Author Topic: The Labour Party (*)  (Read 882395 times)

Offline Alan_X

  • WUM. 'twatito' - The Cat Herding Firm But Fair Voice Of Reason (Except when he's got a plank up his arse). Gimme some skin, priest! Has a general dislike for Elijah Wood. Clearly cannot fill even a thong! RAWK Resident Muppet. Has a crush o
  • RAWK Staff
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 53,347
  • Come on you fucking red men!!!
  • Super Title: This is super!
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6160 on: April 25, 2017, 07:51:56 pm »
So all those big-hitters sold the country down the Swanny because if they didn't they would have got reprimanded - fair enough.

I'm really struggling to see your point. Am I disappointed they followed the whip? Yes.

Am I absolutely fucking fuming that our leader imposed a three-line-whip and showed he's an incompetent, useless twat with zero political ability?...
Sid Lowe (@sidlowe)
09/03/2011 08:04
Give a man a mask and he will tell the truth, Give a man a user name and he will act like a total twat.
Its all about winning shiny things.

Offline Dr. Beaker

  • Veo, to his mates. Shares 50% of his DNA with a banana. Would dearly love to strangle Frankengoose. Lo! Be he not ye Messiah, verily be he a child of questionable conduct in the eyes of Ye Holy Border Guards.
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 16,799
  • I... think I am, therefore...I....maybe.
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6161 on: April 25, 2017, 09:44:51 pm »
I'm really struggling to see your point. Am I disappointed they followed the whip? Yes.

Am I absolutely fucking fuming that our leader imposed a three-line-whip and showed he's an incompetent, useless twat with zero political ability?...
I don't think they were following the whip out of blind loyalty to Corbyn, or even fear. I think they had their reasons for voting that way, which may or may not have been the same as Corbyn's reasons. And I don't think that people with such status within the party would sell the country down the Swanny for fear of a possible reprimand.

If it was a disastrous decision to vote that way, then they all made a bad decision, and that was by damn near all of the party's heavyweights. A Corbyn three line whip is like anyone else's free vote. There is also the possibility that it was actually the right thing to do, even with hindsight it's impossible to tell.

If the lightweights dared to vote against it surely it wouldn't have daunted the big boys.
NAKED BOOBERY

Rile-Me costed L. Nee-Naw "The Child" Torrence the first jack the hat-trick since Eon Rush vs Accursed Toffos, many moons passed. Nee-Naw he could have done a concreted his palace in the pantyhose off the LibPole Gods...was not was for the invented intervention of Rile-Me whistler.

Offline Trev20

  • Wool
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,301
  • I am not!
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6162 on: April 26, 2017, 08:25:31 am »
https://twitter.com/labour_history/status/856745755150766080

Those were the days.....
...my friends we took the Stretford End!

Blair was a class act, nobody in the Labour Party these days comes close to how impressive he was so don't depress yourself reminiscing too long.


Offline Sangria

  • In trying to be right ends up wrong without fail
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 19,097
  • We all Live in a Red and White Kop
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6163 on: April 26, 2017, 09:39:42 am »
...my friends we took the Stretford End!

Blair was a class act, nobody in the Labour Party these days comes close to how impressive he was so don't depress yourself reminiscing too long.

The thing is, even Major is a heavyweight compared with May. And yet May wipes the floor with the non-entities leading the Labour party. It shouldn't have required that much to bring the Labour party back up to speed after 2015. But the members decided on the most radical, irrevocable shooting off of both feet, repeatedly, with the heaviest calibre they could find. Just as idiotic as the country's Brexit decision, which, of course, the Labour leader wholeheartedly supports. The shitshow that is the Labour party is exactly what the Labour members deserve, and I don't see any way back for it.
"i just dont think (Lucas is) that type of player that Kenny wants"
Vidocq, 20 January 2011

http://www.redandwhitekop.com/forum/index.php?topic=267148.msg8032258#msg8032258

Offline classycarra

  • The Left Disonourable Chuntering Member For Scousepool.
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 30,484
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6164 on: April 26, 2017, 01:48:10 pm »
Looks like Malia Bouattia lost her NUS re-election. Now she's unemployed, and given her awful PR, wonder what odds we could get on her being made a lifetime peer by Corbyn and joining his other cronie?

Offline The Gulleysucker

  • RAWK's very own spinached up Popeye. Transfer Board Veteran 5 Stars.
  • RAWK Remembers
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 11,496
  • An Indolent Sybarite
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6165 on: April 26, 2017, 06:31:53 pm »
Interesting interview with Dugher in The Staggers. It's hard to disagree with any of it, especially that last paragraph.



