terms of scoring.  If they get past your press but you can set up in time defensively their chances of scoring are low, but if they want to keep the ball your chances of getting it back are low.  if you have the ball your chances of scoring are low, and this is why the "resting on the ball" becomes useful as it provides some utility in this situation.  Even if you don't end up scoring the opposition is probably too knackered to break at speed or break the press, resulting in lots of hoofing and you can start again.

The first requires a team-wide understanding of when and how to press.  Two strikers running from defender to defender does nothing.  If one third of the team presses and the rest of the team drops back then that's acres of space.  The "keys" to when to press are vital, everyone has to recognise them together.  The second requires a disciplined defence when dropping back (something almost all professional teams can do) but most importantly fast, technical, direct players.  Spain or Germany respectively.

This is what made me despair over the last year.  No pressing as a unit, just Carroll and Suarez running around by themselves (Suarez is actually the best pressing player I have ever seen) and yet no speed in the team to counterattack.  That's why we looked pretty, passing the ball around, moving it up the field and getting a huge number of balls into the box, but almost never a player with the ball at his feet in the box when not surrounded.  lots of possession but few goals.

Offline John C

  • Likes it kinky. Feedback loiterer. mere clutz
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 20,013
Re: Bridging the Gap to a Structured Playmaking Style
« Reply #308 on: June 6, 2012, 08:46:12 PM »
Why have we moved this? Surely this needs to be in the main forum and bumped every half hour. This is exactly the kind of thread that this site needs, and is actually good at. Its quality and it educates. Why move it?
In here leaves it nice and tidy for some intelligent debate over the coming weeks mate. Out in the main forum it will attract one line nonsense. I haven't added anything useful to it but I completely understand why its here.

Offline Not A Scouser

  • Anny Roader
  • ***
  • Posts: 321
Re: Bridging the Gap to a Structured Playmaking Style
« Reply #309 on: June 6, 2012, 08:48:19 PM »
I think Gerrard is actually a great one touch passer.  I think he just has rarely been used in that role throughout his career.  The biggest problems I see with Gerrard in such a system is his trust in his teammates.  You can see that there are certain players that he trusts, and with those players he moves the ball quickly and precisely.  With other players he doesn't trust them to keep the ball, or use it well, and then he tries to create things for himself.  I think he's the most technically proficient player in the squad at moving the ball quickly and accurately.

I also think there's a reason why he has been moved around a lot in his career, and it's not because he is tactically inept, or lacks discipline.  You don't move a great athlete with a great cross and a great through ball from the right wing if he can't understand what he's supposed to do elsewhere.  Gerrard has been played (to my knowledge) at right back, right wing, behind the centre-forward, on the left of midfield (under Capello), as a box-to-box central midfielder and a deep lying midfielder.  I think he wanders when he feels he has to do everything.

I have a suspicion that if the system seems to work quickly he will relish moving the ball around quickly without the risk of losing it.  I think he will love the idea of pressing the ball immediately after losing it and then bursting into an empty penalty area once possession is turned over.  Defensively that really seems to suit his personality.  If he keeps giving the ball to players who lose it I think his tendency to keep the ball and wander around will return.

Online BMW

  • "Bloody Memory Wavers" Currently in debt with RAWK.
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 7,239
  • Luis Suarez is innocent.
Re: Bridging the Gap to a Structured Playmaking Style
« Reply #310 on: June 7, 2012, 04:12:14 AM »
Depends on the type of players you get in, Vulmea. But if you look at Rafa's side you had the front 4 who were all capable of operating effectively in each other's areas, you had the midfield triangle who could interchange to an extent, you had the full backs and wide players who, at our best, could offer cover for each other, and in Agger and now Skrtel CBs who can move up the pitch with the DMs covering any holes (and indeed also with the full backs) and with a genuine footballer in goal acting more like a CB at times.

But the degree of flexibility is not just conditional on the quality but also the flexibility of the players. One of my main gripes with Dalglish/Commoli's summer signings is how inflexible the main ones were - Carroll, Downing and Adam are all decent players, more than capable of doing a dangerous job, but none are really that flexible. Downing has, or had, the potential to be, but apart from him Henderson and Bellamy are the only really 'modern' footballers among them, and Bellamy can clearly be no-more than a useful squad option (albeit a very useful one).

This is something I've thought about as well.

Our players ability to interchange with each and how or will Rogers system allow it.

I remember when Rafa was on the 'brink' between taking us from being a more of direct, swift attacking side - a team that had one playmaker who had the ability to not only control the tempo of the match but when 'it's on' cut out three opposition players with one pass of the ball... to a team that instead of having only one playermaker (a bloody good one I'll admit), to a team of players that are all responsible for being playmakers when they have the ball. Apart from having players with the right mentality -i.e. will I force the play and make something happen or keep the ball ticking over, should I put my foot down or take a step back etc etc... you need players who can interchange positions and not just left to right, right to left - i.e. the left inside forward interchanging with the right inside forward.

IMO you need your players to be able to interchange positions up and down the pitch -i.e.  your midfield pivot interchanging with the more attacking of the two CMs and being able push forward, finding himself in the box. But at the same time the more attacking of the two CMs has the awareness, positional sense and the 'right' mentality to be able to drop back and cover him.  Another example would be your wide inside forward having the right 'right' mentality etc etc, to be able to drop off and cover your WBs so they are able to cut inside and make runs into 'zone 7' (I could see Johnson doing just that) without holes left behind him. The best example of this is Agger when he decides to bring the ball out past the half way line, passes the ball off to a midfielder and then continues his run into space... 99% it will be Lucas who drop back and covers him, so the are no holes left in our defense.

I don't think Rogers' need to play that kind of expansive football, to that extent at Swansea. After all teams didn't intend to just come for a draw and if they get it see it as a victory against Swansea last season. They didn't have to face teams who just park the bus for 90 mins, with odd attack here and there. This season Rogers will face that and have to find a way to counter it, after all it's been a big problem for our last 3 managers; Rafa, Kenny and that other guy. What will be Rogers' answer to over coming teams who look to park the bus on us?

