92A is it? That's just it - I'm Absolutely convinced that Moores and Parry DID know all they needed to know about Hicks & Gillette And? Went ahead and sold us down the river anyway - why? One word, money.......................
We may believe Moores is a well meaning bumbling fool and Parry an idiot and maybe they both are but in this case Moores wanted out and now refuses to acknowledge it was HIS fcukup that led to all this madness and Parry? HE wanted to keep his job - until Rafa' assassinated him at LFC anyway in conjunction with Hicks. No I'm UTTERLY convinced that Moores and Parry did this move DELIBERATELY - for different reasons but they STILL meant it Despite knowing what had gone on re Hicks & Gillette (I mean come on? Do you REALLY think that BOTH of them totally ignored the Internet/Research, took the twin b*stards on trust and proceeded on the deal thus? Don't talk rubbish, NO business deal is EVER done that way nowadays - least of all one like THAT; They knew alright - they had to of done and thus BOTH of them - ESPecially Moores - whose got off FAR to lightly IMO- deserve an absolute BARRAGE of abuse for what they've done to our club. In fact Moores should be absolutely bloody Bombarded until he gets up and denounces the twin fcukers in public and possibly thereby deals a deathblow to their pathetic regime at Anfield by absolutely FLOODING SOS with new recruits as well as removing the ONE legitimate plank left to those w*nkers in that obviously at present they can say ''well the man who sold to us thinks HE sold to the right people'' What IF they COULDN'T say that anymore? That WOULD set the cat amongst the pigeons methinks and Moores COULD do that in fact, it's the least he could damn well do after what he's done during and since February 2007 with regard to Liverpool FC.
As to others on here; I agree - I can easily see Hicks dragging everything along and making us think he'll sell with everything intact and then? Fcuk it up RIGHT at the death by umm, I don't know sacking Rafa', selling Gerrard and Torres and Masch' and Reina, hiking his price RIGHT back up before the deal is concluded in a last desperate attempt to make a profit before being forced out OR? The worst one of the lot - dragging the whole saga RIGHT out to it's inevitable, messy conclusion like trench warfare or Stalingrad and FORCING the bank to BLAST him out of LFC room by room - taking things to the ABSOLUTE deadline and STILL not going - FORCING them to get rid of him and NOT paying debts the whole time - THAT would be VERY messy, very messy indeed and Hicks WOULD do it alright - why? From nothing more than sheer, nasty, vicious, childish spite of course.
They always say like father, like son; So if Hicks JR is a complete arsewipe (and he IS - has been shown to be) then HOW bad does that make Hicks Sr whose the whole reason for the little scrote being here? I think that yes, we WILL get a decent new owner Eventually but first thanks to the current useless toad and his dinky sidekick? Well because of THEM, things could (and probably Will) get VERY nasty indeed at Anfield....................................
NB Blert - it's JUST like 2007 all over again isn't it? Do the current owners (tossers though they are) sell up for LESS, but a later promise of more and the good of the club OR do they take ALL they can get from the other, less stable offer NOW and run, leaving us, our debt and THEIR mess for someone else to clear up? I think I know which one they'll choose and I don't like that idea, not one bit.
