In what way? Not saying I agree with all of that, but at least outline where you specifically don't.
It's complete balls from start to finish. First of all the premise is based on article froma Dublin-based radio station, Newstalk. I am a regular listener, the station is made up of self-professed Everton supporters (Colm Parkinson) and Man United supporters (Tom Dunne). Parkinson is particulalry vitriolic and never passes up an opportunity to have a pop at Liverpool... depsite being from the Midlands and never having attended a game.
The article is also shit because it bases it's criticism on the rest of the team around Coutinho being shit and forcing Coutinho to play shittily to accomodate them. To wit
"Coutinho is at his best as a footballer facilitating others, making them better players, making them the best player. The tone of the criticism he gets both here and at times in general is that he should have more nine out of 10 games. In reality, he needs to have more sevens and eights leaving other lads taking the plaudits for nines they don’t quite deserve."
So, Coutinho is shit by not making everyone else look better, i.e. Coutinho is shit because he is not Suarez, or Alonso, or some kind of deep lying playmaker... it's the equivalent of saying Ronaldo is shit because he doesn't get more assists. Fuck that, we have a diamond of a player and they are criticising him for a] not being a diffferent type of player b] not making the shit players around him look average.
What kind of fucked up logic is that? Next week, how Mignolet fails to score more goals, how Gomez really needs to get those 60 yard defence splitting passes sorted and finally, why Ibe needs to become a dominant header of the ball in the box.
The most football manager article ever written, bilge, why don't they edit wiki to see if that improves his game for them...