Offline bigbear

  • offering a $10,000 reward for information leading to arrest and imprisonment of the international porridge thief and furniture wrecker Goldilocks
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 20,492
  • We all Live in a Red and White Kop
Re: Bridging the Gap to a Structured Playmaking Style
« Reply #311 on: June 7, 2012, 10:43:14 AM »
It΄s a big question that BMW. How does Rodgers tease out a side by keeping the ball deep at Anfield if the side is (say) Stoke City who don΄t want to cross the half way line or indeed move off the edge of their box.

This is where Carroll can still have a role if he retains his fitness. At Swansea, sides would engage them up the pitch and at times be picked off for being too open, that happens to Barca less and less as sides drop off in 2 banks of 5 almost across the edge of their box.

Rodgers is smart and he will realise there΄s no point keeping the ball for the sake of it if the other side doesn΄t want to come and try to get it. I can see his methods working for Liverpool away from home perhaps albeit the high pressing will get the home crowd more interested.

Offline exiledinyorkshire

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,857
Re: Bridging the Gap to a Structured Playmaking Style
« Reply #312 on: June 7, 2012, 10:47:32 AM »
I think Gerrard is actually a great one touch passer.  I think he just has rarely been used in that role throughout his career.  The biggest problems I see with Gerrard in such a system is his trust in his teammates.  You can see that there are certain players that he trusts, and with those players he moves the ball quickly and precisely.  With other players he doesn't trust them to keep the ball, or use it well, and then he tries to create things for himself.  I think he's the most technically proficient player in the squad at moving the ball quickly and accurately.

I also think there's a reason why he has been moved around a lot in his career, and it's not because he is tactically inept, or lacks discipline.  You don't move a great athlete with a great cross and a great through ball from the right wing if he can't understand what he's supposed to do elsewhere.  Gerrard has been played (to my knowledge) at right back, right wing, behind the centre-forward, on the left of midfield (under Capello), as a box-to-box central midfielder and a deep lying midfielder.  I think he wanders when he feels he has to do everything.

I have a suspicion that if the system seems to work quickly he will relish moving the ball around quickly without the risk of losing it.  I think he will love the idea of pressing the ball immediately after losing it and then bursting into an empty penalty area once possession is turned over.  Defensively that really seems to suit his personality.  If he keeps giving the ball to players who lose it I think his tendency to keep the ball and wander around will return.

I think thats all fair comment, and obviously when looking at Gerrard there is no reason that he cant do what he's asked , he's a fabulous player. You say though, that basically should the others not be upto it then Gerrard may slip back into his trying to do it all mode. I actually feel there is some mileage in the theory that when Gerrard plays he sapps some of the confidence from the others, he's kind of responsible for some of the shrinking violet performances that often get put in. If that is true, then it cant just be because they wilt in his saintly glow, It must be somthing to do with Gerrard the player or Man and if so its a genuine problem for Rodgers.

Offline PhaseofPlay

  • Well red.
  • RAWK Writer
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,644
  • JFT96 RIP
Re: Bridging the Gap to a Structured Playmaking Style
« Reply #313 on: June 7, 2012, 05:32:43 PM »
It΄s a big question that BMW. How does Rodgers tease out a side by keeping the ball deep at Anfield if the side is (say) Stoke City who don΄t want to cross the half way line or indeed move off the edge of their box.

This is where Carroll can still have a role if he retains his fitness. At Swansea, sides would engage them up the pitch and at times be picked off for being too open, that happens to Barca less and less as sides drop off in 2 banks of 5 almost across the edge of their box.

Rodgers is smart and he will realise there΄s no point keeping the ball for the sake of it if the other side doesn΄t want to come and try to get it. I can see his methods working for Liverpool away from home perhaps albeit the high pressing will get the home crowd more interested.

This is not a problem for a team with systematic possession. It is not a problem because the basic principles of defense state that the nearest player must always delay or pressure the ball, depending on whether they are covered. If they don't, then the attack gets time to either dribble or pick the best pass. Possession also requires movement, and in a possession team based on Spanish or Dutch principles, this movement is always diagonal and away from the ball, designed to put the marking defender in a bind - for example:

--------O2-X2--------------
-----------------------
----------O1------------
----------X.-----------

"X." is the player with the ball. X2 is the 2nd attacker. O1 is the 1st defender, O2 is the marking defender. If X2 makes a diagonal checking run to the right of X., like so:

--------O2-----------------
-------------------X2--
----------O1------------
----------X.-----------

Then O2 now has a problem. If they follow X2, they create space behind O1 which another player can move into (or X. can dribble into if they can beat O1 1v1). If they remain in their cover position, then X2 has space to receive and turn, at which point O2 has to press if they are the nearest player. This creates an overshift from the defense, depending on X.'s next move, because someone has to cover that space. At some point within 5 seconds of that single checking run, a player either near the ball or wide of the ball is going to have a lot of space to play in. The key then is to recognise this player and get the ball to them as quickly as possible, because they have space, and space equals time, and time equals better decisions and technical precision. So a high quality passing team playing a bunker team like Stoke actually has an advantage if the players are willing to put in the work to make the checking runs that might not always get them the ball, but which might open up space for someone else to take advantage with a penetrating run of their own. The goal primary goal of the defense is to prevent goals, then to regain possession, and to ultimately not lose their shape in doing so. Direct teams succeed by taking advantage of the moment of transition (notice I said direct, not long ball - Mourinho, rather than Wimbledon) where the attackers are out of defensive position. This is why Hodgson is limited, because he is more concerned with maintaining defensive shape in the attack than in hurting the opposition with movement. Possession teams succeed by pulling defenders out of their defensive shape and exploiting the space created with speed and mobility. This is why Mowbray failed at West Brom - the players were good at passing and keeping the ball, but they didn't make enough penetrating runs and their movement to create space was lacking. What Barca does so well (and what Rodgers is hoping to recreate with Liverpool) is to accept the fact that the ball is quite often lost when the ball is played into the forward positions (because the concentration of defenders is greater in the final third); to take advantage of this, Barca and Rodgers play the pressing game, which means that when the ball is lost, it is lost in a dangerous area close to the opponent's goal, and winning the ball back here has all the advantages mentioned previously that direct teams enjoy (attacking team breaking shape to get into attack on the transition), but these advantages are gained closer to the goal than further from it. This is actually why a player like Carroll might not work in this system against a Stoke - the transition needs speed and one-touch short passes with lots of diagonal runs to and away from the ball to create the space.

