Red and White Kop

Author Topic: Gillett's Opinion of Rafa...  (Read 15611 times)

Offline Canada Loves Anfield

  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 7,561
  • Gender: Male
  • Join The Union Now and Help Save Our Club!
    • View Profile
Gillett's Opinion of Rafa...
« on: October 6, 2009, 02:33:13 AM »
George Gillett blames Rafael Benítez for Liverpool's poor start

• Gillet points to £128m investment in last 18 months
• American questions Benítez's scouting and recruitment

Liverpool's co-owner George Gillett has defended his and Tom Hicks's reign at Liverpool and pointed the finger at the manager, Rafael Benítez, after a disappointing start to the season.

Liverpool's defeat at Chelsea on Sunday was their third in the Premier League this season and followed a 2-0 reverse at Fiorentina in the Champions League. Gillett pointed to the investment he and Hicks have made when saying the owners were not responsible for any shortcomings.

"We have invested more money than our competitors, in keeping with the history of the club," he is quoted as telling a representative of the fans' group Spirit of Shankly last week. "In the last 18 months, we have invested £128m on top of what has come in.

"That means it should be getting better. Now if it's not getting better, it's not Gillett and Hicks; it's the manager; it's the scouting. You have to make sure you balance out your analysis. There was plenty of money, so if you have any complaints, take a look at the ins and outs."

Gillett said the £30m from Xabi Alonso's sale to Real Madrid "went straight back" into Bénitez's kitty and added to funds of "£22-23m as part of our budgets".

The American also claimed that Liverpool are "in an extraordinarily good financial position. Far better than Manchester United, Chelsea or Arsenal."

http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2009/oct/06/rafael-benitez-liverpool-george-gillett
« Last Edit: October 6, 2009, 10:09:15 PM by Barney_Rubble »
Liverpool FC - Toronto Supporters Club: http://lfctoronto.com/

Offline Brissie Red

  • Anny Roader
  • ***
  • Posts: 401
  • Gender: Male
  • We all Live in a Red and White Kop
    • View Profile
Re: Gillette's Opinion of Rafa...
« Reply #1 on: October 6, 2009, 02:41:00 AM »
Just great. Expect stories like "Anfield in Turmoil", "When will Rafa get the chop?" and all this kind of crap from the press.

Offline LiverpoolLankford

  • Anny Roader
  • ***
  • Posts: 324
    • View Profile
Re: Gillette's Opinion of Rafa...
« Reply #2 on: October 6, 2009, 02:41:40 AM »

The American also claimed that Liverpool are "in an extraordinarily good financial position. Far better than Manchester United, Chelsea or Arsenal."


?????

Surely not better than chelsea or man united... Chelsea have a billionaire owner and Man united have the best merchandising scheme in the world. Maybe better than arsenal

Offline toshi

  • Kopite
  • ****
  • Posts: 772
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect
    • View Profile
Re: Gillette's Opinion of Rafa...
« Reply #3 on: October 6, 2009, 02:45:00 AM »
oh dear....
CJ        : "Morton, this is President Bartlett"
Bartlett : "Hey Morton"
Morton (stunned) : "WOW"
Bartlett  : "Well Said"

Offline woof

  • Barking up the wrong tree.
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,181
  • Gender: Male
  • ..and on the 8th day, God made LFC and it was good
    • View Profile
Re: Gillette's Opinion of Rafa...
« Reply #4 on: October 6, 2009, 02:47:28 AM »
What a fuckwit

Offline FatOldMonkey

  • Main Stander
  • **
  • Posts: 240
    • View Profile
Re: Gillette's Opinion of Rafa...
« Reply #5 on: October 6, 2009, 02:50:44 AM »
I simply love the way the article put on the quotes on "went straight back" and "in an extraordinarily good financial position. Far better than Manchester United, Chelsea or Arsenal."

hahaha...
"Thank you so much once more and always remember: You’ll never walk alone." - Rafa Benitez, 3 Jun 2010

Offline keeno8

  • Main Stander
  • **
  • Posts: 143
  • Gender: Male
  • Michael Owen's signed a deal with the devil...
    • View Profile
Re: Gillette's Opinion of Rafa...
« Reply #6 on: October 6, 2009, 02:52:42 AM »
I hope you will allow me to be somewhat straightforward in my summation of this news but what a dick he is.

Blatant and outright lies, as far as investement - look at chelsea/man city thats the future of the sport, how can Liverpool be expected to win the title on a shoestring?

Yanks out   
“When I’ve got nothing better to do, I look down the league table to see how Everton are getting along.”

Offline Silent...Violet...

  • ...annoying fucking thick eternal cherry keeping shite...
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 11,786
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: Gillette's Opinion of Rafa...
« Reply #7 on: October 6, 2009, 02:56:29 AM »
Yes, we are in better financial shape than Arsenal and United at the moment. They have debts much larger than ours.

However, I don't get the case about him talking about the money involved in transfers. We bought Glen for £17m, and the up-front payment for Aquilani was in the region of £7m, which makes the total spending in this window as v24m (and there have been some disputes regarding Glen's transfer, since money from Crouch's transfer was owed to us). However, we sold Xabi for £30m and Arbeloa for £4m, which more than covers the two transfers. So, where the fuck has the remaining money from Xabi's transfer and the additional "£22-23m as a part of our budget" gone? And even if you include contract renewals, there should still be a sizeable chunk of money left.

Quote
"In the last 18 months, we have invested £128m on top of what has come in."

But where did that money go? We haven't bought big in the transfer market, only reduced our debts by £60m. Where has the rest of the money gone?

And on the footballing matters, he really has no clue about them. Blaming Rafa and the scouting network on our failures. He knows fuck all about football, which him and his half-wit friend showed by trying to get fucking Klinsmann to manage us, all behind Rafa's back.

All in all, these two, and especially this fucking midget, are lying c*nts of the highest order and need to be fucked off as soon as possible.
Why was Reina acting the big man anyway? Sure he did no more for Spains win than I did.
Did he dies of Nacho-ral causes then?

