Author Topic: Brendan Rodgers  (Read 146884 times)

Offline Xabifan

  • Kopite
  • ****
  • Posts: 507
  • We all Live in a Red and White Kop
Re: Brendan Rodgers
« Reply #3040 on: May 30, 2012, 03:32:44 PM »
Lucas strikes me as a player who will thrive under Rodgers Style (injuries permitting)

Offline rednich85

  • Gargantuan Wanker.
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 17,123
  • Stay Black. That's the most important thing.
Re: Brendan Rodgers
« Reply #3041 on: May 30, 2012, 03:32:54 PM »
Reading expert analysis of a manager along with his own ideas of how he sees the game and wants his side to play is a pretty sensible way to make a decision when there is a lack of on the field evidence to go on.

Expert analysis Kev? Who said anything about expert analysis?

Those articles could have come from some tit journo who likes Brendan Rodgers/Martinez.

Who's providing this analysis and to what end?

It's like reading a medical book and self diagnosing. Fuck that.

I think it's odd to make your selection based on a few articles. Regardless of who has penned them.

Just my view.
“When I was in first grade, I went to Catholic school and I can very clearly remember thinking that I'm fucked, because I know I don't know what life is all about, but I know these assholes don't either, and they're the ones who are gonna tell me.”

@rednich85

Offline Redkoprob

  • Anny Roader
  • ***
  • Posts: 450
  • We all Live in a Red and White Kop
Re: Brendan Rodgers
« Reply #3042 on: May 30, 2012, 03:33:03 PM »
Made it the Beebs.  Less underwhelming that Robbie Martinez.  Fingers crossed he will do a great job for us.  Come on Brendan!

Offline spider-neil

  • Can watch 30 games in a day. He's not Spidey - he's Sway!
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,668
  • does whatever a spider can, spins a web any size
Re: Brendan Rodgers
« Reply #3043 on: May 30, 2012, 03:33:07 PM »
His pressing high up the pitch.
His instance that the ball is played out from the back (rather than punting it up field in a panic).
Possession through passing.
All this makes him a very exciting prospect indeed.

Offline brownie 09

  • Long-winded.....but never mind :)
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,654
  • twitter - brownie09RAWK
Re: Brendan Rodgers
« Reply #3044 on: May 30, 2012, 03:33:25 PM »
One problem I can foresee if Rodgers gets the job is his ability to attract the top-end players. Without Champions League someone who's more of a name (Rafa, for example) would have a lot more of a chance bringing in the better players on the promise of better things... obviously FSG are not planning on splashing the cash, which is worrying.
is that obvious yeah? or just an opinion based upon nothing?
One of Kennys Kids

Offline isildurrr

  • Capital letters are so last year.
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,362
  • We all Live in a Red and White Kop
Re: Brendan Rodgers
« Reply #3045 on: May 30, 2012, 03:33:41 PM »
if he's coming alone it will be underwhelming.

there are too many established people with a vision similar to his who should have been preferred.if it is with a DOF then excellent.

Online robbie keane

  • Football Club. Est 2008.
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,776
Re: Brendan Rodgers
« Reply #3046 on: May 30, 2012, 03:33:44 PM »
I honestly feel a little worry for Rodgers because this will only work if he has our full support. One bad run of results and the knives will be out. The lg is far stronger than it was 3 or 4 years ago, spurs, Newcastle and of course city have all caught us and passed us.

We have to manage expectations and take each season as an individual case, we can not compare now to let's say 4 years ago.
A lot has happened and we are playing catch up with a new manager and new ideas, let's embrace it, go with it and give it our full backing. Forget what has gone before and look forward to new beginnings please for the sake of our great club.
« Last Edit: May 30, 2012, 03:40:09 PM by robbie keane »

Offline rednich85

  • Gargantuan Wanker.
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 17,123
  • Stay Black. That's the most important thing.
Re: Brendan Rodgers
« Reply #3047 on: May 30, 2012, 03:33:52 PM »
Decent results over a season?

That's very vague.

Kenny had decent results over last season but we were still shit.
“When I was in first grade, I went to Catholic school and I can very clearly remember thinking that I'm fucked, because I know I don't know what life is all about, but I know these assholes don't either, and they're the ones who are gonna tell me.”

@rednich85

Online SerbianScouser

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,361
Re: Brendan Rodgers
« Reply #3048 on: May 30, 2012, 03:33:54 PM »
Nobody can say that FSG dont have some major major cojones.

