Author Topic: Baseball Owner 'To Buy Liverpool' (includes official LFC statement)  (Read 153329 times)

Offline James Mac

  • Sabu Pundit's PR
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,128
  • Return of the Mac
Re: Baseball Owner 'To Buy Liverpool' (includes official LFC statement)
« Reply #1240 on: October 6, 2010, 12:43:46 PM »
Sky are desperately trying to deflate the news, they all look and sound gutted.

Is this actually true? Or are we being paranoid? I always think they're against us as well, but I suppose from a neutral perspective, they're not doing anything wrong, per se.
"He worshipped expertness of any kind. He loved his work passionately and had no tolerance for anything save for other single-track devotions. He was a master in his own field and felt no sympathy except for mastery. His view of the world was simple: there were the able, and there were the incompetent; he was not concerned with the latter."

Offline TipTopKop

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 5,568
  • Call Meeeeeee The Splund
Re: Baseball Owner 'To Buy Liverpool' (includes official LFC statement)
« Reply #1241 on: October 6, 2010, 12:43:51 PM »
Thommo on SSN comparing transfer targets to shopping , saying he wants to be shopping in harrods not the corner shop.
Dunno, I don't think we should expect massive signings in the short term.

Offline sattapaal

  • The new 'pete price' of RAWK.
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,788
  • @sattapaal on Twitter
Re: Baseball Owner 'To Buy Liverpool' (includes official LFC statement)
« Reply #1242 on: October 6, 2010, 12:44:13 PM »

As a born and bred Red Sox fan, along with parents and every generation that came before back to the beginning of time, I'll tell you how I feel about it:  utterly offended by your use of the "s" word.

I've posted some thoughts about the sox ownership previously, but now I'll tell you how I really feel.  There's a part of me inside that is excited at the link on a purely emotional level.  Of course we need to learn more, but it has long bothered me that the majority of Americans seem to think that Manchester United IS English football.  When people hear that I support a football team, they immediately assume it's Man U.  I take a deep breath and forgive them because they're American, and then I go on to explain that utd is like the yankees, and Liverpool is like the Red Sox... so of course I support Liverpool.  Then they nod in understanding.

I have always felt that there are many, many parallels between Liverpool and the Red Sox.  The history, the tradition, the depth of passion (throughout families, neighborhoods), the wit and astuteness of the fans and their will to support through thick and thin, and an inner understanding that their team is better than all others no matter what the table-of-the-moment says.  Years ago, when utd came to the states and started doing joint promotions and marketing with the Yankees, it just affirmed my hate for the both of them.  Financial questions aside, there's something that tickles my insides when I think of Liverpool and the Red Sox sticking it back to them.

great post mate, appreciated.

the link could be good, we just need to start doing the business on the pitch once the takeover is confirmed.
Quote from: JohnWHenry
We will build and grow from within, buy prudently and cleverly and never again waste resources on inflated transfer fees and unrealistic wages. We have no fear of spending and competing with the very best but we will not overpay for players
Too late eh?

Online danwms

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,215
  • Walking through the storm.
    • Last FM
Re: Baseball Owner 'To Buy Liverpool' (includes official LFC statement)
« Reply #1243 on: October 6, 2010, 12:44:30 PM »
Anyone have a link to the full broughton interview.

5 Live cut off half way through.

Offline Dewey Finn

  • Steve Bruce's Mum
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,533
  • Better find another solution
Re: Baseball Owner 'To Buy Liverpool' (includes official LFC statement)
« Reply #1244 on: October 6, 2010, 12:44:32 PM »
Thommo on SSN comparing transfer targets to shopping , saying he wants to be shopping in harrods not the corner shop.

Excellent.
"Imagine someone holding forth on biology whose only knowledge of the subject is the Book of British Birds, and you have a rough idea of what it feels like to read Richard Dawkins on theology." Terry Eagleton

Offline xerxes1

  • Arch Revisionist. Lord Marmaduke of Bunkerton. Has no agenda other than the truth. Descendant of Prince John.
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 10,649
  • L-I-V,E-R-P-,double OL, Liverpool FC.
Re: Baseball Owner 'To Buy Liverpool' (includes official LFC statement)
« Reply #1245 on: October 6, 2010, 12:45:07 PM »
Is this actually true? Or are we being paranoid? I always think they're against us as well, but I suppose from a neutral perspective, they're not doing anything wrong, per se.

