They don't. They show nothing conclusive at all since they contain no information about motion.
EDIT: In fact, here's a little deconstruction of why the photos don't say what you want them to say:
The first, third and fourth suggest Lallana should have passed the ball at the very moment he wasn't even close to touching it. Fine, if everyone else in the picture stays still for the next 2 seconds. But they won't will they?
The second involves an unrealistic pass given his body shape - and one, if somehow accomplished, that would, in any case, quite clearly have been intercepted by the defender who is already moving towards the suggested trajectory.
We have all watched the matches to see Lallana's poor decision making. The pics are to re-jog the memories, but you can pretend he's perfect if you want. My eyes, the pics and stats say otherwise.
Without the ball he's very impressive, with the ball - I think he can improve, that's all I'm saying.
Why bother? He's now got to find out what the guy who posted all that on Twitter has to think about it as he clearly can't think for himself.
Snide as ever Gibbons, very RAWK (that's not a compliment).
Yes I get all my opinions from others, of course I do.
Or maybe, I thought it was a very good example and I used it to back up my opinion on the issue.