Offline Jai

  • oh?
  • Kopite
  • ****
  • Posts: 928
  • Oh the carnage
    • View Profile
Re: Gillette's Opinion of Rafa...
« Reply #8 on: October 6, 2009, 03:02:10 AM »
Excuse me, I just threw up in my mouth a little bit

Offline JLStretton

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,173
  • Yanks OUT!!!
    • View Profile
Re: Gillette's Opinion of Rafa...
« Reply #9 on: October 6, 2009, 03:09:19 AM »
Ballbag!
"There is a forgotten, nay almost forbidden word, which means more to me than any other.
That word is ENGLAND." - Sir Winston Churchill

Offline rotistgeil

  • Unflabbable in the face of lesbian scenes in public park.
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 5,599
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: Gillette's Opinion of Rafa...
« Reply #10 on: October 6, 2009, 03:09:37 AM »
fuck off

Offline kkhaku

  • Kaladze
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,434
  • Gender: Male
  • This is your club. Fight for it.
    • View Profile
Re: Gillette's Opinion of Rafa...
« Reply #11 on: October 6, 2009, 03:11:28 AM »
Just to play devil's advocate here:

If he's right about the money - there is the outside chance Rafa didn't see the right buy, and didn't spend.

With all the stick he's gotten, if him and Hicks did actually put the money back into Rafa's kitty, well then he's right to deflect blame from himself.

Now, taking off my devil's advocate hat. The lying fuckwit can lie and moan about money all he likes - but don't fucking bring Rafa into it to make yourself look angelic. All that does is further alienate your dishonest yankee ass from the club and its supporters. How about following up your money lies with 'we have given Rafa the financial means and we are backing him to suceed' - why couldnt you come out and say something that isn't completely stupid for once?
"God is dead." - Freidrich Nietzsche, 1882
"Nietzsche is dead." - God, 1900

Offline FatOldMonkey

  • Main Stander
  • **
  • Posts: 240
    • View Profile
Re: Gillette's Opinion of Rafa...
« Reply #12 on: October 6, 2009, 03:16:01 AM »
Yes, we are in better financial shape than Arsenal and United at the moment. They have debts much larger than ours.

However, I don't get the case about him talking about the money involved in transfers. We bought Glen for £17m, and the up-front payment for Aquilani was in the region of £7m, which makes the total spending in this window as v24m (and there have been some disputes regarding Glen's transfer, since money from Crouch's transfer was owed to us). However, we sold Xabi for £30m and Arbeloa for £4m, which more than covers the two transfers. So, where the fuck has the remaining money from Xabi's transfer and the additional "£22-23m as a part of our budget" gone? And even if you include contract renewals, there should still be a sizeable chunk of money left.

But where did that money go? We haven't bought big in the transfer market, only reduced our debts by £60m. Where has the rest of the money gone?

And on the footballing matters, he really has no clue about them. Blaming Rafa and the scouting network on our failures. He knows fuck all about football, which him and his half-wit friend showed by trying to get fucking Klinsmann to manage us, all behind Rafa's back.

All in all, these two, and especially this fucking midget, are lying c*nts of the highest order and need to be fucked off as soon as possible.

In the financial world, you can play around with figures without lying. £128m would means:
- purchase of players
- salaries (director + manager + players + staffs)
- maintenance (stadium, merchandise shop, etc)
- bank charges (bank interest, etc)
- marketing (advertisment, etc)
- general expense (entertainment fee, printing, etc)

Everything is usually added up and hence he can quote the figure of £128m without being caught lying.
"Thank you so much once more and always remember: You’ll never walk alone." - Rafa Benitez, 3 Jun 2010

Offline 4pool

  • Mr. ( last name) Minister Of Truth - 1984 to 1984.
  • RAWK Scribe
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 30,309
  • Gender: Male
  • Liverpool: European Capital of Football 2005/2006
    • View Profile
Re: Gillette's Opinion of Rafa...
« Reply #13 on: October 6, 2009, 03:18:46 AM »
So George gave an interview to the Guardian?

Looks like the Guardian lifted some quotes out of here which is in the off the pitch thread and made their article.



Nicked off TLW
...

As some of you know I had an impromptu meeting with George Gillett last Saturday at the academy. Here is the content of what was said.


MEETING WITH GEORGE GILLETT


THE ACADEMY


26 SEPTEMBER 2009



As I dint think one half of our custodianship would invite me in for a talk please understand I went into the meeting with nothing prepared.


The discussion started about the current financial situation that the club is reportedly in and I started off by asking GG about what happened to the £60m borrowed from the bank as working capital and reported to get the construction on the new stadium started GG said he wasn’t aware of any £60m that had been reported.


GG} "If we tried to correct all the mistakes that had been printed we’d have a full time job doing it".


MC} "So there wasn’t £60m borrowed as a start up fund?"


GG} "I think what we did was paid it down".


I repeated the question.


GG} "I don’t think so I can’t recall it. The only money we have been involved in, we certainly haven’t

Seen any money let’s put it that way".


I was then asked by GG to "try and take my attitude out of the questions".


GG} "When we bought the club we bought it with our own money" "CASH"

MC} "Your saying you bought the club with your own money".

GG} "When a year and a half later the credit crunch, we each put our portion of the club and refinanced

the business.

"Today the club has the lowest debt to each dollar of profit of any of the major clubs in the sport".


GG} "The club is in extraordinarily good condition, far better than Man U, Arsenal or Chelsea".

MC} "When you and Tom bought the club from Moores, how much debt was it in ".

GG} "The club had" (He then paused)

MC} "£40m"

GG} "Between 40 and £80m but it had no earnings"

GG} "Don’t you think we have invested massively" and said they had "put more money in other than

City".

MC } "I would like to know where the money came from"

GG} "The vast majority of it came from Tom and mine, our personal cash, not from the club or anything

it came from us.

MC} "How much debt is the club in now"

GG} "That’s not the question the question is how the debt is relative to the earnings. The debt on the club today is very sound".

MC} "That’s not how the fans see it"

GG } "That’s bullshit the way the media writes it, they don’t understand how to write about cash flow and profit and loss"

MC } "Why don’t you make a public statement instead of us being drip fed information by the media as the media is often unreliable and like to sensationalise things. Why don’t the two of you make a public statement and explain where the club is at".