Sky News is pro any news which keeps them busy.
"I've never felt being in a minority of one was in any way an indication that I might be in error"

Offline Raz

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,923
Re: Baseball Owner 'To Buy Liverpool' (includes official LFC statement)
« Reply #1246 on: October 6, 2010, 12:45:40 PM »
Alright lads. my first post.
I was one of the ones sitting outside this forum looking in and following all the events as they happend, but somehow it didnt feel quite right peering through the window so I registered. I dont normally do forums so please be gentle with me (Im sure I said that to my missus on our first date)

Its a simple fact that for us to have any future whatsoever the Tweedle brothers must go! but Im not going to get over excited about this new bloke and his mates. Yes he can clear the clubs debts and that would be a great start but we need much more than that. What if this new lot simply buy the club and leave it floating along for a while until they need some cash to plow into their other ventures? I know they are making an initial layout by clearing the debt but they can recoup that over time until they have it all back and then turn us into another piggy bank like the first two uglies did!

I want the yanks out!
I want Rafa back!
I want chocolate orange flavour ice cream!

One thing is certain for me tho. I dont want a "Manchester City" type sugar plum who will lose interest in a couple of seasons. We need long term stability and if this lot can bring us that then I will be well chuffed!

You can buy a title but you cant buy respect!! 

Good post.

Welcome to RAWK mate.
He then starts trying to punch the ghost and starts telling it to fuck off

Offline No Way José

  • Kopite
  • ****
  • Posts: 693
  • Hard as fuck - Not me, Wiggo
Re: Baseball Owner 'To Buy Liverpool' (includes official LFC statement)
« Reply #1247 on: October 6, 2010, 12:45:52 PM »
Quote
In a statement they said: "In April, we confirmed our agreement to sell Liverpool Football Club, and appointed a new Chairman and advisers to oversee the process. At that time we and Martin Broughton stated our commitment to finding the right buyer for LFC, one that could support and sustain the Club in the future. We remain committed to that goal.

The owners have invested more than $270 million in cash into the club, and during their tenure revenues have nearly doubled, investment in players has increased and the Club is one of the most profitable in the EPL. As such, the Board has been presented with offers that we believe dramatically undervalue the Club.
“To be clear, there is no change in our commitment to finding a buyer for Liverpool Football Club at a fair price that reflects the very significant investment we've made. We will however resist any attempt to sell the Club without due process or agreement by the owners."

 :lmao
What doesn't kill you, only makes you stronger. Except Polio

Offline Breitner

  • Charles 'Charlie' Charles says: "No more tactics God damn you. This is Association Football!"
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 7,303
Re: Baseball Owner 'To Buy Liverpool' (includes official LFC statement)
« Reply #1248 on: October 6, 2010, 12:46:44 PM »
Is this actually true? Or are we being paranoid?

Maybe. I just always sense an air of negativity from them concerning us. Plus I genuinely despise the whole brand and what it's done to football.
If you can't trust Kenny, you need to find another club, seriously.

Offline Bob Loblaw

  • Could be John Giles, or his agent.
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 25,394
Re: Baseball Owner 'To Buy Liverpool' (includes official LFC statement)
« Reply #1249 on: October 6, 2010, 12:48:28 PM »
The parent company is taking on the debt to buy the club. It won't be secured against the club. To be honest, how many people have a spare £300-£500m cash to spend on a club?

How long then before that debt is loaded back onto the club?

Offline Lent§

  • RAWK Stuff
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 17,398
Re: Baseball Owner 'To Buy Liverpool' (includes official LFC statement)
« Reply #1250 on: October 6, 2010, 12:48:42 PM »
Maybe. I just always sense an air of negativity from them concerning us. Plus I genuinely despise the whole brand and what it's done to football.
They are Hicks go-to men, his first port of call to release more lies so they probably don't want to ruin that just yet since they get the exclusive on him first. Fuck Sky Sports though the sooner clubs can stream their own matches the better.
psn = Lents123

Offline Red_Rich

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 5,635
  • Fan since Liverpool 5 Stoke 3 in 1976
Re: Baseball Owner 'To Buy Liverpool' (includes official LFC statement)
« Reply #1251 on: October 6, 2010, 12:49:52 PM »
What i cant understand, is the people saying they don't want no sugar daddy, as the likes of chelseas and citys (possible) success has been bought.