Where Rodgers might have a problem is when the other team is super-disciplined in it's shape and also possesses the ball rather than goes direct - a classic Italian team, in other words. City will be the biggest problem I think, and possibly Chelsea. But we don't need to beat those teams to challenge for the title. We just have to make sure we beat all the other teams outside the top four at home, and not lose to them away. I think Rodgers' system might be capable of doing that if it is bedded in quick enough.

Offline Spanish Al

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 5,612
  • Internet Terrorist
Re: Bridging the Gap to a Structured Playmaking Style
« Reply #314 on: June 7, 2012, 05:56:27 PM »
I see a few people are questioning whether Gerrard can play in Rodger's system because he wont keep it simple etc. Imo, Gerrad isn't great at setting the tempo, but if someone else is setting it he adjusts and can play fantastic one touch footy. Take a look at this video against Pompey when Aquilani was the man who looked to be setting our tempo http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zklgnhA6x_E. Note that Masch was also there, another player who can keep the ball. Gerrard tries the more difficult stuff when he is by far the best passer in the team ie when hes with spearing in the middle rather than when with Masch and Xabi.

I for one am excited at seeing how Gerrard adapts to this system and I think he could have another few years in him.
http://gadgets.freebiejeebies.co.uk/172993

Sign up for free Xbox 360's, PS3'S, iPads and other gadgets! 100% genuine! Pm me with any questions!

Offline bigbear

  • offering a $10,000 reward for information leading to arrest and imprisonment of the international porridge thief and furniture wrecker Goldilocks
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 20,492
  • We all Live in a Red and White Kop
Re: Bridging the Gap to a Structured Playmaking Style
« Reply #315 on: June 8, 2012, 08:56:40 AM »
This is not a problem for a team with systematic possession. It is not a problem because the basic principles of defense state that the nearest player must always delay or pressure the ball, depending on whether they are covered. If they don't, then the attack gets time to either dribble or pick the best pass. Possession also requires movement, and in a possession team based on Spanish or Dutch principles, this movement is always diagonal and away from the ball, designed to put the marking defender in a bind - for example:

--------O2-X2--------------
-----------------------
----------O1------------
----------X.-----------

"X." is the player with the ball. X2 is the 2nd attacker. O1 is the 1st defender, O2 is the marking defender. If X2 makes a diagonal checking run to the right of X., like so:

--------O2-----------------
-------------------X2--
----------O1------------
----------X.-----------

Then O2 now has a problem. If they follow X2, they create space behind O1 which another player can move into (or X. can dribble into if they can beat O1 1v1). If they remain in their cover position, then X2 has space to receive and turn, at which point O2 has to press if they are the nearest player. This creates an overshift from the defense, depending on X.'s next move, because someone has to cover that space. At some point within 5 seconds of that single checking run, a player either near the ball or wide of the ball is going to have a lot of space to play in. The key then is to recognise this player and get the ball to them as quickly as possible, because they have space, and space equals time, and time equals better decisions and technical precision. So a high quality passing team playing a bunker team like Stoke actually has an advantage if the players are willing to put in the work to make the checking runs that might not always get them the ball, but which might open up space for someone else to take advantage with a penetrating run of their own. The goal primary goal of the defense is to prevent goals, then to regain possession, and to ultimately not lose their shape in doing so. Direct teams succeed by taking advantage of the moment of transition (notice I said direct, not long ball - Mourinho, rather than Wimbledon) where the attackers are out of defensive position. This is why Hodgson is limited, because he is more concerned with maintaining defensive shape in the attack than in hurting the opposition with movement. Possession teams succeed by pulling defenders out of their defensive shape and exploiting the space created with speed and mobility. This is why Mowbray failed at West Brom - the players were good at passing and keeping the ball, but they didn't make enough penetrating runs and their movement to create space was lacking. What Barca does so well (and what Rodgers is hoping to recreate with Liverpool) is to accept the fact that the ball is quite often lost when the ball is played into the forward positions (because the concentration of defenders is greater in the final third); to take advantage of this, Barca and Rodgers play the pressing game, which means that when the ball is lost, it is lost in a dangerous area close to the opponent's goal, and winning the ball back here has all the advantages mentioned previously that direct teams enjoy (attacking team breaking shape to get into attack on the transition), but these advantages are gained closer to the goal than further from it. This is actually why a player like Carroll might not work in this system against a Stoke - the transition needs speed and one-touch short passes with lots of diagonal runs to and away from the ball to create the space.

Where Rodgers might have a problem is when the other team is super-disciplined in it's shape and also possesses the ball rather than goes direct - a classic Italian team, in other words. City will be the biggest problem I think, and possibly Chelsea. But we don't need to beat those teams to challenge for the title. We just have to make sure we beat all the other teams outside the top four at home, and not lose to them away. I think Rodgers' system might be capable of doing that if it is bedded in quick enough.
But a side like Chelsea or Man City will try and get the ball from us for their own use.

My point was that Rodger's Swansea side would generally face more spread opposition (vertically across the pitch) than Liverpool would face against most sides. So when Swansea tease a side with the ball and have 3/4 opposition players pressing high up the pitch if they are successful in retaining possession they automatically create an attacking position.

