Yeah.
This same midfield was slaughtered by our own early in the season- after just 2/3/4 games in which they were quite good overall. People compared them to the Alonso/Gerrard/Mascherano midfield from the start and how they will never reach that standard(not that they need to, but that's just my opinion). Some of us pointed out how unfair that is. I said that they need to be given time and that this is a different age/methodology and therefore different requirements for our midfield; and that these lads are here to set their own standards and play the game in their own manner and not that of Alonso or Mascherano or Gerrard.
Glad to see they are doing just that. People sometimes, are like donkeys: blinkered. We will insist on only seeing one way and we refuse to see another. Give us a reason to justify that("opinion") and we're unstoppable.
The midfield is playing well but it's too simplistic to attribute the control we are showing solely to them.
In fact I would say after goalkeeper it would be a toss up between CB and CM as to where we should prioritise for improvement (in terms of the first 11)
The following enable us and our midfield to control games.
- Our high line enables us to compress the space, limiting passing lanes making it easier for a compact midfield to press the space win the ball back
- CBs comfortable in possession who actively seek to support the play. Lovren, Klavan and particularly Matip help massively not only in retention of the ball but in playmaking
- Effervescent FBs always offering options + plus pushing opponents back and reducing their options when in possession
- Narrow advanced wing forwards closing down passing lanes and busting a gut to make space when in possession.
- Terrier like central forward leading the press
- Every player pressing granting the opposition few 'easy' passes
Take away any one of these and the midfield won't find gaining control nearly as easy.