Short memories maybe?

Despite the fact we have never had mega rich people running the club, right throughout our most successful era, we were famous for breaking transfer records, buying the best available talent.

Does that previous "bought" success leave a nasty taste in the mouth too, or is that conveniently forgotten?




There's a difference in buying one or two top money players that may be transfer records, to that of City who buy 5 or 6 players at once all at £20m+ and then only play half of them on the pitch causing unrest and sulking.

I'll repeat - I don't want us to be like City.

Offline mbyx6cg2

  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,813
Once she's had a few glasses of Chardonnay I'll be in quicker than you can say PDF to offer her a jolly good spit shining of her corned beef curtains

Offline Chivasino

  • educated whopper
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 13,337
Re: Baseball Owner 'To Buy Liverpool' (includes official LFC statement)
« Reply #1253 on: October 6, 2010, 12:52:44 PM »
How long then before that debt is loaded back onto the club?

Hopefully that can't/won't happen because it's in agreement before the club is signed over, and because no one would so fucking stupid having seen what G&H have been through with us.
"...British people are highly indebted and obliged to Sikhs for a long time. I know that within this century we needed their help twice and they did help us very well. As a result of their timely help, we are today able to live with honour, dignity, and independence. In the war, they fought and died for us, wearing the turbans" Winston Churchill

Offline Yakyb

  • Anny Roader
  • ***
  • Posts: 487
  • Wirralien Born and Bred
Re: Baseball Owner 'To Buy Liverpool' (includes official LFC statement)
« Reply #1254 on: October 6, 2010, 12:53:16 PM »
There's a difference in buying one or two top money players that may be transfer records, to that of City who buy 5 or 6 players at once all at £20m+ and then only play half of them on the pitch causing unrest and sulking.

I'll repeat - I don't want us to be like City.

yeah for example the Ballotelli buy may be their undoing already

Offline Stussy

  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 14,623
Re: Baseball Owner 'To Buy Liverpool' (includes official LFC statement)
« Reply #1255 on: October 6, 2010, 12:53:22 PM »
What i cant understand, is the people saying they don't want no sugar daddy, as the likes of chelseas and citys (possible) success has been bought.

Short memories maybe?

Despite the fact we have never had mega rich people running the club, right throughout our most successful era, we were famous for breaking transfer records, buying the best available talent.

Does that previous "bought" success leave a nasty taste in the mouth too, or is that conveniently forgotten?


No, because we did it with our own money, from revenues that we generated ourselves.




Offline buchigo!

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 5,674
  • okay javier but i'm only on loan... for sure no?
Re: Baseball Owner 'To Buy Liverpool' (includes official LFC statement)
« Reply #1257 on: October 6, 2010, 12:54:25 PM »

There's a difference in buying one or two top money players that may be transfer records, to that of City who buy 5 or 6 players at once all at £20m+ and then only play half of them on the pitch causing unrest and sulking.

I'll repeat - I don't want us to be like City.

agree mate.

our problem was depth- so far as if A gets injured B gets on without not much difference in quality. and we're only a few pieces more from getting there. let's not go galacti-pool.
Finish the job sir. Come back when we deserve you.

Online ♠Dirty Harry♠

  • Michael Pain the tittie-fixated inflatable doll salesman
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 18,872
Re: Baseball Owner 'To Buy Liverpool' (includes official LFC statement)
« Reply #1258 on: October 6, 2010, 12:54:38 PM »
I liked Broughton's Q&A but I do worry that the stadium bit could easily be read as saying we could end up with a 60,000 stadium that does just happen to be shared with Everton.

As it happens I'm actually not really anti-groundshare if its the least bad alternative.  but I know that many fans are dead set against it and we really could do without all the aggro it will inevitably invite.

