He wasn't very good at Liverpool. He was great at scoring goals but that was it. He might have been a bit better earlier in his career but he wasn't good enough for us by the time he arrived (which seems a bit daft seeing as he scored 27 goals). We were appalling in 1984/5 which wasn't easy to stomach at the time. He soon got the bullet which says it all.
Yep, agree with that.
Scored a lot of goals but wasnt good enough to play in central midfield. Basically we lost Souness the previous season for Sampdoria and had to buy no fewer than 4 players to replace him:
Wark : who scored goals from midfield like Souness could
MacDonal: who covered ground like Souness did
McMahon: who tackled like Souness did (but arrived the following season)
Molby: who passed like Souness did
Unfortunately as there are only 11 on a pitch only 1 (or 2) of them could play at any one time, so we never really replaced Souness.
I always felt that Wark was most effective in Europe where for some reason continental teams could never cope with his ghosting runs from midfield and he scored tons of goals for us in Europe. He did hte same for Ipswich previously. In the league he just want good enough; or rather was good enough to get into most post-1984 Liverpool midfields, but looked so much worse than the player he ostensibly replaced, Souness.