On the morning of 18 April, as news broke that Theresa May would make a surprise announcement, Michael Dugher was on the phone to his old friend Tom Watson. By chance, Labour’s deputy leader was “the person who had said most consistently that there would be an early election,” Dugher recalled. “I thought it was likely but once they decided not to have it at the same time as the locals I thought that ship had sailed.”

Two days after May revealed that a snap election would be held, the 42-year-old Barnsley East MP and former shadow cabinet minister announced that he would stand down. Labour allies and lobby journalists mourned the loss of one of Westminster’s characters: a pugnacious northerner full of authentic loathing of the Tories and contempt for his party’s hard-left.

When I met Dugher in his parliamentary office four days later, he told me that he longed to see more of his family (he has three children aged 11, nine and four) but also that the last two years had been “thoroughly miserable”. The former Brown spin doctor lamented: “Opposition is always really, really hard. People who like opposition and skip into the chamber every day, I kind of wonder whether all the lights are on ...  The only point of being in opposition is to try and get into government.” He would trade his seven years in parliament, he told me, for seven days on the backbenches in government.

Born into a working class family in Erdlington, a Doncaster mining village, Dugher hails from Labour’s “old right” - a tradition antithetical to that of Jeremy Corbyn. Like other standard-bearers such as Tom Watson and John Spellar (all former trade union officials), Dugher is pro-Trident, pro-NATO and devoted to the politics of power, rather than protest.

Four months after he became shadow culture secretary under Corbyn (having served as shadow transport secretary under Ed Miliband), Dugher was sacked for “disloyalty”. Corbyn privately cited a New Statesman article in which Dugher argued against a “revenge reshuffle” targeting supporters of Syrian intervention.

Ever since, he has warned that Labour is drifting remorselessly away from power. Though he insisted that electoral defeat was not inevitable (“Politics is wild and unpredictable. Who knows what could happen?”), he added: “You’d have to have a screw loose not to think things are pretty tough. I noticed when Jeremy addressed the PLP [Parliamentary Labour Party] he didn’t announce the key seats we’d need to take off the Tories to form a Labour government. I thought that was ominous.”

He continued: “It is a remarkable achievement for the leadership to have taken a catastrophic situation in Scotland and made it quite a lot worse. We seem to be doing worse in Wales ... We’ve gone backwards amongst every demographic, every region of the country. Jeremy is behind Theresa May on managing the NHS! It’s quite a special achievement to put all of that together in a short period of time. Hats off to Jeremy and Seumas [Milne], Diane [Abbott] and John [McDonnell]. That’s pretty special.”

Some Corbyn allies privately suggest that the Labour leader could retain office even after a heavy defeat (as Neil Kinnock did in 1987 - though he gained 20 seats). "If Jeremy loses the general election he’s got to go," Dugher said. "The election’s started, I want Labour to do as well as possible but if Labour lost again, particularly if we did worse than last time, it would be ridiculous and an act of profound self-indulgence and vanity to consider staying on in those circumstances.

"I don’t know what his office are so defensive about. They think Jeremy’s going to win. Jeremy’s office should have a bit more faith in him to win the election and then the issue won’t arise."


He added: "The left have always been in the fortunate position of being able to blame the moderates, the centre for when we’ve lost. But whenever we’ve won, they’ve banked it, saying anyone would have won. 'Jeremy Corbyn could have in 1997' - not sure that’s the case, actually. For the first time, they are going to be put to an electoral test themselves: they’ve got the leadership, it’s Jeremy’s shadow cabinet, it will be his manifesto, the public are fairly clear about what Jeremy believes in and the direction of the party, so let’s see how it does electorally.”

Dugher ridiculed the suggestion that party disunity and a hostile media were to blame for Labour's woes. “I recognise that disunity does not help. But the reason why we are so far behind in the polls, it comes down to very simple things: it’s about leadership, leadership is the dominant issue at every general election.

“The idea that Labour might do badly because of Michael Dugher’s tweets, someone who nobody has bloody heard of, rather than Jeremy Corbyn, who is standing to be prime minister, is just for the birds, it’s the politics of excuses.”

Dugher added: “We’ve had a Tory press forever and a day ... They’re a lot less powerful than they were. The Sun will never be able to claim it won anything now, it isn’t like 1992. And yet they [Corbyn supporters] use it as an excuse, it’s just deranged.”