GG} "That’s a good idea".

MC} "We are being drip fed information".

GG} "Not by me I try to support our manager and let him have the freedom to spend it his way wisely, to do with scouting to go get the best young men available. That’s what we try to do I don’t get into strategy or individual players"


MC} "At the minute the earnings might be three because we have the fan base"

GG} "Our budgets are based on the last six years earnings of the club. We don’t put it on going to the finals or anything of that sort. The budgets are done conservatively".

MC} "A lot of it is based on champions league football".

GG} "It is based on a relatively limited success in the CL"

MC} "What if we went two or three seasons without CL football what would happen to the debt related to the clubs earnings".

GG} "The debt wouldn’t go up we have enough cash flow to pay the minimum interest that we have which is not very high and enough to give to Rafa to be competitive".

MC} "That where we are at loggerheads with your idea of capital for Rafa and ours".

GG} "Arsenal by law can’t spend as much per year as we spend. Man U can’t out spend us. Based on UTD and Arsenal do you think we under spend".

MC} "Looking at this years transfers yes. What happened to the £30m from the Xabi Alonso sale"?

GG} "We put that back in, we didn’t take it out, we didn’t do like Man U did. They took all the money they got from player sales and they owed so much money they had to use it to pay down the debt. We didn’t do that. In keeping with the history of the club we have invested more money than our competitors, which should mean it should be getting better. If its not getting better it’s not because of Gillett and Hicks, it’s the manager it the scouting and so forth. So make sure you guys balance out your analysis.

MC} "Us as Liverpool fans were use to seeing a policy of money recouped on player sales being reinvested back into the squad".

GG} Rafa had the money from Xabi plus another £22-£23m and all the money that came plus the money budgeted was made available to Rafa".


GG denied that there was a £20m price cap for player signings and said


GG} "Rafa had more than was in the budget and the money from the sales. Hicks and I didn’t take any money out or use it to pay down debt.


We then talked about the stadium and the sixty day quote. GG denied it was him who made the spades in the ground in sixty days quote and went on to say.


GG} "Any comments on the stadium came from hicks. I think what happened was Hicks was absolutely convinced that we were going to start to move dirt to make for the foundations. In the period of time between Hicks saying that and the sixty day , the entire world credit market fell apart and I believe that he ended up with big egg on his face, making it look like he’d said something and then not living up to what he’d said and that was a mistake on his part".

MC} "It’s our belief that one of the main selling issues for David Moores was that you were going to build a stadium. We should be on a par with Barca and Real Madrid. All the 2005 CL success had not been built o

GG } "Do you think GG doesn’t want to build a stadium".

MC } "It wouldn’t be the first time that Tom Hicks has been involved with a football club, promised them a new stadium and it never happened".

George Gillett pauses.

MC } "Corinthians"


I reminded GG again about Tom Hicks past dealings with Corinthians.


GG} "Michael that’s not George Gillett. I own 50% of the club and nothing is going to happen to the club good or bad that ultimately Tom or I don’t take credit for".


GG then asked me.


GG} "Did I believe after our conversation if I thought he wouldn’t love to build a new stadium"


MC } "I’m curious as to why with the wealth that you and Hicks have got they cant come together and start to build the stadium out of their own capital".

GG } "That’s a totally different issue and I’m not going to go there"

MC} "Why not build the stadium with your own money and get it back from the extra money it generates".

GG} "What’s symbolic about the stadium".

MC} "We need the new stadium George, we are falling behind


George losses his temper and raises his voice.

GG} "We are not falling behind that’s horseshit. If we could figure out how to build a stadium I would have done it yesterday".

MC} "I’ve just told you how you can do it. You and Hicks could use your own capital"

GG} "Michael that’s not what we’re going to do".

MC} "Why".

GG} "Because that’s not the way smart investment occurs".

MC} "Well why not, you have the money why not do it".

GG } "Abramavic he didn’t use his own money he used borrowed money".


MC} "Your saying that Abramovic didn’t use his own money to buy Chelsea and bankroll the squad".

GG } "There’s a difference between lateral wealth and personal wealth".

MC } "Where did he get the money from then".

GG } "From his banks in Russia".


I then asked GG about his and Hicks reported and what seemed frivolous expenses claims and used the reported £1m as a ballpark figure.


GG} "We don’t charge or take salaries from the club. We charge the club for our travel expenses for our travel expenses and our legal fees"

GG seemed surprised at the amounts of money that had been reported.


MC} "Surely you must have a press officer who reports back to you what is being said about you in the British press".

GG} "What’s being reported about me".

MC} "About your expenses claims".

GG} "All expenses was for legitimate reasons, legal people, auditors etc. Hicks put his bill directly through the club. I ran mine through my own accountant, used my own money and I was reimbursed for legal and accounting fees. There was no money taken by me. I have never taken a cent from this club, I get no salaries no compensation, the money that I got reimbursed was money that I paid out because of the way we do it is actually for the benefit of the club. The club didn’t reimburse me for over a year after I ran up the expenses, and then a year later reimbursed me for the expenses. That’s for the benefit of the club not for the detriment of it.

MC] "Its all about what’s believable George and the facts are.

GG} "The one fact that you’ve levelled at me today was that, Tom Hicks promised a spade in the ground in sixty days and it hasn’t happened. It’s the one fact that you’ve laid out. The free cash flow the amount of money reinvested in the players, every one of the other facts that you’ve raised that primarily came from the media was wrong".

MC} "I suggest to you George that you keep a closer eye on what’s being reported in the British media and rather than a wall of silence, respond to things because we are being drip fed information, rumour and Chinese whispers. Whether you decide to act upon that is totally up to yourself but, us as Liverpool supporters do not see the club moving in the right direction".


Frank McParland enters the room


GG} "Michael is involved with a group called SOS. This has been a dumping on me of vitriol of hatred of suspicion of calling me a liar on half dozen different comments. The one I plead guilty to is that I have a partner who promised put a spade in the ground in sixty days in the midst of the credit market and the stadium hasn’t and the stadium hasn’t been built. That’s the one thing, there’s no way I can deny that. That was said and it was fact, but with regard to the rest of the things, he and his group have gotten very angry at Tom and I because of things reported in the media that were inaccurate. For example he was just charging me that I had taken money out the club. The fact is that I take nothing out the club other than being reimbursed for accounting fees.