I share the same uneasiness as you mentioned in your first paragraph, but groundshare shouldn't be considered. Ever.

Offline Rigden

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,804
Re: Baseball Owner 'To Buy Liverpool' (includes official LFC statement)
« Reply #1259 on: October 6, 2010, 12:55:08 PM »
Just woke up, seems like utter chaos is going through the boardroom at Anfield. Any news comments by Hicks & GG?
“Fans are great, but the quickest way to start losing is to listen to them.” – Sam Pollock

Offline Red Mouse

  • Anny Roader
  • ***
  • Posts: 458
Re: Baseball Owner 'To Buy Liverpool' (includes official LFC statement)
« Reply #1260 on: October 6, 2010, 12:56:22 PM »
Thommo wants to be shopping in Harrods and not some DIY store in Kirkby!

:D

Offline Redeo

  • Kopite
  • ****
  • Posts: 791
Re: Baseball Owner 'To Buy Liverpool' (includes official LFC statement)
« Reply #1261 on: October 6, 2010, 12:56:23 PM »
I am not at all ecstatic about this. 
For me the logic is simple: there is no big-fortune money to be made in professional sports, hence the preferred buyer is n o t one who already owns several sport 'franchises' but would be one who has a separate source of fortune and an unrelenting passion for the preferably one club he owns.  That would be the perfect formula.  What we got here looks and smells better than what we had with H&G, but I don't think it is in a different league which is what I was hoping for.  If things indeed work out with this bid, I would love to be proven wrong.
It's a website mate. Names can't be named. If they were, there'd be mutiny. If they aren't, people will scream ... ask for proof. But you will never find 100% proof of anything on here. So, .. look at all evidence, weigh everything up and make a decision.

Online Tepid water

  • Folically-challenged monkey-rubber.
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 15,190
  • Humongous D. Back of the net.
Re: Baseball Owner 'To Buy Liverpool' (includes official LFC statement)
« Reply #1262 on: October 6, 2010, 12:56:51 PM »
The parent company is taking on the debt to buy the club. It won't be secured against the club. To be honest, how many people have a spare £300-£500m cash to spend on a club?

My concern is that there will be debt associated with the club and that someone has to pay the interest and that would be us. If there is no debt at all then great, the club can fund itself quite happily.

We need more info I guess.

Their track record does seem much more honourable than the vermin though.
I TOLD YOU WE WEREN'T SIGNING HUNTELAAR.

Offline Mighty_Red

  • Rojo Poderoso!
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 9,191
  • All hail the King...
    • Join the fight - SOS
Re: Baseball Owner 'To Buy Liverpool' (includes official LFC statement)
« Reply #1263 on: October 6, 2010, 12:57:16 PM »
Good words from Broughton, probably the most believable since he has been here. He sounds too confident for the challenge to be upheld - if they signed all board authority to him, then they have nothing to go on, unless they can prove that the NESV bid is not in the best interests of all concerned.

With an impending loan to be repaid and the creditor backing NESV, I cannot see how a judge could halt things, but it may delay things a bit more.
Some clubs were always destined for greatness...

Offline Finn Solomon

  • Prefers a stroke from a thin whippy cane
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 17,563
  • I love Coutinho's balls
Re: Baseball Owner 'To Buy Liverpool' (includes official LFC statement)
« Reply #1264 on: October 6, 2010, 12:57:25 PM »
Liverpool and the Red Sox vs the Mancs and the Yanks. Sounds good.

broughton also said there will be money available in january

It's imperative we get a new manager before then.

Twitter - FinnSolomon
Rafa made it so that you didn't give a shit which fucking ball emerged from Platini's jar.

Offline buchigo!

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 5,674
  • okay javier but i'm only on loan... for sure no?
Re: Baseball Owner 'To Buy Liverpool' (includes official LFC statement)
« Reply #1265 on: October 6, 2010, 12:57:56 PM »
I am not at all ecstatic about this. 
For me the logic is simple: there is no big-fortune money to be made in professional sports, hence the preferred buyer is n o t one who already owns several sport 'franchises' but would be one who has a separate source of fortune and an unrelenting passion for the preferably one club he owns.  That would be the perfect formula.  What we got here looks and smells better than what we had with H&G, but I don't think it is in a different league which is what I was hoping for.  If things indeed work out with this bid, I would love to be proven wrong.

the ones comprising nesv have other business interests.
Finish the job sir. Come back when we deserve you.