That doesn't happen when you are Liverpool at Anfield. Many sides will just sit in full stop and that's where Kenny's side struggled because despite generally dominating possession at home (unlike Hodgson's side) they did not convert the few chances (especially early chances) they made and so the oppositon rarely came out and allowed themselves to be spread.

Offline exiledinyorkshire

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,857
Re: Bridging the Gap to a Structured Playmaking Style
« Reply #316 on: June 8, 2012, 09:51:05 AM »
But a side like Chelsea or Man City will try and get the ball from us for their own use.

My point was that Rodger's Swansea side would generally face more spread opposition (vertically across the pitch) than Liverpool would face against most sides. So when Swansea tease a side with the ball and have 3/4 opposition players pressing high up the pitch if they are successful in retaining possession they automatically create an attacking position.

That doesn't happen when you are Liverpool at Anfield. Many sides will just sit in full stop and that's where Kenny's side struggled because despite generally dominating possession at home (unlike Hodgson's side) they did not convert the few chances (especially early chances) they made and so the oppositon rarely came out and allowed themselves to be spread.

i really dont yet have a full grasp on this to be fair, but i have been pondering Phase of plays post, and trying to put my finger on why it wont work for us if you like. My initial thoughts were, ok but if they just sit and dont go after the player making the run then we are simply playing in front of them. I had thoughts of 2 banks of 4 just keeping their shape and it being an utter piece of shit fest at Anfield, and the more we keep the ball the worse it will become.

But my second thought was that, ok if this happens then we stick to the structured pass and move patterns of play but just higher up. Eventually they have to break. We will have to be very good at it but thats fine by me. Then obviously you can start to see why the team set up begins to be 343, its kind of a natural development to start loosing specialist defenders to get overloads further up the pitch. Like i say i dont really have a full grasp of it, but the notion of a park the bus side, although presenting a different set of questions, doesnt negate the system. In actual fact it helps develop the system. I feel sure that this is where the false 9 comes from. And why Phase suggests that Carroll possibly wont fit, like Ibra didnt at barca. Because the penetration in the centre has to come from deep, it has to perfectly break the defensive line on the diagonal.

I'm muddled but i think i get it. We are a long way off that yet mind you, but if it works it wont be long before we have to think about it.

perhaps one last random thought, and maybe Phase of play can help me here, but i have always struggled to justify or articulate why the short game is better than the direct game. It's starting to crystalise, in as much as the idea is to get the ball from A to B. Ok there are ways and means of doing this, we can simply pick a player who can put the ball directly from distance at the feet of B, or with short passes on the diagonal and with little space we can move it via rotation from A to B. The reason its better this way, is that more movements of the ball create the possibility of more movements of the covering players and therfore give a greater probability that when the ball eventually reaches B it does so with B in greater space and with more options available.

Phase of Play................ am i along the right line here.
« Last Edit: June 8, 2012, 10:23:30 AM by exiledinyorkshire »

Offline exiledinyorkshire

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,857
Re: Bridging the Gap to a Structured Playmaking Style
« Reply #317 on: June 8, 2012, 10:07:49 AM »
also, i think that the near perfect storm of the Chelsea Barca semi fianl is clouding the view somewhat.

It's being suggested by many in the media, that it spelt the end of Tiki Taka. Well on closer inspection it really didnt. Barca unquestionably in my opinion should have easily won that tie. And Chelsea unusually for a top side decide to deploy 200 million pounds of intelligent footballer in a negative one dimentional way. It worked! well done Chelsea, but it was lucky.

I think we can safely go about our business as has been described and see a distinct improvement on the perenial problem of teams playing us with limited ambition. The more structured approach wont exactly be a cure all from the start, but it will perhaps be a natural progression from what we saw last season. We were inches on many occasions last season from having many more points at home, suggesting that the margins of error were tight, and perhaps alluding more than ever to the fact that its the small details that make all the difference, in Rodgers we once again have a details man in charge.

Offline Vulmea

  • Almost saint-like.....
  • RAWK Scribe
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,235
Re: Bridging the Gap to a Structured Playmaking Style
« Reply #318 on: June 8, 2012, 02:06:03 PM »
This was the post I've been trying to find on teh comparisons with brasil - it was posted by Felipe in Rio back in August last year - but I couldn't figure out how to quote it. Over to Felipe...........

First of all, what was supposed to be a small explanation, ended up being one of the biggest posts I've written in my entire life. So I will divide it into sections so that you (meaning anyone reading this) can skip some stuff if you can't take it anymore or if you wanna come back to it after taking a nap, eating, taking a shower, Christmas or something like that. The sections titles will be in BOLD (if i can make it work).

Oh yeah, in case you don't want to read this, I suggest you at least take a look at the video I mentioned as one to watch in "Chapter" 10. You won't regret it, I bet on it.

Anyway, let's go:





1 - WHAT'S THIS ALL ABOUT?


That's the problem you (now it's really you Pistolero) see, you seem to understand Lucas' qualities very well, but you don't understand his role, he is not the be all and end all of CMs simply because he is not a CM, even if he has the technical ability to be one.

Let me explain something about Brazilian tactics, it may be long and a bit boring, but I think it will help understand who was the player who arrived at Anfield 4 or 5 years ago.





2 - AN OVERVIEW ON THE BRAZILIAN 4-4-2 (AND A BIT MORE)*
*By the way, this is in no way a full explanation on Brazilian tactics, this is only a part of it, a part that really only started in the 80s, and even then, it's not complete on that, I just talked about the stuff I though was relevant to the topic... which shows I have no idea what "relevant" means.


