^Questioning English players' passion to play for England is wrong, IMO. As is anything that has to do with passion. The problem is in football and not psychology.
There is a problem with coaching, but I don't think a good coach, even the best one, will fix all of England's problems. Ericsson wasn't bad when he came, was he? But he didn't make England a particularly superb team. The same with Capello, one of the best coaches around, he came, and England looked more solid. But it wasn't as if they looked like world beaters.
The problem is a combination of coaching and footballing abilities. English players are used to playing high tempo football without stops. International football is not like that, the games aren't 100 mph like in England. The games have lots of stoppages, it's slower because the opponents keep the ball when they have it. So when England get it, they should also keep it, and not rush with it, which they usually do. There needs to be 1-2 playmakers, who do that, if other players are incapable of doing that. England's game looks patchy, players look a bunch of individuals and not a team, the game is very patchy. There's no pattern to the play. I don't think this is due to lack of passion.