Offline Chivasino

  • educated whopper
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 13,337
Re: Baseball Owner 'To Buy Liverpool' (includes official LFC statement)
« Reply #1266 on: October 6, 2010, 12:58:00 PM »
I share the same uneasiness as you mentioned in your first paragraph, but groundshare shouldn't be considered. Ever.

It was also mentioned that it woudl be done in consultation with supporters. So that should put an end to groundshare staright away.
"...British people are highly indebted and obliged to Sikhs for a long time. I know that within this century we needed their help twice and they did help us very well. As a result of their timely help, we are today able to live with honour, dignity, and independence. In the war, they fought and died for us, wearing the turbans" Winston Churchill

Offline xerxes1

  • Arch Revisionist. Lord Marmaduke of Bunkerton. Has no agenda other than the truth. Descendant of Prince John.
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 10,649
  • L-I-V,E-R-P-,double OL, Liverpool FC.
Re: Baseball Owner 'To Buy Liverpool' (includes official LFC statement)
« Reply #1267 on: October 6, 2010, 12:58:29 PM »
I liked Broughton's Q&A but I do worry that the stadium bit could easily be read as saying we could end up with a 60,000 stadium that does just happen to be shared with Everton.

As it happens I'm actually not really anti-groundshare if its the least bad alternative.  but I know that many fans are dead set against it and we really could do without all the aggro it will inevitably invite.

I agree with all of that.

Fascinating interview with Bernie Mullins who knows G&H personally on SSN who predicts they will go the distance on a legal challenge.
"I've never felt being in a minority of one was in any way an indication that I might be in error"

Offline Yakyb

  • Anny Roader
  • ***
  • Posts: 487
  • Wirralien Born and Bred

Offline Effes

  • Bat droppings in the gym. Bestial Porn Fiend. Horsey horsey dont you stop, now you're wanted by internet cop. Four legs good, two legs bad.
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,548
  • No longer goes the game. Thread-starter bore
Re: Baseball Owner 'To Buy Liverpool' (includes official LFC statement)
« Reply #1269 on: October 6, 2010, 12:59:09 PM »

I'll repeat - I don't want us to be like City.

Beggars can't be choosers - a City scenario is miles away
Conversion into the opposite - a fool who persists in his folly will become wise.

Offline Carra-ton

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,507
Re: Baseball Owner 'To Buy Liverpool' (includes official LFC statement)
« Reply #1270 on: October 6, 2010, 12:59:14 PM »
One thing that is pathetic is that G & H tried to change the board. Changing board members is a big task which needs justification at the best of times in any business.
Doing it on the eve of a major ownership change is like the worst dick move ever.

Just find it funny, but that proves to me that G & H aren't leaving without a fight, they will pull all stops.
WHO IS BIGGER THAN LIVERPOOL!!!

Offline Redeo

  • Kopite
  • ****
  • Posts: 791
Re: Baseball Owner 'To Buy Liverpool' (includes official LFC statement)
« Reply #1271 on: October 6, 2010, 12:59:55 PM »
the ones comprising nesv have other business interests.
like? from what I gather they seem to be mostly associated with sport franchises.  no?
It's a website mate. Names can't be named. If they were, there'd be mutiny. If they aren't, people will scream ... ask for proof. But you will never find 100% proof of anything on here. So, .. look at all evidence, weigh everything up and make a decision.

Offline widgit

  • Boys Pen
  • *
  • Posts: 12
  • We all Live in a Red and White Kop
Re: Baseball Owner 'To Buy Liverpool' (includes official LFC statement)
« Reply #1272 on: October 6, 2010, 01:00:21 PM »
Ive been looking at the forum for a while and finally got accepted. I am over the moon that the H&G have finally gone ( although clinging on with their fingertips). But am finding it hard to get over excited about the new owners. We dont know much about them, They have not yet made a statement. I would say there is alot of speculation and ifs and maybes ayt the moment. Nobody seems to know for sure what they are about or their intentions as this seemed to come out of left field (like what i did there) with little or no speculation until last night.