He derided the pro-Corbyn sites The Canary and SKWAWKBOX as "total bollocks" and recalled tweets claiming YouGov was biased towards the Tories. "It’s a member of the British Polling Council! Have these people been smoking something? They should just quit the excuses.

"When I saw a [Momentum] demonstration outside the New Statesman, and you had a beautiful look of bemusement on your face as much as anything, and I just thought 'the left are demonstrating against the New Statesman!' Is the New Statesman now part of the Tory press? What do they want, Pravda?"


But Dugher, who managed Andy Burnham’s 2015 leadership campaign, conceded that it was “no good moderates blaming Corbyn”. Labour members, he said, were “lured to Corbyn out of desperation. What we offered didn’t inspire, it wasn’t radical, it was more of the same. I am as guilty as everyone else.” He insisted that he was not pessimistic about Labour’s future, singling out Rachel Reeves (“the biggest brain in the House of Commons”), Chuka Umunna (“incredibly talented”) and Dan Jarvis (“I knew him when he was in the army and I was at the MoD, a great talent for the future”) for praise.

Dugher is not a man who will struggle to entertain himself outside of Westminster. He delights in sport, cooking (tweeting photos of his homemade curry), karaoke (unlike most, he really can sing) and sharing his Beatles obsession (his office includes an Abbey Road sign and a framed Yellow Submarine cover). “I know but I’m not going to tell you yet,” he said of his future plans.

As Dugher prepared to meet fellow MPs for leaving drinks in Strangers’ Bar, I asked whether he would ever stand again. “I’m a big believer in never say never,” he replied. “I’m very proud of the very small contribution I played in previous Labour governments.

“Unlike Jeremy and Seumas and others, who have no idea about government, who learned about socialism in expensive private schools, my politics was because of where I was from. I was born into the politics of Labour because I grew up in a pit village in the strike ... There was a lot of poverty when I was a child, I have very strong memories of that. That’s made me who I am and that’s why representing that working class constituency, ex-pit villages, I’m really proud of that.”


I don't do polite so fuck yoursalf with your stupid accusations...

Right you fuckwit I will show you why you are talking out of your fat arse...

Mutton Geoff (Obviously a real nice guy)

Offline Lush is the best medicine...

  • FUCK THE POLICE - NWA
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 40,806
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6166 on: April 26, 2017, 07:18:19 pm »
That last paragraph is a killer.

Offline killer-heels

  • Hates everyone and everything. Including YOU! Negativity not just for Christmas. Thinks 'irony' means 'metallic'......
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 76,318
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6167 on: April 26, 2017, 07:38:42 pm »
That last paragraph is a killer.

Rinsed Corbyn there.

Offline Lush is the best medicine...

  • FUCK THE POLICE - NWA
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 40,806
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6168 on: April 26, 2017, 07:42:00 pm »
Rinsed Corbyn there.
also can throw Schneider in there too, looks like the type of posh boy wanker who thinks he's knows the cures to all the worlds ills walking round in a Che Guevara t shirt

Offline Alan_X

  • WUM. 'twatito' - The Cat Herding Firm But Fair Voice Of Reason (Except when he's got a plank up his arse). Gimme some skin, priest! Has a general dislike for Elijah Wood. Clearly cannot fill even a thong! RAWK Resident Muppet. Has a crush o
  • RAWK Staff
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 53,347
  • Come on you fucking red men!!!
  • Super Title: This is super!
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6169 on: April 26, 2017, 07:44:44 pm »
also can throw Schneider in there too, looks like the type of posh boy wanker who thinks he's knows the cures to all the worlds ills walking round in a Che Guevara t shirt

And Lansmann.
Sid Lowe (@sidlowe)
09/03/2011 08:04
Give a man a mask and he will tell the truth, Give a man a user name and he will act like a total twat.
Its all about winning shiny things.

Offline TepidT2O

  • Deffo NOT 9"! MUFC bedwetter. Grass. Folically-challenged, God-piece-wearing, monkey-rubber. Jizz aroma expert. Operating at the lower end of the distribution curve...has the hots for Alan. Bastard. Fearless in transfer windows with lack of convicti
  • Lead Matchday Commentator
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 94,021
  • Dejan Lovren fan club member #1
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6170 on: April 26, 2017, 07:46:38 pm »
I don't like the last paragraph at all...

Because being posh isn't the problem, it's being shit.

Criticising the elite when you are part of the elite is the problem.

I find his comments no more helpful than corbyn's

It doesn't matter what your background is, what matters  is what you do.  How you help people.

