Author Topic: The Daily Mail (Read 81410 times)

Alf Garnett · « **Reply #41 on:** August 11, 2015, 03:33:43 pm »

Quote from: The Fletcher Memorial on August 11, 2015, 03:28:18 pm

I don't think frightened is the word at all - you tosser.

If you don't like a paper don't buy it or read it, how simple is that, you tosser?

Red Beret · « **Reply #42 on:** August 11, 2015, 03:36:53 pm »

Quote from: The Fletcher Memorial on August 11, 2015, 03:28:18 pm

I don't think frightened is the word at all - you tosser.

Quote from: Alf Garnett on August 11, 2015, 03:33:43 pm

If you don't like a paper don't buy it or read it, how simple is that, you tosser?

Might be too soon but still *gets comfortable*

Elmo! · « **Reply #43 on:** August 11, 2015, 03:38:12 pm »

Quote from: Red Beret on August 11, 2015, 03:36:53 pm

Might be too soon but still *gets comfortable*

Toss some of that popcorn my way....

thejbs · « **Reply #44 on:** August 11, 2015, 03:40:18 pm »

Quote from: Alf Garnett on August 11, 2015, 03:33:43 pm

If you don't like a paper don't buy it or read it, how simple is that, you tosser?

You see, it's all not as simple as that. If someone complains about a marauding mad man walking down the street with a machete hacking away at folks, do you say 'just ignore him if you don't like him, you tosser.'

To simply stop reading the Daily Mail does not remove the problem which is the Daily Mail. To my mind, it exerts an undesirable and subversive influence, peddling a right-wing agenda, fear mongering and spreading falsehoods. If I were to simply ignore it or not buy it, it would still do these things. Therefore ignorance is not an option.

Alf Garnett · « **Reply #45 on:** August 11, 2015, 03:40:37 pm »

Quote from: Red Beret on August 11, 2015, 03:36:53 pm

Might be too soon but still *gets comfortable*

Sorry to disappoint but I have to go back to work now, break over.

HarryLabrador · « **Reply #46 on:** August 11, 2015, 03:57:32 pm »

Quote from: Alf Garnett on August 11, 2015, 03:33:43 pm

If you don't like a paper don't buy it or read it, how simple is that, you tosser?

Avatar and username, umm, quite not one expects on RAWK. Perhaps you could try an even better avatar with Frottage sitting on top of the white cliffs. I'm sure I've seen one somewhere.

Redman0151 · « **Reply #47 on:** August 11, 2015, 03:58:18 pm »

Quote from: HarryLabrador on August 11, 2015, 03:57:32 pm

Avatar and username, umm, quite not one expects on RAWK. Perhaps you could try an even better avatar with Frottage sitting on top of the white cliffs. I'm sure I've seen one somewhere.

Think his username got changed because he was chatting shite about immigration in another thread

HarryLabrador · « **Reply #48 on:** August 11, 2015, 03:59:26 pm »

Quote from: Crosby Wych on August 11, 2015, 03:58:18 pm

Think his username got changed because he was chatting shite about immigration in another thread

Ah...apologies to him then.

SamAteTheRedAcid · « **Reply #49 on:** August 11, 2015, 04:03:12 pm »

Quote from: Alf Garnett on August 11, 2015, 03:33:43 pm

If you don't like a paper don't buy it or read it, how simple is that, you tosser?

Are you seriously going to defend the Mail then? On a site that has an autocorrect specially for it, and where it is listed as an unreliable source for any info?

B0151? · « **Reply #50 on:** August 11, 2015, 04:24:37 pm »

Our lovely media.

Channel 5.

johnsmithlfc · « **Reply #51 on:** August 11, 2015, 04:25:56 pm »

Don't feed the troll....

johnsmithlfc · « **Reply #52 on:** August 11, 2015, 04:29:09 pm »

Quote from: Bakez0151 on August 11, 2015, 04:24:37 pm

Our lovely media.

Channel 5.

Is that real?? Fuck me.... that is scandalous.

Nessy76 · « **Reply #53 on:** August 11, 2015, 04:29:44 pm »

V V V V V V

24/7 · « **Reply #54 on:** August 11, 2015, 04:38:37 pm »

Quote from: Alf Garnett on August 11, 2015, 03:33:43 pm

If you don't like a paper don't buy it or read it, how simple is that, you tosser?

Would you say that about The Sun? Are you sure you're on the right site?