In here, the most used formation for a long while is the 4-4-2, but our 4-4-2 is completely different from yours (even in the other formations like 4-3-3 for example, the roles are quite different from the ones you have there), it works likes this:


----------------------1-------------------------
--------------3---------------4----------------
------------------------------------------------
---2----------------------------------------6---
----------------------------5-------------------
------------------7-----------------------------
------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------8--------------
-----------------------10-----------------------
------------11---------------------------------
------------------------9-----------------------




Now, the names we give to these positions are (in between braquets are the literal translations):

1- Goleiro (Goalkeeper)

2- Lateral-Direito (Right Side)

3- Zagueiro Central (Central Furthest Back)

4- Quarto Zagueiro (Fourth Furthest Back)

6- Lateral Esquerdo (Left Side)

5 - Primeiro Volante (First Steering Wheel)

7 - Segundo Volante (Second Steering Wheel)

8 - Meia-armador (Attacking Midfielder-Playmaker)

10 - Meia-atacante [or "Ponta-de-Lanca"] (Attacking Midfielder-Attacker) [or Spear-Head]

11 - Segundo Atacante [or simply "atacante"] (Second Attacker) [or simply "attacker"]

9 - Centro-Avante (Center Forward - yeah, that one is the same)





3 - SO WHAT DOES THAT MEAN IN ENGLAND?


Now, as you can see, some of those names in English don't really say much of what they do, so, if we try to find their respective positions in English tactics here is what we would have:

1 - GK. That's exactly as it is up there, except for the rare technically gifted enough goalkeeper to play the sweeper role.

2 - RB, RWB, RMF. Yep, that's right, that's why the word we use, "lateral" means simply "side", he is both the wide player in defense and in Midfield. in the 4-4-2 he even does the job of the Winger and of the RWF too (just so you have an idea, the only criticism Maicon has here as a Fullback, is that he is too defensive, I'm not kidding). That's just in 4-4-2 though, in our 4-4-3 or 4-2-3-1 we also have the "Pontas" which were basically WFs. In 3-5-2 our "alas" are more similar to Wingers.

3 - CB. Our number 3 is Carragher. He is big, he is scary, he hoofs and he screams. He is Lucio.

4 - CB. Our number 4 is also a CB, but he usually the more technical one who goes for the second challenge or to collect the loose balls, David Luiz is an example of that. Most of our CBs though can do both jobs as they are similar, Thiago Silva for example excels at both.

6 - LB, LWB, LMF. Exact same thing as the Number 2, just on the left side.

5 - DM/Sweeper/CB. Now is when things starting getting confusing, the number 5 role is very similar to your DM or holding midfielder, but not exaaactly the same, I will explain more of this later. This is the position Lucas plays in the Brazil National Team now.

7 - DM/CDM/CM. Now this is the most difficult one, he is more offensive than your DM, but he is more defensive than even your most defensive CM, that's the role Lucas played in Gremio, which as you can see has nothing to do with an AM as people claimed, Anderson was the AM in that team (until he left). Again, I will explain more on this later.

8 - CM/AM. It's the playmaker, whose job you know very well, but this playmaker doesn't play behind the midfield as in there, he plays near the opponent's goal area. Zidane was almost like this (he had a bit of a number 10 too), as was/is Riquelme (this one was a 8/10 halfbreed to be fair) or maybe Nedved (haven't watched him enough to be sure). But the more classical examples would be Socrates, Gerson or Didi. Veron is the only pure Number 8 in the modern game I can think of right now. Don't worry about this too much though, this position is a little blurry even for us 

10 - AM. This player is Pele, Zico, Maradona, Kaka (when Milan Played two strikers), Seedorf (when Kaka played as forward), Gerrard (under Benitez), Lampard, Ronaldinho (in the 2002 WC winning team), Deco (in the Barcelona team Ronaldinho played in), Messi (when he has the ball, when he doesn't he is a number 9, we call that here a "false number 9", it's an European invention from (I think) the Dutch, or maybe the Hungarians, i'm not too sure, so you may know it), Sjneider (has a bit of a number 8 too) etc. As you can see, it's hard to find a pure example since they play under different tactics in Europe, but mostly this man's job is to receive the ball from the numbers 5 and 7 and to create a scoring opportunity with swift runs and dribbling from the middle, and then either shoot it himself or create a 5-10 yards pass to a free teammate (usually number 9) as the defenders come at him. Exactly what Gerrard was doing with Benitez. Of course, since this player is usually the most technally all-round gifted in the team, he can do pretty much whatever he wants and is often given free-reign of the team in the field.

11 - SS. This is the support striker. This one should be easy as you guys have more names and divisions for it than we do. A Number 11 for us includes fairly diverse players as Cristiano Ronaldo (can be number 9 or a "Ponta"), Luis Suarez (can be number 9, but best as 11), Aguero (can be both 9 and 11, I like him more as a 9), Pato (I'd like him as a 9, but he needs better finishing and area presence), Rooney (who could also play number 10, I believe), Di Maria (could also be a "ponta"), Kuyt (seems like he can play wherever people put him), Henry (can be Number 9), Villa (can be number 9, but not as efficient), Pedro (could be a "ponta"), Forlan (can be an AM and used to be a number 9, he has brilliant understanding of the game, as does Suarez btw, that's why he likes Lucas so much) and plenty more. If you want to know what a number 11 should do, just watch Suarez for 10 minutes, there's your answer. By the way, that's why Suarez plays from the sides so much even when he is theorically being played behind Carrol, his instinct as a number 11 is to look for the weaker side of the defense and to try to break in from there.

9 - CF. Pretty much the same. The way they play may change a little here since they are more involved in close range passing with the numbers 10 and 11, but as in there, they stay in or close to the box, they must score a lot, hold the ball for the players coming from behind, take in headers etc. Romario was the perfect 9, Ronaldo had less number 9 qualities than him (still way more than pretty much anyone) but also had plenty of number 11 skills, not to mention that beautiful shooting technique that allowed him to score buckets of goals without ever having to shoot a ball hard in his life. Aguero has some of Romario's qualities, but he is still far from that level obviously. But talking about players who are not from another planet, we have Torres, Drogba, Benzema, Adriano, Diego Milito, Carrol, Adebayor, Van Nistelrooy, Luis Fabiano etc.