People of all classes get way too concerned about identity politics like this, but no one can help how they are brought up, they can only help what they do with their talents as a politician.
“Happiness can be found in the darkest of times, if one only remembers to turn on the light.”
“Generosity always pays off. Generosity in your effort, in your work, in your kindness, in the way you look after people and take care of people. In the long run, if you are generous with a heart, and with humanity, it always pays off.”
W

Offline killer-heels

  • Hates everyone and everything. Including YOU! Negativity not just for Christmas. Thinks 'irony' means 'metallic'......
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 76,318
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6171 on: April 26, 2017, 07:47:41 pm »
also can throw Schneider in there too, looks like the type of posh boy wanker who thinks he's knows the cures to all the worlds ills walking round in a Che Guevara t shirt

These people are losers. They dont realise the British people at all. This is a society that does massively value its public services and does want government influence, but it also loves the allure of ambition, money and class. Trying to go full socialist in this society will result in absolute disaster.

Id imagine them lot probably think Theresa May travelling in a top of the range XJR is too flash.

Offline Lush is the best medicine...

  • FUCK THE POLICE - NWA
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 40,806
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6172 on: April 26, 2017, 08:00:55 pm »
These people are losers. They dont realise the British people at all. This is a society that does massively value its public services and does want government influence, but it also loves the allure of ambition, money and class. Trying to go full socialist in this society will result in absolute disaster.

Id imagine them lot probably think Theresa May travelling in a top of the range XJR is too flash.
its not just that, it's their worldview, especially of the economy, is stuck in some 80s time warp with some of their ridiculous policy ideas he mentioned at the trade union conference the other week is what you'd expect from the communist party

But yeah, losers they are. That's why they are going down the class warfare bollocks with their Ł70k a year is rich and the Ł250k wage cap (even though the dickhead in charge is on Ł137k a year and a massive expenses account, but hey he doesn't feel rich s he's not rich

Offline The Gulleysucker

  • RAWK's very own spinached up Popeye. Transfer Board Veteran 5 Stars.
  • RAWK Remembers
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 11,496
  • An Indolent Sybarite
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6173 on: April 27, 2017, 07:35:57 am »
And another Staggers article.

I'd really recommend getting yourself a cup of tea, sitting down and having a read of this, as although quite long, it's pretty good.

http://www.newstatesman.com/politics/june2017/2017/04/jeremy-corbyn-has-attracted-socialism-fans-not-labour-voters
I don't do polite so fuck yoursalf with your stupid accusations...

Right you fuckwit I will show you why you are talking out of your fat arse...

Mutton Geoff (Obviously a real nice guy)

Offline SP

  • Thor ain't got shit on this dude! Alpheus. SPoogle. The Equusfluminis Of RAWK. Straight in at the deep end with a tube of Vagisil. Needs to get a half-life. Needs a damned good de-frag.
  • RAWK Staff.
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 36,042
  • .
  • Super Title: Southern Pansy
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6174 on: April 27, 2017, 08:14:53 am »
http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/wigan-council-leader-lord-peter-12950335

Trouble in Andy Burnham's soon to be ex-seat. Parachuting in the leader's choice against the constituency's wishes.

Offline Alan_X

  • WUM. 'twatito' - The Cat Herding Firm But Fair Voice Of Reason (Except when he's got a plank up his arse). Gimme some skin, priest! Has a general dislike for Elijah Wood. Clearly cannot fill even a thong! RAWK Resident Muppet. Has a crush o
  • RAWK Staff
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 53,347
  • Come on you fucking red men!!!
  • Super Title: This is super!
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6175 on: April 27, 2017, 08:18:28 am »
And another Staggers article.

I'd really recommend getting yourself a cup of tea, sitting down and having a read of this, as although quite long, it's pretty good.

http://www.newstatesman.com/politics/june2017/2017/04/jeremy-corbyn-has-attracted-socialism-fans-not-labour-voters

Cheers Nick, reading it now.

This really worries me:

The best way to find out what a particular group thinks is to survey a random sample of about a thousand of its members — and this is exactly what Ian Warren of Election Data has done, by commissioning a YouGov opinion poll of the Labour Party. Warren’s poll found striking differences between party members who joined before Corbyn became leader and party members who joined afterwards.

Among the former group, 28% approve and 62% disapprove of his leadership, but among the latter, 69% approve and 20% disapprove.

The poll also found Corbyn’s leadership to have the approval of only 47% of those members who voted Labour in 2015, but of 73% of those who voted for other parties at that time.