Offline conman

  • Ohh aaaah just a little bit, Ooh aahh, a little bit more. Aerial stalker perv. Not cool enough to get the lolz.
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 21,010
  • sound as a pound
Re: Brendan Rodgers
« Reply #3049 on: May 30, 2012, 03:34:16 PM »

I agree mate. Still willing to give Rodgers time, but baffled why the man we know can do it has been left out in the cold.

Offline babraham

  • blincoln. Likes to have man crushes.
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,964
Re: Brendan Rodgers
« Reply #3050 on: May 30, 2012, 03:34:44 PM »
One problem I can foresee if Rodgers gets the job is his ability to attract the top-end players. Without Champions League someone who's more of a name (Rafa, for example) would have a lot more of a chance bringing in the better players on the promise of better things... obviously FSG are not planning on splashing the cash, which is worrying.
Step up Aloysius Paulus Maria "Louis" van Gaal
We'll be selling Henderson within 3 years and not for a profit, I guarantee it. Bookmark this post, I won't be eating my words.

YNWA!!!

Offline gemkopqueen

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,483
  • You'll never walk alone.
Re: Brendan Rodgers
« Reply #3051 on: May 30, 2012, 03:34:51 PM »
One problem I can foresee if Rodgers gets the job is his ability to attract the top-end players. Without Champions League someone who's more of a name (Rafa, for example) would have a lot more of a chance bringing in the better players on the promise of better things... obviously FSG are not planning on splashing the cash, which is worrying.

Obvious??  We don't know the ins and outs of anything yet.
Gemzy Wemzy

Offline Melbred

  • Kim cloned.
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,769
  • We all Live in a Red and White Kop
Re: Brendan Rodgers
« Reply #3052 on: May 30, 2012, 03:35:07 PM »
Expert analysis Kev? Who said anything about expert analysis?

Those articles could have come from some tit journo who likes Brendan Rodgers/Martinez.

Who's providing this analysis and to what end?

It's like reading a medical book and self diagnosing. Fuck that.

I think it's odd to make your selection based on a few articles. Regardless of who has penned them.

Just my view.

The articles provide a great insight into the way Rodgers' approach to the game, considering they are filled with quotes of him explaining how and why he plays the way he does. It's not just journos talking shite.

Offline Johnnyboy1973

  • Alcoholic Abuser
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 11,799
Re: Brendan Rodgers
« Reply #3053 on: May 30, 2012, 03:35:11 PM »
Nobody can say that FSG dont have some major major cojones.

They can.

It could quite easily be they're clueless.

Time will tell.

Offline ryatnalkar

  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,209
  • We all Live in a Red and White Kop
Re: Brendan Rodgers
« Reply #3054 on: May 30, 2012, 03:35:16 PM »
Not really, no, because it's a whole different thread. But to summarise: Suarez, Commolli, absentee owners, ill communication, transfer funding, Carroll swap deals, DOF sackings, no operational/press/PR support. Kenny was hung out to dry in a way he didn't deserve, and meanwhile took the flak for everything on the chin, trying to keep the facade of a unified club intact for the baying press horde, the stress of which led to them interpreting his stance as belligerent and so on and so forth.

So Kenny didn't get support, and as such, his authority was undermined. If that happens with Rodgers, these owners will be twice culpable.

If that is what you call Kenny didn't get support, then I dont even know how one can describe what went with Rafa.

Let's not rewrite history and say Kenny gave up because of above (many hypothetical in there). Its complete lack of any fixed formation and absent tactics that lead to disastrous results which is why he got the sack. I believe we will do better under Rodgers than Kenny. Hell, he did so well with a Swansea squad, if he was here last season, we would have been better.

Offline Sharado

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,299
  • This game is rigged
Re: Brendan Rodgers
« Reply #3055 on: May 30, 2012, 03:35:17 PM »
Hang on...Hang on....Has anyone yet seen the potential for headlines here?

Brendan Rodgers Fergie...and so forth.

I'm 100% behind him now that's passed through my tiny mind. 
twitter.com/Sharadospolier

Offline Redeo

  • Kopite
  • ****
  • Posts: 791
Re: Brendan Rodgers
« Reply #3056 on: May 30, 2012, 03:35:40 PM »
Top 4 next season and a quality showing in Europa. Title contention thereafter.
That's some mammoth optimism. Surely it is this: flirting with Top 4 next season and genuine title contention by 2016-2017 at the earliest.
You honestly think we can challenge MC and MU for title in 12 months time?
It's a website mate. Names can't be named. If they were, there'd be mutiny. If they aren't, people will scream ... ask for proof. But you will never find 100% proof of anything on here. So, .. look at all evidence, weigh everything up and make a decision.

