Funny though, cos ALOT of indians who live in the UK support Liverpool.I can testify to that - i live in Birmingham, only been to Liverpool a few times and for some reason support them!
In all that time I've only ever experienced any kind of direct racism twice. Once when some lad barged into me and gave me a dirty stare, and most recently (Bham game this season), someone spat on my wife's back.
Barnes was not the first black player at Anfield - Howard Gayle was.
I'm sorry but to say they were racially motivated is nothing more than an assumption. Just because you are not white you are assuming that was the reason for both instances.
Being Indian okay - don't take this as offensive. I remember in the early 80's the Liverpool area was kind of a racist area, you had very few other ethnic minorities there. I always remember when John Barnes signed for Liverpool, he was the first black player, But alarmingly - or coincidence perhaps why it Took Liverpool until 1987 to sign a black footballer? And Everton didn't sign Amokachi their first black player till 1995. But does anyone remember a game against Everton when they everton fans started throwing bananas at Barnes?
Point 1. Total bollocks, Liverpool has been a multicultural area since 1840'sChina town has been there even longer.Point 2. John Barnes was not our first coloured player.point 3. both dates are wrong and Amokachi wasn't the first coloured player for Everton.point 4. Everton weren't the only ones throwing bananas.At a time when Love thy neighbour, Alf Garnet and Chalky White were airing what we would today consider racist humour on television. Throwing a banana was considered humourous not racist.I'm glad times have moved on and these actions are considered unacceptable, but dont suggest that Liverpool as a City was any different or worse than any other town / city.
I agree. Also been told the first Indian imigrants came to Liverpool first, not 100% sure about this but I know many who had passed through Liverpool docks.
I think this is missing the point. Yes other places were racist. Yes we've had an immigrant population for a long time. But when I was growing up, a lot of immigrant populations were pretty much ghetto-ised, and you wouldn't see a non-white face at the match. Black players would be routinely taunted. I don't think you can downplay the past that easily.
Asa lifelong supporter, and as someone from an "ethnic" (WTF is that btw?) background, every time I have been to Anfield, I've always been surprised, pleasantly at how easy-going everyone is. Long as I wear the shirt, that's all everyone sees..
In all that time I've only ever experienced any kind of direct racism twice. Once when some lad barged into me and gave me a dirty stare
But when I was growing up, a lot of immigrant populations were pretty much ghetto-ised, and you wouldn't see a non-white face at the match.
There were not many black faces around at that time at ANY ground, not just Anfield
please dont shoot from the hip when discussing such an emotional issue.Both points are total bollocks.In 1962 I sat on a bar in the kop next to a black Father and son.In the early seventies I went to the games with a schoolmate Bill Khanajou, you may guess from his name he wasn't Swedish.Suggesting we Ghetto-ised immigrants is a disgrace.Most immigrants settled by choice with their own kind.There was massive Irish areas in Liverpool, firstly they lodged with people from their own country then they sorted houses out close to where they felt at home.