Both of these findings support the view of Corbynism as a hostile takeover  of the Labour Party.
Sid Lowe (@sidlowe)
09/03/2011 08:04
Give a man a mask and he will tell the truth, Give a man a user name and he will act like a total twat.
Its all about winning shiny things.

Offline Libertine

  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 13,487
  • Nothing behind me, everything ahead of me
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6176 on: April 27, 2017, 09:43:04 am »

Offline classycarra

  • The Left Disonourable Chuntering Member For Scousepool.
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 30,484
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6177 on: April 27, 2017, 09:57:00 am »
http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/wigan-council-leader-lord-peter-12950335

Trouble in Andy Burnham's soon to be ex-seat. Parachuting in the leader's choice against the constituency's wishes.

Not the first time this leadership have toyed with the idea of parachuting this particular crony into a seat:
http://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/politics/ex-scottish-labour-mp--10731569

Who would have thought that being Len McCluskey’s partner and Corbyn’s colleague would allow her potential opportunities

Offline Crumble

  • It's rhyming slang
  • Kopite
  • *****
  • Posts: 792
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6178 on: April 27, 2017, 10:02:51 am »
And another Staggers article.

I'd really recommend getting yourself a cup of tea, sitting down and having a read of this, as although quite long, it's pretty good.

http://www.newstatesman.com/politics/june2017/2017/04/jeremy-corbyn-has-attracted-socialism-fans-not-labour-voters

Thanks for this, as you say a pretty good read.

He has an interesting perspective on Labour party history. Mine is slightly different. Examples:
1) As its constitution spells out, Labour was always a democratic socialist party. The purge of Militant and other revolutionary socialist groupings in the 1980s was therefore necessary; a retreat from the neoliberalism introduced by the New Labour project in the 1990s is now similarly overdue.
2) The disaster of the 1983 general elections was caused not primarily by the left-wing manifesto (well to the left of the likely 2015 one btw) but by the defection of high-profile right-leaning Labour defections to the newly formed SDP and the resulting media shitfest.
3) The recent surge in party membership seems to be a mixture of older democratic socialists (like me) returning to the party with new optimism that New Labour was in retreat following a string of general election defeats, plus young and energetic idealists hopeful for an alternative to "all the same" politics. I haven't seen much evidence of revolutionary socialists even in the Momentum crowd.

Also, I dislike the coining of the term "Corbynite" when we already have the appropriate and well-understood term "democratic socialist". It's not all about Corbyn, it's about what he stands for.

Overall, I don't think the author's conclusions flow smoothly from his premises. But I like his exploration of "Corbynite commonplaces", most of which I agree with.

Offline Libertine

  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 13,487
  • Nothing behind me, everything ahead of me
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6179 on: April 27, 2017, 10:58:52 am »

Offline Banquo's Ghost

  • Macbeth's on repeat. To boldly split infinitives that lesser men would dare. To.
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 3,475
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6180 on: April 27, 2017, 11:13:21 am »
The New Statesman article is thoughtful and thought provoking. Thank you for posting the link.

A telling part for me is this paragraph characterising (correctly in my view) the wings of the party.

Quote
Corbynism is the exploitation of that vulnerability in order to increase the influence of a particular faction within the Labour Party. This faction is sometimes referred to as Labour’s "hard left" wing, to distinguish it both from the party’s "centrist" wing (think Tony Blair or Harold Wilson) and the "soft left" that lies between the two (think Ed Miliband or Neil Kinnock). However, it is perhaps more useful to refer to it as the party’s "Bennite" faction.

Notably - and I think this bears examination by those who support Corbyn and his wing of the party - some of those are not like the others. There are two names that were Prime Ministers in a Labour government. There are two names that came close but failed the electorate's test, despite facing a wounded Tory party. The 'Bennite' leaders of Foot and Corbyn (the latter's record yet to be proven conclusively ) both led/may lead the party to near oblivion.

This tells me something about the electorate of the United Kingdom.
« Last Edit: April 27, 2017, 11:15:14 am by Banquo's Ghost »
Be humble, for you are made of earth. Be noble, for you are made of stars.

Offline redmark

  • RAWK Scribe
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 21,395
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6181 on: April 27, 2017, 07:25:12 pm »
Also, I dislike the coining of the term "Corbynite" when we already have the appropriate and well-understood term "democratic socialist". It's not all about Corbyn, it's about what he stands for.

