plymouth came and got what they wanted.
they didnt come to play any football.
So many people saying this, and I don't get this at all, on several levels.
1. Teams can play however the fuck they want. The object of any game is to win it, the object of any set of tactics or overall strategy is to give yourself the best chance of doing that. The object is not to entertain neutrals so if a team chooses to play defensively - within the rules - and you can't break them down, well that's just part of the game. Grow up and learn how to do it better (if you're a player) or don't expect teams to play how you want them to (as a fan).
2. These guys are underdogs. In football, scoring is low frequency - it's hard to make chances. Playing defensively is a great way of maximising the chance of not just a result, but in an FA cup away leg, a lucrative home tie which, at Plymouth's level, can make a massive, massive difference to a club's finances.
3. The commentator's were banging on constantly about Plymouth's tight defence away from home. So are we saying they should have changed their style of play and gone more attacking when facing higher level opposition? Nonsensical.
Plymouth got a replay, they've done a fantastic job. Whining about their style of play smacks of sour grapes, especially as they're not exactly billionaires, are they? And their fans sure as fuck weren't complaining about it. And why would they?