In my view, the big problem with Lucas is that people look at what he can't do or who he is not. If you take that approach, we should probably replace our whole squad with better players, because Benteke is no Suarez, Sturridge is no Torres (and I'm talking about the Torres-under-Rafa Torres) and Lovren is no Carragher. So, Lucas being compared to other players' strengths will always be bad for him. Yes, he is no Alonso, yes, he is no Mascherano. However, he does have a certain way of playing and if used in the right way he can play an equally important role in a team (even though it's a different one). Give us some stability in defence, but at the same time be an outlet when we go forward. Not in terms of getting 20 assists every season, but in terms of keeping the ball, finding guys in red shirts in good positions or simply moving the ball forward. I'm glad Klopp seems to value his contribution, because I think he is very good at what he does. There are certainly better players out there than him, but there always are for (almost) every player. So, why criticise him for not being Alonso instead of Mascherano? I'd rather people start appreciating him for being Lucas Leiva, because that lad is quite a fine footballer and one of the few consistant ones in our current squad...