Not all (possibly far from all) democratic socialists support Corbyn.
Stop whining : https://spiritofshankly.com/ : https://thefsa.org.uk/join/ : https://reclaimourgame.com/
The focus now should not be on who the owners are, but limits on what owners can do without formal supporter agreement. At all clubs.

Offline OOS

  • Jordan Henderson fanclub member #4
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 6,657
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6182 on: April 27, 2017, 08:07:24 pm »
Not the first time this leadership have toyed with the idea of parachuting this particular crony into a seat:
http://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/politics/ex-scottish-labour-mp--10731569

Who would have thought that being Len McCluskey’s partner and Corbyn’s colleague would allow her potential opportunities

Len wants his best mate be selected for Walton, which the local members are furious at. Reason why Rotherham is standing, so the members can have a say. If Rotherham said he wasn't going to stand, the NEC would have chose Lens mate as the candidate.
"I think the most important thing about music is the sense of escape." - Thom Yorke

Offline classycarra

  • The Left Disonourable Chuntering Member For Scousepool.
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 30,484
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6183 on: April 27, 2017, 08:56:39 pm »
Len wants his best mate be selected for Walton, which the local members are furious at. Reason why Rotherham is standing, so the members can have a say. If Rotherham said he wasn't going to stand, the NEC would have chose Lens mate as the candidate.

To be fair, Rotherham (and Burnham) aren't angels. The pair of them kissed arse to get endorsement from Corbyn, so they could get their Mayor gigs. Suppose on the other end, can understand them for wanting to escape the scrutiny they'd face as MPs following a Corbyn-led election so they can stand alone (like Khan)

Offline JohnnoWhite

  • Deliverer of the -Q- de grace.
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 6,968
  • Thought I was wrong once - but I was mistaken.
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6184 on: April 28, 2017, 11:32:12 am »
So the summary conclusion of all of these critical posts has to come down to this conundrum. Are you willing to see the Tories be given a fresh 5 year mandate to punish the nation even more by NOT voting Labour or will those of you unhappy waverers pass the real acid test and still vote Labour to rid our country of this destructive and malevolent Tory vermin?
There is nothing wrong with striving to win, so long as you don't set the prize above the game. There can be no dishonour in defeat nor any conceit in victory. What matters above all is that the team plays in the right spirit, with skill, courage, fair play,no favour and the result accepted without bitterness. Sir Matt Busby CBE KCSG 1909-1994

Offline Banquo's Ghost

  • Macbeth's on repeat. To boldly split infinitives that lesser men would dare. To.
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 3,475
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6185 on: April 28, 2017, 11:41:05 am »
So the summary conclusion of all of these critical posts has to come down to this conundrum. Are you willing to see the Tories be given a fresh 5 year mandate to punish the nation even more by NOT voting Labour or will those of you unhappy waverers pass the real acid test and still vote Labour to rid our country of this destructive and malevolent Tory vermin?

I think the discussion has made it clear in this and the general election thread. Most of us will be voting Labour despite deep reservations about Corbyn and his cronies, or if in marginal seats where another party has a chance at beating the Tories, voting for the party best able to win and stop the Tory.

I think I've only seen one post where a member says they are going to vote Tory. Does this help or hinder your narrative?
Be humble, for you are made of earth. Be noble, for you are made of stars.

Offline zero zero

  • Karma's a bitch. Innit.
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 15,512
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6186 on: April 28, 2017, 11:47:12 am »
So the summary conclusion of all of these critical posts has to come down to this conundrum. Are you willing to see the Tories be given a fresh 5 year mandate to punish the nation even more by NOT voting Labour or will those of you unhappy waverers pass the real acid test and still vote Labour...
...to see the Tories be given a fresh 5 year mandate to punish the nation even more


Decisions, decisions

Offline TepidT2O

  • Deffo NOT 9"! MUFC bedwetter. Grass. Folically-challenged, God-piece-wearing, monkey-rubber. Jizz aroma expert. Operating at the lower end of the distribution curve...has the hots for Alan. Bastard. Fearless in transfer windows with lack of convicti
  • Lead Matchday Commentator
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 94,021
  • Dejan Lovren fan club member #1
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6187 on: April 28, 2017, 12:04:14 pm »
No one here will be voting Tory.

Simple.