MC} I don’t think I charged you with taking money out the club".

I repeated to FMc the issue about the concerns about the money from the sale of Xabi Alonso and that the money recouped from his sale went towards paying off debt.


GG} "The only pay down came from Hicks and I pocket. We put £128m in the last eighteen months to buy players on top of the money that came from the club not. The reason I'm upset is that he (mc) just said I have no more confidence and fundamentally I don’t believe you and all I can do is tell him the facts and he’s recommended I think correctly that there’s no wall of silence that the information is being drip fed to the media and we should make the facts more available".

FMc "One thing about SOS is that their mad passionate Liverpool supporters like we all are and they’ll always speak from the heart and if they know the situation and you tell them the situation they’ll take that on and I know that. Its all about us isn’t it".

MC} "It’s about LFC George. When you quote Chelsea, Man U and Arsenal, as I said the only time I worry about them is when we are playing them, as clubs the can crash and burn I’m worried about LFC"

GG} "We are putting more money in than they are and we are not getting credit for it from SOS because all they care about is Liverpool. On the other hand the same media they quote are criticising us for not being competitive with the other teams.


Frank McParland went on to say that he was 100% behind Rafa and that every time he’d asked for something for the academy it had been provided and he and GG used the AstroTurf pitch as an example.


MC} "The academy and Melwood is fine we are worried Anfield and the progression of the club on the basis that the club progresses from the success of the first team onwards. So as a group and as Liverpool supporters that’s what we are worried about.


I repeated to FMc that one of the biggest selling factors of the club from DM to H+G was the stadium.

MC} "A lot of this is based around the stadium. I personally and not speaking for SOS believe that personally that could move this situation forward is if we seen progress on the stadium and we seen a way forward and lets start competing with Barca and Madrid. The stadium is one of the biggest issues George".

GG}"Let’s focus on one set of challenges. When I was in Spain the other day to try and understand the economics of those clubs. The way they survive is that every five years the government writes off their debt. They’ve spent crazily this is now the third cycle of what’s happening. That’s not going to happen here and its not going to happen to any other EPL".

As time was running short I ended the meeting by saying.


MC} "At the minute we have people from around the globe banging on the doors to watch Liverpool. If the club had a sustained run of poor results and went without success that the glory hunters would soon go and the support the next successful club and that that G+H would be glad of the bread and butter supporters like my self and SOS.


I have done my best to relate all of what was said between my self and George Gillett. If I have missed anything out it is because I have either forgotten or it was just things that have already been said.
http://www.redandwhitekop.com/forum/index.php?topic=247542.1120
For the 96 -----Justice

Offline Silent...Violet...

  • ...annoying fucking thick eternal cherry keeping shite...
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 11,786
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: Gillette's Opinion of Rafa...
« Reply #14 on: October 6, 2009, 03:19:17 AM »
In the financial world, you can play around with figures without lying. £128m would means:
- purchase of players
- salaries (director + manager + players + staffs)
- maintenance (stadium, merchandise shop, etc)
- bank charges (bank interest, etc)
- marketing (advertisment, etc)
- general expense (entertainment fee, printing, etc)

Everything is usually added up and hence he can quote the figure of £128m without being caught lying.

That's exactly what I was thinking. And he also lumps his and Hick's visits to Liverpool as expenses on the club. We need to get rid of him asap.

And what about this:

Quote
Gillett said the £30m from Xabi Alonso's sale to Real Madrid "went straight back" into Bénitez's kitty and added to funds of "£22-23m as part of our budgets".
Why was Reina acting the big man anyway? Sure he did no more for Spains win than I did.
Did he dies of Nacho-ral causes then?

Offline Silent...Violet...

  • ...annoying fucking thick eternal cherry keeping shite...
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 11,786
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: Gillette's Opinion of Rafa...
« Reply #15 on: October 6, 2009, 03:20:26 AM »
4pool, they got it from the SOS:

Quote
"We have invested more money than our competitors, in keeping with the history of the club," he is quoted as telling a representative of the fans' group Spirit of Shankly last week. "In the last 18 months, we have invested £128m on top of what has come in.
Why was Reina acting the big man anyway? Sure he did no more for Spains win than I did.
Did he dies of Nacho-ral causes then?

Offline Bronx Red

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,605
  • Gender: Male
  • We all Live in a Red and White Kop
    • View Profile
Re: Gillette's Opinion of Rafa...
« Reply #16 on: October 6, 2009, 03:21:48 AM »
Looks like the Guardian are robben stuff Liverpool web sites again , if I'm not mistaken you will see the interview in "Off Field "

Offline 4pool

  • Mr. ( last name) Minister Of Truth - 1984 to 1984.
  • RAWK Scribe
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 30,309
  • Gender: Male
  • Liverpool: European Capital of Football 2005/2006
    • View Profile
Re: Gillette's Opinion of Rafa...
« Reply #17 on: October 6, 2009, 03:30:56 AM »
4pool, they got it from the SOS:


well reading the lad who talked to him at The Academy the question was and answer;

MC} "Looking at this years transfers yes. What happened to the £30m from the Xabi Alonso sale"?

GG} "We put that back in, we didn’t take it out, we didn’t do like Man U did. They took all the money they got from player sales and they owed so much money they had to use it to pay down the debt. We didn’t do that. In keeping with the history of the club we have invested more money than our competitors, which should mean it should be getting better. If its not getting better it’s not because of Gillett and Hicks, it’s the manager it the scouting and so forth. So make sure you guys balance out your analysis.


the Guardian takes the 128 mil from another question and answer and puts them together:


MC} I don’t think I charged you with taking money out the club".

I repeated to FMc the issue about the concerns about the money from the sale of Xabi Alonso and that the money recouped from his sale went towards paying off debt.