I will be cautiously optimistic at the moment and will enjoy the fact the parasites have gone and will start to think about the new owners when a statement has been made.

Offline Groundskeeper Willie

  • Silent screaming fistpumper. Don't wake the kids!
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,249
  • http://bootroom2.swedishforum.net/
    • Svenskt Liverpoolforum
Re: Baseball Owner 'To Buy Liverpool' (includes official LFC statement)
« Reply #1273 on: October 6, 2010, 01:00:48 PM »
like? from what I gather they seem to be mostly associated with sport franchises.  no?

Isn´t New York Times Company part of the group? I think Liam G posted that yesterday.
http://bootroom2.swedishforum.net/ Independent Swedish forum. Scandinavian and/or Swedish speaking? Join the fun then!

Offline Stussy

  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 14,623
Re: Baseball Owner 'To Buy Liverpool' (includes official LFC statement)
« Reply #1274 on: October 6, 2010, 01:01:58 PM »
REVEALED: The details behind the ‘winning’ bid for Liverpool (£240m cash, ‘wait and see’ on stadium)By Nick Harris

6 October 2010

Liverpool’s potential new owners, New England Sports Ventures, have proposed buying Liverpool in a £300m deal that will involve a cash injection of £240m to clear most of the club’s debt, sportingintelligence can reveal. This should alleviate some concerns among fans that the club is heading for another leveraged buyout.

As the sales process remains fluid – but complicated by legal action by Tom Hicks and George Gillett (more from earlier) – we can also reveal:

•New England Sports Ventures (NESV), owners of the Boston Red Sox, were the preferred bidders of RBS bank, which was owed a large chunk of £237m by Hicks / Gillett / Liverpool. The other “credible” bidder’s identity remains unconfirmed.

•The former Arsenal managing director, Keith Edelman, has been working on the deal as an advisor to RBS, but solely for his knowledge of football finance, and will have no role at Liverpool.

NESV has promised £240m in cash to wipe out the majority of the monies owed to RBS and Wachovia. This is cash, not borrowed money, and therefore not to be leveraged against any Liverpool assets, sources say.

•Some £60m of debt will remain in the club (guaranteed by NESV), with approximately £40m of that earmarked for stadium redevelopment, and £20m for cashflow.

•The £240m debt clearance plus assuming responsibility for the other £60m gives the £300m valuation for the deal.

•NESV has “an open mind” on whether it will build a new stadium. The Red Sox’s Fenway Park was redeveloped rather than the Sox being relocated, for example.

•Executives from NESV have already had at least one “clearance” meeting with the Premier League to discuss meeting “fit and proper” owners requirements, say sources Stateside. The Premier League is expected to release a statement later today to make the general point it is undertaking its own checks.

•Sportingintelligence understands NESV has already provided the Premier League with proof of funds and a sustainable business plan and the League should be able to “green light” the sale from its own point of view by Friday.
.

Liverpool’s chairman Martin Broughton has said today: “This was frankly [Hicks and Gillett’s] last chance to leave Liverpool with their heads high and they have chosen to go this route.

“It is a difficult issue. Part of me taking on the role – and I was appointed by Tom and George – was that they gave a written undertaking that only I could change the board, they wrote that into the articles of the two companies Kop Football and Kop Holdings.

“They also gave a written undertaking to RBS that they would not frustrate any reasonable sale and this is frankly a flagrant abuse of those two written undertakings.”

“At Fenway they chose not to build a new stadium. They will want to make sure that they do the right thing, but [Liverpool] willl have a stadium which holds 60,000-odd.

“Whether that is the new stadium as designed or not, that is not a commitment, but will we have stadium development? Yes.”

The legal wrangle over whether the board should have been allowed to agree a sale goes on but Broughton is confident it is a battle that can be won.

http://www.sportingintelligence.com/2010/10/06/revealed-the-details-behind-the-%e2%80%98winning%e2%80%99-bid-for-liverpool-240m-cash-%e2%80%98wait-and-see%e2%80%99-on-stadium-061006/



Offline Scousebeef

  • Kopite
  • ****
  • Posts: 652
  • Larry Grayson & Diana Dors Lovechild
Re: Baseball Owner 'To Buy Liverpool' (includes official LFC statement)
« Reply #1275 on: October 6, 2010, 01:02:13 PM »
Good post.