Never would, never will.
“Happiness can be found in the darkest of times, if one only remembers to turn on the light.”
“Generosity always pays off. Generosity in your effort, in your work, in your kindness, in the way you look after people and take care of people. In the long run, if you are generous with a heart, and with humanity, it always pays off.”
W

Offline Zeb

  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 18,571
  • Justice.
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6188 on: April 28, 2017, 12:20:43 pm »
So the summary conclusion of all of these critical posts has to come down to this conundrum. Are you willing to see the Tories be given a fresh 5 year mandate to punish the nation even more by NOT voting Labour or will those of you unhappy waverers pass the real acid test and still vote Labour to rid our country of this destructive and malevolent Tory vermin?

Wouldn't this have been a good thing for Corbyn supporters to have asked a couple years back before having Corbyn elected as leader? Even got a chance to think about the question last year too.
"And the voices of the standing Kop still whispering in the wind will salute the wee Scots redman and he will still walk on.
And your money will have bought you nothing."

Offline Millie

  • Athens Airport Queen. Dude, never mind my car, where's my hand sanitiser?!
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 13,054
  • IFWT
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6189 on: April 28, 2017, 12:49:39 pm »
I am not a Corbyn fan but I will be voting Labour
"If you can't say anything nice, don't say nothing at all"  Thumper (1942)

Justice for the 96

I'm a Believer

Offline Danny Boys Dad

  • Errol Flynn when he's had a few
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 13,082
  • Now listen here son
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6190 on: April 28, 2017, 12:51:57 pm »
Wouldn't this have been a good thing for Corbyn supporters to have asked a couple years back before having Corbyn elected as leader? Even got a chance to think about the question last year too.

Wouldn't it have been better for the other candidates and their supporters to have asked themselves what it was about them and their record that was so unpalatable to a majority of party members?
Legacy fan

Offline classycarra

  • The Left Disonourable Chuntering Member For Scousepool.
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 30,484
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6191 on: April 28, 2017, 12:54:33 pm »
So the summary conclusion of all of these critical posts has to come down to this conundrum. Are you willing to see the Tories be given a fresh 5 year mandate to punish the nation even more by NOT voting Labour or will those of you unhappy waverers pass the real acid test and still vote Labour to rid our country of this destructive and malevolent Tory vermin?

Wasn't long ago you were telling us all that you wouldn't vote Labour if Corbyn wasn't leader. Seems awfully 'do as I say, not as I do' of you.

Not to mention, misguide. Corbyn has expressed his delight at George Galloway taking a Labour seat. The man who Corbyn has writing the Labour manifesto supported a Class War candidate in an election against Labour. James Schneider was a paid up Lib Dem and lead their University Society. Then there's the countless associates of Corbyn and McDonnell who actively promote nasty parties like the SWP while they are competing with Labour. Just seems an odd critique when, as Banquo points out most of us in here have expressed how we're voting.

Offline classycarra

  • The Left Disonourable Chuntering Member For Scousepool.
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 30,484
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6192 on: April 28, 2017, 12:55:53 pm »
Wouldn't it have been better for the other candidates and their supporters to have asked themselves what it was about them and their record that was so unpalatable to a majority of party members?

Is it not clear now that the party members shouldn't be pandered to? They have made two very bad choices that have more or less cost us the Labour Party, and cost the whole country an opposition when it needed it most.

Offline Zeb

  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 18,571
  • Justice.
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6193 on: April 28, 2017, 01:06:29 pm »
Wouldn't it have been better for the other candidates and their supporters to have asked themselves what it was about them and their record that was so unpalatable to a majority of party members?

Possibly. But how's appealing to that huge Momentum vote working out for Jeremy right now? In the context of actually doing something about winning an election and governing the country.
"And the voices of the standing Kop still whispering in the wind will salute the wee Scots redman and he will still walk on.
And your money will have bought you nothing."

Offline Danny Boys Dad

  • Errol Flynn when he's had a few
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 13,082
  • Now listen here son
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6194 on: April 28, 2017, 01:07:23 pm »
Is it not clear now that the party members shouldn't be pandered to? They have made two very bad choices that have more or less cost us the Labour Party, and cost the whole country an opposition when it needed it most.

You could argue that the PLP should take the decisions but they still have to be answerable to the members otherwise what's the point?

You could also argue that it's the PLP that have created the conditions for Corbyn to be elected in the first place so if there's blame to be apportioned they should take a fair share.

I voted for Corbyn because I didn't like any of the others. I've changed my mind about him a bit because of the way that Labour has dealt with Brexit and I'm not very happy with my Labour MP either but I'll be voting Labour because otherwise the Tories could easily nick the constituency I live in.