Offline conman

  • Ohh aaaah just a little bit, Ooh aahh, a little bit more. Aerial stalker perv. Not cool enough to get the lolz.
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 21,010
  • sound as a pound
Re: Brendan Rodgers
« Reply #3057 on: May 30, 2012, 03:35:48 PM »
Not really, no, because it's a whole different thread. But to summarise: Suarez, Commolli, absentee owners, ill communication, transfer funding, Carroll swap deals, DOF sackings, no operational/press/PR support. Kenny was hung out to dry in a way he didn't deserve, and meanwhile took the flak for everything on the chin, trying to keep the facade of a unified club intact for the baying press horde, the stress of which led to them interpreting his stance as belligerent and so on and so forth.

So Kenny didn't get support, and as such, his authority was undermined. If that happens with Rodgers, these owners will be twice culpable.
I reckon Kenny wanted to get someone in for Lucas at xmas, but the owners had probably made up their mind by then and said no. thats just my opinion, but would further validate the "hung out to dry" train of thought.

Offline Terry De Niro

  • Cellar dweller feller, y'know
  • RAWK Scribe
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 44,872
  • Are you talkin' to me or chewin' a brick?
Re: Brendan Rodgers
« Reply #3058 on: May 30, 2012, 03:36:01 PM »
That's very vague.

Kenny had decent results over last season but we were still shit.
Our league finish would suggest that you are right, but we did play some good football as well under Kenny.

Offline ChristophLFC

  • No new LFC topics
  • Kopite
  • ****
  • Posts: 847
Re: Brendan Rodgers
« Reply #3059 on: May 30, 2012, 03:36:24 PM »
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/18235961

welcome to anfield brenden!!  :scarf :scarf

i am very much looking forward to see what he can do

pass,pass,pass,pass,pass,pass,pass,pass,pass GOAAAAL!  ;D

Offline WhiteHeat

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,787
  • wants the traditions of LFC back.
Re: Brendan Rodgers
« Reply #3060 on: May 30, 2012, 03:36:27 PM »
Anyone care to outline what a "fine job" will be?

1 Build a rapport with the fans, something the last 'outsider' failed to do
2 Play good footy and show signs of progression
3 Aim to win one of the three cup comps we're in. Europa League would be the nicest prize
4 Get as close to the top four as we can. If we get, say, 65 points or more that would be a good effort. 52 points last year was not good enough although the players were more to blame than Kenny IMO, they switched off and gave up after the Arsenal game
« Last Edit: May 30, 2012, 03:38:44 PM by WhiteHeat »

Offline CRAZY HORSE EMLYN

  • Kopite
  • ****
  • Posts: 874
Re: Brendan Rodgers
« Reply #3061 on: May 30, 2012, 03:36:42 PM »
His pressing high up the pitch.
His instance that the ball is played out from the back (rather than punting it up field in a panic).
Possession through passing.
All this makes him a very exciting prospect indeed.

Got a bit excited from the way you'd set that out, thinking you'd penned a little verse already about the man there!
Lewsoppppijojikk nnunhkbjhjoiijoifc gg c. C Czech
45 Woolmer Close, Birchwood, Warrington WA3 6TT, UK
 x. X

Offline benn25

  • Finger licker
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,711
  • We all Live in a Red and White Kop
Re: Brendan Rodgers
« Reply #3062 on: May 30, 2012, 03:36:54 PM »
Im skimming the last 5 pages. Is Rodgers our manager or is it still speculation?
Wrong on two counts. He didn't give himself a ten match ban. And this thread is about calculating the ban not about selling Suarez. In the spirit of your post I'm giving you a ten day ban for detailing the thread. It's completely out of proportion but you did it to yourself. I take it you won't be asking for it to be reduced.

Offline thekremlin

  • Kopite
  • ****
  • Posts: 700
  • nothing like a nice cup of tea
Re: Brendan Rodgers
« Reply #3063 on: May 30, 2012, 03:37:00 PM »
is that obvious yeah? or just an opinion based upon nothing?

Okay, an opinion. More of a turn of phrase than anything. But based on the prior reasoning of my post, who is going to come here that is actually worth a lot of money? We'll see, in any case.

Offline babraham

  • blincoln. Likes to have man crushes.
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,964
Re: Brendan Rodgers
« Reply #3064 on: May 30, 2012, 03:37:58 PM »
Im skimming the last 5 pages. Is Rodgers our manager or is it still speculation?
Almost certain.
We'll be selling Henderson within 3 years and not for a profit, I guarantee it. Bookmark this post, I won't be eating my words.

