I don't believe in full scale conspiracy bollocks, but after our 1-4 win at their swamp, did Alan Wiley (the referee on that day and the ref who the season after that, whiskey nose labelled him as incompetent[maybe he had the 1-4 in mind] refer another game at OT? He might have, he might haven't (if which is the case, seems dodgy), but something just doesn't add up.
Another thing is, why do all the so called "soft" decision go in their favour? I mean, ALL.
oh, hi caferouge lurkers. wassup?