Any Labour supporters who are considering voting for someone other than Labour (unless it's a tactical voting thing) or not voting at all because of Corbyn should give themselves a bit of a shake.
Legacy fan

Offline Danny Boys Dad

  • Errol Flynn when he's had a few
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 13,082
  • Now listen here son
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6195 on: April 28, 2017, 01:09:33 pm »
Possibly. But how's appealing to that huge Momentum vote working out for Jeremy right now? In the context of actually doing something about winning an election and governing the country.

You won't know until June 9th. Bollocks to the polls, just get out and vote and encourage everyone you know to vote as well (unless they are Tories or UKIPs of course)
Legacy fan

Offline classycarra

  • The Left Disonourable Chuntering Member For Scousepool.
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 30,484
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6196 on: April 28, 2017, 01:13:21 pm »

Any Labour supporters who are considering voting for someone other than Labour (unless it's a tactical voting thing) or not voting at all because of Corbyn should give themselves a bit of a shake.


Let me know when you find any of them.

Funnily enough, I've encountered more 'Labour supporters' willing to throw their toys out the pram and not vote Labour (Not tactically but out of anger) based on Tony Blair being a Labour Prime Minister than I have with Labour supporters frustrated with Corbyn.

In fact the only thin skinned 'Labour supporters' that I see lashing out against the party and the PLP are the 'returning supporters' who came back for Corbyn, but hadn't voted Labour in 2010 or 2015. I'd ask if they gave themselves a shake, but large chunks of them RE-elected Corbyn!

Offline Zeb

  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 18,571
  • Justice.
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6197 on: April 28, 2017, 01:14:00 pm »
You won't know until June 9th. Bollocks to the polls, just get out and vote and encourage everyone you know to vote as well (unless they are Tories or UKIPs of course)

Haha. Fair enough. Just Classycarra's point really, had tab open and didn't see til after I'd posted, that consistently chasing a narrower perspective/ideological purity is pulling Labour further from government as parts of the party seem to be detaching from a fact based reality.

I'm voting Green in protest. It will have no impact on this election other than registering clearly a vote for a Pro-EU party and candidate. If I were in a marginal then I'd certainly vote anti-Tory.
"And the voices of the standing Kop still whispering in the wind will salute the wee Scots redman and he will still walk on.
And your money will have bought you nothing."

Offline Alan_X

  • WUM. 'twatito' - The Cat Herding Firm But Fair Voice Of Reason (Except when he's got a plank up his arse). Gimme some skin, priest! Has a general dislike for Elijah Wood. Clearly cannot fill even a thong! RAWK Resident Muppet. Has a crush o
  • RAWK Staff
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 53,347
  • Come on you fucking red men!!!
  • Super Title: This is super!
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6198 on: April 28, 2017, 01:16:43 pm »
You could argue that the PLP should take the decisions but they still have to be answerable to the members otherwise what's the point?
Sorry but the members (and I am one) can go fuck themselves if they think the business of Labour Party is about keeping them happy.

It's about the people in this country who most need a Labour Government. It's about being in power and doing the right thing.

I fucking hate the self-entitled pricks who say how Jeremy has re-invigorated their interest in politics. Whoop-de-fucking-doo.

Were the desperate people that apparently now need the personal leadership of Jeremy Corbyn not living in poverty, having wages cut and their rights taken away? Did the NHS suddenly fall into decline on the day that Corbyn's leadership campaign started.

Self entitled pricks the fucking lot of them
Sid Lowe (@sidlowe)
09/03/2011 08:04
Give a man a mask and he will tell the truth, Give a man a user name and he will act like a total twat.
Its all about winning shiny things.

Offline Danny Boys Dad

  • Errol Flynn when he's had a few
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 13,082
  • Now listen here son
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6199 on: April 28, 2017, 01:21:41 pm »
Let me know when you find any of them.

I am a bit concerned about people not voting because they don't like the current leader, I hope you're right and I'm wrong.

Funnily enough, I've encountered more 'Labour supporters' willing to throw their toys out the pram and not vote Labour (Not tactically but out of anger) based on Tony Blair being a Labour Prime Minister than I have with Labour supporters frustrated with Corbyn.

Enough still voted Labour to win though

In fact the only thin skinned 'Labour supporters' that I see lashing out against the party and the PLP are the 'returning supporters' who came back for Corbyn, but hadn't voted Labour in 2010 or 2015. I'd ask if they gave themselves a shake, but large chunks of them RE-elected Corbyn!

Not sure why anyone wouldn't vote Labour in 2010 unless it was an Iraq protest and that didn't exactly work out well for us did it? In 2015 there were even less reasons not to vote Labour.
Legacy fan