Welcome to RAWK mate.

ta lar  :)
I wish united would hurry up and win more European cups than us. Perhaps then the F.A will stop all their shit decisions against us to keep us out of the top four!!

Offline buchigo!

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 5,674
  • okay javier but i'm only on loan... for sure no?
Re: Baseball Owner 'To Buy Liverpool' (includes official LFC statement)
« Reply #1276 on: October 6, 2010, 01:02:21 PM »
like? from what I gather they seem to be mostly associated with sport franchises.  no?

werner's a tv producer. lucchino's a lawyer.
Finish the job sir. Come back when we deserve you.

Offline JOYRO

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,334
  • El Nino
Re: Baseball Owner 'To Buy Liverpool' (includes official LFC statement)
« Reply #1277 on: October 6, 2010, 01:03:14 PM »

As a born and bred Red Sox fan, along with parents and every generation that came before back to the beginning of time, I'll tell you how I feel about it:  utterly offended by your use of the "s" word.

I've posted some thoughts about the sox ownership previously, but now I'll tell you how I really feel.  There's a part of me inside that is excited at the link on a purely emotional level.  Of course we need to learn more, but it has long bothered me that the majority of Americans seem to think that Manchester United IS English football.  When people hear that I support a football team, they immediately assume it's Man U.  I take a deep breath and forgive them because they're American, and then I go on to explain that utd is like the yankees, and Liverpool is like the Red Sox... so of course I support Liverpool.  Then they nod in understanding.

I have always felt that there are many, many parallels between Liverpool and the Red Sox.  The history, the tradition, the depth of passion (throughout families, neighborhoods), the wit and astuteness of the fans and their will to support through thick and thin, and an inner understanding that their team is better than all others no matter what the table-of-the-moment says.  Years ago, when utd came to the states and started doing joint promotions and marketing with the Yankees, it just affirmed my hate for the both of them.  Financial questions aside, there's something that tickles my insides when I think of Liverpool and the Red Sox sticking it back to them.
Thanks for your view of the new owners. It's always nice to get some words from a fan of the club so that it's not all about money.

Offline wideawakewesley

  • Kopite
  • ****
  • Posts: 723
  • We all bleed red, so take the hint!
    • Weekly Geekly
Re: Baseball Owner 'To Buy Liverpool' (includes official LFC statement)
« Reply #1278 on: October 6, 2010, 01:03:50 PM »

Offline Lecter

  • Anny Roader
  • ***
  • Posts: 409
  • We all live in a Red and White Kop
Re: Baseball Owner 'To Buy Liverpool' (includes official LFC statement)
« Reply #1279 on: October 6, 2010, 01:04:29 PM »
 Liverpool FC sale: chairman Martin Broughton heralds 'new era'
Oct 6 2010 By John Thompson
Comments (3)Recommend (1) 1234next
 
Martin Broughton
LIVERPOOL FC chairman Martin Broughton today heralded a new era at Anfield after he, Managing Director Christian Purslow and Commercial Director Ian Ayre removed Tom Hicks and George Gillett from the club.

Liverpool have been provisionally sold  for £300m to New  England Ventures – an American sports investment company which runs the Boston Red Sox baseball team – restored to its former glory by NEV over the past decade.

Today Broughton declared them  “winners” as he revealed the takeover now sees Liverpool freed of £200m of debt.

£37m of “external debt” remains. But that is basically a typical working overdraft facility and the agreed deal would see Liverpool  carrying the second lowest debt burden in the Premier League.


Broughton said the new owners are committed to building a new stadium – possibly by redeveloping Anfield – in a bid to keep the club's history and traditions in place on the present site. Broughton said they would investigate an idea to redevelop on the current stadium site first mooted by Anfield legend Kenny Dalglish.

If not feasible he said  they will build a new stadium on the alternative site in Stanley Park.