Now, from 8 to 11 it's not so different so it should be easy to get it, as are numbers 1, 3 and 4. But the whole point of me talking about all of this was to discuss numbers 2, 6, 5 and 7.





4 - THE TACTICAL DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE TWO 4-4-2 FORMATIONS


As I said, we have two "Volantes", which are somewhat like DMs, and two "Laterais" who do a hell of a lot of stuff.

The "Laterais" have the winger's job of creating width in attack, but they also have the job of the English CMs of building-up play. Yeah, I know it seems weird, but just watch one Brazil match and you will see it. Weirdly enough, this is also the job of the DMs. These four are the guys who bring the ball from the defense to the attacking players (numbers 8, 9, 10 and 11). They are not responsible though, for the creation of scoring opportunities as CMs also are in England, their job is only to take the ball there, and then, if opportunity arises, to join the attack as a surprise man (with crosses for laterais or through passes and forward runs from the volantes).

That's also the reason we have two "AMs", since there are no CMs trying to score and dribble their way into the area, those 2 players, the numbers 8 and 10, are the ones who create chances for numbers 11 and 9.

On the other side, for these two players, numbers 8 and 10, to be effective, they must ALWAYS be part of the attacking play, so they don't defend. that's why you get so many Brazilian midfielders groaning about how managers want them to tackle, in Brazil tackling is not the job of the creative midfielders, we'd never have a Gerrard or Xabi Alonso MARKING someone (although numbers 11, 10 and specially 8 do come back to fill up space and help a bit, but they are not expected to tackle or to steal balls, they mostly try to not allow the laterais and volantes to get the ball to the attackers and meias).

So, we have 2 players (numbers 3 and 4) who mostly only defend and 4 (numbers 8, 9, 10 and 11) who mostly only attack. While in England you have 4 who mostly only defend (the two CBs and two SBs) and 2 who only attack (AM/SS depending on what you wanna call it and the CF).





5 - WHY THE **** DID I WRITE ALL THAT? or THE TACTICAL THING THEY HAVE IN COMMON somewhat


Now, every team must have it's balance, and in both countries, the 4 players remaining (Numbers 2, 6, 5 and 7 in Brazil and the pairs of CMs and Wingers in England) are the guys with the responsability of providing this balance, all of these guys do both things, ATTACK and DEFEND. But since in Brazil, there are more offensive "fixed" players than defensive ones, these 4 will focus more in defense than in offense, while in England, since there are more "fixed" defensive players than there are offensive ones, they will focus more on offense. It's about 70% to 30% in both cases. The main point here, is that laterais and volantes as a whole, are more defensive than CMs and Wingers.





6 - HOW THAT BALANCE WORKS IN BRAZIL (INCLUDES LUCAS AND THE NATIONAL TEAM)



In Brazil, to achieve the 70% defence to 30% offense balance, there are a couple of ways to go, you can use two fairly offensive volantes, that would be ALMOST( I said ALMOST) CMs to pass the ball in the middle, while keeping the laterais in the defense. With the volantes playing in a more advanced position, the numbers 8 and 10 would have to move a bit to the wings to give them the space in which to work, thus providing the width lost with the laterais staying back (when this is done, it becomes very similar to the English 4-4-2, which shows that they are indeed closer to each other then one would guess at first, considering that only 4 players have the same role in both - the GK, the 2 CBs and the CF). Or you could do exactly the opposite, keep the Volantes at defence at all times and have the laterais blast towards the opponent's flanks all game long, the AMs would then play very centrally while the Volantes would become almost CBs (that's why I put "CB" as the third option next to number 5). Or you could of course use any other mix of these factors.

The second option (marauding laterais and CB volantes) has been the most used BY FAR in Brazil though for a long time for two main reasons:

Number 1 is the success of 1994's National Team who played just like that.
Number 2 is that this was the time when we started losing our stars to the European Clubs.

Every one wants to copy a champion, and that explains number 1. Number 2 is easy too, with less quality left for our clubs to use, they couldn't have a player like Dunga or Mauro Silva to use as a "DM almost CB", those were extremely good defensive players with decent technique (for Brazilian standards, btw there were considerable differences between the two, but let's not get too much into that), they could only have either those two player's decent technique, OR they had their defensive ability and NO technique. They chose the second option and more and more our laterais became almost pure attackers and our DMs almost pure defenders, since they couldn't pass the ball, taking away the options we used to have for balance. And that's why Gilberto Silva played 3 World Cups (he was a CB until he was 20 years old in case you don't know).

Only since 2005, when Sao Paulo beat Liverpool in Japan with 2 volantes with some technical ability (Josue and Mineiro, who scored the winning goal in that match by the way, something he really rarely did) did people start to rethink that, and then some technical volantes started to reappear, the very first of them, being your very own Lucas in Gremio, who was soon followed by Hernanes, Ramirez, Sandro, Cicero and others, which are now the ones that Mano Menezes wants to use in his team.

What the Brazil side is now TRYING to do, is to get back to the old times of having options for balance, like we did in 1982 when our 2 volantes were simply Falcao and Cerezo and our 2 laterais Junior and Leandro (damn I'm getting goosebumps just thinking of it lol, these 4 defensive players had the technique to make Kaka look like Terry). Anyway, what I'm trying to say, is that, although Mano is using 3 strikers (but neither Robinho or Neymar are wingers, something that Man City coach couldn't understand, and that's coming from someone who hates Robinho), the idea of balance between the two DMs and SBs is still there, we still have Maicon/Daniel Alvez and Andre Santos (ugh) going up, but the DMs, Lucas and Ramirez, even if still more defensive than the laterais, are also a part of the attacking play, Lucas mainly doing what he does at Liverpool, although from a deeper position, while Ramirez supports him with that providing option and doing forward runs into space when they open up in the opponents defense. They are not Falcao and Cerezo obviously***, but they have been great until now, unfortunately, our attacking quartet hasn't quite found it's best way to play together yet, because, as you can see in the Paraguay match, the ball arrives in their feet from Lucas and Ramirez time and time again.