Red Beret · « **Reply #55 on:** August 11, 2015, 04:55:14 pm »

Quote from: Alf Garnett on August 11, 2015, 03:40:37 pm

Sorry to disappoint but I have to go back to work now, break over.

Wondering how much of a break the mods may end up giving you if the stuff mentioned about you in this thread is true.

Alf Garnett · « **Reply #56 on:** August 11, 2015, 05:05:14 pm »

Quote from: Red Beret on August 11, 2015, 04:55:14 pm

Wondering how much of a break the mods may end up giving you if the stuff mentioned about you in this thread is true.

They can delete my account on here now if they want, don't give a fuck.

jed the red · « **Reply #57 on:** August 11, 2015, 05:07:28 pm »

Quote from: Alf Garnett on August 11, 2015, 03:06:28 pm

Why are people so frightened of a newspaper?

Why are some people frightened of immigration so much that they put a 'joke' picture up!

Jake · « **Reply #58 on:** August 11, 2015, 05:31:27 pm »

Quote from: Alf Garnett on August 11, 2015, 05:05:14 pm

They can delete my account on here now if they want, don't give a fuck.

Some Polish twat will probably make better posts than you for half the price.

And some Syrian refugees can use your bandwidth.

Red Beret · « **Reply #59 on:** August 11, 2015, 05:44:20 pm »

That foreign muck coming over and taking over our RAWK accounts...

The Fletcher Memorial · « **Reply #60 on:** August 11, 2015, 05:47:31 pm »

Quote from: johnsmithlfc on August 11, 2015, 04:29:09 pm

Is that real?? Fuck me.... that is scandalous.

I imagine so, CH4 is near enough the same these days, and it’s a fucking sick bastard joke. It influences how a large percentage of people in this small minded country view people on benefits.

And I could go on but I reckon I’ve lost the will with it all to be honest.

24/7 · « **Reply #61 on:** August 11, 2015, 05:50:56 pm »

Quote from: 24/7 on August 11, 2015, 04:38:37 pm

Would you say that about The Sun? Are you sure you're on the right site?

Quote from: Alf Garnett on August 11, 2015, 05:05:14 pm

They can delete my account on here now if they want, don't give a fuck.

I'll take that as a yes and a no respectively.

TepidT2O · « **Reply #62 on:** August 11, 2015, 05:53:56 pm »

The express is just as bad...

The front cover berating the BBC for hosting songs of praise from the Calais refugee camp...

Mind blowing bigotry.....

Rome-77 · « **Reply #63 on:** August 11, 2015, 06:04:20 pm »

Quote from: Red Beret on August 11, 2015, 03:29:06 pm

.

what a c*nt

ha ha not you red beret, him from the dailymail

Redman0151 · « **Reply #64 on:** August 11, 2015, 06:15:49 pm »

Quote from: Tepid water on August 11, 2015, 05:53:56 pm

The express is just as bad...

The front cover berating the BBC for hosting songs of praise from the Calais refugee camp...

Mind blowing bigotry.....

Saw that when I was in Tescos before. First part of the sentence included "lawless migrant ghetto" with "THIS IS WHAT THE BBC SPEND YOUR LICENSE FEE ON" written above.

It's absolutely mental how such obvious propaganda is still so widely consumed

TepidT2O · « **Reply #65 on:** August 11, 2015, 06:18:21 pm »

Quote from: Crosby Wych on August 11, 2015, 06:15:49 pm

Saw that when I was in Tescos before. First part of the sentence included "lawless migrant ghetto" with "THIS IS WHAT THE BBC SPEND YOUR LICENSE FEE ON" written above.

It's absolutely mental how such obvious propaganda is still so widely consumed

To criticize a program that is ostensibly Christian for showing Christian charity to desperate people is one of the lowest things I've seen for a long time.

Gerry Attrick · « **Reply #66 on:** August 11, 2015, 06:25:17 pm »

Quote from: Crosby Wych on August 11, 2015, 06:15:49 pm

Saw that when I was in Tescos before. First part of the sentence included "lawless migrant ghetto" with "THIS IS WHAT THE BBC SPEND YOUR LICENSE FEE ON" written above.