YNWA!!!

Offline CRAZY HORSE EMLYN

  • Kopite
  • ****
  • Posts: 874
Re: Brendan Rodgers
« Reply #3065 on: May 30, 2012, 03:38:00 PM »
I guess we can we make do with "Brehhh -ndan RO–GERZZ... clap clap clap clap..." for the time being though
Lewsoppppijojikk nnunhkbjhjoiijoifc gg c. C Czech
45 Woolmer Close, Birchwood, Warrington WA3 6TT, UK
 x. X

Offline scared_person

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,475
Re: Brendan Rodgers
« Reply #3066 on: May 30, 2012, 03:38:08 PM »
I think its a punt.

He could have the potential to be a great manager and build a dynasty. He might turn out to be a one season wonder who struggles to handle the big club pressure.

People saying he must have impressed in the interview: Who has he impressed? I could interview a genius and a moron for a baseball manager's job and I wouldn't know the difference. Werner and Henry know fuck all about football so who is making this appointment?

My questions:
Are we in a good position to be gambling on a manager now?
Do the people making the gamble now have sufficient knowledge of the game to stack the odds in their favour?

Offline brownie 09

  • Long-winded.....but never mind :)
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,654
  • twitter - brownie09RAWK
Re: Brendan Rodgers
« Reply #3067 on: May 30, 2012, 03:38:32 PM »
Okay, an opinion. More of a turn of phrase than anything. But based on the prior reasoning of my post, who is going to come here that is actually worth a lot of money? We'll see, in any case.
Regardless of who is manager. With the posistions we have been in over the last 3years I doubt we would have the pull unless we were offering mega amounts of money in wages.
One of Kennys Kids

Offline Redeo

  • Kopite
  • ****
  • Posts: 791
Re: Brendan Rodgers
« Reply #3068 on: May 30, 2012, 03:38:45 PM »
Not really, no, because it's a whole different thread. But to summarise: Suarez, Commolli, absentee owners, ill communication, transfer funding, Carroll swap deals, DOF sackings, no operational/press/PR support. Kenny was hung out to dry in a way he didn't deserve, and meanwhile took the flak for everything on the chin, trying to keep the facade of a unified club intact for the baying press horde, the stress of which led to them interpreting his stance as belligerent and so on and so forth.

So Kenny didn't get support, and as such, his authority was undermined. If that happens with Rodgers, these owners will be twice culpable.
Ok, thanks. Different thread indeed. Perhaps will pick up on elsewhere...
It's a website mate. Names can't be named. If they were, there'd be mutiny. If they aren't, people will scream ... ask for proof. But you will never find 100% proof of anything on here. So, .. look at all evidence, weigh everything up and make a decision.

Offline RedPross

  • Main Stander
  • **
  • Posts: 239
  • We all Live in a Red and White Kop
Re: Brendan Rodgers
« Reply #3069 on: May 30, 2012, 03:39:41 PM »
So Roman meets with Pep after buying Hazard for £34m.....and we get Brendan !!!

How football has changed over the years... doesn't look anything like the "Beautiful Game" I grew up with.... its more like Monopoly for the rich and infamous!!!

Anyway good luck to however gets in... they're going to need it (still not convinced it will be BR think hes just another on the ever growing list)

Offline JackWard33

  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,553
Re: Brendan Rodgers
« Reply #3070 on: May 30, 2012, 03:39:51 PM »
His pressing high up the pitch.
His instance that the ball is played out from the back (rather than punting it up field in a panic).
Possession through passing.
All this makes him a very exciting prospect indeed.

This is the bit that worries me.
He's not exactly alone in this is he? There are young coaches all over europe coaching this style of play it doesn't make him unique.

He's unproven at so many things that are central to this job, from handling 'star' players through to dealing with the media cauldron and constant focus, actually winning trophies not just over achieving in competitions, attracting top notch playing talent and on and on.
He could be fantastic at everything - but then so could a lot of coaches.

If appointed he's the least qualified manager we've had since the club came back to the top division; what's really scary is that all of this is based on just a couple of good years at one club, and just one in the PL. People keep calling it a gamble, without anyone more senior with footballing knowledge its not a gamble its a massive close your eyes and hope punt and its one we don't have to take

Offline Gene

  • Severe Tropical Cyclone (RSMC Nadi designation:12F JTWC designation:15P)
  • Kopite
  • ****
  • Posts: 784
  • YNWA
Re: Brendan Rodgers
« Reply #3071 on: May 30, 2012, 03:40:07 PM »
To say I'm pleased, would be an understatement.
'Liverpool was made for me and I was made for Liverpool.'