GG} "The only pay down came from Hicks and I pocket. We put £128m in the last eighteen months to buy players on top of the money that came from the club not. The reason I'm upset is that he (mc) just said I have no more confidence and fundamentally I don’t believe you and all I can do is tell him the facts and he’s recommended I think correctly that there’s no wall of silence that the information is being drip fed to the media and we should make the facts more available".


yet, the Guardian takes the 128mil quote, adds it to it's not Gillett and Hicks fault.

Looks to me they are two seperate questions and answers.

But it's easy to do something and make it sound a certain way if you have a mind to do that. Reading the entire interview in the order and context the lad wrote it, the Guardian then fudges a story.

One can pick on George and his "lies" but one doesn't need to make things up that aren't there. But it's International week and a slow media week because England have qualified.

For the 96 -----Justice

Offline rafathegaffa83

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 7,295
  • Dutch Class
    • View Profile
Re: Gillette's Opinion of Rafa...
« Reply #18 on: October 6, 2009, 03:34:06 AM »
Looks like the Guardian lifted some quotes out of here which is in the off the pitch thread and made their article.

I was wondering how long it would take for parts of that interview to be twisted in anti-Rafa slant and published in the media. Surely Gillett's figures include wages, because we haven't spent £128m in the past 18 months. It's amazing how money (transfer, stadium development) seems to be constantly evaporating into thin air.

Offline Ceebs

  • Main Stander
  • **
  • Posts: 103
  • Gender: Male
  • We all Live in a Red and White Kop
    • View Profile
Re: Gillette's Opinion of Rafa...
« Reply #19 on: October 6, 2009, 03:37:37 AM »
As far as I know - I'm pretty sure - the Guardian picked it up from Matt Dickinson's piece in the Times here...

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/sport/columnists/matt_dickinson/article6862436.ece?openComment=true

And the Guardian goes on to attribute the quotes to SOS.

"We have invested more money than our competitors, in keeping with the history of the club," he is quoted as telling a representative of the fans' group Spirit of Shankly last week.

Times says they've a transcript...most likely they just read it online.

For what it's worth...

Let's drink to the hard working people
Let's think of the lowly of birth
Spare a thought for the rag taggy people
Let's drink to the salt of the earth

Offline 4pool

  • Mr. ( last name) Minister Of Truth - 1984 to 1984.
  • RAWK Scribe
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 30,309
  • Gender: Male
  • Liverpool: European Capital of Football 2005/2006
    • View Profile
Re: Gillette's Opinion of Rafa...
« Reply #20 on: October 6, 2009, 03:38:21 AM »
I was wondering how long it would take for parts of that interview to be twisted in anti-Rafa slant and published in the media. Surely Gillett's figures include wages, because we haven't spent £128m in the past 18 months. It's amazing how money (transfer, stadium development) seems to be constantly evaporating into thin air.

The only question I would have of the lad who got the interview is did George say 128 million pounds? or did he just say 128mil and the lad "assumed" it was pounds. Because there is a difference between 128mil USD and £128m.
Only the lad could answer as he was there.
For the 96 -----Justice

Offline FatOldMonkey

  • Main Stander
  • **
  • Posts: 240
    • View Profile
Re: Gillette's Opinion of Rafa...
« Reply #21 on: October 6, 2009, 03:41:34 AM »
I was wondering how long it would take for parts of that interview to be twisted in anti-Rafa slant and published in the media. Surely Gillett's figures include wages, because we haven't spent £128m in the past 18 months. It's amazing how money (transfer, stadium development) seems to be constantly evaporating into thin air.
See how i can spin a story off your simple comment?
"Thank you so much once more and always remember: You’ll never walk alone." - Rafa Benitez, 3 Jun 2010

Offline rafathegaffa83

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 7,295
  • Dutch Class
    • View Profile
Re: Gillette's Opinion of Rafa...
« Reply #22 on: October 6, 2009, 03:52:54 AM »
The only question I would have of the lad who got the interview is did George say 128 million pounds? or did he just say 128mil and the lad "assumed" it was pounds. Because there is a difference between 128mil USD and £128m.
Only the lad could answer as he was there.

Good point.

Offline mysterio_86

  • Kemlynite
  • *
  • Posts: 25
  • Gender: Male
  • We all Live in a Red and White Kop
    • View Profile
Re: Gillette's Opinion of Rafa...
« Reply #23 on: October 6, 2009, 03:53:04 AM »
what a prick ! 128m what where who how ? fucking cocksucker just wants to get himself some profit and fuck off. If these cocksuckers can just keep their mouth shut for two days, I think Rafa and lads would have much better days and not worry about every single reporter in the world looking for revengeful answer. so the fucking war begins again.

Offline pundapat

  • Main Stander
  • **
  • Posts: 227
    • View Profile
Re: Gillette's Opinion of Rafa...
« Reply #24 on: October 6, 2009, 04:14:52 AM »
Fuck off you american twats

Offline Cocacola_Red

  • Main Stander
  • **
  • Posts: 97
    • View Profile
Re: Gillette's Opinion of Rafa...
« Reply #25 on: October 6, 2009, 04:18:14 AM »
The players know all these shit said by GG and that may lead to the performance on the field...
ENOUGH IS ENOUGH! GO NOW!

Offline gamble

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,604
    • View Profile
Re: Gillette's Opinion of Rafa...
« Reply #26 on: October 6, 2009, 04:18:15 AM »
get these lying yank shysters out of our club.

piss off G+H.

Offline LFCTorres9

  • Kopite
  • ****
  • Posts: 722
  • Gender: Male
  • JFT 96
    • View Profile
Re: Gillette's Opinion of Rafa...
« Reply #27 on: October 6, 2009, 04:24:46 AM »
What a fucking cu*t . Yanks Out.

Offline FryBaconFace

  • Main Stander
  • **
  • Posts: 70
  • Gender: Male
  • ~~sizzle~~
    • View Profile
Re: Gillette's Opinion of Rafa...
« Reply #28 on: October 6, 2009, 04:29:38 AM »
It's true, this is a new low.  Rafa's done so much with resources so limited.  And G&H stab him in the back at every opportunity. 