It's absolutely mental how such obvious propaganda is still so widely consumed

Hardly surprising they run a headline like that, after all the owner of the Express is Richard Desmond, a man who's donated over a million pounds to UKIP

Redman0151 · « **Reply #67 on:** August 11, 2015, 06:27:32 pm »

Quote from: Gerry Attrick on August 11, 2015, 06:25:17 pm

Hardly surprising they run a headline like that, after all the owner of the Express is Richard Desmond, a man who's donated over a million pounds to UKIP

Yep, JK Rowling has just taken a dig at him

J.K. RowlingVerified account
‏@jk_rowling

Newspaper owned by man who got rich peddling pornography condemns the BBC for filming migrants singing hymns.

Red Beret · « **Reply #68 on:** August 11, 2015, 06:39:06 pm »

Quote from: Rome-77 on August 11, 2015, 06:04:20 pm

what a c*nt

ha ha not you red beret, him from the dailymail

macca888 · « **Reply #69 on:** August 12, 2015, 05:46:11 pm »

Quote from: Bakez0151 on August 11, 2015, 04:24:37 pm

Our lovely media.

Channel 5.

Chopper went to the doctor's and said that he thought he might be suffering from that Giant Hand Syndrome.

The doctor said "Don't worry Chops, your hands are normal size. It's just that your cock is fucking tiny, mate."

True fact. Possibly.

TepidT2O · « **Reply #70 on:** August 12, 2015, 05:50:42 pm »

The demonisation of the poor has to stop....
It's dreadful

Millie · « **Reply #71 on:** August 12, 2015, 05:52:52 pm »

Quote from: Alf Garnett on August 11, 2015, 03:33:43 pm

If you don't like a paper don't buy it or read it, how simple is that, you tosser?

Care to explain your Avatar? Tosser

Red Beret · « **Reply #72 on:** August 12, 2015, 05:56:26 pm »

Quote from: In Fowler we trust on August 12, 2015, 05:52:52 pm

Care to explain your Avatar? Tosser

I believe he got jacked by the mods after comments he made in the Calais thread - or do you think he purposefully called himself Alf Garnet?

Millie · « **Reply #73 on:** August 12, 2015, 05:58:56 pm »

Quote from: Red Beret on August 12, 2015, 05:56:26 pm

I believe he got jacked by the mods after comments he made in the Calais thread - or do you think he purposefully called himself Alf Garnet?

Those comments on the Calais thread were a few days ago now - and he got that thread closed (the tosser) - he has been commenting on this thread since - and I know about the name change

24/7 · « **Reply #74 on:** August 12, 2015, 09:08:02 pm »

His right to reply has been revoked under the European Union Act of Preventing Tossers From Ruining Your Eyesight.

Brian Blessed · « **Reply #75 on:** August 12, 2015, 09:19:32 pm »

Good, keep them off our boards, send them back to their own.

quinny · « **Reply #76 on:** August 13, 2015, 02:22:36 pm »

Are we not allowed different opinions on here? I didn't see him say anything particularly wrong on this thread. Don't get me wrong I think the Mail is a shite paper but isn't banning someone for not hating it a bit, well, Daily Mail-esque?

Elmo! · « **Reply #77 on:** August 13, 2015, 02:29:27 pm »

Quote from: quinny on August 13, 2015, 02:22:36 pm

Are we not allowed different opinions on here? I didn't see him say anything particularly wrong on this thread. Don't get me wrong I think the Mail is a shite paper but isn't banning someone for not hating it a bit, well, Daily Mail-esque?

I think people are reacting to his comments in the Calais thread as well as the comments in here.

24/7 · « **Reply #78 on:** August 13, 2015, 02:32:04 pm »

The thing is quinny just like most Mail readers and reporters you are not in possession of the bigger picture. There used to be a great tv ad by either the Guardian or Independentor other such paper that illustrated this point very well. People are rarely banned on the basis of one post. Unless they ask for it and not even that's not a guarantee! I hope that explains things a bit better.

quinny · « **Reply #79 on:** August 13, 2015, 02:36:24 pm »

Quote from: elmo_swatloski on August 13, 2015, 02:29:27 pm

I think people are reacting to his comments in the Calais thread as well as the comments in here.

Quote from: 24/7 on August 13, 2015, 02:32:04 pm

The thing is quinny just like most Mail readers and reporters you are not in possession of the bigger picture. There used to be a great tv ad by either the Guardian or Independentor other such paper that illustrated thus point very well. People are rarely banned on the basis of one post. Unless they ask for it and not even that's a guarantee! I hope that explains things a bit better.

I can't remember his comments in the Calais thread so apologies if it was for those or if they were involved in a culmination of posts that led to his ban. I assumed it was for this one as the Calais thread was locked over a week ago and he posted on this thread two days ago.