Broughton also revealed a tight contractual agreement has been put in place to ensure the debt for taking over Liverpool  can never be put back on the club again – as Hicks and Gillett did sparking the crisis of the past few years.

He acknowledged there will now be court action to try and prove the sale to New England Ventures is legitimate and has been properly handled. He insists it has been.

But Hicks and Gillett, who it is understood walk away with no profit at all from three-and-a-half years in charge, are bound to contest the sale in court, meaning a period of uncertainty for fans about their exit being final.


British Airways Chairman Broughton said today:  "We set out to find the right owners for Liverpool. It's been a fascinating process full of twists and turns – even a farce at times.

"But we have with Barclays Capital been leading the process exhaustively across the world.

"We have had two very attractive offers from two bidders of roughly the same amounts who would prove excellent owners. I think we have chosen New England ventures because if you look at their track record with the Boston Red Sox it's been outstanding.

"These guys are winners. It's all about winning to them and it's all about building or developing the stadium. They are absolutely going to invest in the stadium.

"They understand that winning is what drives fans. They will be excellent owners.

"Altogether it's a £300m deal paying off the acquisition debt of £200m.

Broughton said New England Ventures had revolutionised the fortunes of the Boston Red Sox after taking over in 2001.

He added: "If you look at the Boston Red Sox when they arrived everyone said 'We have to build a new stadium - this one is clapped out'.

"They looked at it, its tradition and decided to invest heavily to reinvent Fenway Park, rather than move to a new stadium.

"They have been the most successful team since acquiring the Red Sox in 2001 - there are parallels with Liverpool."

Broughton also revealed the dramatic details of yesterday afternoon at Anfield when Hicks tried to sack Purslow and Ayre before a crunch board meeting.

He told them they could not do so.

Said Broughton: "This is not straightforward.

"I don't want to tell you about the detail because that will be subject to legal proceedings.

"But in trying to remove Christian Purslow and Ian Ayre they made an astonishing move.



"I say that because as part of my appointment they gave specific undertakings to the Royal Bank of Scotland that said Martin Broughton was the only person authorised to make any board changes.

"Otherwise they would take no action to frustrate any reasonable sale.

"They basically flagrantly abused those two undertakings to RBS and removed Christian and Ian from the board and sent us details just before the board meeting saying they had been removed and appointing two others.

"We took legal advice and I determined that the action was invalid.

"So I went back to  Tom Hicks and George Gillett, reconvened the board meeting and said 'Look, your action is invalid'.

"I told them I was continuing to hold the meeting with Christian Purslow and Ian Ayre present.

"They objected, called for an adjournment - which I declined - and offered them the opportunity to take part.

"They chose not to, although George Gillett's lawyer was there.”

Broughton said the club would now be applying for a court judgement over the disputed sale which will tale place in a UK court hearing at a date to be decided.



He said: "The sale is subject to us having valid authority to sell.

"We are applying to court soon  for a declaratory judgement to get the court to declare that the action we took was proper and valid.
“No one likes being in court – someone comes out winning and someone comes out losing.

"If there is any justice we will win
."

Broughton added: " This is a great day for Liverpool Football Club and the supporters.

"I would like to thank the Liverpool fans for their patience.

"I know how frustrating it has been for them wanting to know what is going on.

"I know they have been frustrated by my refusal to give a running commentary.

"But I have always believed – and this demonstrates it – that the best deals get done behind closed doors."

Broughton stressed there are 17 principal investors behind New England Ventures and that the future is by no means dependent on the personal wealth of John Henry Winter.

He also moved to allay fans fears about one set of Americans being now replaced by other US owners at Anfield.

He said: "I can understand why that might be an instant reaction about them being American. But being American is not a problem.

"Leveraged ownership of a football club is the problem.

"I just hope we can deliver what we have set out to do.

"We have found the right owners. There will be money to invest in the squad.

"It is all about winning – that is their philosophy."



Read More http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/liverpool-news/local-news//2010/10/06/liverpool-fc-sale-chairman-martin-broughton-says-john-w-henry-and-new-england-sports-ventures-will-be-excellent-owners-100252-27413801/4/#ixzz11Zs492fL