What a disgrace.
God kills a kitten every time Gerrard takes a corner. - Juan Loco

Offline Cocacola_Red

  • Main Stander
  • **
  • Posts: 97
    • View Profile
Re: Gillette's Opinion of Rafa...
« Reply #29 on: October 6, 2009, 04:33:17 AM »
A good man too for McParland on supporting Rafa and did not stand down in front of the owner....
ENOUGH IS ENOUGH! GO NOW!

Offline Franck Le Poof

  • Blonde transvestite who is utterly haunted by the idea of sitting in other mens piss. Has ticked the box for no publicity ;)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 8,639
  • Your mother, she is ze sex.
    • View Profile
Re: Gillette's Opinion of Rafa...
« Reply #30 on: October 6, 2009, 04:35:01 AM »
Regardless of what context it's taken out of, it is just daft isn't it?

The pressure on the team in and around the big games is massive (forget even the amount of pressure on us to win the title), and coming off the back of a loss against our title rivals is clearly a big enough dent in spirits. Hell, just take a look at the amount of doubt it has put in some supporters' minds already (see: post match thread). The last thing we needed was any added negativity and he should have well known that, even if it was a well intentioned comment (which I doubt in and of itself), it was bound to get spun by the press in one way or another.

It's just a fucking daft thing to say and it was said at a daft time.
I feel the exact same. But the polar opposite.

Offline Bob Loblaw

  • Could be John Giles, or his agent.
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 18,465
  • Gender: Male
  • I like em au naturale baby,Swing lo sweet chariots
    • View Profile
Re: Gillette's Opinion of Rafa...
« Reply #31 on: October 6, 2009, 04:43:50 AM »
I don't agree with him. But at the same time, i'm just as fed up with people crying about money. We've spent plenty the last few years.

I'd like to hear SOS's take on this meeting though

Offline Bob Loblaw

  • Could be John Giles, or his agent.
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 18,465
  • Gender: Male
  • I like em au naturale baby,Swing lo sweet chariots
    • View Profile
Re: Gillette's Opinion of Rafa...
« Reply #32 on: October 6, 2009, 04:45:32 AM »
Regardless of what context it's taken out of, it is just daft isn't it?

The pressure on the team in and around the big games is massive (forget even the amount of pressure on us to win the title), and coming off the back of a loss against our title rivals is clearly a big enough dent in spirits. Hell, just take a look at the amount of doubt it has put in some supporters' minds already (see: post match thread). The last thing we needed was any added negativity and he should have well known that, even if it was a well intentioned comment (which I doubt in and of itself), it was bound to get spun by the press in one way or another.

It's just a fucking daft thing to say and it was said at a daft time.

Was said last week according to the article.

Offline Franck Le Poof

  • Blonde transvestite who is utterly haunted by the idea of sitting in other mens piss. Has ticked the box for no publicity ;)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 8,639
  • Your mother, she is ze sex.
    • View Profile
Re: Gillette's Opinion of Rafa...
« Reply #33 on: October 6, 2009, 04:51:38 AM »
Was said last week according to the article.
Ah, didn't see that. Before the big game then? Just as shit I reckon!
I feel the exact same. But the polar opposite.

Offline Jonno_

  • Main Stander
  • **
  • Posts: 74
  • Gender: Male
  • We all Live in a Red and White Kop
    • View Profile
Re: Gillette's Opinion of Rafa...
« Reply #34 on: October 6, 2009, 05:53:26 AM »
George Gillett blames Rafael Benítez for Liverpool's poor start

The American also claimed that Liverpool are "in an extraordinarily good financial position. Far better than Manchester United, Chelsea or Arsenal."

I really hope so. I try not to concern myself with the economic side of football because I don't understand a thing about it, but I hope this is true.

Offline Redshadow77

  • ARSE!!! I am you KNOW!
  • Anny Roader
  • ***
  • Posts: 302
  • Gender: Male
  • I'm Redshadow77 and I'm NOT angry!!! LOL Honest.
    • View Profile
Re: Gillette's Opinion of Rafa...
« Reply #35 on: October 6, 2009, 05:56:25 AM »
I apologise to those who are easily bored/sidetracked and I'm sorry if you think that what follows is long but I DO still think it needs to be said though.  See what you think;

I believe in the recent interview recorded on the Liverpool Way Website (TLW) where he was surprised by a member of SOS on a one man mission to get answers from him; Our esteemed co-owner George Gillette (possessor of the few brain cells given to the two of them unlike the empty husk that is Hicks) stated ''If its not getting better it’s not because of Gillett and Hicks, it’s the manager it the scouting and so forth'' and a poster on here named Muser believes it may have been a well intentioned comment taken out of context?  Well, I hate to disappoint you but Muser and the rest of you on here - It WASN'T a well-intentioned comment;  In fact, I'd go so far as to say it was a DELIBERATE comment in both its timing And it's execution - Why?  Because those two tw*ts wanted Rafa' out a couple of years ago, picked a fight with him in the public eye, tried to put the supporters onside for their ludicrous excuse for a Klinnsmann plan and?.........Lost.  Owners don't forget things like that or certainly vengeful b*stards like Gillette don't, not sure about Hicks who only ever opens his mouth for the benefit of Thomas O'Hicks Jr. 

But Gillette? Oh, he hates Rafa' alright, I seem to remember in February he did something similar when WE beat Chelsea 2 - 0 at Anfield (yes we CAN and DO beat them - that's to those defeatist losers on here from the other threads who called for Rafa's head - predictably) - I believe at that time he said something along the lines of ''We were top of the league and going well until a certain individual made remarks referring to another teams manager and ever since then we have been in a slump'' or something similar and when asked by a fan if that meant Rafa' and what he said re Mr Alex Ferguson - Gillette said ''You said it, not me'' to  the person in question.  Well this comment, together with the remark I put at the start from the recent interview AND the completely ridiculous argument that they have invested enough money in the team (IF we want to qualify for the revamped UEFA Cup maybe they have but for the Title of the Premier League? Forget it) shows that A:) George won't miss an opportunity to put the boot in if and when he can regardless of whether it will worsen the teams results and/or damage morale as HE (don't know about Tom) STILL wants Rafa' OUT and ASAP, and B:) That he is EQUALLY determined to maintain the myth that those two chancers have invested more than enough money for the team to be competitive in order to obscure the funds he and Hicks ARE taking from the club on a regular basis in expenses etc, to pay for Interest AND their refusal to invest their own cash ala Abramovich as they want the team to run on the bare minimum.

