Just turned on LFCDaytrippers now (for the first time). Within 30 secs they're laughing and taking the piss out of Migs and calling him a wet wipe that can't even be flushed down the toilet.
Not for me thanks, and I'm Irish.
I think you know what 'bants' means unless you've been living on the moon. Suggesting TAW never discusses Gerrard because he's from Liverpool is just tin hat bollox.
Just listened back to start of the most recent LFCDaytrippers pod and couldn't find any such thing. In fact the first seven minutes were about the positivity to be gleaned from the performances of relatively young players. With respect, I think your characterisation of them as shite, sensationalist, bant, and piss takers is undeserved, wrong and something the less reactionary members of the TAW team would reject.
Anyway that was off the point: mild criticism of TAW's line on Gerrard, Johnson and other topics is not a figment of anyone's imagination: just read this and other RAWK threads, even the TAW site itself. I posited one explanation. Besides the "they are out of towners" or "they are shite" suggestions, can you posit an explanation? Suggesting TAW don't discuss Gerrard (for any reason) would be bollix; thankfully nobody claimed that.
It's not an attack on TAW, which we are lucky to have, it's just a question.