Just a question, would you call your team bottlers the last 10-15 years?
I'd have to break that down into different periods as we've had so many incarnations as a club in that time. So going back 15 years to 2002;
2002-2009: If anything, we were the opposite of bottlers in this period (overachievers? Big game players?). In the league I'd have to hold my hands up and say first Arsenal, then Chelsea, then Man Utd were just better than us. There's a good argument to say that Arsenal 2002-2004, Chelsea 2004-2006 and Man Utd 2006-2009 were the best teams in their respective club's histories. So I'd put not winning the league in that period to just not being as good as them, rather than bottling it at any point. We did however dominate Europe, hence overachieving and being the opposite of bottlers.
2009-12 (the Hicks and Gillette fallout & rebuild): We were just crap. We weren't good enough to be in a position to bottle anything.
2012-15 (the Rodgers years): We probably finished each of Rodger's seasons where we deserved to. I guess you could say throwing away a two point lead in 2014 is bottling it if you were being particularly weird, but truth is Man City were the better team and deservedly won.
2015- (the Klopp years): Who knows, way too early to say. Losing 2 finals in his first year is very bad final form (11 finals short of being Henry-esque you could say). If this keeps happening and we keep getting to, and losing, finals then yeah, I'd say we're bottlers. Ask again in a few years.