Therefore in Gillette's eyes it's simple, it MUST be the managers fault that the team is faltering despite the obvious truth that even a blind man could see that Nothing like enough was spent on bolstering out the squad in the summer for a repeat of last season's glorious attempted Title Charge.  Heck, we lost a 20 million player in Robbie Keane, a 30 million one in Xabi Alonso, a 10 year veteran of the defence and a colossus in anyone's book in Hyppia AND a useful option at Right back in Arbeloa and replaced them with what? Nothing or an apparently rejuvenated Babel, an injured Italian international who cost 20 million and has yet to make his debut 3 months on from his purchase, a cheap as chips Greek defender whose career is nearly over and whose buy screams out ''bargain basement' whose played what? Twice for the club and will be lucky to double that by the end of the season and the only TRULY brilliant purchase this summer in the right sided version of Ashley Cole for England whose fulfilled every bit of his price tag thus far and who even outscored some of our strikers in earlier matches.  Yes, that may be spending 40 million to replace 50 million and thus look like balanced business to the untrained eye but you can't put a price on the symbiosis/relationships that Sami, Xabi, Alvaro and even Robbie Keane (was starting to) had with the rest of the team OR the strength/depth they added to the squad and until Babel reaches his potential (IF he ever does) and Aquilani, Kyrgiakos and even Johnson whose started so well have been here for a year or two, we won't even know if the squad's as strong as that we had last year - never mind stronger! While in the meantime, we're forced to rely on half trained replacements in the likes of Lucas and Babel (who's young despite his length of time at the club) AND as if that's not enough we have an injury crisis in the defence and midfield of Biblical proportions with Skrtel, Aurelio, Riera AND Mascherano ALL being injured and coming back gradually into the team whilst Aquilani isn't even IN the team yet!!

Oh yes and as if that little lot wasn't enough (!!) On top of that, we have now lost the abilities of Xabi that proved so vital to us last season in so many games.  Namely the knack possessed by Alonso to A:) Pick out quick forward passes and maintain the ''wave after wave'' of attacks that we often mounted against teams in games and B:) the nous/intelligence to play 'forward defence' in the oppositions half that he helped orchestrate against Chelsea (twice), Arsenal (away) AND United (Home) last season and against all the better sides we played.  We now have NO chance of regaining that VITAL cog to our machine until Aquilani is settled in well.  So in view of all this is it any wonder that we've struggled a bit thus far? And it's not over yet either - Aquilani's first three games at this rate COULD include United at Home, Arsenal away and Sunderland (who battered United for long periods on Saturday AT Old Trafford) away.  Glorious isn't it? But then Liverpool FC WAS forged from triumph over this sort of adversity no? Right since Rafa's first season indeed, we've been overcoming the odds year after year and almost been FORCED to win huge runs of difficult games such as those now looming like an October shadow before us.  Still, who knows? Maybe our recent experience in winning just such difficult runs will pull us through - One things for sure - The title's NOT out of the question yet whatever the doom-mongers say - United had 14 points (one LESS than us - Last season WE had 17 points - only 2 more than our current 15) after 7 games (i.e. now/this stage of the season) in each of the last TWO seasons and we all know how those ended for them don't we? (with 2 titles and a European Cup) So why not us?  Although it may have to be one of the most spectacular league winning comebacks on record, it certainly IS possible (we overcame worse in 1982) and for LFC, nothing's impossible, we proved that in Istanbul and again in Cardiff.

On another note, before ANYONE else on here has a go at me for trying to be a modern day Arthur Scargill/William Wallace style character etc regarding raising a 'people's army against the twin horrors as has happened in the past - I'll just answer that charge with this; Nope, I'm just a fan who cares deeply about his club and has a few notions on how to unblock the valve in our clubs heart that those two are clogging up, which if blocked long enough could bring about a fatal heart attack AND I'm willing to bet that if we put those theories into action - not only would we massively damage Gillette, we'd probably soon remove him from the club in short order. If Corinthians in Brazil can remove a FAR more stubborn owner in Tom Hicks alone then why can't the volatile, passionate fans of England's most successful side remove someone with Far less sticking power than Hicks? - Gillette is Only still there as we're to busy fighting amongst ourselves over what, if anything can be done (it can) and how to do it/when etc.  Well, maybe that interview's given us the answer which is to use it AGAINST Gillette and to do it NOW. 

To Conclude though, I'll refer to George Gillette by his proper name as bestowed upon him by a poster whose name escapes me in this very forum more than a year ago now - That is ''The Snake in the Grass'' That user always said that George was the more dangerous of our two owners despite the hot gas emanating from Hick's mouth at the time (I believe it was around the time of his famous interview by the fireside when the Everton Anfield game was played 2 seasons ago, ahem famous AND cringeworthy) and to tell the truth, I always agreed with them.  By his despicable attempt to kick his own team while it's down, Gillette has just  proven that name right (maybe 'Silent Assassin' would be more appropriate - given what he's Trying to do to Rafa'?). However, I've said on here many times - indeed I've bored people and started arguments by saying it that we Need to be pro-active in FORCING the Americans out, that we need to batter and batter and batter away at them and then? Batter some more and just keep coming at them until they crack and go;  They Won't just go - they're cancers, leeches with the difference that their host cannot be killed, just bled and bled and bled and.......you get the idea? Well, what I've also Always said is that one day Gillette (the allegedly smoother operator of the two) or Hicks (the blustering bull with the big mouth who just does NOT know how to shut it) WILL make an error, a faux pas, a mistake of some sort either in writing, actions or words which would provide the supporters of our great club with the loaded gun we need to convince ALL our support of the true poison that these men are and finally unite us all to force them out. 