*** Btw, just thought of something, I read a lot of people in the British media at the time saying that they were told Lucas was similar to Falcao.... so how the hell did people come to the conclusion that Lucas was an AM??? He was a Primeiro Volante, in fact, he played EXACTLY how Lucas is playing now, with more quality obviously, but still at the exact same role, in the exact same position in the field, doing the exact same thing (get the ball, start the new attack, receive the ball back if the forwards can't find a way to goal, move the ball around, repeat.) Want to know how Falcao was? Watch the Lucas match vs Fulham and you will know. The only difference is that Falcao played like that week in week out.


And that's a DM's role, he makes sure the balls gets to the feet of the AMs and Strikers as often as is possible, and then move into space so that if those players can't find any space into which to create an opportunity, they can give the ball back to the DMs so they can do it again.





7 - HOW THAT BALANCE WORKS IN ENGLAND (LUCAS HERE AND LIVERPOOL AS A WHOLE)


Obviously in an English tactics it's a bit different, but not too much, let's see that:

In England, they can also use their 4 players in different ways to achieve this 70% offense to 30% defense balance, they can have one winger be more offensive while another stays back more to protect the back of both fairly offensive CMs, or they can find whatever other solution (that's the coach's job) they prefer for this.

What Kenny has done in the last match, was to have one winger play almost as an striker (Downing), the other winger in a more reserved manner but still fairly offensive, the same with Adam. So, having the other three players in a more offensive role, he kept Lucas back to give that balance, even when he was namely a CM, in this formation he acted as a DM (and any formation that wants to get the best out of Lucas will do that), playing almost like he does in Brazil (in Brazil he is a little more defensive though). This is similar to how in Brazil we would make the number 5 into pretty much a CB so that the laterais could go on an all out offensive.

I don't think this is the ideal (I at least believe that, only my opinion) though, I'd have Lucas playing in this exact way he has in the last game, but as officially a DM, with two classic style CMs (you guys understand that role better than me) who could be two of Gerrard, Aquilani, Adam, Henderson or Raul ahead of him in a triangle formation. up front I'd leave Downing as a pure offensive Winger (maybe make he even MORE purely offensive) and add another one to the other side (who could be Kuit or Suarez, but only if they are REALLY purely offensive) with Suarez or Carrol as Target Man. They are completely different players I know, but both can work there, Suarez played as the only striker for Uruguay in Copa America and you know what happened (Forlan was more of a Number 10 than anything else, as you can see from he only scoring in the final even though he played an awesome tournament). It would be down to "What is better? Kuyt as an Attack Winger or Carrol as a Center Forward?" unless Kenny prefers one style or the other, both could work so it's his choice really.

This formation would put a lot of defensive strain on Lucas since Gerrard and Aquilani are not the most defensive guys around, BUT I think he can pull it off. Actually it would be a great test for him, only a World Class DM could do an effective DM job (tackling/intercepting and moving the ball around) in a formation like this, and if, while playing this formation I mentioned, he still manages to do his job, I'm 100% sure Liverpool can win the EPL. Just imagine if he can keep a considerable flow of balls arriving at the feet of the likes of Gerrard, Aquilani, Downing, Suarez and Carrol all at the same time, all in the opposition's half. I know only of one guy who does that in a similar formation and that guy is Busquets, who helps make sure that Xavi, Iniesta, Villa, Pedro/Sanchez and Messi keep getting the ball all the time (although those 5 steal lots of balls in the attack as well, which is why they are the best by far, Liverpool won't become that this season, probably not even in the next one, but if Lucas can pull it off, in some seasons, depending on how much is spent on transfers and how well the money is spent, it could become an outstanding force capable of making the mancs look like fools just like they did against Barca).

Lucas is confident now, looking better than ever, maybe this could be the time to take the next step, I'm sure Kenny would love this to happen, I hope he's thought of it.




8 - I FINALLY GET TO THE POINT


Well, anyway, I got terribly side-tracked, the reason i wrote all of this was to say:

Lucas is a DM, a player who needs to have an incridible rate of stealing the ball, who must understand the big picture of a match very well to know when to fool, which pass to pick (thinking ahead some 2 or 3 moves so that he can analize which way is the better one to attack through). He is not perfect at those things, but he IS very good at them as you have mentioned yourself, you just thought that wasn't enough to make him a really outstanding DM, but that's really all his need.

Because his job isn't to score goals, dribble defenders or even place pinpoint passes inside the opposition's defense, his job, the end product of the DM game, is to allow the ones who are most capable of doing these things (ie. Gerrard, Suarez, and the other attacking players) to have as many chances of trying them as possible.
And that's important because even with Gerrard being as good as Gerrard is at long shots for example, if he only has the opportunity to try it 2 times a game, he will rarely score, but if Lucas does his job well and the ball keeps getting in good conditions to Gerrard, he will be able to try it 10 times instead of 2, and the chances of 1 in 10 being a goal is MUCH greater than 1 in 2.

That's why people rate Lucas so highly, his attributes are perfect for that job.




9 - I EXPLAIN WHAT I JUST DID THERE WITH A SHORT STORY ABOUT VALUE AND RESPECT. Seriously, it's short, I wrote a 30 pages one as an answer for a youtube comment once, it obviously didn't fit though.


PS: Just a weird exercize on getting the importance of this support. Imagine you are in an archery duel, you and your assistant against an opponent and his assistant. These assistants are crafters who make arrows. Now, the goal of the duel is to shoot a particular deer before your opponent does it.

As you both set on into a forest you both find the deer, now, thing is, you are MUCH better than your opponent, really, by far, you take the first shot...

