| Projected Points | Projected GD | Cumul PtsD | Cumul GFD | Cumul GAD | Cumul GD |
Man City | 85 | +53 | +6 | +3 | -5 | +8 |
Chelsea | 81 | +33 | -6 | -5 | +3 | -8 |
Arsenal | 70 | +26 | -5 | -9 | 0 | -9 |
Man Utd | 70 | +21 | 0 | -4 | 0 | -4 |
Spurs | 65 | +8 | +1 | -2 | -5 | +3 |
Liverpool | 63 | +9 | +1 | -2 | -7 | +5 |
We've just about given back the early season points gains and are only +1 point above last season's equivalent performance.
Our next 5 matches had the following results from last season:
L Liverpool 0-1 Aston Villa
D Everton 0-0 Liverpool
W Tottenham Hotspur 0–3 Liverpool
W Liverpool 2–1 Southampton
D Chelsea 1-1 Liverpool
They include both of the amazing early wins over Southampton and Spurs with the Moreno goal before Sturridge got injured and things seemed to turn sour for the season.
Other tracked teams:
Man City slipped against a resurgent West Ham (a candidate for tracked team #7?) Next week, they're playing Spurs away whom they beat 0-1.
Chelsea beat Arsenal by 2-0 both this time and last. Next match, they have an opportunity to avenge a 2-1 away loss to Newcastle.
Man U beat Southampton to stay even, and next week they play Sunderland at home where they beat them 2-0 last time out.
Arsenal also have an opportunity to improve on last season and get ahead of ManU, as they drew with Leicester City away 1-1 last time.
Spurs improved by beating Palace whom they drew against last season. Next week, as mentioned earlier, they play Manchester City at home, whom they lost to last season
-----------------------
So are West Ham for real or are they the beneficiaries of an early favorable schedule?
Let's take a look at West Ham's first 6 matches and equivalents from last season:
Match description | Last season | This season | Points differential |
Arsenal away | 3-0 | 1-3 | +3 pts |
Leicester City home | 2-0 | 1-2 | -3 pts |
Bournemouth (Hull City) home | 3-0 | 3-4 | -3 pts |
Liverpool away | 2-0 | 0-3 | +3 pts |
Newcastle home | 1-0 | 2-0 | +0 pts |
Man City away | 2-0 | 1-2 | +3 pts |
Not sure what to make of that at all because it's so inconsistent.
Since they've proven that they can beat the "hard" teams, then if they can put together some more consistent effort against mid and low table clubs, they should be very good.
But as things stand because of inconsistency, they're only +3 above last season's performance, which would have them finishing with 47 + 3 = 50 points