Well, I think quite clearly that Gillette has with a number of things in this impromptu interview from TLW (namely with his loss of temper in the interview regarding investing his own money, his obscuring of the obvious fact of our debt, his ludicrous posturing re Man U and Chelsea AND his blatantly disgraceful renewed attack on our manager whilst the team are suffering) done just that.  I think that if we take the worst parts of Gillette in this interview as the papers appear to have done and put it together with what he said in February (clearly directed at Rafa') then we have the makings of a leaflet, speech, presentation, article, any number of things that can not only be used to convince our support (at home AND abroad) that those who hate Gillette were right all along but that also can be used to batter and batter and batter away at him, to beat him around the head with in public and with loaded questions, ambush interviews (like the TLW one) concerning what he said, leaks to his sponsors and business partners of just how badly he's managing his prime asset to damage his American commercial affairs and the like - in fact any number of creative options could be used to attack Gillette now he's just given us the ammunition but they HAVE to be used repeatedly until he's finally gone.  The way Gillette conducted that interview is the greatest gift ANYONE  wanting rid of the Yanks could have hoped for in the circumstances and the most pleasing thing is that one of them has provided it to us himself giftwrapped on a silver platter with a garnishing of blatant lies as well just to spice it up and damage him some more - Now? It's up to us , the fans to TAKE this opportunity, detonate the bomb that this interview represents to George Gillette and finally destroy his interest in Liverpool by forcing him out for good. In short it's time to take the offensive with the weapon our adversary has so kindly provided for us and as it came from him - it can be used to pierce the hitherto impregnable armour of indifference with which he surrounds himself by being used on HIM personally to shatter that indifference but more importantly it can melt away our fans indifference to him (indifference in the US or 'not rocking the boat' among UK fans - same thing) and turn it from ALL our fans into the outright hatred we Need to get rid of him at last.  In short that interview is Very valuable;  Indeed, it COULD if used properly, help to unite the fans of Liverpool FC with one aim and one aim only, the end of George Gillette at our club.....................................................................
« Last Edit: October 6, 2009, 06:46:30 AM by Redshadow77 »
The Japanese say ''Those who know don't talk while those who TALK? Don't know'';  Maybe Everton, Chelsea and United fans should try listening sometimes.......................

Offline jooneyisdagod

  • mellow narcissist
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,115
  • Gender: Male
  • Run run run run run, take a drag or two !
    • View Profile
Re: Gillette's Opinion of Rafa...
« Reply #36 on: October 6, 2009, 05:56:34 AM »
What a load of bollocks.  Both with regards to the amount we have spent and our start to the season which while not being spectacular hasn't been as bad as it has been made out to be. 


And like Silent Violet said, where is the 22-23 m they supposedly invested for transfers ?  If there was such a sum, I'm sure we would have gone out and purchased another player but seeing as how that never happened, I really doubt it. 
Smacks of Rafa putting the boot into Maureen, a big "Hey fuck you special needs, I could of had your job if I wanted it, next time you fuck with me I'll shag yer bird and shit in your shoe!"

Offline Silent...Violet...

  • ...annoying fucking thick eternal cherry keeping shite...
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 11,786
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: Gillette's Opinion of Rafa...
« Reply #37 on: October 6, 2009, 06:13:24 AM »
I really hope so. I try not to concern myself with the economic side of football because I don't understand a thing about it, but I hope this is true.

Why the fuck would you wish that? You trust that fucking snake more than Rafa?

And top post that, Redshadow77. When I talk about fucking Gillet, I never mention the footballing side of things, since it is apparent that this fucking c*nt of a man has no fucking idea of the game. Like you mentioned, he has repeatedly questioned Rafa's management, taking shots at him for Rafa's jibe at Ferguson, or for the poor start this season. All this coming from the fucking man who tried to appoint Jurgen Klinsmann as our boss. He's a fucking hypocritical fucker, who wants to make a quick buck out of the club and milk it for all it's worth:

Quote
"Not by me I try to support our manager and let him have the freedom to spend it his way wisely, to do with scouting to go get the best young men available. That’s what we try to do I don’t get into strategy or individual players"

But you continue to take pot-shots at Rafa, don't you, you snivelling little c*nt.

And he's still not coming clear on the business side of stuff either. God knows what is going behind the scenes at the club. Inflated figures all round, with a lot of it being unaccounted for. They need to come clear soon, with the financial figures.

Then there's Hicks. Stupid as fuck, but atleast he makes an effort to show that he likes us. I hate him less than Gillet, solely because he has always publicly backed Rafa (but fucking lied about the stadium :no).

We need to get these parasites out of the club. Moores and Parry fucked up big time by selling to these two businessmen, who just wanted to make a quick buck out of the club.

And kudos to Rafa for staying put,despite all the turmoil all round. People are easy to blame Rafa for defeats and call for his head, but they forget that he is fighting a lone battle at the club, something which he is not obliged to. He left Valencia for less, and he can easily leave anytime he wants and join a big club. But he is fucking staying and fighting a battle, on the field and off it.
Why was Reina acting the big man anyway? Sure he did no more for Spains win than I did.
Did he dies of Nacho-ral causes then?

Offline Gerrard[LFC]

  • Anny Roader
  • ***
  • Posts: 298
  • Gender: Male
  • We are all part of Liverpool-FC
    • View Profile
Re: Gillette's Opinion of Rafa...
« Reply #38 on: October 6, 2009, 06:13:49 AM »
either players who got renewed contracts have a huge increase and Rafa and management goto strip club every weekend after game or the money is up yanks wallet,
I mean "SHOW ME THE MONEY" if he says he invested 128mil, get his accountant or whatever to show us where he spent that kind of money. Is that not including sales of players and just talking about money spent? it seems like that to me.
And GG says he doesnt get money from the club? is he running a charity fund? does he want to fatten up LFC for a big sale? if he is a business man, surely he wants profit and earnings for himself. I just dont understand at all.
The greater danger for most of us lies not in setting our aim too high and falling short; but in setting our aim too low, and achieving our mark.
Michelangelo

Offline Passmaster Molby

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,052
  • We Won It Five Times.....
    • View Profile
Re: Gillette's Opinion of Rafa...
« Reply #39 on: October 6, 2009, 06:31:21 AM »
Snivelling little chipmunk faced twat - the sooner he fucks off out of our club the better.
"Who's bigger than Liverpool?"

Jamie Carragher