Offline b_joseph

  • Unloyal gloryhunter who was probably Kelly Osbourne in another life.
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 15,528
Re: Brendan Rodgers
« Reply #3072 on: May 30, 2012, 03:40:29 PM »
Lucas strikes me as a player who will thrive under Rodgers Style (injuries permitting)
Lucas strikes me as a player who thrives under anyone style...great players will be great.


I wish our new Boss all the best...Not many will say he was near the top of their wishlist but you have to admire someone this early in their career taking on a job of this size.
Dry sheets, ice cream, jelly beans....3 of my favorite things.

Offline WhiteHeat

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,787
  • wants the traditions of LFC back.
Re: Brendan Rodgers
« Reply #3073 on: May 30, 2012, 03:40:52 PM »
This is the bit that worries me.
He's not exactly alone in this is he? There are young coaches all over europe coaching this style of play it doesn't make him unique.

He's unproven at so many things that are central to this job, from handling 'star' players through to dealing with the media cauldron and constant focus, actually winning trophies not just over achieving in competitions, attracting top notch playing talent and on and on.
He could be fantastic at everything - but then so could a lot of coaches.

If appointed he's the least qualified manager we've had since the club came back to the top division; what's really scary is that all of this is based on just a couple of good years at one club, and just one in the PL. People keep calling it a gamble, without anyone more senior with footballing knowledge its not a gamble its a massive close your eyes and hope punt and its one we don't have to take


Souness/Evans/Hodgson all had superior CVs?

Offline Melbred

  • Kim cloned.
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,769
  • We all Live in a Red and White Kop
Re: Brendan Rodgers
« Reply #3074 on: May 30, 2012, 03:40:55 PM »
Ah well, thats ok then.

Bloggers sway the masses. Fucking hell.

Why would you just quote that part of my post? Did I not say that the most valuable insight comes directly from Rodgers himself?


Offline rednich85

  • Gargantuan Wanker.
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 17,123
  • Stay Black. That's the most important thing.
Re: Brendan Rodgers
« Reply #3075 on: May 30, 2012, 03:41:03 PM »
Our league finish would suggest that you are right, but we did play some good football as well under Kenny.


No doubt, Terry. No doubt at all. Some of the football, even last season, was fucking great. Its a results business, fuck, if our Brendan isn't in the top four come Christmas, the usual groans of discontent will be heard.
“When I was in first grade, I went to Catholic school and I can very clearly remember thinking that I'm fucked, because I know I don't know what life is all about, but I know these assholes don't either, and they're the ones who are gonna tell me.”

@rednich85

Offline Redeo

  • Kopite
  • ****
  • Posts: 791
Re: Brendan Rodgers
« Reply #3076 on: May 30, 2012, 03:41:08 PM »
3 Aim to win one of the three cup comps we're in. Europa League would be the nicest prize
Not for FSG!
It's a website mate. Names can't be named. If they were, there'd be mutiny. If they aren't, people will scream ... ask for proof. But you will never find 100% proof of anything on here. So, .. look at all evidence, weigh everything up and make a decision.

Offline scatman

  • Slutty enough to make Jordan blush - and hard enough to piss in the wrong bush! Missing a shift key.
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 16,350
  • This is my world, you just WORK here :D
    • Twatterings of a Maniac
Re: Brendan Rodgers
« Reply #3077 on: May 30, 2012, 03:41:26 PM »
I'm just trying to find out where these nice places to eat are.
Swansea is shite, you're better off diving into the sea and catching some fish yaself.
Would sacrifice Fordy in a sacred Mayan ritual to have him as the next Liverpool manager

Offline Coley_DP

  • Main Stander
  • **
  • Posts: 69
  • Armchair fan extraordinaire
Re: Brendan Rodgers
« Reply #3078 on: May 30, 2012, 03:41:44 PM »
His song will have to be to the tune of Feeder's "Buck Rodgers"

Offline rednich85

  • Gargantuan Wanker.
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 17,123
  • Stay Black. That's the most important thing.
Re: Brendan Rodgers
« Reply #3079 on: May 30, 2012, 03:41:47 PM »
Why would you just quote that part of my post? Did I not say that the most valuable insight comes directly from Rodgers himself?



Because Rodgers didn't write an article on himself, did he?

I'd be worried if he did.
“When I was in first grade, I went to Catholic school and I can very clearly remember thinking that I'm fucked, because I know I don't know what life is all about, but I know these assholes don't either, and they're the ones who are gonna tell me.”

@rednich85