Chance is, you probably hit the target, because you are great, and great people are great for a reason. But there's a chance of you missing (a fairly small chance in archery -when you are REALLY good- , not so much in Football -even for the best players- ). Your opponent then shoots and misses too.

Thing is, each one of you only had one arrow, (because we were talking about football and football only has 1 ball in the field at a time so I will arbitrarily say you only had 1 arrow or the whole story would be pointless) and that's why you brought your crafters with you.

After both of you missed your shots, both crafters went to work into making new arrows with the wood's trees. You were still very confident, you were MUCH better than him after all, the chances of you missing again are minimal...

You look to your opponent and he is shooting his second arrow, and he misses again, again with the third. and with the fourth.

And your crafter is still making the second.

Your opponent shoots the fifth, sixth and seventh arrows, missing again. On the eighth one, he hits the target. You both go back to town, where they greet your opponent and proclaim him the best archer ever, they give him free beer at the local pub and he gets free service from every one of the cities' huh... working ladies.

You are on the verge of exploding in anger, you tell everyone that he is not really so good, that he missed 7 shots while you only missed one, and that he only won because his crafter was much better and faster than yours. Everyone laughes at you obviously, because everyone knows crafters don't decide matches.

You fire your crafter, hires your opponent's crafter who was annoyed that no one was congratulating him and you tell him:

"Don't worry mate, everytime I win a match from now on, I will tell them of how important you are, and from now on, neither me nor anyone else will ever say that - He who doesn't shoot the arrow, can't be the one who kills the deer."

And so may it be that one day, no one else will say that - He who doesn't score the goal, can't be the one who wins the footbal match.




10 - WANNA SEE THE 4-4-2 THAT I HAVE MENTIONED AT IT'S BEST?


By the way, try searching for this in the youtube search engine:

"Brasil 1982 - The 11 Greatest Goals of Brasil 1982's Magic 11"

You may want to look at this one too, but it's sad    ... You will see what I mean.
"Brazil 1982 - A tribute to the art of football"

That's the perfect Brazilian 4-4-2, the greatest team ever that didn't win, if only Reinaldo or even Careca was fit to play Number 9...
Anyway, there will never be any build-up play like the ones performed over and over again dozens of times in every match by Leandro (Number 2), Junior (Number 6), Falcao (Number 5), Cerezo (number 7), Socrates (Number 8 ) and Zico (Number 10). Not even the 70 team had that (but it was better in the front).

PS: The numbers there are their positions in the team based on my explanation on the 4-4-2 up there, not their actual numbers, I'm not sure of which numbers were Socrates and Cerezo wearing.

PS2: Junior, Leandro and Zico played for my club, maybe someone here remembers these players and their club.




11 - AKA - THE END - WHO THE **** AM I?


Oh yeah, this may be a little weird, you know, me writing a God knows how many lines post considering it's my very first post here on rawk, but I first read the old Lucas thread about 2 years ago I think, and I have been following it since the Argentina x Brasil game last year (I read the whole thing... seriously, it took me like 2 weeks to catch up with it the first time). It started with me wondering "hey, how is that Lucas lad from Gremio I liked so much doing in Liverpool? I bet he's their captain already by now!". So I did a little research and well... let's just say I was surprised, and VERY pissed, murmuring stuff about stupid Brits and their hoofball (btw, reading this was the first step into opening my eyes into the good sides of English Football, and there are plenty of good sides too! Although I still hate hoofball). So as I tried to find someone saying anything GOOD about him, I ended up in that thread.


COMPLETELY OFF-TOPIC, YOU MAY WANT TO SKIP THIS PARAGRAPH AND COME BACK WHEN THIS SECTION IS OVER. I WOULDN'T THOUGH, IT'S ABOUT HAIR:

Btw, what was your problem with his hair? Maybe the Brazilian League is not exactly a standard, but his hair was among the most normal ones we have here! Don't believe me? Look at this (if you are worried if these links are safe or not, let me explain from where they are: The first one is from Terra, one of the biggest internet portals in Brazil, kind of like The Sun but without the newspaper. The second one is from Editora Abril, Brazil's biggest publisher with magazines that sell over 10 Million copies a week. So I'm pretty sure they are too rich to rob people. Anyway, if these sites aren't acceptable by the forums rules, please feel free to delete these links and for God's sake don't ban me in my first post, I swear I will read the rules again 3 more times and paying more and more attention each time if that's the case) : http://img.terra.com.br/i/2011/07/21/1960411-7968-atm14.jpg or this http://clubalfa.abril.com.br/top-10/futebol/10-piores-cortes-de-cabelo-do-brasileirao-2011/).



BACK TO LUCAS

Well, there was a lot of crap about him there too, but some very smart comments, and I ended up getting caught up in it and the rest is history.

End of story is, I know some guys here, like sangria, leivapool, red_new etc, better than I know most of my friends, at least when it comes to football obviously, just from the sheer amount of great stuff I've read from them.

So I'm sorry if I - have gone/will mostly likely go - over the top sometimes since to me it feels like I've been taking part in these discussions for over an year 

Oh yeah, about who the **** I am, my name is Felipe, I'm 20, live in Rio de Janeiro, Brasil and my club is somewhere on the post and on my photograph.

Now let's see if I can post this in one shot...
The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie — deliberate, contrived and dishonest — but the myth — persistent, persuasive and unrealistic.

John F. Kennedy/Shanklyboy.

Offline No666

  • RAWK Scribe
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 11,025
Re: Bridging the Gap to a Structured Playmaking Style
« Reply #319 on: June 8, 2012, 04:59:39 PM »
That's one hell of a post.
But can someone - Vulmea/Felipe? - tell me why that Brazilian 4-4-2 isn't a 4-3-3 masquerading under a different banner?
BETTISON IS LAUGHING AT YOU.....AND YOU PAY FOR IT! SIGN THIS! https://submissions.epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/47770